Plant milks ‘not nutritionally equivalent' to cows' milk
Now nutritional experts advising the UK Government have published a report on the benefits and risks of milk substitutes, with some concerns raised about the use of the products among children under the age of five.
In children aged one to five there is a risk that only consuming plant-based drinks can lead to 'inadequate intakes of some micronutrients', according to experts on the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) and the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (Cot).
And people of any age group who have these drinks could have a higher intake of added sugar.
But the report stresses that nutritional concerns may be 'lessened' if people opt for unsweetened soya, oat and almond milk drinks and if these drinks are fortified with vitamin A, riboflavin, vitamin B12, calcium and iodine at similar levels to those in cows' milk, and also with vitamin D.
And they said that typical almond, oat and soya drinks may contribute to lower intakes of calories and saturated fat, with higher intake of fibre and vitamin D, which would be beneficial to most.
But the new report highlights a 'potential toxicological concern' with milk substitutes in children up to the age of five who follow a vegan diet and consume a lot of soya.
The expert group said that these children may be more likely to consume high amounts of a naturally occurring compound called isoflavones.
But the risk could be partially mitigated by ensuring children following a vegan diet get their protein from a variety of sources and not just soya.
SACN and Cot made a series of nutrition recommendations for children under the age of five, older children and adults who drink milk substitutes, including:
– It is 'preferable' that children aged one to five consume whole or semi-skimmed cows' milk over plant-based drinks, if they consume animal products, but unsweetened and fortified plant-based milks are an 'acceptable alternative'.
– Unfortified or sweetened plant-based drinks are 'not an acceptable alternative to cows' milk'.
– SACN and Cot also said that 'there is no need for drinks specifically marketed for children aged one to three years, including plant-based follow-on formula, 'growing up' and other 'toddler' drinks'.
– Vegan children aged one to five should consume fortified and unsweetened plant-based milks over water, where other children would drink cows' milk.
– Soya milk is preferable as the main substitute for cows' milk for vegan children aged one to five, because it has higher amounts of protein compared to almond or oat milks. But the experts stressed vegan children should be offered a wide variety in protein in their general food and drink consumption, to avoid high intakes of isoflavones linked to soya.
– For children aged five and over and adults, fortified and unsweetened almond, oat and soya drinks are an acceptable alternative to cows' milk.
They conclude: 'No almond, oat or soya drink available in the UK is nutritionally equivalent to cows' milk.
'The most appropriate alternative to cows' milk varies by age group and people's wider dietary intakes and health concerns.'
They add: 'There are potential nutritional and toxicological concerns related to plant-based drinks, and these particularly apply to children aged one to five years, especially those who are following a vegan diet.
'There are potential nutritional concerns related to higher intakes of free sugars and inadequate intakes of certain micronutrients (for all three plant-based drinks) and lower intakes of protein (for almond and oat drinks).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
24 minutes ago
- Metro
GP reveals 5 common mistakes people make when stopping weight loss jabs
While treatments like Ozempic, Mounjaro and Wegovy can provide a helping hand, there's no magic bullet when it comes to losing weight. Given GLP-1 agonist medications have been shown to help people lose up to four times more than going it alone, it's no wonder they're popular. However, a proportion of the estimated 1.5 million people in the UK who are now on these jabs will struggle to keep the pounds off long-term — and some may even end up heavier than when they started. 'While it can differ depending on the individual, it's quite common for people to regain some of the weight lost once they stop taking the medication,' Dr Donald Grant, GP and senior clinical advisor at The Independent Pharmacy, tells Metro. There are a few factors behind this, from metabolism to appetite. But going back on your progress isn't inevitable, as long as you're careful to avoid these five common pitfalls. As these treatments work by suppressing appetite, Dr Grant warns that going cold turkey 'could increase it, leading to poor eating habits and potential weight gain.' If you're considering coming off your medication, he recommends speaking to your GP about doing so slowly and safely. 'A medical professional can advise further on a potential tapering plan, while also providing dietary advice and lifestyle habits that can help reduce weight gain,' he adds. According to a recent study of over 6,000 people by scientists at Oxford University, those who use GLP-1 drugs will put their weight back on within 10 months of stopping if they don't continue to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Dr Grant explains: 'When stopping weight loss injections, it's crucially important that individuals replace the treatment with another way to keep weight off.' Even 30 minutes of daily exercise can make all the difference, burning off some of those extra calories you're consuming and stopping you falling into a sedentary routine. Quick fixes and 'crash diets' rarely result in any lasting improvements — and the same is true for GLP-1 medications. 