logo
Texas' has the highest rate of uninsured children, and it's getting worse

Texas' has the highest rate of uninsured children, and it's getting worse

Yahoo26-02-2025

HOUSTON — Almost 1 million Texas children and teens went without health insurance at some point over the most recent year recorded. Many of them live in Houston, which has a higher rate of uninsured children than any other major metropolitan area in the nation.
Overall, Texas has the worst coverage rate for kids in the country, with nearly 12% going uninsured in 2023 — up from nearly 11% in 2022.
A number of issues are driving the numbers. But the fact that many uninsured Texas children are actually eligible for public insurance exposes what experts say are alarming gaps in the state's enrollment and outreach system — gaps that can limit health-care access for low-income kids and endanger their health.
Among the issues is a backlog of thousands of families who applied for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, known as CHIP. For most of 2024, the average waiting time for a decision by the state was well over two months, which triggered a federal probe under the Biden administration. The application process remains tedious and confusing, requiring families to sometimes round up dozens of documents to prove they're eligible. Some give up.
The state has booted more than 1 million children from Medicaid since it began reviewing recipients' eligibility again in 2023 after a pause during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many were dropped not because they were ineligible, but for procedural reasons, such as their parents' failure to submit a renewal packet.
Texas lawmakers also have rejected or stalled proposals that typically help more children access CHIP or Medicaid. A 2023 state House bill would have streamlined Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for kids by relying on information already verified via other state benefit programs, such as food assistance. Despite bipartisan support, the bill failed to advance. It's been introduced again in this year's session.
Texas has shunned broad proposals enacted by other states, such as expanding Medicaid for low-income adults. Research shows Medicaid expansion has a 'welcome-mat' effect for children, with parents on Medicaid more likely to sign up their eligible kids as well.
The range of barriers mean many Texas children go without vital medical care or health screenings, health experts and advocates say.
'When kids are enrolled in Medicaid, they do have better access and better health care outcomes,' said Alec Mendoza, senior policy associate for health at Texans Care for Children.
Until recently, Houston native Maria Reyes was terrified that her 7-year-old daughter, Maya, might join the ranks of Texas' uninsured. No child should miss out on regular medical checkups, but Maya really can't.
She was born with a rare genetic condition that prevents her pancreas from properly absorbing nutrients and her bone marrow from producing enough blood cells. As a baby, she couldn't put on weight and her breathing was erratic, a symptom of rib-cage abnormalities caused by the condition, known as Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. After multiple hospitalizations, she was diagnosed at 8 months old.
Maya needs frequent care to stay healthy, including visits with a blood specialist every two months and a bone marrow biopsy every year, Reyes said.
Without Texas Medicaid coverage, which Maya has had since she was a baby, the family would be swimming in medical debt, Reyes said. Just one of her prescriptions costs about $1,500 a month.
Reyes was braced for that reality last fall when the state conducted its yearly assessment of Medicaid eligibility for Maya and her two younger siblings. She was worried that her new job as a medical assistant, making less than $20 an hour, might bump her income enough to disqualify her kids. While the family could visit a local community health center that serves the uninsured, finding affordable specialty care would be very difficult.
She spent weeks trying to prove their eligibility. 'It's like they don't believe you need it,' she said.
Maya has more complex medical needs than most kids. But research shows that going without health insurance has serious risks for all children, particularly in their early years, when their bodies are still developing and they're vulnerable to infections.
In interviews with Public Health Watch, health providers and advocates in Houston said their experiences mirror what the research already reports: Uninsured children are more likely to have unmet health-care needs. As a result, their families, who typically have low incomes, face more financial stress.
The number of Texas kids who are eligible for public insurance but not signed up is especially frustrating, advocates said. A 2023 report from Texas 2036, a public-policy nonprofit, estimated that 400,000 uninsured Texas children were eligible for Texas Medicaid or CHIP but weren't enrolled.
For Reyes, her hunch about her kids' Medicaid coverage wasn't totally off. Maya was still eligible, but to keep all three of her children covered and healthy, Reyes had to cut her work hours.
In April 2023, states began dropping people from Medicaid rolls when federal pandemic protections came to an end. Texas disenrolled 2.5 million people by September 2024 — the most of any state, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation tracker of the Medicaid 'unwinding.' A year after it began, more than 1.3 million Texas kids had lost their Medicaid coverage, most of them for procedural reasons, Texas Human Health and Services Commission reported.
While community health centers can still serve as medical homes for the uninsured, parents of uninsured kids are often less likely to bring them in for care, said Jana Eubank, executive director of the Texas Association of Community Health Centers. They are often worried about incurring unexpected bills they can't pay.
