US Public Debt Trajectory and Interest Payments Set to Worsen and Exceed Sovereign Peers
Persistently high fiscal deficits, rising interest expenses and constrained budgetary flexibility are the primary factors driving the upward trajectory of the US general government debt-to-GDP. These dynamics underpinned Scope Ratings (Scope)'s decision to affirm the US's AA ratings with a Negative Outlook on 9 May 2025 given the presence of several credit strengths. Among them are the resilient economy, deep and liquid capital markets, and the dollar's primacy as the global reserve currency.
The US general government deficit widened to 7.3% of GDP last year, well above the pre-pandemic average of roughly 4.8% between 2015 and 2019. Scope expects this deficit to remain elevated this year at around 6.4% of GDP and to average around 7% over 2026-2030, driven by rising interest payments and greater funding needs to support entitlement programmes like Social Security, Medicare, and retirement and disability services for military and civil servants. The likely extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, additional proposed tax reductions, as well as higher defence and border security spending will further pressure the health of government finances.
Figure 1: Rising public debt is key challenge for sovereign ratings of the US, France, UK
% of GDP
Scope's projection of an increase in the US general government debt-to-GDP (Figure 1) stems from persistent primary budget deficits and high net interest payments; the latter set to average around 12% of revenues between 2025 to 2030 (Figure 2). This compares to around 7% for the UK, 5% for France and Belgium, and only around 2.5% for Germany. Since the average maturity of US Treasuries is low at 5.9 years, compared with an advanced-economy average of 7.2 years, higher interest rates impact debt dynamics relatively quickly.
Gross government financing requirements are high at 38% of GDP this year and will remain so, averaging 34% of GDP over 2026-30 – the highest of any Scope-rated sovereign borrower except Japan.
Figure 2: Significantly higher net interest payments compared with peers
% of government revenues
Constrained budgetary flexibility limits the administration's ability to offset higher expenditure needs with significant spending cuts or revenue increases. In 2024, mandatory spending, including on major healthcare programmes and Social Security, accounted for around 60% of federal spending. Discretionary spending, which is determined by Congress and the administration in the annual budget and appropriations process, accounted for around 27%, of which almost half relates to defence. Net outlays on interest represented around 13% of total annual spending.
Continued spending pressures, particularly from rising mandatory spending and outlays on interest will likely push the gross federal debt ratio to 169% of GDP by 2055, according to the Congressional Budget Office. This trajectory also reflects long-run ageing-related spending pressures. The IMF estimates a net present value of health care (112%) and pension (15%) spending of 127.5% of GDP over 2024-50, the highest projected burden among advanced economies.
President Donald Trump's proposed reductions in discretionary funding for the fiscal year 2026-27, combined with higher-than-expected revenues from tariffs, are unlikely to significantly lower the budget deficit. Proposals include significant cuts to non-defence discretionary spending of 22.6%, or USD 163bn.
Still, with total government spending of USD 6.75trn in 2024, such spending cuts would represent only 0.5% of GDP. In addition, proposals to raise defence spending by 13% suggest that total discretionary spending will remain broadly unchanged. Additionally, new tariffs announced in April 2025 on 'Liberation Day' could, according to estimates by the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, generate around USD 145bn per year over the next decade (less than 0.5% of GDP).
Even if additional savings can be identified by reducing fraud and improper payments, significantly reducing the budget deficit through spending cuts would also require reductions in mandatory outlays. However, political constraints make such measures unlikely. In the absence of cuts to social security, Medicare or defence-related spending, stabilising the federal debt trajectory will prove challenging without new revenue-raising measures such as broad-based tax increases.
For a look at all of today's economic events, check out our economic calendar.
Eiko Sievert is an Executive Director in Sovereign and Public Sector ratings at Scope Ratings GmbH.