'Choosing to stop weight loss treatment too early is by far one of the most common errors people make,' says Dr Grant. 'These drugs are designed to be used long-term, but not doing so gives the body little time to adapt to the treatment.' It's a marathon, not a sprint, with many providers recommending a course of between 12 and 24 months. Unless you're prepared to make that commitment, you may not reap the full benefits of treatment. Making changes to your diet while taking Ozempic, Mounjaro or Wegovy is a vital step to maintaining your progress forward. In fact, Dr Grant claims failure to do so is a 'sure-fire way to regain weight lost'. 'It's important for people to draw up a dietary plan, including structured meal times to avoid overeating,' he explains. More Trending 'I also recommend a well-balanced diet including a variety of high-protein, fibre-rich and healthy fat foods.' 'While it's important not to create an unhealthy relationship with weight management, tracking weight closely once ending any treatments can help people adjust their routine to avoid losing progress,' says Dr Grant. It's easy to revert to old habits once you end a course of medication, but regular monitoring ensures you can get back on track before you lose too much progress. View More » Since you've put so much time, energy and potentially money into the progress you've made so far, just think of this as protecting your investment. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: 'I've tried jabs and pills to lose weight – but my latest attempt is the most extreme' MORE: Lives at risk because we've already forgotten a basic mantra MORE: The golden rule for how long it should take you to pee Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Scotsman
24 minutes ago
- Scotsman
The 'kind' outcome of the Sandie Peggie v NHS Fife tribunal would be a return to reality
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As someone who follows the 'gender wars' closely, I often try to view them as a mildly-entertaining soap opera rather than the chaotic reality they are. The root madness can lead to the most high-octane courtroom dramas, or sometimes ludicrous comedy farce. While often frustrating to have to keep discussing – and punishing to become a target of opprobrium for daring to, as I have - the gender wars nevertheless make for compelling viewing. Particularly so when those who push the ideology at the heart of this – genderism – are forced to respond to exposing questions from highly competent barristers. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Which brings us to the ongoing Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife/Dr Upton employment tribunal. Nurse Sandie Peggie and Dr Beth Upton | PA At root is whether Dr Upton is female - as he claims - because he 'identifies' that way. This assertion, genderists believe, means he should be granted unquestioned access to women's single-sex spaces, including the female changing room at Royal Victoria hospital. If you're on my 'side' of the gender wars this is entirely wrong, both legally and morally. If you're on the gender-identity side, the fact Nurse Peggie views 'trans women' as male makes her a 'transphobe' deserving of severe reprisals. This has been made clear in several extraordinary moments in this week's tribunal. Peggie cleared of gross misconduct Dr Upton's claims about Peggie's interactions with him formed the basis of a separate internal investigation, which only recently concluded with the nurse being cleared of gross misconduct by NHS Fife, citing insufficient evidence. The Dr's claims remain integral to this tribunal; at question is how NHS Fife dealt with them. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Upton claims Peggie endangered patient safety by refusing to speak with him on duty; that her self-excluding from the changing room to avoid him was upsetting, all of which culminated in an exchange on Christmas Eve 2023, when Peggie directly confronted him about his presence there. She was experiencing a menstrual flood she understandably wished privacy to deal with. IT forensic expert Jim Borthwick, however, revealed on Friday that his investigation of the data provided by NHS Fife suggests Upton doctored his phone notes to include the accusations about patient safety far later than he initially claimed they took place. If so, this means Upton has misled the tribunal about having kept 'contemporaneous' notes about his interactions with Peggie. These include incredibly serious, potentially career-ending accusations against his colleague. Upton's version of events appear to have been accepted uncritically by NHS Fife management. Without seeking Peggie's side, clinician Kate Searle, Upton's supervisor, judged them a 'hate incident', openly condemned Peggie to other consultants, and spoke of potential police involvement. This, despite revelations in new disclosures to the evidence bundle that Upton reportedly caused 'chaos' on another placement, allegedly accusing an elderly woman patient of 'misgendering' him, and huffing about a female colleague not being supportive enough. I'm afraid to say that embellishment or outright invention of supposedly 'hateful' incidents are tactics common to gender-identity activists. Not difficult to invent, of course, when using truthful pronouns – a necessity when making legal arguments, or writing about them, and wholly forgivable from an elderly woman with medical issues – is enough to render some genderists outraged, vengeful, or insensible. