logo
Texas' has the highest rate of uninsured children, and it's getting worse

Texas' has the highest rate of uninsured children, and it's getting worse

Yahoo26-02-2025

HOUSTON — Almost 1 million Texas children and teens went without health insurance at some point over the most recent year recorded. Many of them live in Houston, which has a higher rate of uninsured children than any other major metropolitan area in the nation.
Overall, Texas has the worst coverage rate for kids in the country, with nearly 12% going uninsured in 2023 — up from nearly 11% in 2022.
A number of issues are driving the numbers. But the fact that many uninsured Texas children are actually eligible for public insurance exposes what experts say are alarming gaps in the state's enrollment and outreach system — gaps that can limit health-care access for low-income kids and endanger their health.
Among the issues is a backlog of thousands of families who applied for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, known as CHIP. For most of 2024, the average waiting time for a decision by the state was well over two months, which triggered a federal probe under the Biden administration. The application process remains tedious and confusing, requiring families to sometimes round up dozens of documents to prove they're eligible. Some give up.
The state has booted more than 1 million children from Medicaid since it began reviewing recipients' eligibility again in 2023 after a pause during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many were dropped not because they were ineligible, but for procedural reasons, such as their parents' failure to submit a renewal packet.
Texas lawmakers also have rejected or stalled proposals that typically help more children access CHIP or Medicaid. A 2023 state House bill would have streamlined Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for kids by relying on information already verified via other state benefit programs, such as food assistance. Despite bipartisan support, the bill failed to advance. It's been introduced again in this year's session.
Texas has shunned broad proposals enacted by other states, such as expanding Medicaid for low-income adults. Research shows Medicaid expansion has a 'welcome-mat' effect for children, with parents on Medicaid more likely to sign up their eligible kids as well.
The range of barriers mean many Texas children go without vital medical care or health screenings, health experts and advocates say.
'When kids are enrolled in Medicaid, they do have better access and better health care outcomes,' said Alec Mendoza, senior policy associate for health at Texans Care for Children.
Until recently, Houston native Maria Reyes was terrified that her 7-year-old daughter, Maya, might join the ranks of Texas' uninsured. No child should miss out on regular medical checkups, but Maya really can't.
She was born with a rare genetic condition that prevents her pancreas from properly absorbing nutrients and her bone marrow from producing enough blood cells. As a baby, she couldn't put on weight and her breathing was erratic, a symptom of rib-cage abnormalities caused by the condition, known as Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. After multiple hospitalizations, she was diagnosed at 8 months old.
Maya needs frequent care to stay healthy, including visits with a blood specialist every two months and a bone marrow biopsy every year, Reyes said.
Without Texas Medicaid coverage, which Maya has had since she was a baby, the family would be swimming in medical debt, Reyes said. Just one of her prescriptions costs about $1,500 a month.
Reyes was braced for that reality last fall when the state conducted its yearly assessment of Medicaid eligibility for Maya and her two younger siblings. She was worried that her new job as a medical assistant, making less than $20 an hour, might bump her income enough to disqualify her kids. While the family could visit a local community health center that serves the uninsured, finding affordable specialty care would be very difficult.
She spent weeks trying to prove their eligibility. 'It's like they don't believe you need it,' she said.
Maya has more complex medical needs than most kids. But research shows that going without health insurance has serious risks for all children, particularly in their early years, when their bodies are still developing and they're vulnerable to infections.
In interviews with Public Health Watch, health providers and advocates in Houston said their experiences mirror what the research already reports: Uninsured children are more likely to have unmet health-care needs. As a result, their families, who typically have low incomes, face more financial stress.
The number of Texas kids who are eligible for public insurance but not signed up is especially frustrating, advocates said. A 2023 report from Texas 2036, a public-policy nonprofit, estimated that 400,000 uninsured Texas children were eligible for Texas Medicaid or CHIP but weren't enrolled.
For Reyes, her hunch about her kids' Medicaid coverage wasn't totally off. Maya was still eligible, but to keep all three of her children covered and healthy, Reyes had to cut her work hours.
In April 2023, states began dropping people from Medicaid rolls when federal pandemic protections came to an end. Texas disenrolled 2.5 million people by September 2024 — the most of any state, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation tracker of the Medicaid 'unwinding.' A year after it began, more than 1.3 million Texas kids had lost their Medicaid coverage, most of them for procedural reasons, Texas Human Health and Services Commission reported.
While community health centers can still serve as medical homes for the uninsured, parents of uninsured kids are often less likely to bring them in for care, said Jana Eubank, executive director of the Texas Association of Community Health Centers. They are often worried about incurring unexpected bills they can't pay.