This article was originally posted on FX Empire
Weekly Data for Oil and Gold: Price Review for the Week Ahead
Revenue Gains, Bold Guidance Lift ADMA Shares
US Public Debt Trajectory and Interest Payments Set to Worsen and Exceed Sovereign Peers
The U.S. Dollar Slips as Economic Uncertainty Rises
Howmet Flies Higher on Earnings Strength
Forced Buying That Starts a New Market Phase
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pond Lehocky Expands Presence in Central Pennsylvania with Addition of Taylor Eckenrode
Eckenrode's practice will focus on workers' compensation and defending the rights of injured workers in Harrisburg and across the Commonwealth PHILADELPHIA, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Taylor Eckenrode, a rising legal talent in the worker's compensation sector, has joined Pond Lehocky Giordano's legal practice. Eckenrode will work out of the firm's Harrisburg and Lancaster offices, as part of the firm's continued expansion across Pennsylvania. Before coming to Pond Lehocky, Eckenrode practiced as a Civil Defense Litigator focusing on personal injury. She witnessed how large insurance companies handle claims related to injured persons, and as a result, was inspired to refocus her practice to help those who were injured. 'Taylor's commitment to standing up for injured workers aligns perfectly with the values upon which we've built this firm,' said Jerry Lehocky, founding partner of Pond Lehocky Giordano. 'We're confident she will be a strong addition as we continue fighting for clients across Pennsylvania.' 'Pond Lehocky Giordano is known for its commitment to standing up for injured workers,' said Eckenrode. 'I look forward to bringing my experience in injury and commercial law to the firm, as we continue to advocate for workers' rights.' Eckenrode's addition is part of the firm's broader expansion to offer workers across the state and country access to top quality legal services. Earlier this year, the firm added Jim Garver to lead its Altoona Office, and announced the opening of a new Lehigh Valley office. 'Taylor's arrival reflects our commitment to expanding our reach across Pennsylvania,' said Samuel Pond, managing partner of Pond Lehocky Giordano. 'As we grow our presence in Harrisburg and beyond, Taylor will play an important role in helping us better serve injured workers throughout the state.' Eckenrode earned her B.A. in Political Science from the University of Alabama and her J.D. from the University of Alabama School of Law. About Pond Lehocky Giordano: Pond Lehocky Giordano is a nationally recognized law firm dedicated to fighting for injured and disabled workers. With a strong presence throughout Pennsylvania, the firm has secured justice for thousands of clients in workers' compensation, Social Security disability and employment law cases. For more information, visit Media Contact:Buchanan Public Relations, pondlehocky@
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
DOGE results murky amid Elon Musk's exit
1 of 5 | Elon Musk and President Donald Trump take part in a press conference in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 30. Musk's work in the government has ended after five months and former White House staff have serious doubts about the Department of Government Efficiency self-reported results. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- Elon Musk's work in the government has ended after five months and former White House staff have serious doubts about the Department of Government Efficiency self-reported results. To date, DOGE claims that it has saved the government about $180 billion by slashing the federal workforce, ending contracts, selling assets and cutting grant programs. However, its so-called "Wall of Receipts" is filled with questionable or inaccurate entries, according to Elaine Karmarck, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Karmarck led President Bill Clinton's Reinventing Government Initiative, a program that cut 426,000 civil servants from the federal payroll and cut federal and agency regulations. There are three metrics Karmarck told UPI she uses to measure how effective DOGE is. Some of those metrics will not be available until the next administration takes office on Jan. 20, 2029. The first metric is whether there are fewer people working in the federal government at the end of President Donald Trump's term. There are about 2.2 million federal employees, a number that -- despite narratives claiming the government continues to grow -- has been consistent for decades. In the 1940s, there were as many as 3 million federal employees. In the 1950s, there were about 2.5 million. In the 1980s, the number of federal employees increased back to about 3 million. It has remained between 2 and 3 million since. Federal judges have ruled that some federal employees DOGE advised to be fired must be rehired. Musk also said that it has made mistakes in some layoffs, including laying off employees with the National Nuclear Safety Administration who are responsible for the safekeeping of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. The second metric is whether there are fewer government contracts and fewer dollars spent on those contracts. DOGE lists more than 11,000 contract terminations totaling $34 billion in savings. It says more than 15,000 grants have been terminated resulting in about $44 billion in savings. Third is the government's performance as measured by economic markers such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics' unemployment reports as well as people's own experiences receiving government services. "That's a biggie. In other words, you can cut the government but if you have airplanes crashing and you have massive mix ups in Social Security checks, nobody is going to be applauding