Texas' has the highest rate of uninsured children, and it's getting worse
HOUSTON — Almost 1 million Texas children and teens went without health insurance at some point over the most recent year recorded. Many of them live in Houston, which has a higher rate of uninsured children than any other major metropolitan area in the nation.
Overall, Texas has the worst coverage rate for kids in the country, with nearly 12% going uninsured in 2023 — up from nearly 11% in 2022.
A number of issues are driving the numbers. But the fact that many uninsured Texas children are actually eligible for public insurance exposes what experts say are alarming gaps in the state's enrollment and outreach system — gaps that can limit health-care access for low-income kids and endanger their health.
Among the issues is a backlog of thousands of families who applied for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, known as CHIP. For most of 2024, the average waiting time for a decision by the state was well over two months, which triggered a federal probe under the Biden administration. The application process remains tedious and confusing, requiring families to sometimes round up dozens of documents to prove they're eligible. Some give up.
The state has booted more than 1 million children from Medicaid since it began reviewing recipients' eligibility again in 2023 after a pause during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many were dropped not because they were ineligible, but for procedural reasons, such as their parents' failure to submit a renewal packet.
Texas lawmakers also have rejected or stalled proposals that typically help more children access CHIP or Medicaid. A 2023 state House bill would have streamlined Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for kids by relying on information already verified via other state benefit programs, such as food assistance. Despite bipartisan support, the bill failed to advance. It's been introduced again in this year's session.
Texas has shunned broad proposals enacted by other states, such as expanding Medicaid for low-income adults. Research shows Medicaid expansion has a 'welcome-mat' effect for children, with parents on Medicaid more likely to sign up their eligible kids as well.
The range of barriers mean many Texas children go without vital medical care or health screenings, health experts and advocates say.
'When kids are enrolled in Medicaid, they do have better access and better health care outcomes,' said Alec Mendoza, senior policy associate for health at Texans Care for Children.
Until recently, Houston native Maria Reyes was terrified that her 7-year-old daughter, Maya, might join the ranks of Texas' uninsured. No child should miss out on regular medical checkups, but Maya really can't.
She was born with a rare genetic condition that prevents her pancreas from properly absorbing nutrients and her bone marrow from producing enough blood cells. As a baby, she couldn't put on weight and her breathing was erratic, a symptom of rib-cage abnormalities caused by the condition, known as Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. After multiple hospitalizations, she was diagnosed at 8 months old.
Maya needs frequent care to stay healthy, including visits with a blood specialist every two months and a bone marrow biopsy every year, Reyes said.
Without Texas Medicaid coverage, which Maya has had since she was a baby, the family would be swimming in medical debt, Reyes said. Just one of her prescriptions costs about $1,500 a month.
Reyes was braced for that reality last fall when the state conducted its yearly assessment of Medicaid eligibility for Maya and her two younger siblings. She was worried that her new job as a medical assistant, making less than $20 an hour, might bump her income enough to disqualify her kids. While the family could visit a local community health center that serves the uninsured, finding affordable specialty care would be very difficult.
She spent weeks trying to prove their eligibility. 'It's like they don't believe you need it,' she said.
Maya has more complex medical needs than most kids. But research shows that going without health insurance has serious risks for all children, particularly in their early years, when their bodies are still developing and they're vulnerable to infections.
In interviews with Public Health Watch, health providers and advocates in Houston said their experiences mirror what the research already reports: Uninsured children are more likely to have unmet health-care needs. As a result, their families, who typically have low incomes, face more financial stress.
The number of Texas kids who are eligible for public insurance but not signed up is especially frustrating, advocates said. A 2023 report from Texas 2036, a public-policy nonprofit, estimated that 400,000 uninsured Texas children were eligible for Texas Medicaid or CHIP but weren't enrolled.
For Reyes, her hunch about her kids' Medicaid coverage wasn't totally off. Maya was still eligible, but to keep all three of her children covered and healthy, Reyes had to cut her work hours.
In April 2023, states began dropping people from Medicaid rolls when federal pandemic protections came to an end. Texas disenrolled 2.5 million people by September 2024 — the most of any state, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation tracker of the Medicaid 'unwinding.' A year after it began, more than 1.3 million Texas kids had lost their Medicaid coverage, most of them for procedural reasons, Texas Human Health and Services Commission reported.
While community health centers can still serve as medical homes for the uninsured, parents of uninsured kids are often less likely to bring them in for care, said Jana Eubank, executive director of the Texas Association of Community Health Centers. They are often worried about incurring unexpected bills they can't pay.
'If they need specialty care or inpatient care, they often just go without or wait until it's very serious and present at the emergency room,' she said.