'If they need specialty care or inpatient care, they often just go without or wait until it's very serious and present at the emergency room,' she said.
Regular checkups for kids are vital. They give doctors a chance to catch developmental delays early, such as low weight gain or trouble walking and talking.
In the first two years of life, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children visit with their physicians nearly a dozen times.
Years of research show that people with health insurance, including kids, are more likely to access preventive care and receive medical treatments they need. One study, published in 2017, followed a group of 237 children in Dallas County who were eligible for Medicaid or CHIP. Researchers found that uninsured children were almost four times more likely than insured ones to have no primary care provider and three times more likely to delay or skip needed health or dental care.
With Medicaid or CHIP, families rarely have out-of-pocket costs, said pediatrician D. Maneesh Kumar, who runs a small practice in Southwest Houston. About 70% of his patients rely on public insurance. 'It's actually really good coverage,' he said.
But for uninsured kids in households with few resources, even minor medical needs — like treatment for an ear infection or head lice — can be a financial strain, said Dr. Kavon Young, chief clinical officer at El Centro de Corazón, a community health center with three clinics in East Houston. About 40% of its 5,500 pediatric patients are uninsured.
'Something very simple for a child who's insured can pose a lot of difficulty for a child who is not,' Young said.
The health center can offer families low-cost primary care for their uninsured kids, but parents have far fewer, if any, affordable options if their child needs more complex medical care.
Keren, who asked that only her first name be used, has been bringing her three young children to El Centro de Corazón for the last year. All three are uninsured, she said last fall through an interpreter, but the clinic offers a sliding-scale rate she can afford.
She said at times it can be stressful to cover the costs, especially for her children's dental work. But she said she is nervous about filling out the paperwork to apply for Medicaid or CHIP.
Providers and advocates say parents' hesitancy is one reason so many Texas children remain uninsured despite being eligible for state coverage. Some parents are confused by the application process; still others have tried and been rejected for procedural reasons.
Then there are the huge backlogs at the state level in reviewing Medicaid and CHIP applications.
One of the biggest impediments to enrolling eligible kids is the current 'political environment around immigration,' said Marcie Mir, CEO of El Centro de Corazón, referring to state and federal policies, such as Gov. Greg Abbott's 2024 order requiring public hospitals to collect information about undocumented immigrants who seek treatment.
Even if their children do qualify, many immigrant parents don't want to draw any attention from government officials, Mir said. Nearly half of Houston children are in a household with at least one immigrant parent, according to a 2023 report.
The checklist that Maricela Delcid gives parents wanting Texas Medicaid for their kids is long and tedious: Social Security cards, birth certificates, lease contracts, child support records, utility bills, bank statements and two months of detailed income verification. The paper application is 33 pages.
Delcid is team leader for benefits assistance at Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services, or ECHOS, a Houston nonprofit that helps residents apply for public programs like Medicaid. Last year, the nonprofit assisted with about 1,400 applications for Medicaid or food assistance. Many of them families with mixed eligibility status, meaning parents might not be eligible for assistance but their children are.
Delcid is well acquainted with the Texas online benefits portal. She whips around the site with her mouse and keyboard, peppering clients with questions as she helps them apply. The system is confusing to most, she said, especially those who aren't proficient in English or computer use.
The Medicaid application process confuses even medical students who visit the nonprofit to learn about challenges their clients face, said Cathy Moore, ECHOS' executive director.
'We can all hear about it, but until you see how difficult it is, you don't know,' she said.
On top of the application process, the waiting period for a decision can take many weeks longer than it should.
The bottleneck became so bad at one point that some families stopped trying, even though their kids were eligible, Delcid said.
In mid-September, the median statewide wait time for an eligibility determination for Medicaid was 83 days, state officials reported — longer than the 45-day federal limit. Delcid said that at one point last summer, the wait time reached more than 90 days. 'I'd never seen anything like that,' Moore said.
As of Jan. 31, more than 244,000 applications for Texas Medicaid or CHIP were waiting to be processed, up from nearly 132,000 in late November, said Jennifer Ruffcorn, a spokesperson for the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. Applicants were waiting an average of 54 days for an answer.
The backlog has grown even after Texas HHSC dealt with major staffing shortages. By April last year, the agency had reduced its vacancy rate for eligibility advisers to 2.5%, down from over 21% in March 2022. As of November, Ruffcorn said the vacancy rate was about 3.5%.
The long waits prompted the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, to open an investigation into the backlog last May.
At ECHOS, Delcid said wait times are back to normal — no more than 45 days. But the delays have had a lasting impact, as it's hard to convince families who got caught up in the backlog to try again, she said.
