logo
China's Mysterious Tailless Stealth Fighter Has Swiveling Wingtips

China's Mysterious Tailless Stealth Fighter Has Swiveling Wingtips

Yahoo27-01-2025
A new photo of the still-mysterious Chinese tailless combat aircraft, likely from the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, which first surfaced last month, provides a better view of the rear aspect of the jet. The image would appear to confirm that the aircraft's outer wingtip sections act as moving control surfaces, as we had previously suggested was a high possibility. You can read our full extremely in-depth analysis on both of China's new stealthy tailless tactical jets here.
The photo in question was first published on the Chinese microblogging website Weibo. The aircraft is seen on approach to land, passing over a busy highway in daylight. Since it first appeared, some observers have suggested the jet may be designated J-50 (in the Chinese Jianjiji or fighter series), while others have referred to it as the J-XDS. At this stage, we simply don't know for sure.
While it's worth noting that the authenticity of the photo cannot be confirmed, there's nothing to suggest that it's been manipulated and it's otherwise in line with the imagery of the aircraft that we have seen before.
Via ACuriousPLAFan/SDF:'A rear view photo of J-XDS, posted by Cute Orca on Weibo with the caption "If this is not a PS-ed photo, this shows that the J-XDS has full-moving wingtips and no angled vertical stabilizers."' pic.twitter.com/W8UEmA2Twc
— @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) January 27, 2025
Seen here from the rear aspect, there is no sign of the 'pop-out' maneuvering tail surfaces that some had suggested might be present and which had also appeared in 'fan art' of the same aircraft. The suggestion was that such surfaces might sit flush with the inner wing area, before being activated for low-speed flight, increasing control authority and maneuverability. As we explained in our analysis feature, this didn't seem to be the case and this photo helps disprove this claim further — especially since the aircraft is seen in a low-speed phase of flight when such control surfaces would be deployed.
A fan art render shows an imagined configuration with 'pop-out' maneuvering tails, something that we can now more or less rule out:
Just wow! SAC J-50 rendering with foldable tails https://t.co/5obFT6IGDJ pic.twitter.com/iCHMZZ32Lz
— Húrin (@Hurin92) January 1, 2025
As we pointed out in the past, having these auxiliary tail surfaces would add more weight and complexity to the design, and also decrease fuel storage, which would likely not be worth any advantages they would bring in terms of stability and agility.
The apparent confirmation that the aircraft has swiveling outer wingtip sections, which serve as major control surfaces, is significant. In this photo, the tip of the right wing can be clearly seen in a front-up, rear-down position. Having extremely widely spaced surfaces that span from the leading edge to the trailing edge like this should provide a lot of roll authority and, when deployed together, should also be used to control pitch. In this way, the outer wing sections — combined with an advanced digital flight control system — would help mitigate the stability issues that come with a tailless design.
The disadvantage of this arrangement is a likely reduction in low observability, although the designers will have presumably decided that the compromise is worthwhile, especially if it is a requirement of the tailless configuration. This could be reduced in cruise to some degree by limiting the articulation of these surfaces, or even locking them out entirely unless a severe input is commanded. Still, just having a jointed area in this location is less than desirable in a similar manner to how canards are not conducive to extreme radar signature reduction goals.
Aside from this, the new photo probably also provides us with our best look at what could be a cockpit canopy, which was not very discernible in previous images. While it's again hard to determine any details, a prominent bulge does at least seem to be present where a cockpit should be. There has been some speculation that this aircraft could be uncrewed. This doesn't seem to be the case by anything we are seeing, but it's always possible as the bulge could also accommodate a satellite communications package. Once again, this is very unlikely at this time.
The low resolution of the photo means it's hard to determine much about the configuration of the fighter's engine exhausts, although the suggestion, once again, is that the twin powerplants are provided with 2D thrust-vectoring nozzles very similar to those found on the U.S. F-22 Raptor. This would also help with stability and maneuverability. The thickness of the fuselage — another aspect we discussed in our deep-dive analysis piece — is also showcased in this new image.
As well as contributing to low observability, engine nozzles of this kind would enhance the aircraft's maneuverability and stability, key concerns considering that it's a relatively heavy, tailless design.
Overall, there remain many unknowns about this, the second Chinese tailless combat aircraft to break cover last December 26. However, more photos are sure to emerge and these should gradually provide us with a much better idea about its design, as well as provide a hint toward its potential capabilities and anticipated role.
Contact the author: thomas@thedrive.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk feels Apple favors OpenAI over xAI in App Store rankings
Elon Musk feels Apple favors OpenAI over xAI in App Store rankings

