logo
Trump did not understand Pearl Harbor, new book reveals: ‘What's this all about?'

Trump did not understand Pearl Harbor, new book reveals: ‘What's this all about?'

Independent19-02-2025

Donald Trump barely knew of Pearl Harbor, was ignorant about the basics of geography and complained the US constitution was like reading 'a foreign language', a new book reveals.
A Very Stable Genius, by Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig, is the latest book detailing the Trump administration's tumultuous three years in the White House.
Named after Mr Trump's self-declared intellectual brilliance, the book, excerpts of which have been published by The Washington Post, reveals his litany of missteps and willingness to break long-standing legal and ethical norms since becoming president in 2017.
'Hey, John, what's this all about? What's this a tour of?' Mr Trump reportedly asked John Kelly, his then-chief of staff, when they took a private tour in 2017 of the USS Arizona Memorial, a ship commemorating the surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during the Second World War.
"Trump had heard the phrase 'Pearl Harbor' and appeared to understand that he was visiting the scene of a historic battle, but he did not seem to know much else," write the authors, who quote a former White House adviser concluding the US president was 'dangerously uninformed'.
During a meeting with Narendra Modi, the Indian prime minister's 'eyes bulged out in surprise', the Washington Post reporters claim, when Mr Trump told him: 'It's not like you've got China on your border.'
China and India in fact share more than 2,000 miles of common border.
Mr Modi's expression 'shifted from shock and concern to resignation', with aides telling the authors the Indians 'took a step back' in their diplomatic relations with the US following the meeting.
Foreshadowing the later special counsel investigation into his ties with Russia, during the presidential transition Mr Trump interrupted an interview with a potential secretary of state to inquire about when he would be able to meet Vladimir Putin.
"When can I meet Putin? Can I meet with him before the inaugural ceremony?" he reportedly asked.
When the leaders did meet, at a G20 summit in Hamburg, Mr Trump dismissed the expertise of his then-secretary of state Rex Tillerson, an oil executive who knew Mr Putin personally, telling him: 'I have had a two-hour meeting with Putin. That's all I need to know ... I've sized it all up. I've got it.'
He also clashed with Mr Tillerson in 2017 when he asked his help in attempting to ditch the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a decades-old law banning Americans from bribing foreign officials for business deals.
"It's just so unfair that American companies aren't allowed to pay bribes to get business overseas. We're going to change that," Mr Trump said, according to the authors, who claim the president complained the rule prevented industry friends and his own company officials from paying off foreign governments.
When Mr Trump early in his tenure agreed to feature in an HBO documentary in which all living presidents read from the constitution, Mr Trump blamed others in the room when he struggled to read the text.
"It's like a foreign language,' he allegedly complained.
Another chapter reveals Mr Trump speculated an ex-wife of former White House official Rob Porter, who was forced to resign over domestic abuse allegations, faked a photograph in order to frame her ex-husband.
The image, which surfaced online, showed Colbie Holderness sporting a black eye.
'Maybe Holderness purposefully ran into a refrigerator to give herself bruises and try to get money out of Porter?" Mr Trump reportedly said.
The book, the authors say, is based on hundreds of hours of interviews with hundreds of sources, and corroborated when possible with documentation.
The White House has been contacted for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel considering military action against Iran in days without US support
Israel considering military action against Iran in days without US support

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Israel considering military action against Iran in days without US support

Israel is considering taking military action against Iran in the coming days - without American support, sources have told US media. The reports comes as US President Donald Trump is said to be in advanced discussions with Iran about a diplomatic deal to curtail the Middle Eastern country's nuclear programme. Israel is said to have become more serious about a unilateral strike on Iran as the negotiations between Washington and Tehran appear closer to a preliminary or framework agreement that includes provisions about uranium enrichment. Israel views those provisions as unacceptable. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is therefore considering a strike on Iran, a Capitol Hill aide and other sources familiar with the matter have told Sky News' US partner network NBC News. An Israeli strike on Iran would be a dramatic break with the Trump administration which has argued against such a move. The prospect of a new front in the conflict in the Middle East has prompted the Trump administration to order all embassies within striking distance of Iranian missiles, aircraft and other assets, to send cables with assessments about the potential threat to Americans and US infrastructure, according to two sources familiar with the matter. The White House has not yet briefed senior politicians on the situation, according to a US official. The reports have emerged after the US State Department said it had ordered the evacuation of all non-essential personnel from its embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, due to the potential for regional unrest. It did not mention any possible attack by Israel on Iran when it announced the move. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: "The State Department regularly reviews American personnel abroad, and this decision was made as a result of a recent review." It comes as the US is also authorising the departure of non-essential personnel and family members from Bahrain and Kuwait - giving the staff a choice as to whether to leave those countries. An Iraqi government source told the country's state news agency that Baghdad has not recorded any security indication that calls for the evacuation. There was already limited staffing in the US embassy in Baghdad and the order will not affect a large number of personnel. Meanwhile, the military dependents in Bahrain and Kuwait will have the option of leaving those countries at government expense and with government assistance. Asked why the US personnel are being moved out of the Middle East, Mr Trump said on Wednesday evening: "They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we'll see what happens." When asked if there is anything that can be done to reduce tensions in the region, the US president said: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon, we're not going to allow that." US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is set to meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in the Oman capital Muscat on Sunday to discuss the Iranian response to a recent US proposal, according to American news site Axios, which cited a US official. The US and Iran have been engaged in talks aimed at limiting Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of some of the crushing economic sanctions America has imposed on the country. Iran insists its nuclear programme is peaceful. Tehran and Washington tensions Mr Trump, who has previously said Israel or America could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed, has given a less-than-optimistic view about reaching a deal with Iran. He told the New York Post's "Pod Force One" podcast that he was "getting more and more less confident about" a deal. "They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame. I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them," he said in the interview released on Wednesday. Iran's mission to the UN posted on the X social media platform that "threats of 'overwhelming force' won't change facts".

Has Gavin Newsom just made his bid for the presidency?
Has Gavin Newsom just made his bid for the presidency?

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Has Gavin Newsom just made his bid for the presidency?

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 On day 143 of Donald Trump's presidency, Martha Kelner and James Matthews discuss California Governor Gavin Newsom's 'presidential' televised address to the nation, and his case that Donald Trump's extraordinary decision to send troops to LA against his wishes has put the country on the brink of authoritarianism. Plus, billionaire Elon Musk has apologised to Trump over his explosive social media posts following his departure from the administration. But is it enough for the pair to make up? If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA
Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA

A federal court hearing is scheduled for Thursday on whether the Trump administration can use the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles. California Gov. Newsom has depicted the federal military intervention in the nation's second largest city as the onset of a much broader effort by Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed that, saying the deployment of troops was unnecessary and meant to undermine local jurisdictions and intimidate the city's large immigrant population. Newsom filed an emergency motion requesting the court's intervention after President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response on Wednesday. The Democratic governor argued the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and said sending troops to help support immigration raids would only promote civil unrest. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the National Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. Most demonstrations have been peaceful but this weekend some turned raucous with protesters setting cars on fire in downtown Los Angeles. The city has imposed a nightly curfew covering a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometer) section where protests have occurred in the sprawling metropolis of 4 million people. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Newsom filed the motion Tuesday, the same day the military announced some members of the National Guard were now standing in protection around federal agents. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations as Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement. Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer chose not to rule immediately but set the hearing for Thursday in federal court in San Francisco. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store