you for this," Karmarck said. DOGE's goal has been to cut about $2 trillion in federal spending. UPI reached out to the White House Press Office and Tesla's press office for interviews or comments. Neither responded to the requests. About a quarter of the government's budget is discretionary spending, meaning spending that is subject to appropriations by Congress. It amounts to less than $2 trillion. In fiscal year 2024, discretionary outlays totaled about $1.8 trillion. The rest of the budget is mandatory spending, also known as direct spending. This funding goes toward programs like Social Security, Medicare, veterans' benefits and other programs. Jenny Mattingly, vice president of government affairs for Partnership for Public Service, told UPI it would be difficult to reach DOGE's goal without cutting into mandatory spending. "Most of the U.S. budget is this mandatory, non-discretionary spending," Mattingly told UPI. "Just a small portion, comparatively, goes to the federal workforce." While the number of federal employees has remained relatively consistent, Mattingly notes that there are fewer federal employees per capita as the population has grown. "When you look at the U.S. population, that's exploded," she said. "So we actually have fewer federal employees per capita than in the past and they're doing an enormously greater magnitude and scope of work than the federal government did, say 30, 40, 100 years ago. What Congress and administrations have authorized the government to do is far greater and far more complex than it was." Measuring DOGE's progress five months in remains a challenge. The most recent date that DOGE updated its payment statistics or "receipts" was May 13. At that time, less than half of those receipts were itemized. The most cost savings, indicated by DOGE's "Agency Efficiency Leaderboard," have come from the Department of Health and Human Services, followed by the General Services Administration, the Department of Education and the Office of Personnel Management. "The list they put on the DOGE website turns out to be about 40% inaccurate," Karmarck told UPI. "We can't take their word for it. They were very sloppy. They made no effort at transparency other than a website which just has a list of things." An example of the inaccuracies shared by Karmarck is that DOGE has taken credit for ending contracts that ended before Trump was inaugurated. Faith Williams, director of the Effective and Accountable Government Program for Project on Government Oversight, agrees that DOGE's website cannot be trusted based on its inaccuracies and a lack of transparency. Inaccuracies have been brought to DOGE's attention on social media and it has made some corrections, though questions remain about its transparency. "Transparency has been an issue since day one," Williams told UPI. "This is an example of where DOGE has the power of a cabinet-level agency when it wants to but doesn't have to recordkeep when it doesn't want to. DOGE gets to be whatever is convenient in the moment." Musk's initial role -- as stated by him and Trump -- was to lead DOGE in an effort to tackle waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government for the purpose of making it run more efficiently. The White House later downplayed his direct role with DOGE, referring to him as an adviser to the president. The murkiness of Musk's true role in DOGE underlines why Williams has concerns about its structure, mission and lack of transparency. She has been investigating the office since it began, looking into its structure, who works for DOGE and its potential conflicts of interest. "One thing we learned fairly early on DOGE, its structure was very questionable. It was very opaque and it was opaque by design," Williams said. "That opacity really helped shield it and its actors and its actions from any kind of accountability, whether that's from members of the public or even congressional accountability or even in the courts." "Who led DOGE and worked at DOGE was one thing one day and a different thing on a different day depending on what was advantageous," she continued. Project on Government Oversight filed a lawsuit against DOGE over its lack of recordkeeping made available to the public and accessing sensitive records. DOGE faces lawsuits from other organizations related to its alleged lack of compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. In March, U.S. District Court Judge Casey Cooper ruled that DOGE's records are likely subject to the Freedom of Information Act. This was in response to a lawsuit by the government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. There are several more lawsuits against DOGE related to its handling of data, compliance with FOIA and methods of cutting federal workers. In contrast, Karmarck's Reinventing Government Initiative did not face any litigation. "The reason we had no lawsuits is we followed the law," she said. "We passed a buyout bill so we had the congressional authority for buying people out. We simply followed the law." Instead of recommending Congress take actions like laying off federal employees or rescinding funds it has approved, DOGE has taken unilateral actions resulting in lawsuits. Funding approved by Congress requires congressional action to end. DOGE is not a congressionally approved agency, as a president cannot unilaterally create a new agency. He can create a new office, as past presidents have done. The authority of that office to take actions is limited, making it closer to an adviser than a federal agency. Accessing federal data systems and making changes is among the actions DOGE has taken that have raised the greatest concerns. Beth Noveck was the founding director of the White House's Open Government Initiative, a program started under