Engadget

time27 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Elon Musk feels Apple favors OpenAI over xAI in App Store rankings

Elon Musk has accused Apple of committing an "unequivocal antitrust violation" by favoring OpenAI in the App Store rankings. In a post on X, he claimed that Apple has made it impossible for other AI companies to reach number one in those rankings and that xAI "will take immediate legal action." Musk didn't clarify what he meant by that, and he also didn't provide evidence that would prove Apple's supposed antitrust violation. In an earlier post on X that's currently pinned to the top of his profile, however, he tagged Apple, asking the company why it "[refuses] to put either X or Grok in [its] "Must Have" section. He said X is "the #1 news app in the world," while Grok is ranked number five among all apps. "Are you playing politics? What gives?" he continued. We've asked Apple for a comment, but the company has yet to respond. Meanwhile, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted a response to Musk's accusation on X, calling it a "remarkable claim," given that he has heard allegations that Musk manipulates "X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like." To note, Chinese AI chatbot DeepSeek became the top-rated free app on Apple's App Store back in January, overtaking even ChatGPT. While Musk didn't mention it, Apple has an ongoing partnership with OpenAI. The company has integrated ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence to power cloud-based queries for its platforms. More recently, the company said that Apple Intelligence will leverage the capabilities of OpenAI's GPT-5 in iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS Tahoe 26, which are set to arrive sometime in September.

Unlocking Liquidity: Private Market Secondaries And Family Offices
Unlocking Liquidity: Private Market Secondaries And Family Offices

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Unlocking Liquidity: Private Market Secondaries And Family Offices