When wait times were much longer, some kids were rejected and their families told to re-apply — not because they were ineligible, but because the information they had submitted was too old to process by the time they reached the front of the line.
At that point, some families give up, believing the system doesn't work, Delcid said. 'It gets to the point that they're hopeless. It's a story we kept seeing.'
Delcid and Moore said they suspect the children who remain uninsured see a doctor only when they're sick and don't get all the preventive care experts recommend. Their families also risk being saddled with medical bills they can't afford and that Medicaid would have covered.
In a statement to Public Health Watch in November about its investigation, CMS said it 'continues to be actively engaged to bring [Texas] into alignment with federal requirements.'
Emails to CMS earlier this month about the probe's status went unanswered. Ruffcorn at Texas HHSC confirmed the review was still ongoing.
When Congress reauthorized CHIP in 2009, it included a new option for states — "express lane eligibility' — that made it easier for eligible kids to get covered. But first state lawmakers had to adopt it.
In Texas, State Rep. John Bucy III, an Austin Democrat, sponsored a bill to create an express lane in the 2023 legislative session.
The bill passed the House with bipartisan support. It was even endorsed by leading conservative groups such as the Texas Public Policy Foundation, an opponent of Medicaid expansion. But it died in the state Senate, where it never got a hearing.
'Increasing access [to health coverage] is such an uphill fight here,' said Bucy, who has introduced the bill again in the current session.
As of 2021, seven states had an express lane for children's Medicaid; two had it for Medicaid and CHIP. The idea is that states use the information that families submit for other safety-net programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, to determine kids' eligibility for Medicaid or CHIP.
Bucy's bill requires parents' permission before an eligible child is enrolled in Medicaid. But families wouldn't have to endure another application process. Bucy said an express lane could reach hundreds of thousands of uninsured Texas kids who are eligible but unenrolled.
Research shows express lane laws for children have yielded significant coverage gains and administrative cost savings for states.
Alabama started express-lane eligibility in 2010 and has experienced such results, said pediatrician Marsha Raulerson, who is on the state's medical advisory committee for Medicaid. 'It's rare a child doesn't have access to health insurance here,' she said.
While Alabama has one of the country's worst child poverty rates, just under 4% of children there are uninsured — about a third of the Texas rate.
In Texas, newer technology and more eligibility workers would help fix the state's enrollment problems, the Texas HHSC said. In its 2026-2027 appropriations request, the agency wrote that without more funding, wait times for Medicaid applicants will 'continue to fluctuate' and Texas will be unable to fully comply with the 45-day federal standard.
State lawmakers have responded with budget bills in the Texas House and Senate that include the $300 million that HHSC requested to meet federal waiting-time rules, said Mendoza at Texans Care for Children. If approved, he said the funding would help Texas Medicaid streamline its enrollment process.
But in Congress, Republican proposals to cut federal Medicaid funding could dampen efforts to insure more low-income kids.
Children face the brunt of such cuts, said Edwin Park, a Medicaid researcher at Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. As of October 2024, about 75% of Texas Medicaid's 3.8 million enrollees were kids.
'In Texas, it's mostly kids, seniors and people with disabilities on Medicaid,' Park said. 'That's where the cuts would hit. There isn't anywhere else.'
Most of the people who rely on Hope Clinic, a community health center with five clinics in Houston, are immigrants and refugees. Its patients speak more than 30 languages.
Dr. Andrea Caracostis, the clinic's CEO, said its staff is well versed in helping parents overcome application obstacles to Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for their kids. In Texas, children who are lawfully in the country are eligible for the programs.
But misinformed fears that applying will hurt a family's immigration status persist and are a major reason children remain uninsured, Caracostis said.
'I have patients that I beg — I say 'Please get on Medicaid. You have a complicated pregnancy, anything can happen, you're going to rack up debt,'' Caracostis said. 'And they won't … They're afraid of being perceived as a public charge.'
Under federal law, people deemed likely to become dependent on public assistance can be denied lawful permanent residence.
The policy doesn't include Medicaid, but that changed under the first Trump administration. Biden rescinded the change, but policy experts expect it to return during Trump's second term.
While Trump's public charge change never applied to children, Caracostis said many parents remain confused and afraid to enroll anyone in the family.
According to Every Texan, fears about accessing public services in immigrant communities was likely the main reason for a 237,000 decline in children in Texas Medicaid and CHIP from December 2017 to February 2020.
Caracostis expects those fears to roar back. 'There are lives at stake,' she said.
This story is part of 'Uninsured in America,' a project led by Public Health Watch that focuses on life in America's health coverage gap and the 10 states that haven't expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Public Health Watch is a nonprofit, investigative news organization based in Texas.
Disclosure: Texans Care for Children, Texas 2036, Texas Association of Community Health Centers and Texas Public Policy Foundation have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's $1,000-per-baby investment accounts: What to know
Trump's $1,000-per-baby investment accounts: What to know

