Prince William has 'the best day of my life' spraying pond water at journalists
Prince William has claimed to have enjoyed the "best day of my life" as he was encouraged to spray pond water at journalists.
The royal aimed the cloudy water at the media as he joined school children in Guildford collecting DNA samples for NatureMetrics, a finalist in his environmental awards, on Wednesday.
As they were gathering water, NatureMetrics founder Dr Kat Bruce suggested William and the children try and spray some at nearby journalists.
The prince replied "great idea" as he filled up a syringe and took aim at the reporters nearby.
Although the sprays fell short, William was smiling and said: "Oh nearly, so nearly... This is the best day of my life - great fun."
When two further attempts failed, the prince was given a tour of the nearby labs.
The samples were gathered with syringes with a filter to collect environmental DNA. He was shown how NatureMetrics then uses an extraction machine that produces a DNA code sequence which allows the team to identify everything from bacteria to a blue whale.
A finalist in the 2024 Earthshot Prize, the company is attempting to collect and report environmental DNA "to help commercial and conservation organisations make more informed choices to protect and maintain biodiverse ecosystems".
While at their laboratory, William said: "So much of what the environmental world needs right now is data. This is fantastic you guys have got this ability to be able to tell us what's really there.
"There's a lot of guesswork, there's a lot of painstaking volunteers and science going into this, but actually what we need is to be able to understand bigger, large-scale projects as to what is in each area."
Read more from Sky News:
Dr Bruce said she told the prince to spray water at the journalists because "we always have fun when we're doing sampling".
"Once you've done it a couple of times, you're like 'oh we can have a bit of fun with this, where can we spray,'" she added.
Prince William is the founder and president of the Earthshot Prize, a global award that celebrates environmental initiatives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
William pays tribute to rangers protecting snow leopards in wildlife series
The Prince of Wales has praised a wildlife ranger protecting snow leopards coming into conflict with humans for helping 'turn fear into understanding'. William's comments are made in an on-screen introduction for the latest episode of his new wildlife documentary series, Guardians, highlighting the work of rangers across the globe. The future king says: 'Snow leopards are such beautiful creatures, known as the Ghosts of the Himalayas, and just having sight of one is so rare that it feels incredibly special. 'These elusive, big cats may be rarely seen, but they share a deep connection with local people, and as the snow leopards' natural food sources have become scarce, they have ventured closer to human settlements in search of prey, killing livestock and leading to conflicts with local communities. 'In this episode, we meet Kalzang — a ranger bridging the space between tradition and progress. 'His work protects these animals, powers scientific discovery, and helps turn fear into understanding – while guiding a new generation towards sustainable coexistence.' Veteran broadcaster and naturalist Sir David Attenborough is William's 'inspiration' for the six-part series he hopes will help nature's wardens be 'valued, respected, seen' and promote the 'wonderful' regions they protect. Ranger Kalzang Gurmet and his team working in the Indian Himalayas are featured in the episode called the Guardians of the Spiti Valley and seen trekking in the mountains. Mr Gurmet, field manager for Nature Conservation Foundation, said: 'In the context of conserving wild animals, it's said in our stories that wild animals are the jewel of the forest. 'So, for this reason, conservationists are essential. Ultimately, it will benefit us and our region.'