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The tribunal has also featured the spectacle of women so determined to defend Upton's 'right' to demand being viewed as female, they report being unsure what sex they are themselves. Equality and Diversity lead Isla Bumba said (under oath) that she'd never had her chromosomes tested so couldn't be certain. Kate Searle, on the other hand, claimed a lack of expertise in how doctors determine a baby's biological sex. Under questioning from barrister Naomi Cunningham, it also took her painfully long to agree that if a woman had experienced sexual violence at the hands of a male doctor in the past – as Sandie Peggie reportedly has – then encountering a male in a space supposed to be female-only would be a situation requiring 'empathy' and 'compassion', instead of smearing her as motivated by bigotry. Searle sobbed at one point, when Cunningham named healthcare assistant Rehana Ashraf, who witnessed Upton and Peggie conversing, in flat contradiction of the claim – which Searle believed instantly - that Peggie refused to speak with Upton. 'I'm a kind person and I don't want to cause harm to anyone as a result of being involved in this case,' Searle said. She claimed to know Ashraf didn't want mentioned. As a mixed-race person she worried about Peggie's views about her. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Shocking inference It was a shocking inference about Peggie, following a week where it became clear that several baseless character-assassinating insinuations had swirled about Peggie among senior staff at the trust, including that she was racist and 'homophobic.' Her exasperated daughter, a lesbian, felt compelled to take to social media to emphatically refute this. As law professor Michael Foran argued on his daily podcast about the case, Searle's testimony also indicates potential witness tampering. Searle shouldn't have been speaking with Ashraf during the investigation. That out-of-touch, gossiping middle-managers at NHS Fife seemingly bent over backwards to indulge Upton's accusations, while suspending and smearing a nurse who, until Upton's arrival, had an unblemished career of three decades, is indicative of how genderist-activism has long manifested. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We're dealing with an ideology that has barged through society, destroying objective truth, and making otherwise decent, intelligent people say and do outrageous things to non-compliant, wholly reasonable women in its defence.
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fast MRI breast screening hopes to find cancers earlier
A new breast cancer study is looking at whether a fast MRI scan might help find "hard to spot" tumours Fast MRI Dyamond study is being led by North Bristol NHS Trust and will scan about 1,000 women, aged 50 to 52, across six NHS sites, including Cheltenham, Swindon and is hoped the MRI scan – which is carried out in around three minutes - will detect breast cancers that may not be picked up routinely by mammograms in women with average breast Lyn Jones, consultant radiologist and the study lead, believes lives could be saved, adding: "We know that Fast MRI can find cancers earlier than mammograms for women with dense breasts." One of those joining the three and a half year study is Diana Dalgliesh, whose sister Alison died in 2023 from breast cancer in her Dalgliesh, who works at Southmead Hospital, said: "Her breast cancer was not picked up on a mammogram which she'd had only a few months before her diagnosis."Perhaps if there had been a different way of screening it might have been [picked up], so I thought if I am able to have an MRI scan, it may detect things earlier than if I just had a mammogram alone."Ms Dalgliesh said she has "little doubt" her sister's cancer would have been picked up earlier, if she had the option of an MRI."I know the type of cancer she had is more easily seen on an MRI than a mammogram, whether it would have changed the outcome I don't know," she added. At age 50 to 52, breasts can look both completely white or dark on appearances are normal, as are all the different combinations of white and dark in between. These differences are called mammographic density or breast breast density can make a small cancer difficult to spot on a Fast MRI is a shortened form of a breast MRI scan that has already been proven to find aggressive cancers smaller than a centimetre for women with dense benefits of Fast MRI include there being no need to flatten the breast – which can cause discomfort and no need for radiation (X-rays).Jointly funded by grants of £1.36m from the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), it will be the first time in the UK that breast MRI scans will be offered to women with average breast density at their routine screening mammogram. Janice Rose, from Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, a patient advocate group, said the Fast MRI technology "could have a huge benefit to women entering the screening programme"."Early diagnosis for breast cancer gives women the best possible outcome," she NHS Breast Screening Programme offers women aged 50 to 70 years old a mammogram every three detecting breast cancers before they can be seen or felt, breast screening already saves around 1,300 lives each year in the UK.