Evan J. Renov, Cofounder & Managing Partner at Arieli Group. For family offices seeking liquidity, pricing efficiency and access to top-tier assets, the private secondary market has become an increasingly important part of the private capital ecosystem. In recent years, the private secondary market has quietly moved from the margins to the mainstream. As private markets become more efficient and act more like public markets, investments in secondaries are here to stay. Investing in secondaries can create liquidity for investors and, with a quicker timeline to exit, can also be less risky than early-stage investments. Historically, the private secondary market presented meaningful barriers to entry for many investors, particularly family offices. Information asymmetry, complex transaction processes and a lack of standardized platforms meant access was largely reserved for those with deep networks and specialized legal and operational expertise. But over the past several years, those dynamics have fundamentally changed. The rise of purpose-built private market platforms, supported by advances in artificial intelligence (AI), has improved market transparency, simplified legal complexities and made pricing discovery significantly more efficient. At my firm, we are backing this innovation with investments in private market platforms that are democratizing access to a once-exclusive asset class and positioning secondary investments as a key tool for portfolio diversification and liquidity management. Notably, secondary transactions accounted for over 70% of venture capital exits in 2024 (paywall), a signal of the market's growing importance. For family offices managing long-term capital, secondaries offer something few asset classes can: the ability to access high-quality growth companies while retaining flexibility, optionality and shorter exit horizons. What's more, secondary markets function as an engine of liquidity. Secondaries: Giving Family Offices A Pathway To Diversification Family offices are often structured around long-term value creation and legacy-driven investment goals. With a growing share of capital tied up in long-horizon investments, even the most patient investors can face near-term liquidity constraints. Secondary investments can help alleviate this tension. Traditional direct investments often require investors to enter at early stages and hold until IPO or acquisition, sometimes as long as a decade or more. In contrast, secondary transactions allow entry in later growth rounds with the potential to exit within a few years. This ability to enter and exit with greater precision allows family offices to reallocate capital more efficiently, support a broader range of opportunities and better manage exposure across sectors. At the same time, many family offices continue to prioritize long-term impact and legacy. They are uniquely positioned to invest in breakthrough technologies in sectors such as healthcare and the life sciences, where clinical development can span many years, precisely because they are not constrained by short-term return expectations. Secondary investments, when used strategically, provide the liquidity needed to fund these long-horizon opportunities without sacrificing flexibility elsewhere in the portfolio. Liquidity also contributes to portfolio resilience and the ability for families to reinvest their capital in new, innovative opportunities. Strategic Questions To Guide Private Secondary Market Participation As family offices increasingly explore private market secondaries, thoughtful due diligence remains critical. Here are five strategic questions to consider when evaluating opportunities: One of the advantages of the private secondary market is access to more mature companies with proven business models and clear paths to exit. While early-stage investments may offer higher potential upside, secondary transactions in later-stage companies reduce risk and allow for more targeted exposure. In many cases, early-stage participation is better suited to direct investments, while secondary strategies align more effectively with companies approaching exits. Certain sectors lend themselves more naturally to secondary investments. Cybersecurity, for instance, is a fast-moving space with frequent merger and acquisition (M&A) activity and shorter timelines to liquidity. By contrast, industries like biotech, pharma and medtech that are critical for long-term impact often involve extended development cycles and are better aligned with longer-term, direct investment strategies. In an era of increasing transparency, family offices have greater access than ever to data on company performance, capital structure and forward-looking plans. Between regulatory disclosures, industry research and AI-enabled diligence tools, investors can better assess whether a company is likely to pursue an IPO, attract acquisition interest or require additional funding. Understanding a company's trajectory is essential for determining timing and risk. Every secondary deal is unique. Investors should evaluate whether they're purchasing shares directly from an existing shareholder or through intermediaries, and whether additional management fees or layers of ownership could dilute returns. A clear understanding of the deal structure, including rights, restrictions and timing, is essential for making informed decisions. In the secondary market, investors are not only acquiring equity; they are positioning for a future event. Whether the goal is to hold until IPO, sell in a future secondary round or exit via strategic acquisition, having a defined path to liquidity is key. Even in shorter holding periods, investors should identify likely future buyers and evaluate overall market conditions that may support a timely and profitable exit. Building A More Agile Portfolio The future of private market investing is becoming more liquid, more data-driven and increasingly empowered by technology as innovation in investment platforms and operations continues to evolve. For family offices managing intergenerational capital, secondary investments may offer a valuable lever to balance long-term vision with near-term agility. Whether used to unlock capital for new opportunities, manage concentration risk or achieve greater diversification, private market secondaries are increasingly becoming a strategic imperative, not just an opportunistic allocation. As infrastructure continues to improve and market acceptance deepens, the opportunity set for family offices will only expand. Those prepared to embrace the private secondary market thoughtfully and strategically may find themselves well-positioned financially and on the path toward a greater mission of creating enduring prosperity. The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation. Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?

‘Bizarre' Nvidia, AMD chip export deal with Trump raises legal questions
‘Bizarre' Nvidia, AMD chip export deal with Trump raises legal questions

