Ban on political parties taking part in Pride ‘a retrograde step', says minister
Culture minister Sir Chris Bryant said the decision by organisers in five cities was a backwards move as he suggested activists did not give sufficient credit to politicians for law changes in recent decades. He was met with agreement by Conservative shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew.
Sir Chris said Pride is important so young people do not 'internalise hatred and scorn', and hit out at Reform-led councils which have removed Pride flags from display in recent months as he praised the importance of visibility.
Organisers of events in Birmingham, Brighton, London, Manchester and Oxford said they had suspended political party involvement in events in 'unequivocal solidarity' with the transgender movement. June is Pride month, with marches and events taking place over the summer.
Sir Chris was asked by Dawn Butler, Labour MP for Brent East, whether he regretted the bar by Pride organisers.
Ms Butler said: 'Does (he) feel sorry that they've now said that no political parties are allowed to march, because of how the LGBTQI+ community has been treated? I will still be marching, because I normally march with groups, but does he agree with me that this is a sad state of affairs?'
Sir Chris said: 'I think we should be absolutely proud of the fact that politics has changed the law in this country and political parties were absolutely essential to that.
'Of course I pay tribute to everybody in my political party who for many, many generations fought for equality. But it's true in the Conservative Party as well where people in many cases had to be even braver than they did in the Labour movement, and of course in many other political parties as well.
'So yes, I think it's an entirely retrograde step to ban people from political parties from taking part in Pride marches.'
Mr Andrew said: 'I do want to comment that I find it appalling and deeply disappointing that some Prides across the country have banned our political parties from this year's parades.
'LGBT Conservatives, LGBT Labour, the Lib Dems, not allowed to attend, and like (him), I would also remind the organisers that it was these groups and so many MPs in this House that brought about the changes that we enjoy today.
'And as Jo Cox said, there is more than unites us than divides us. Them causing this divide is a retrograde step.'
Former Green Party co-leader Sian Berry (Brighton Pavilion) said she could understand the decision, telling MPs: 'I fully support these decisions being made by the major Pride organisations telling us as political parties we are not welcome this year on their parades or marches.
'Is the minister not as sad as I am about the absolute state of political policy and discourse around trans rights which has directly led to this action?'
Sir Chris, who entered the Commons in 2001, said: 'When I was first elected as the member of Parliament here there was still many laws in this country that dramatically and drastically affected the rights of LGBTQ people in this country, and it's because of political parties that we changed the law in this country, and we shouldn't discard the democratic process, it is absolutely essential… to secure our rights.'
The fallout from the Supreme Court ruling on the meaning of sex hung over the debate, with the Liberal Democrat MP for North Cornwall, Ben Maguire, calling prominent gender-critical campaigner JK Rowling 'desperate for attention and relevance'.
He said: 'As well as politicians, public figures desperate for attention and relevance like JK Rowling and others have poisoned the public discourse with attacks on our trans community, all under the false dichotomy that you cannot be a true feminist and protect women's rights without attacking and abusing the trans community.
'A phoney culture war which has left trans people fearful just to be themselves.'
Sir Chris said: 'We reject any attempts to weaponise this ruling to roll back the hard-won dignity and inclusion of trans people. This is not, and must never become, a zero-sum debate.
'We can protect single-sex spaces based on clear lawful criteria whilst also protecting the fundamental rights and dignity of trans people who… are amongst the most marginalised and misunderstood in our society.'
Speaking from the despatch box, he said the Government would be bringing forward a trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices within the next nine months.
'These so-called therapies are nothing less than abuse, they do not work, they cause deep-lasting harm and their continued existence is a stain on any society that claims to be inclusive,' he said.
MPs later called on shadow equalities minister Mims Davies to 'start challenging' her party's leader Kemi Badenoch on her stance towards LGBT+ people.
Tom Gordon, Lib Dem MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough, told the Commons that 'leaders of political parties with their words have power' and asked Ms Davies: 'Would she push for her party in particular just to make sure that when it comes to LGBT rights that we consider the humanity that we're talking about and don't whip up hate?'
The shadow minister replied that 'we are all leaders in our own ways' and added she was 'proud' the Conservatives 'set the ambitious and absolutely right goal of ending all the new HIV cases by 2030'.