President Barack Obama's administration that focused on using technology and data to modernize and improve government operations. She is currently the director of the Governance Lab and its MacArthur Research Network on Opening Governance at New York University. Noveck told UPI oversight on DOGE is past overdue, due to reports of the data it has accessed or attempted to access, including Medicare and Medicaid payment data, Social Security records, student loan data and the Office of Personnel Management systems. "Who has access and how it is being used is something we need an accounting of," Noveck said. "It's concerning and it seems that we're giving access to the likes of Palantir [Technology] to combine data that will effectuate mass surveillance and control. The risk is not just a failed attempt at cost savings, it's a successful attempt at authoritarian overthrow." The main tenets of DOGE are not new, evidenced by the work Noveck and Karmarck did for past administrations. There are nonpartisan government oversight entities that existed before Trump's current term as well, including the Office of Government Ethics and the inspectors general. However, shortly after Trump returned to office he fired the head of the Office of Government Ethics and 18 inspectors general. Last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., released a report on Musk's 130 days working in the government. The report alleges that Musk used his position to direct lucrative government contracts toward himself and his companies SpaceX, Tesla, Boring Company and Starlink. Amid an online feud with Musk following his departure as a White House Adviser, Trump has threatened to cancel all contracts with his companies. Warren's report also alleges that Musk and DOGE undercut agencies responsible for regulating his businesses and stopped enforcement actions against them.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Social Security Advice: One Key Takeaway for All Retirees
Social Security is a lifeline for many retirees, but it's on shaky ground right now. With benefit cuts potentially coming, now is the time to start preparing. A few simple steps can help protect your retirement no matter what Social Security's future looks like. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › Millions of older adults rely heavily on Social Security in retirement. Around 60% of current retirees say their benefits are a major source of income, according to a 2024 Gallup poll, while an additional 28% say it's a minor income source. While there's no harm in relying on Social Security to some extent, if I could give all Americans one piece of advice about Social Security, it's this: Have a backup plan. First, it's essential to note that Social Security is unlikely to disappear entirely. Many people are concerned about the program going bankrupt. However, while benefit cuts could be on the horizon, the program itself should still be a reliable source of income to some degree. Social Security is funded primarily through payroll taxes. Today's workers pay into the program through taxes, and that money is funneled to current retirees and other beneficiaries. But in recent years, that income hasn't been enough to cover all the benefits that need to be paid out. As a result, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has tapped its two trust funds to continue paying benefits in full. According to the latest projections from the SSA Board of Trustees, which were released in May 2024, those trust funds will likely run out by 2035. Now, this doesn't mean that Social Security itself is running out of money. Again, as long as workers keep paying payroll taxes, retirees will always receive some form of benefits. But unless lawmakers find some sort of solution in the next decade, benefit cuts could be a possibility. The SSA's latest trust fund projections date back over a year. A lot has changed since then, and there could be more potential changes coming that could impact Social Security. For example, President Trump has previously proposed eliminating income tax on Social Security benefits. While that could increase retirees' income in the short term, it would also mean there's less cash for the SSA to fund benefits. Tax cuts, in general, could also hurt Social Security. If the SSA has to take more than it had planned from the trust funds, those reserves could run out even sooner than 2035. Also, with less money coming in from taxes, the subsequent benefit cuts could be even more severe than expected. To be clear, benefit cuts are not a guarantee at this point. Lawmakers still have a few more years before the trust funds run out, and they could come up with a solution to protect the program. But when your retirement is on the line, it may be wise to avoid putting your financial future in the hands of Congress. If you still have some time before retirement, it could be smart to find ways to reduce your dependence on Social Security. That could mean simply saving more in your 401(k) or IRA, or perhaps picking up a side hustle or a source of passive income. Investing in dividend stocks or ETFs can also be a smart strategy to build your investment portfolio while also generating a source of passive retirement income. Investing even $200 per month can add up to more than $137,000 after 20 years, assuming you're earning a 10% average annual return on your investment. No matter your approach, diversifying your income so that you're not completely dependent on Social Security is a wise move right now. While the program isn't going away entirely, it doesn't hurt to be prepared just in case benefit cuts are on the horizon. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Security Advice: One Key Takeaway for All Retirees was originally published by The Motley Fool