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

‘Bizarre' Nvidia, AMD chip export deal with Trump raises legal questions

Two major chipmakers in the U.S., Nvidia and AMD, have struck an unusual agreement with the federal government to share some of their revenue from chip sales to China — a deal that experts say raises constitutional questions and may set a concerning new precedent. The two firms have agreed to share 15 percent of the revenue generated from selling advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China in order to secure export licenses after a months-long pause, a U.S. official confirmed to The Hill on Monday. 'It's bizarre in many respects and pretty troubling because Congress didn't have anything to say about this,' said Gary Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'It's just the president's own negotiating with the individual companies,' he continued. 'That's not how historically we've done business in this country.' Under the agreement, Nvidia will share 15 percent of its revenue from H20 chip sales to China, while AMD will share the same portion of its MI308 chip sales. Both the Nvidia and AMD chips in question, which are graphics processing units (GPUs) designed for the Chinese market with U.S. export controls in mind, faced new restrictions from the Trump administration in April, effectively blocking sales to China. Last month, Nvidia and AMD said the U.S. government had assured them it would begin approving export licenses for the H20 and MI308 chips, although the Commerce Department reportedly did not start issuing licenses for several weeks. The new revenue-sharing agreement comes after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with President Trump at the White House last week, according to Bloomberg. Huang has found himself in a tricky situation, balancing Washington and Beijing's interests as both countries vie for AI dominance. 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets,' an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement. 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide.' 'America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership,' they added. 'America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.' Nvidia dominates the market for GPUs, the chips powering the AI boom, fueling the company's rapid growth over the past few years. It became the first company in the world to reach a market capitalization of $4 trillion last month. AMD holds a much smaller share of the market, although it remains a key player. The agreement appears to remove a major impediment for both companies. Nvidia said earlier this year it incurred $4.5 billion in charges associated with the chip restrictions in the first quarter and expected an $8 billion sales hit in the second quarter. AMD forecast a $1.5 billion hit to revenue this year. The deal represents a notable shift in how the government approaches export controls. 'It's quite extraordinary because it turns the export control function of the government into a money-raising proposition, and that's never happened before,' Hufbauer said. The U.S. government is barred from imposing taxes on exports under both the Constitution and federal law. 'In addition to the policy problems with just charging Nvidia and AMD a 15% share of revenues to sell advanced chips in China, the US Constitution flatly forbids export taxes,' Peter Harrell, a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote in a post on X. 'In addition to the Constitution, 50 USC 4815(c) expressly prohibits fees for export control licenses,' Harrell, who served as senior director of international economics in the Biden administration, added. It's unclear whether the 15 percent cut from Nvidia and AMD's revenues would count as an export tax because 'it looks like the companies just decided to make this payment in order to further their business,' Hufbauer noted. It's also not entirely clear who would have standing to challenge the move in court — an outcome Hufbauer suggested is ultimately unlikely. Even so, the agreements with Nvidia and AMD are likely to face pushback. The Trump administration's decision to allow Nvidia to resume H20 sales to China has already been a source of concern among both Democrats and Republicans, who have warned that it could boost Beijing's AI capabilities. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has argued the administration is only giving China Nvidia's 'fourth best' chip. This represents an approach to export restrictions, largely supported by the semiconductor industry, that chipmakers should be allowed to sell some chips to China to prevent its national champion Huawei from gaining ground. However, the administration's latest move creates a new set of concerns. 'It raises concerns, certainly for many national security minded folks, of — are we now selling export control licenses? Is there a way that Nvidia will be able to buy licenses to sell more advanced chips than they're currently able to?' said Owen Tedford, a senior research analyst at Beacon Policy Advisors. Stacy Rasgon, a senior analyst at Bernstein Research, underscored that it makes sense for Nvidia and AMD to take a 15 percent cut because '85 percent is better than nothing.' However, he added, 'It feels like a little bit of a slippery slope. What's next? Where does it stop? Does it stop with China AI? Does it move to other China stuff that's under export control? In that case, sometimes there's a reason that there's export controls. Can you buy your way out of them? Strategically that's not great.' The deals could be a 'template' that other companies facing export controls try to follow, Tedford noted. 'It's somewhat unique in the way that they only would have happened with Trump as president,' he said. 'If we'd had a Biden or Harris administration and even if you'd had the same kind of on and off of these H20 chips, this really speaks to Trump's transactional nature, his desire to get some sort of win.' 'It raises questions about how — and I think this gets to some of more general concerns with the Trump administration — just policy feels like it's for sale in some ways, like policy outcomes,' Tedford added. 'If companies are big enough or strong enough, they can basically buy the policy that they want from the Trump administration.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store