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's $1,000-per-baby investment accounts: What to know

President Trump has lauded the House-approved spending bill for the 'pro-family initiative' tucked inside the legislation, which creates investment accounts for newborn babies. 'They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economy,' Trump said at a Monday event at the White House that touted the accounts. The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' lays out rules for the Trump accounts. To qualify, a child must be a U.S. citizen, born within the next four years to at least one parent with a Social Security number. The money could be withdrawn starting at age 18. Here's what you need to know about the proposed federal program: Under the current bill text, the program would be available to families of all income levels, with babies born after Dec. 31, 2024, and before Jan. 1, 2029. A one-time $1,000 contribution would be provided by the Treasury Department and deposited into a diversified U.S. stock index fund or its equivalent. Families, guardians and private entities will be able to contribute no more than $5,000 per year to the account. An estimated 7 percent return on the $1,000 would compound to roughly $3,570 over 18 years, according to the Associated Press. The legislation does not provide a limit on the amount of money a nonprofit or company can donate to a child's investment account within the $5,000 annual contribution limit. Several businesses, including Uber, Dell, Goldman Sachs and Altimeter have committed to setting aside billions to invest in the accounts of company employees who become new parents. 'It's not just an account; it's a launchpad. It puts the unstoppable engine of compounding to work for our kids, building a future for them from day one,' Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said about the initiative during a White House roundtable. Children enrolled in the investment program are eligible to withdraw half of the cash value amount between their 18th and 25th birthdays, according to CNN. Families and beneficiaries would pay a penalty for early withdrawal as there is no allowance for emergency use of the funds, the outlet reported. Funds withdrawn for anything other than 'qualified expenses,' including paying for higher education, buying a residence or starting a business, will be taxed. Researchers have said the investment accounts could widen America's wealth gap. 'Under the current proposal, every child starts with the same amount, and families can contribute up to $5,000 annually,' the Urban Institute, a think-tank focused on social policy, wrote in a late May report. 'But relatively few households hold substantial liquid wealth in the United States, meaning higher-income households are far more likely than their lower-income counterparts to have the means to contribute additional funds,' it continued. The study noted that Trump accounts are likely to only benefit those who have already maxed out existing tax-preferred savings opportunities, like 529 accounts. Instead, they suggested low income families with job insecurity are more likely to gravitate towards investing in traditional accounts that offer flexible guidelines. Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' still needs approval from the upper chamber. Senators considering potential changes or cuts to the legislation, hoping to pass the bill before July 4.