'If they need specialty care or inpatient care, they often just go without or wait until it's very serious and present at the emergency room,' she said.
Regular checkups for kids are vital. They give doctors a chance to catch developmental delays early, such as low weight gain or trouble walking and talking.
In the first two years of life, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children visit with their physicians nearly a dozen times.
Years of research show that people with health insurance, including kids, are more likely to access preventive care and receive medical treatments they need. One study, published in 2017, followed a group of 237 children in Dallas County who were eligible for Medicaid or CHIP. Researchers found that uninsured children were almost four times more likely than insured ones to have no primary care provider and three times more likely to delay or skip needed health or dental care.
With Medicaid or CHIP, families rarely have out-of-pocket costs, said pediatrician D. Maneesh Kumar, who runs a small practice in Southwest Houston. About 70% of his patients rely on public insurance. 'It's actually really good coverage,' he said.
But for uninsured kids in households with few resources, even minor medical needs — like treatment for an ear infection or head lice — can be a financial strain, said Dr. Kavon Young, chief clinical officer at El Centro de Corazón, a community health center with three clinics in East Houston. About 40% of its 5,500 pediatric patients are uninsured.
'Something very simple for a child who's insured can pose a lot of difficulty for a child who is not,' Young said.
The health center can offer families low-cost primary care for their uninsured kids, but parents have far fewer, if any, affordable options if their child needs more complex medical care.
Keren, who asked that only her first name be used, has been bringing her three young children to El Centro de Corazón for the last year. All three are uninsured, she said last fall through an interpreter, but the clinic offers a sliding-scale rate she can afford.
She said at times it can be stressful to cover the costs, especially for her children's dental work. But she said she is nervous about filling out the paperwork to apply for Medicaid or CHIP.
Providers and advocates say parents' hesitancy is one reason so many Texas children remain uninsured despite being eligible for state coverage. Some parents are confused by the application process; still others have tried and been rejected for procedural reasons.
Then there are the huge backlogs at the state level in reviewing Medicaid and CHIP applications.
One of the biggest impediments to enrolling eligible kids is the current 'political environment around immigration,' said Marcie Mir, CEO of El Centro de Corazón, referring to state and federal policies, such as Gov. Greg Abbott's 2024 order requiring public hospitals to collect information about undocumented immigrants who seek treatment.
Even if their children do qualify, many immigrant parents don't want to draw any attention from government officials, Mir said. Nearly half of Houston children are in a household with at least one immigrant parent, according to a 2023 report.
The checklist that Maricela Delcid gives parents wanting Texas Medicaid for their kids is long and tedious: Social Security cards, birth certificates, lease contracts, child support records, utility bills, bank statements and two months of detailed income verification. The paper application is 33 pages.
Delcid is team leader for benefits assistance at Epiphany Community Health Outreach Services, or ECHOS, a Houston nonprofit that helps residents apply for public programs like Medicaid. Last year, the nonprofit assisted with about 1,400 applications for Medicaid or food assistance. Many of them families with mixed eligibility status, meaning parents might not be eligible for assistance but their children are.
Delcid is well acquainted with the Texas online benefits portal. She whips around the site with her mouse and keyboard, peppering clients with questions as she helps them apply. The system is confusing to most, she said, especially those who aren't proficient in English or computer use.
The Medicaid application process confuses even medical students who visit the nonprofit to learn about challenges their clients face, said Cathy Moore, ECHOS' executive director.
'We can all hear about it, but until you see how difficult it is, you don't know,' she said.
On top of the application process, the waiting period for a decision can take many weeks longer than it should.
The bottleneck became so bad at one point that some families stopped trying, even though their kids were eligible, Delcid said.
In mid-September, the median statewide wait time for an eligibility determination for Medicaid was 83 days, state officials reported — longer than the 45-day federal limit. Delcid said that at one point last summer, the wait time reached more than 90 days. 'I'd never seen anything like that,' Moore said.
As of Jan. 31, more than 244,000 applications for Texas Medicaid or CHIP were waiting to be processed, up from nearly 132,000 in late November, said Jennifer Ruffcorn, a spokesperson for the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. Applicants were waiting an average of 54 days for an answer.
The backlog has grown even after Texas HHSC dealt with major staffing shortages. By April last year, the agency had reduced its vacancy rate for eligibility advisers to 2.5%, down from over 21% in March 2022. As of November, Ruffcorn said the vacancy rate was about 3.5%.
The long waits prompted the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, to open an investigation into the backlog last May.
At ECHOS, Delcid said wait times are back to normal — no more than 45 days. But the delays have had a lasting impact, as it's hard to convince families who got caught up in the backlog to try again, she said.