Rachel Taylor, Labour MP for North Warwickshire and Bedworth, said the Tories' 'words will sound hollow up and down this country unless they start challenging their leader to do what is right for LGBT people up and down this country', to which Ms Davies replied: 'I think this goes for all parties.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Spectator
Labour rebels declare war over Starmer's welfare cuts
It is a year next week since the general election and Labour is marking the occasion with the biggest backbench rebellion of Keir Starmer's premiership. Overnight, scores of Starmer's MPs have signed a reasoned amendment to the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Bill. This would effectively kill the Bill at its second reading next Tuesday if it passes through the Commons. Of the 108 Labour MPs who have signed the amendment, ten are Labour select committee chairs. The key message being sent by the rebels is that these are not the so-called 'usual suspects' on the left of the party. Indeed, organisers made a point of adding the names of the Socialist Campaign Group last to the list, to send the message to party whips that dissatisfaction is felt across the whole party. The government is now stuck between a rock and a hard place The full list of names are here and they include the likes of Labour grandee Dame Meg Hillier, the respected chair of the Treasury Select Committee. There are ambitious new MPs too, like Yuan Yang. Adam Jogee and Polly Billington, plus prominent names on the so-called 'soft left' like Rosena Allin-Khan, Stella Creasy and Louise Haigh. They want more consultation on Liz Kendall's reforms, which would spend an extra £1 billion on getting people back to work and reduce the eligibility for PIP. The frustration of the rebels is obvious. Paul Foster, the new MP for South Ribble, is among those to add his name this morning. He wrote on X that he 'attempted to engage privately and behind the scenes' to convey his 'deep rooted concerns' but that he and colleagues 'unfortunately haven't been listened to'. In 17 years as a Labour councillor, 'never before have I been placed in a position where I have ever had to vote against the whip. Never'. Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, is keeping her cards close to her chest on how she will instruct her MPs to vote next week. The striking thing from the list of Labour rebels is how many have felt disrespected or sidelined by the Starmer leadership during the past five years. The fact that so many feel strongly enough to publicly break with the government, this early on, will raise questions over the parliamentary management of the 'soft left'. As one puts it, 'if you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.' The government is now stuck between a rock and a hard place. Politically, it is hard to see how the government can proceed as planned. Fiscally, it is hard to see how they cannot. The OBR expects welfare spending to reach over £100 billion by the end of this parliament. If Keir Starmer cannot trim welfare by £5 billion without wrecking his majority of 156, what chance has he got at serious reform? The one certainty is tax rises. As Paul Johnson of the IFS noted this morning: Another £30 billion on defence. U-turn on winter fuel. Rebellion on plans which just slightly slow huge increases in spending on disability benefits. If spending goes only one way then so, inevitably, will tax. Historic increases already this decade. Looks like a lot more to come. Kendall told MPs last night there was 'no route to social justice based on greater benefit spending alone'. Unfortunately for her, it appears to be an argument that is falling on deaf ears.
The National
40 minutes ago
- The National
See the full list of Labour MPs rebelling on UK welfare and Pip cuts
Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment spelling out why they cannot support the Labour Government's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, which would cut back disability benefit payments by around £5 billion per year. READ MORE: Cuts to PIP will plunge families further into poverty, research says If passed – which it could do with support from Westminster's opposition parties – the amendment would block the bill from progressing to its second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1. The amendment says that the proposed reforms amount to 'dangerous and counterproductive cuts', and further notes that the UK Government's 'own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of [the bill], including 50,000 children'. Of the 108 Labour MPs who have signed the amendment, nine are from Scottish Labour. They are: Patricia Ferguson Tracy Gilbert Scott Arthur Kirsteen Sullivan Richard Baker Euan Stainbank Lilian Jones Elaine Stewart Brian Leishman Scottish Labour's nominal leader Anas Sarwar has supported the UK Government's plans to cut welfare. Leishman, the MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, urged his colleagues to oppose the cuts. He told The Record: "Labour MPs have a choice to make. Do they believe that the most vulnerable people should be looked after, or not? That's what the vote on these welfare reforms ultimately boils down to. This vote will define careers and this Labour Government." Labour committee chairs oppose the UK welfare reforms Ferguson, the MP for Glasgow West, is also chair of the Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster. A further nine Labour select committee chairs have also signed the reasoned amendment, underlining the scale of the challenge facing the UK Government. These are: Tan Dhesi Helen Hayes Florence Eshalomi Ruth Cadbury Meg Hillier Ruth Jones Sarah Owen Debbie Abrahams Cat Smith Other senior Labour MPs to have signed the amendment include former transport secretary Louise Haigh. The Times reported that although the list does not include current ministers, as many as a dozen are said to be privately opposing the welfare reforms. All the Labour MPs opposing the UK welfare reforms Here is a full list of all the MPs to have signed the reasoned amendment against the UK Government's welfare changes:
The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
Israeli troops kill at least 25 people waiting for aid in Gaza
The Awda hospital in the urban Nuseirat refugee camp, which received the victims, said the Palestinians were waiting for the trucks on the Salah al-Din Road south of Wadi Gaza. Witnesses told the Associated Press that Israeli forces opened fire as people were advancing eastward to be close to the approaching trucks. The Israeli military did not immediately comment. READ MORE: Iran denies launching missiles at Israel after IDF claims 'It was a massacre,' said Ahmed Halawa. He said tanks and drones fired at people, 'even as we were fleeing. Many people were either martyred or wounded'. Hossam Abu Shahada, another eyewitness, said drones were flying over the area, watching the crowds first, then there was gunfire from tanks and drones as people were moving eastward. He described a 'chaotic and bloody' scene as people were attempting to escape. He said he saw at least three people lying on the ground motionless and many others wounded as he fled the site. The Awda hospital said another 146 Palestinians were wounded. Among them were 62 in critical condition, who were transferred to other hospitals in central Gaza, it said. In the central town of Deir al-Balah, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospital said it received the bodies of six people who were killed in the same incident. Palestinian witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire on crowds seeking desperately needed food, killing hundreds of people in recent weeks. The military claims it has fired warning shots at people it said approached its forces in a suspicious manner. The deaths were the latest in Israel's brutal assault on Gaza which has so far killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, most of whom were women and children. READ MORE: More than 100 Labour MPs threaten to halt welfare cuts in biggest rebellion yet Human rights agencies have widely condemned the new aid distribution system and have refused to take part. Ahead of a briefing on Tuesday, the United Nations urged Israeli forces to "stop shooting at people trying to get food". In a written statement, the UN human rights office strongly condemned the "weaponisation of food" in Gaza, warning that such actions amount to a war crime. "The weaponisation of food for civilians, in addition to restricting or preventing their access to life-sustaining services, constitutes a war crime," the statement read. "Israel's militarised humanitarian assistance mechanism is in contradiction with international standards on aid distribution."