Can You Still Get a COVID Vaccine This Fall? Here's What to Know
Can You Still Get a COVID Vaccine This Fall? Here's What to Know

Scientific American

time23 minutes ago

  • Scientific American

Can You Still Get a COVID Vaccine This Fall? Here's What to Know

For the first time since the COVID vaccines became available in pharmacies in 2021, the average person in the U.S. can't count on getting a free annual shot against a disease that has been the main or a contributing cause of death for more than 1.2 million people around the country, including nearly 12,000 to date this year. 'COVID's not done with us,' says Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Brown University. 'We have to keep using the tools that we have. It's not like we get to forget about COVID.' In recent weeks, the Department of Health and Human Services, led by prominent antivaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has announced a barrage of measures that are likely to reduce COVID vaccine access, leading to a swirl of confusion about what will be available for the 2025–2026 season. HHS officials did not respond to a request for comment for this article. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Government officials appear to be limiting COVID shots to people who are aged 65 and older and to those who have certain preexisting health conditions—groups that have long been known to face a higher risk of developing severe COVID. Pregnant people and some children, meanwhile, appear to be explicitly excluded from access, despite plentiful evidence that vaccines are very safe and effective for them and that COVID infections can cause them significant harm. Scientific American spoke with clinicians and public health experts about the latest COVID vaccine recommendations, what access may look like this fall and how these policies might influence people's vaccination choices and health. What COVID vaccines will be manufactured this year? Public health experts are monitoring a strain of the COVID-causing virus SARS-CoV-2 called NB.1.8.1, which was first detected early this year and last month became responsible for one in 10 COVID cases globally. So far, the new variant has mostly been reported in Asia and Europe. But it has also been picked up in airport surveillance in multiple U.S. states, says Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease physician and a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. The emergence of a new variant isn't surprising, particularly at this time of year, Chin-Hong says. 'It's kind of acting like clockwork—maybe this might be the variant of the summer,' he adds. Still, NB.1.8.1 has led to concerns about a potential surge in cases—although Chin-Hong and other scientists don't have any evidence so far that it causes more serious disease than other currently circulating strains. 'All of these new variants, they might be more transmissible, they might be more immune evasive, but I've seen no data whatsoever that suggests that they're more pathogenic,' says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan. Within the U.S., a strain called LP.8.1 has been the most common one detected since March. Both NB.1.8.1 and LP.8.1 are among the alphabet soup of strains that descended from a key ancestor lineage called Omicron JN.1, which dominated U.S. cases by early 2024. Current vaccines target this category of strains. And in May a Food and Drug Administration panel determined that, this year, vaccine producers should again tailor their shots to a single strain within the JN.1 lineage—preferably LP.8.1. What's going on with COVID vaccine policy? Strain selection aside, the recent messaging and decision-making on vaccine policy for COVID and beyond have been chaotic, with various governmental groups and officials announcing different access guidelines and restrictions. 'The situation we're in right now is nuts,' says Nuzzo, referring to the fact that agency leaders have sidestepped the formal science committees that traditionally make vaccine-related decisions. 'We don't change vaccine policy on a willy-nilly basis. There's an incredible amount of nuance, and all of the data need to be considered.' But on June 9 Kennedy took a major step against this evidence-driven decision-making process by firing the entire CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Kennedy announced the committee rehaul in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, in which he alleged there were 'persistent conflicts of interest' among committee members. According to a recent HHS statement, new committee members are under consideration, and the group will still meet as scheduled from June 25 to 27. ACIP has traditionally been particularly important because any vaccine it recommends must be fully paid for by health insurance companies—a condition that greatly determines real-world access. It's unclear what the committee's overhaul will mean for COVID vaccine access in particular. Another concern is that Kennedy announced in late April that HHS would implement a policy requiring all 'new' vaccines—including updated versions of existing ones, such as COVID shots—to be tested against a placebo. The original COVID vaccines were tested in just this manner. But conducting similar tests when an effective and very safe vaccine already exists