Regular checkups for kids are vital. They give doctors a chance to catch developmental delays early, such as low weight gain or trouble walking and talking.
In the first two years of life, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children visit with their physicians nearly a dozen times.
Years of research show that people with health insurance, including kids, are more likely to access preventive care and receive medical treatments they need. One study, published in 2017, followed a group of 237 children in Dallas County who were eligible for Medicaid or CHIP. Researchers found that uninsured children were almost four times more likely than insured ones to have no primary care provider and three times more likely to delay or skip needed health or dental care.
With Medicaid or CHIP, families rarely have out-of-pocket costs, said pediatrician D. Maneesh Kumar, who runs a small practice in Southwest Houston. About 70% of his patients rely on public insurance. 'It's actually really good coverage,' he said.
But for uninsured kids in households with few resources, even minor medical needs — like treatment for an ear infection or head lice — can be a financial strain, said Dr. Kavon Young, chief clinical officer at El Centro de Corazón, a community health center with three clinics in East Houston. About 40% of its 5,500 pediatric patients are uninsured.
'Something very simple for a child who's insured can pose a lot of difficulty for a child who is not,' Young said.
The health center can offer families low-cost primary care for their uninsured kids, but parents have far fewer, if any, affordable options if their child needs more complex medical care.
Keren, who asked that only her first name be used, has been bringing her three young children to El Centro de Corazón for the last year. All three are uninsured, she said last fall through an interpreter, but the clinic offers a sliding-scale rate she can afford.
She said at times it can be stressful to cover the costs, especially for her children's dental work. But she said she is nervous about filling out the paperwork to apply for Medicaid or CHIP.
Providers and advocates say parents' hesitancy is one reason so many Texas children remain uninsured despite being eligible for state coverage. Some parents are confused by the application process; still others have tried and been rejected for procedural reasons.
Then there are the huge backlogs at the state level in reviewing Medicaid and CHIP applications.
One of the biggest impediments to enrolling eligible kids is the current 'political environment around immigration,' said Marcie Mir, CEO of El Centro de Corazón, referring to state and federal policies, such as Gov. Greg Abbott's 2024 order requiring public hospitals to collect information about undocumented immigrants who seek treatment.
Even if their children do qualify, many immigrant parents don't want to draw any attention from government officials, Mir said. Nearly half of Houston children are in a household with at least one immigrant parent, according to a 2023 report.
The checklist that Maricela Delcid gives parents wanting Texas Medicaid for their kids is long and tedious: Social Security cards, birth certificates, lease contracts, child support records, utility bills, bank statements and two months of detailed income verification. The paper application is 33 pages.
Delcid is team leader for benefits assistance at Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services, or ECHOS, a Houston nonprofit that helps residents apply for public programs like Medicaid. Last year, the nonprofit assisted with about 1,400 applications for Medicaid or food assistance. Many of them families with mixed eligibility status, meaning parents might not be eligible for assistance but their children are.
Delcid is well acquainted with the Texas online benefits portal. She whips around the site with her mouse and keyboard, peppering clients with questions as she helps them apply. The system is confusing to most, she said, especially those who aren't proficient in English or computer use.
The Medicaid application process confuses even medical students who visit the nonprofit to learn about challenges their clients face, said Cathy Moore, ECHOS' executive director.
'We can all hear about it, but until you see how difficult it is, you don't know,' she said.
On top of the application process, the waiting period for a decision can take many weeks longer than it should.
The bottleneck became so bad at one point that some families stopped trying, even though their kids were eligible, Delcid said.
In mid-September, the median statewide wait time for an eligibility determination for Medicaid was 83 days, state officials reported — longer than the 45-day federal limit. Delcid said that at one point last summer, the wait time reached more than 90 days. 'I'd never seen anything like that,' Moore said.
As of Jan. 31, more than 244,000 applications for Texas Medicaid or CHIP were waiting to be processed, up from nearly 132,000 in late November, said Jennifer Ruffcorn, a spokesperson for the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. Applicants were waiting an average of 54 days for an answer.
The backlog has grown even after Texas HHSC dealt with major staffing shortages. By April last year, the agency had reduced its vacancy rate for eligibility advisers to 2.5%, down from over 21% in March 2022. As of November, Ruffcorn said the vacancy rate was about 3.5%.
The long waits prompted the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, to open an investigation into the backlog last May.
At ECHOS, Delcid said wait times are back to normal — no more than 45 days. But the delays have had a lasting impact, as it's hard to convince families who got caught up in the backlog to try again, she said.