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Yahoo
'Explosion' of octopus in British waters is cause for 'concern'
An 'explosion' of octopuses in UK waters has encouraged regulators to and fishing industry specialists to meet today (May 28). Over the last few months, fishers along the southwest coast of England have seen an increase in the number and size of common octopus. Alan Steer, a crab fisher based in Devon, told Sky News: 'As of February this year, there was just a massive explosion in the population of octopus.' He added: 'We went from catching nothing to catching 1,000 kilograms a day.' Fishers have noticed an increase in octopus (Image: Getty) Steer explained that each octopus weighed between 2.5kg and 3.5kg. Sky News explained: 'The octopus is a valuable catch, fetching more at the fish market than the crab that many local fleets are designed to fish for. 'And it's just as well, because the eight-limbed creatures are also devouring local crab and lobster species, leaving some fishers empty-handed.' Steer said: 'Since the octopus have turned up now, we are seeing massive devastation to the crab and lobster and scallop stocks in the pots' as he showed empty crab and lobster shells inside them. The crab fisher thinks his crab and lobster catches have dropped by around 70%. While the common octopus is no stranger to British waters, more research is needed to understand why there has been a recent boom, say scientists. It's possible that warmer temperatures and fewer predators (such as tuna, cod and sharks) could have an impact. The pots have holes for small crabs and lobsters to exit out of but octopus can also get through these holes meaning they're being caught. Sky News explained: 'Previous "blooms" of octopus, recorded in 1899, 1950 and 2022, saw the animals stick around for a season or two, before disappearing in cold winters.' It added: 'The Devon and Severn Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority (IFCA) said the escape holes can be closed off if fishers were trying to catch octopus only, in which case they'd have to throw any other catch back into the sea.' The IFCA's deputy chief officer, Sarah Clark, said the increase in octopus is a 'concern', saying: 'We're going to be trying to gather as much information about octopus and what we do in the next coming months, years, if the octopus fishery remains within the South West. Recommended reading: What to do if your dog is bitten by a snake - symptoms, treatment and more Great white sharks could be found in UK waters soon according to marine experts Zoo animals to get more space amid 'long overdue' welfare changes 'And that's obviously a big 'if', because we don't know if the octopus will be here again next year.' Today, the support fishers need will be determined as a result of the meeting with the future involving more meetings that will focus 'on collecting data, the impact on other species and how to determine whether the octopus are here to stay.' 'Dr Zoe Jacobs, from the National Oceanography Centre (NOC), said the recent 'marine heatwave', which has seen water temperatures 2.3C higher than average, might be behind the reported early sightings of barrel jellyfish, increased numbers of seabass and pods of dolphins spotted in shallow inshore regions,' Sky News explained. She explained: 'It may also be behind the recent spike in octopus. We need to improve our monitoring of such species to collect as much evidence as we can to understand if the marine heatwave is indeed driving this sudden influx of warm-water species into coastal waters.'
Newsweek
27-05-2025
- Newsweek
How Trump AI Law Could Spark a constitutional Crisis
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Trump's big beautiful bill may have passed the House, but experts have told Newsweek that the legislation's provisions on artificial intelligence could face an even greater challenge in the courts. The bill impacts a huge range of policy areas and industries, but its ban on states' ability to enforce AI regulations could be one of the most legally challenged parts, as it arguably contradicts existing state laws. The Context The more than 1,000-page bill passed 215-214 following days of negotiations. Republicans Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio voted against it, joining every House Democrat. The bill, which includes about $4.9 trillion in tax breaks, was passed after weeks of negotiations and talks with Republicans, some of whom were concerned about constituents losing critical benefits and others who called for further budget cuts. What To Know Despite attempts during the Biden administration to create an AI Bill of Rights, the U.S. does not have any federally binding laws about how AI should be regulated. If signed into law, Trump's bill would be the first on a federal level to dictate how states should treat artificial intelligence, after Trump abolished Biden's executive order on AI ethics and safety standards in January. The bill calls for the end to all state AI regulations, and bans states from enforcing existing regulations, reading: "No state or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act." Here's the problem: several states already have AI regulations, and many more could be on the way. Utah, California, and Colorado have all passed laws addressing rights and transparency surrounding AI development and usage, and 40 bills across over a dozen states are currently in the legislative process. Margaret Hu, a professor of Law at William & Mary Law School and director of the Digital Democracy Lab, told Newsweek that Trump's bill could clash with states' status as "laboratories of democracy," which could see parts of the bill challenged in the courts if passed. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty "Prohibiting or limiting states and local governments from regulating AI would likely face an immediate challenge in the courts," Hu said. "Under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, Congress can pass legislation that preempts states from regulating in specific fields. But in the absence of a comprehensive scheme of AI regulation or specific AI system regulation in federal law, the Constitution reserves broad regulatory authority for the states." "States are 'laboratories of democracy.' In the context of a field as new as AI law and policy, states and municipalities have been 'AI law laboratories of democracy.' If and when an omnibus AI law is passed by Congress, then Congress can say: we're now regulating the field at the federal level and states should not interfere or pose an obstacle to federal regulation. "But that's not where we are right now. It's highly problematic constitutionally for Congress to say: 'we don't want to regulate AI and we don't want states to regulate AI either.'" What People Are Saying Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on Wednesday that it would be unlikely that the bill would see any serious changes in the Senate, saying: "When it comes over here, I think [Speaker Mike Johnson] would like to see as little change to the product as possible, because they've cobbled together a delicate balance over there. "The Senate will have its imprint on it." What Happens Next Trump's bill is now headed for the Senate, which it will need to pass before the president can sign it into law.