would be not only unethical for researchers but also expensive and time-consuming for manufacturers. It remains unclear when the new policy will take effect. What does this mean for COVID vaccine access this fall? If you are 65 years old or older, you should be able to get a COVID shot as you have in recent years. If you have an underlying condition such as cancer, diabetes, or heart or lung problems, you may also be able to get a COVID shot as usual. These issues and several others are on the CDC's list of conditions that leave people more vulnerable to severe disease, and this list is included in the description of the new regulatory framework. One 2021 study looked at many (but not all) of the conditions on the list and estimated that three in four U.S. adults has at least one. People are allowed to self-disclose a preexisting condition at pharmacies without a prescription or doctor's note. That list could also be expanded later if new research finds other risk factors that increase people's risk of severe COVID, says Jacinda Abdul-Mutakabbir, a clinical pharmacist and an assistant professor at the University of California, San Diego. But there's also a chance that qualifying conditions may be reduced instead. For example, current or recent pregnancy is included in the CDC's existing list, but HHS officials announced in late May that the COVID vaccine would no longer be recommended for pregnant people. Data have shown that COVID may cause various complications during pregnancy —increasing the risk that the pregnant person may require emergency care, be put on a ventilator or die. The newborn child of an infected person is also more likely to be born preterm or to have low birth weight. And babies younger than six months old—who are ineligible for vaccination because of their immature immune system—have the highest rates COVID hospitalization after adults aged 75 and older. In contrast, evidence from people vaccinated during pregnancy show that newborns receive protective immunity through antibodies that cross the placenta and are found in breast milk, Chin-Hong explains. Healthy children also face new restrictions to COVID vaccine access: The shot is now only recommended to them based on 'shared clinical decision-making,' according to the vaccine schedules released by the CDC last month. This means parents must consult with a health practitioner about whether to vaccinate such children. Experts worry about the consequences of restricting access for kids. Children under age 18 make up a smaller percentage of COVID hospitalizations and deaths. But that doesn't mean zero risk, Chin-Hong says. 'We know that COVID still kills kids,' he says. 'No death of a child is a good death—and these are all preventable.' 'Because children and pregnant people are considered vulnerable populations, they were not included in the original studies that were done for the COVID vaccines,' Abdul-Mutakabbir says. But five years' worth of real-world vaccine data from these groups show the health benefits. 'We do see effectiveness and safety in these vaccines,' she says. It's still possible that the late June ACIP meeting will shift the landscape again. But if you want a COVID vaccine this fall and don't meet current guidelines, you may still be able to request a shot. Your insurance may not pay for it, however, leaving you to risk a price tag of around $200. 'Insurance companies or providers are only required to pay for vaccines that are listed as recommended by the CDC,' Abdul-Mutakabbir says. Full, partial or no-cost coverage for nonrecommended vaccines is at the insurance provider's discretion. Any changes to coverage—and the times at which those changes are announced—will vary among programs, including private and governmental ones, such as the federal-state program Medicaid and the federal program Medicare. Until then, Chin-Hong and Abdul-Mutakabbir say, the COVID vaccines released in the fall of 2024 are still recommended and available to people who haven't already had one. And as of April 26, only 23 percent of adults and 13 percent of children in the U.S. had received the shot. 'If you are nervous about the surge or planning summer travel, I would recommend' getting the vaccine, Abdul-Mutakabbir says. The larger fight over vaccines For Rasmussen, the confusion over COVID shots signals the beginning of a longer tug-of-war—with Kennedy's HHS on one end. 'I think I know what their plan is, and it's to reduce access to vaccines in general,' she says. 'In my view, this is an incremental step in a larger attack on vaccination in general.' She encourages people worried about vaccine restrictions—and about the role of science in making these decisions—to call their congressional legislators. 'A lot of people speaking out is what is needed right now to make a big difference here,' she says. Abdul-Mutakabbir also hopes people continue to seek vaccines for COVID and other diseases—especially while they are still easily available. 'It's important that we consider the things that we can protect ourselves against,' Abdul-Mutakabbir says. 'Should you have a barrier with getting a COVID vaccine, guess what? There's no change to the flu vaccine; there's no changes to the pneumococcal recommendations; there's no change to measles, mumps, rubella vaccine. Get the vaccines that we can get.'