When wait times were much longer, some kids were rejected and their families told to re-apply — not because they were ineligible, but because the information they had submitted was too old to process by the time they reached the front of the line.
At that point, some families give up, believing the system doesn't work, Delcid said. 'It gets to the point that they're hopeless. It's a story we kept seeing.'
Delcid and Moore said they suspect the children who remain uninsured see a doctor only when they're sick and don't get all the preventive care experts recommend. Their families also risk being saddled with medical bills they can't afford and that Medicaid would have covered.
In a statement to Public Health Watch in November about its investigation, CMS said it 'continues to be actively engaged to bring [Texas] into alignment with federal requirements.'
Emails to CMS earlier this month about the probe's status went unanswered. Ruffcorn at Texas HHSC confirmed the review was still ongoing.
When Congress reauthorized CHIP in 2009, it included a new option for states — "express lane eligibility' — that made it easier for eligible kids to get covered. But first state lawmakers had to adopt it.
In Texas, State Rep. John Bucy III, an Austin Democrat, sponsored a bill to create an express lane in the 2023 legislative session.
The bill passed the House with bipartisan support. It was even endorsed by leading conservative groups such as the Texas Public Policy Foundation, an opponent of Medicaid expansion. But it died in the state Senate, where it never got a hearing.
'Increasing access [to health coverage] is such an uphill fight here,' said Bucy, who has introduced the bill again in the current session.
As of 2021, seven states had an express lane for children's Medicaid; two had it for Medicaid and CHIP. The idea is that states use the information that families submit for other safety-net programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, to determine kids' eligibility for Medicaid or CHIP.
Bucy's bill requires parents' permission before an eligible child is enrolled in Medicaid. But families wouldn't have to endure another application process. Bucy said an express lane could reach hundreds of thousands of uninsured Texas kids who are eligible but unenrolled.
Research shows express lane laws for children have yielded significant coverage gains and administrative cost savings for states.
Alabama started express-lane eligibility in 2010 and has experienced such results, said pediatrician Marsha Raulerson, who is on the state's medical advisory committee for Medicaid. 'It's rare a child doesn't have access to health insurance here,' she said.
While Alabama has one of the country's worst child poverty rates, just under 4% of children there are uninsured — about a third of the Texas rate.
In Texas, newer technology and more eligibility workers would help fix the state's enrollment problems, the Texas HHSC said. In its 2026-2027 appropriations request, the agency wrote that without more funding, wait times for Medicaid applicants will 'continue to fluctuate' and Texas will be unable to fully comply with the 45-day federal standard.
State lawmakers have responded with budget bills in the Texas House and Senate that include the $300 million that HHSC requested to meet federal waiting-time rules, said Mendoza at Texans Care for Children. If approved, he said the funding would help Texas Medicaid streamline its enrollment process.
But in Congress, Republican proposals to cut federal Medicaid funding could dampen efforts to insure more low-income kids.
Children face the brunt of such cuts, said Edwin Park, a Medicaid researcher at Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. As of October 2024, about 75% of Texas Medicaid's 3.8 million enrollees were kids.
'In Texas, it's mostly kids, seniors and people with disabilities on Medicaid,' Park said. 'That's where the cuts would hit. There isn't anywhere else.'
Most of the people who rely on Hope Clinic, a community health center with five clinics in Houston, are immigrants and refugees. Its patients speak more than 30 languages.
Dr. Andrea Caracostis, the clinic's CEO, said its staff is well versed in helping parents overcome application obstacles to Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for their kids. In Texas, children who are lawfully in the country are eligible for the programs.
But misinformed fears that applying will hurt a family's immigration status persist and are a major reason children remain uninsured, Caracostis said.
'I have patients that I beg — I say 'Please get on Medicaid. You have a complicated pregnancy, anything can happen, you're going to rack up debt,'' Caracostis said. 'And they won't … They're afraid of being perceived as a public charge.'
Under federal law, people deemed likely to become dependent on public assistance can be denied lawful permanent residence.
The policy doesn't include Medicaid, but that changed under the first Trump administration. Biden rescinded the change, but policy experts expect it to return during Trump's second term.
While Trump's public charge change never applied to children, Caracostis said many parents remain confused and afraid to enroll anyone in the family.
According to Every Texan, fears about accessing public services in immigrant communities was likely the main reason for a 237,000 decline in children in Texas Medicaid and CHIP from December 2017 to February 2020.
Caracostis expects those fears to roar back. 'There are lives at stake,' she said.
This story is part of 'Uninsured in America,' a project led by Public Health Watch that focuses on life in America's health coverage gap and the 10 states that haven't expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Public Health Watch is a nonprofit, investigative news organization based in Texas.