When wait times were much longer, some kids were rejected and their families told to re-apply — not because they were ineligible, but because the information they had submitted was too old to process by the time they reached the front of the line.
At that point, some families give up, believing the system doesn't work, Delcid said. 'It gets to the point that they're hopeless. It's a story we kept seeing.'
Delcid and Moore said they suspect the children who remain uninsured see a doctor only when they're sick and don't get all the preventive care experts recommend. Their families also risk being saddled with medical bills they can't afford and that Medicaid would have covered.
In a statement to Public Health Watch in November about its investigation, CMS said it 'continues to be actively engaged to bring [Texas] into alignment with federal requirements.'
Emails to CMS earlier this month about the probe's status went unanswered. Ruffcorn at Texas HHSC confirmed the review was still ongoing.
When Congress reauthorized CHIP in 2009, it included a new option for states — "express lane eligibility' — that made it easier for eligible kids to get covered. But first state lawmakers had to adopt it.
In Texas, State Rep. John Bucy III, an Austin Democrat, sponsored a bill to create an express lane in the 2023 legislative session.
The bill passed the House with bipartisan support. It was even endorsed by leading conservative groups such as the Texas Public Policy Foundation, an opponent of Medicaid expansion. But it died in the state Senate, where it never got a hearing.
'Increasing access [to health coverage] is such an uphill fight here,' said Bucy, who has introduced the bill again in the current session.
As of 2021, seven states had an express lane for children's Medicaid; two had it for Medicaid and CHIP. The idea is that states use the information that families submit for other safety-net programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, to determine kids' eligibility for Medicaid or CHIP.
Bucy's bill requires parents' permission before an eligible child is enrolled in Medicaid. But families wouldn't have to endure another application process. Bucy said an express lane could reach hundreds of thousands of uninsured Texas kids who are eligible but unenrolled.
Research shows express lane laws for children have yielded significant coverage gains and administrative cost savings for states.
Alabama started express-lane eligibility in 2010 and has experienced such results, said pediatrician Marsha Raulerson, who is on the state's medical advisory committee for Medicaid. 'It's rare a child doesn't have access to health insurance here,' she said.
While Alabama has one of the country's worst child poverty rates, just under 4% of children there are uninsured — about a third of the Texas rate.
In Texas, newer technology and more eligibility workers would help fix the state's enrollment problems, the Texas HHSC said. In its 2026-2027 appropriations request, the agency wrote that without more funding, wait times for Medicaid applicants will 'continue to fluctuate' and Texas will be unable to fully comply with the 45-day federal standard.
State lawmakers have responded with budget bills in the Texas House and Senate that include the $300 million that HHSC requested to meet federal waiting-time rules, said Mendoza at Texans Care for Children. If approved, he said the funding would help Texas Medicaid streamline its enrollment process.
But in Congress, Republican proposals to cut federal Medicaid funding could dampen efforts to insure more low-income kids.
Children face the brunt of such cuts, said Edwin Park, a Medicaid researcher at Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. As of October 2024, about 75% of Texas Medicaid's 3.8 million enrollees were kids.
'In Texas, it's mostly kids, seniors and people with disabilities on Medicaid,' Park said. 'That's where the cuts would hit. There isn't anywhere else.'
Most of the people who rely on Hope Clinic, a community health center with five clinics in Houston, are immigrants and refugees. Its patients speak more than 30 languages.
Dr. Andrea Caracostis, the clinic's CEO, said its staff is well versed in helping parents overcome application obstacles to Medicaid and CHIP enrollment for their kids. In Texas, children who are lawfully in the country are eligible for the programs.
But misinformed fears that applying will hurt a family's immigration status persist and are a major reason children remain uninsured, Caracostis said.
'I have patients that I beg — I say 'Please get on Medicaid. You have a complicated pregnancy, anything can happen, you're going to rack up debt,'' Caracostis said. 'And they won't … They're afraid of being perceived as a public charge.'
Under federal law, people deemed likely to become dependent on public assistance can be denied lawful permanent residence.
The policy doesn't include Medicaid, but that changed under the first Trump administration. Biden rescinded the change, but policy experts expect it to return during Trump's second term.
While Trump's public charge change never applied to children, Caracostis said many parents remain confused and afraid to enroll anyone in the family.
According to Every Texan, fears about accessing public services in immigrant communities was likely the main reason for a 237,000 decline in children in Texas Medicaid and CHIP from December 2017 to February 2020.
Caracostis expects those fears to roar back. 'There are lives at stake,' she said.
This story is part of 'Uninsured in America,' a project led by Public Health Watch that focuses on life in America's health coverage gap and the 10 states that haven't expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Public Health Watch is a nonprofit, investigative news organization based in Texas.
Disclosure: Texans Care for Children, Texas 2036, Texas Association of Community Health Centers and Texas Public Policy Foundation have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"