New York Judge Censured After Erupting During School Board Meeting, Demanding His Son Be Named Valedictorian
New York Judge Censured After Erupting During School Board Meeting, Demanding His Son Be Named Valedictorian

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New York Judge Censured After Erupting During School Board Meeting, Demanding His Son Be Named Valedictorian

Long Beach City Court Judge Corey E. Klein was formally censured by the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct The judge, who will maintain office through 2034, was accused of using his title amid a heated exchange during a school board meeting where he complained that his son was not named valedictorian Klein now has 30 days to appeal the decisionA New York judge was censured after erupting during a school board meeting. The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct confirmed via press release on Monday, June 9 that Long Beach City Court Judge Corey E. Klein had been censured for "invoking his judicial office in a personal matter involving his son." During a local school board meeting that streamed live on YouTube on April 11, 2024, Klein took the microphone after the session was opened up to the public for questions. He announced that he wanted "to discuss the implications of this board's policies as it relates to COVID and the selection of the valedictorian." The judge proceeded to say that his son was "not selected as a valedictorian because of this board's policies," adding that they "impact[ed] one person and one person only this year, my son." Klein said that his son was a straight-A student before he was cut off. "Don't try to out-lawyer me with the law," the judge said when the superintendent asked the school district attorney if this was the right place to have Klein's conversation, per a formal written complaint reviewed by the Commission on Judicial Conduct on Feb. 20, 2025. The judge's microphone was seemingly turned off as a member of the school board spoke. However, Klein could still be heard shouting in the background. 'If you are going to try to be a lawyer, then refer to me by my title as well, okay. Thank you," Klein said. 'You can refer to me, counsel, as judge,' he also said, according to the complaint, which also noted that Klein frequently used the terms "counsel" and "counselor" to address the attorney. At one point, Klein accused the board of "[trying] to sick your pit bull attorney on me." He also said, "I'm sorry that your attorney needed to go at me when all I wanted to do was come up here and politely address one simple question." He had the floor for nearly 20 minutes. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Amid his outburst, he was told that he "had the right to appeal" the decision about his son. However, this was not the place to do so. "Don't try to shut me down," Klein said, threatening to continue speaking "all night." At one point, the attorney noted that he was "respecting" Klein and asked for the same respect in return. He also addressed Klein's repeated use of legal terminology, saying, "Your Honor, we are not in court at this point." In the commission's press release, it was noted that Klein "agreed to the censure." The release also noted that all 11 members "concurred" with the determination that was made on May 29, 2025. He was also censured for using his office to help an "acquaintance" get out of a "traffic matter." Now that the determination has been filed, Klein has 30 days to make a formal appeal. According to the New York State Commission, the judge has held office at the Long Beach City Court since 2015. He will remain a judge until the end of 2034. 'It corrodes public confidence in the judiciary when a judge lends the prestige of judicial office to advance a private benefit," Commission Administrator Robert H. Tembeckjian said, per the release. Tembeckjian continued, by adding, "Doing so impulsively, in an unseemly public argument over who should be a high school's honoree, or as a favor to a parking ticket scofflaw, is especially irresponsible." According to the Center for Judicial Ethics of the National Center for State Courts, a censure "is a formal sanction for violating the Code of Judicial Conduct." While a judge who is censured "does not require suspension or removal," the formal matter is a "stern rebuke." PEOPLE reached out to the New York State Unified Court System for comment but did not hear back at the time of publication. Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store