Disclosure: Texans Care for Children, Texas 2036, Texas Association of Community Health Centers and Texas Public Policy Foundation have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask
ALBANY – State Republican lawmakers offered advice to their congressional counterparts ahead of Gov. Kathy Hochul testimony on Thursday over sanctuary policies – outlining a list of questions to fling at the Democrat. The GOP legislators sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer ahead of Hochul's trip to Washington, DC where she'll be grilled by a congressional panel on the Empire State's sanctuary laws. 'Governor Hochul's sanctuary state policies have played a direct role in the ongoing migrant crisis throughout our state, despite bipartisan concern including repeated warnings from New York City Mayor Eric Adams,' Assemblyman Michael Tannousis (R-Staten Island) wrote in the letter, cosigned by various other New York GOP lawmakers. Advertisement 'We believe that Governor Hochul must be held accountable for her failure to reverse the state's sanctuary policies and recklessness with taxpayer dollars,' Tannousis continued. Gov. Kathy Hochul is set to testify on capitol hill Thursday on New York's sanctuary city laws and its handling of the influx of migrants. Hochul is voluntarily appearing before the House committee on Capitol Hill and will testify alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. Advertisement In their letter, the Republican state lawmakers ask the House Republicans to ask Hochul to outline: Why New York continued to accept migrants during the height of the crisis The vetting process for migrants and concerns about public safety A shady $432 million no-bid contract awarded to DocGo to help mitigate the crisis Her justification for roughly $4 billion the state has spent dealing with migrants Why some municipalities weren't reimbursed with costs associated with the migrants Tannousis said he wants the House Oversight committee to follow through after Hochul's testimony to deliver 'accountability.' The governor has tried to navigate a vague middle ground when it comes to the state's sanctuary policy, which is still based on a 2017 executive order issued by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo who is now running for mayor of New York City. Advertisement Assemblyman Michael Tannousis and other Albany Republicans wrote a letter to the House panel suggesting areas where they should hammer Hochul. Michael McWeeney Hochul had promised specifics and clarity over her guidance on how New York would work with federal immigration authorities. Instead, her office only provided a list of four broad categories of situations that would trigger state law enforcement to work with the feds, such as if ICE has a judicial warrant or when relevant to investigating another crime committed in New York. Hochul had previously said she was 'happy to go down' to DC for the hearing. 'I'll tell them our policy in the state of New York is not to use state resources, our state police, to enforce the civil infractions,' Hochul said earlier this year.


New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand
The Democratic Party has never been more unpopular — yet no Democrat seems to understand why. Some say they're not fighting President Donald Trump hard enough. Others say they aren't messaging their agenda well enough. In reality, they're fighting too hard for an agenda that Americans reject, with a central demand of welfare for all. Thirty-two years after President Bill Clinton promised to 'end welfare as we know it,' no idea unifies the Democratic Party more than the belief that welfare should be never-ending. This vision of government dependency spurred their most notable policies of recent years, and explains their intransigent opposition to Republican reforms. While some Democrats show an increasing willingness to compromise on other leftist priorities, such as biological men in women's sports, the party brooks no dissent on welfare — even though Americans want to fix the system's many failures. Consider the ongoing federal budget battle. House Republicans have put together a reconciliation bill that would slow the rate of Medicaid growth — from a projected 59.6% increase to 40% — over the next decade. Democrats oppose even that, including GOP attempts to end waste, fraud and abuse. Yet the latest federal data show that 22% of Medicaid payments and 12% of food-stamp payments went to ineligible recipients. More than 70% of likely voters want to protect taxpayers from fraud and abuse, polls show, yet Democrats essentially deny there's a problem that needs to be solved. In fact, when the Trump administration proposed a rule in March to end $11 billion in improper ObamaCare subsidies — aiming solely to curtail fraud — Democrats immediately opposed it. Democrats are just as adamant when it comes to work requirements for welfare recipients. My organization, the Foundation for Government Accountability, recently found that six in 10 able-bodied adults on Medicaid don't work at all, hoovering up resources that would benefit the truly vulnerable. When voters in purple Wisconsin were asked two years ago if welfare recipients should work as a condition of receiving benefits, nearly 80% said yes — but national Democrats now say no. They also reject Republican attempts to block Medicaid payments for illegal immigrants, which would save billions of dollars over the next decade. More than 70% of voters don't want illegal immigrants to receive government benefits, yet Democrats bizarrely disagree. But it's not just Congress; Democrats are striking the same strange tune in state capitols. Over the past 10 years, virtually all Republican-led states have taken steps to purge waste, fraud and abuse from welfare programs. By contrast, Democrat-run states have expanded illegal immigrants' access to Medicaid and pushed able-bodied adults onto welfare programs. In recent months, Democratic governors in Kansas and Arizona have vetoed Republican bills that would ban food-stamp purchases of soda and junk food — a reform that could lower state and federal Medicaid spending and encourage healthier choices. Democrats have a long history of supporting restrictions on consumers' options, but as soon as welfare enters the picture, they oppose it. Apparently limiting freedom is fine by them, but limiting federal welfare is unthinkable. The left's unwillingness to support even modest welfare reforms reflects the reality that government dependency is the biggest thing Democrats now offer Americans — even beyond limitless immigration and the Green New Deal. The Affordable Care Act, the central achievement of Barack Obama's presidency, dramatically expanded Medicaid while creating a new welfare system for the individual health-insurance market. Joe Biden enacted a work-destroying child tax credit and sought perpetual expansions of Medicaid and food stamps under the guise of pandemic relief. A slew of Biden regulations made it easier for people to abuse the taxpayer's generosity, from Medicaid to food stamps to free school lunches for rich kids. Democrats' end goal is clear: Get every American on the dole. Yet insisting that government dependency is always the answer means Democrats can't publicly admit that seemingly infinite welfare has any shortcomings. In fact, the left's agenda of welfare-for-all is profoundly harmful, and voters know it. Democrats have built a welfare system that taxpayers can't afford while pushing millions of people out of the workforce — a dual assault on the economic growth. They've left fewer resources for disabled children and the elderly by prioritizing able-bodied adults and illegal immigrants. And they're corrupting the foundational American belief that welfare is temporary assistance whose recipients should work to get back on their feet. No wonder Democrats are so unpopular: They're fleecing taxpayers, crippling the economy, hurting the truly needy and giving handouts to those who don't deserve them — none of which has Americans' support. The first Democrat who wakes up on welfare will be the hero their party desperately needs. Hayden Dublois is data and analytics director at the Foundation for Government Accountability.


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Kennedy names new members of CDC vaccine advisory panel days after removing previous advisers
Vaccines Federal agencies Respiratory virusesFacebookTweetLink Follow Just two days after retiring the entirety of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory panel, US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has appointed several prominent critics of the government's Covid-19 response to that committee. He announced eight new members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, on Wednesday. Kennedy had said Monday that the previous 17-member panel that makes recommendations on who should get vaccines and when was rife with conflicts of interest and that he would appoint new 'highly credentialed' experts in time for the panel's June 25 meeting, at which the members are expected to discuss guidance for Covid-19 and HPV shots, among others. In a statement Wednesday, Kennedy said the reassembled panel will demand 'definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations, but will also review data for the current vaccine schedule as well.' The eight new ACIP members include Dr. Robert Malone, a biochemist who made early innovations in the field of messenger RNA but in more recent years has been a vocal critic of mRNA technology in Covid-19 vaccines. The CDC recently narrowed its recommendations for mRNA Covid-19 shots, but some advocates in the Make America Healthy Again space have pressed Kennedy to go further and bar the vaccines entirely. Another new member is Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who co-authored an October 2020 strategy on herd immunity known as the Great Barrington Declaration with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, now director of the US National Institutes of Health. Both Malone's and Kulldorff's names were circulated early in the second Trump administration as potential advisers on ACIP or other panels, according to a person familiar with the process who requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak with CNN. Kennedy also chose Dr. James Pagano, an emergency medicine physician he described as a 'strong advocate for evidence-based medicine' who has served on hospital committees and medical executive boards. Dr. Retsef Levi, an MIT professor who has published studies on mRNA vaccines and cardiovascular events, is also joining the panel. Levi is a professor of operations management. Several of the new members have served in federal health agencies previously, including Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, a former acting chief of the NIH's section on nutritional neurosciences. Dr. Cody Meissner, a Dartmouth professor of pediatrics who also signed the Great Barrington Declaration, has previously served on ACIP and on the US Food and Drug Administration's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. Dr. Vicky Pebsworth, the Pacific region director of the National Association of Catholic Nurses, also served on the FDA committee and on a national panel reviewing the 2009 H1N1 swine flu vaccine. Dr. Michael Ross, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at George Washington University and Virginia Commonwealth University, has previously served on the CDC's Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Breast and Cervical Cancer. Kennedy also nodded in his statement to Ross' 'continued service on biotech and healthcare boards.' The private equity company Havencrest, in which Ross is an operating partner, describes him on its site as a 'serial CEO' who has served on the boards of several biotechnology companies.