CBS News

time6 minutes ago

  • CBS News

GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"

Washington — The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are urging lawmakers to quickly get behind the centerpiece of President Trump's legislative agenda, saying the ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles adds urgency to the push to secure additional resources for border security. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on X on Monday that the legislation, which addresses Mr. Trump's tax, energy and immigration priorities, "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation[']s borders." Republicans call the legislation the "one big, beautiful bill." "The lawlessness happening in LA is ANOTHER reason why we need to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill IMMEDIATELY," Johnson said, pledging that Congress will support Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who he said are "fighting to keep Americans safe against illegal aliens AND the radical left." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt shared a similar message earlier Monday, saying the scenes unfolding in some areas of Los Angeles "prove that we desperately need more immigration enforcement personnel and resources." "America must reverse the invasion unleashed by Joe Biden of millions of unvetted illegal aliens into our country," Leavitt said in a post on X. "That's why President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill funds at least one million annual removals and hires 10,000 new ICE personnel, 5,000 new customs officers, and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents." Speaker of the House Mike Johnson holds a press conference after the House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025, in Washington, legislation is now in the hands of the Senate after the House narrowly approved it last month following weeks of intraparty disagreement over its components. Though the bulk of the funding allocated in the legislation goes toward tax cuts, it also includes resources aimed at bolstering border security and defense. It provides $46.5 billion for the border wall, $4.1 billion to hire Border Patrol agents and other personnel and more than $2 billion for signing and retention bonuses for agents. It also imposes an additional $1,000 fee for people who are filing for asylum in the U.S. The disagreement among Republicans over the bill has largely centered on cuts meant to offset the bill's spending, including restrictions to Medicaid. In the House's razor-thin GOP majority, the disagreements threatened to tank the bill's progress at every stage. And as the bill moved to the Senate for consideration last week, Johnson warned the upper chamber against making significant changes that would throw off the delicate balance. Senate Republicans initially voiced support for separating the complicated tax components and border security provisions into two separate bills to deliver Mr. Trump a victory on immigration early on in his tenure. But House Republicans opposed the approach, expressing doubts that the president's agenda could pass through the narrow GOP majority in the lower chamber in separate parts. Senate Republicans are now seeking to amend the House-passed bill, sending it back to the House for approval with a goal of getting the legislation to the president's desk by the July 4 holiday. And with a 53-seat majority, the upper chamber can afford to lose just three Republicans. Last week, opposition from Elon Musk threatened to throw a wrench into the legislation's progress, after he stoked concerns by fiscal hawks about the bill's impact on the deficit. The episode, which began with Musk calling the bill "a disgusting abomination," erupted into a dramatic and public feud between Musk and the president last week. But the dispute did not appear to spark significant new opposition the the bill in Congress. The urgency expressed Monday surrounding securing additional border resources comes as Mr. Trump called for the National Guard to enforce order in the L.A. area amid protests over activity by ICE, prompting a clash with California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom warned that the move would inflame the situation, while urging that there is no shortage of law enforcement. The governor indicated late Sunday that his office plans to sue the Trump administration over Mr. Trump's move. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the president's move on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" Sunday, claiming Newsom "has proven that he makes bad decisions." "The president knows that [Newsom] makes bad decisions, and that's why the president chose the safety of this community over waiting for Gov. Newsom to get some sanity," Noem added.

Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline
Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline

A privately owned company is proposing a pipeline across five states. While some of the state governments appear to be on board, the project is facing backlash from a large and formidable population: property owners. The pipeline, known as Summit Carbon Solutions, would span 2,500 miles and transport carbon dioxide (CO2) captured at 57 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and the Dakotas to a permanent underground storage site in North Dakota. Construction of the $9 billion pipeline is expected to begin this year, with operations kicking off in 2026. In June 2024, the project received regulatory approval from the Iowa Utilities Commission, despite landowner protests. Julie Glade and her husband, Paul, are Iowans who oppose the project because of its use of eminent domain. Their property aligns with the proposed route, and in 2022 the couple was visited by a land agent. "The guy who came to our door wanted us to sit down and sign it without reading it," Glade tells Reason. "They swooped in and tried to contact as many people as possible right away before the people knew what the consequences were. It's very unethical." Several other landowners in the state share the Glades' worries. During a hearing conducted by the Iowa Utility Commission, landowner Joan Gaul testified against the pipeline, which she said would cross a large portion of her farmland. Gaul said Summit Carbon Solutions mailed two easements, which would give the pipeline a legal right to her land, to her without notice. "This letter came telling us about taking our land using eminent domain. It was a difficult pill to swallow," she said. Gaul said she didn't accept the easements and has indicated that she will continue to fight the project. The Glades visit the Iowa Capitol nearly every week to voice their opposition to the pipeline. They are joined by what the couple calls a diverse coalition united by their concern for the basic constitutional right to land ownership. "We have MAGA Republicans and we have lefties. We put our differences aside and we work together," she says. The Glades' efforts could soon pay off. In May the state Senate passed House File 639, which would prevent CO2 pipelines from using eminent domain unless the company proves the pipeline meets the definition of public use. The bill would also prevent CO2 pipelines from operating longer than 25 years. The bill is awaiting the signature of Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds, who is reportedly weighing opinions from pipeline supporters and detractors. If passed, the bill would represent a significant win for the rights of Iowa property owners. It would also be the latest setback for the Summit Carbon Solutions project. After the company launched a blitz of eminent domain lawsuits in South Dakota, Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed a bill into law in March preventing carbon dioxide pipelines from receiving eminent domain permission in the state. The post Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline appeared first on

Opinion - Democrats are looking for answers — outside Washington
Opinion - Democrats are looking for answers — outside Washington

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Democrats are looking for answers — outside Washington

On the campaign trail, President Trump made a lot of promises. He promised to strengthen our economy. He promised to make our government more efficient. He promised to bring down costs. But after more than 100 days in, our economy is not strengthened, our government is certainly not more efficient, and costs are not down. The president has entangled us in trade wars with some of our closest trading partners — wars that erased $10 trillion from the stock market this spring and threaten to decimate family farms in my district and across the country. And with the help of the Department of Government Efficiency, he has waged an all-out assault on the federal government in an effort to weed out 'waste, fraud, and abuse.' I believe the American people elected Trump because they wanted solutions to pocketbook issues and a government that took action to get things done. But the president's agenda isn't working, and Democrats need to deliver. That's where the New Dem Coalition comes in. Before I explain why, I want to acknowledge that Democrats haven't always gotten everything right. During the election, we saw many working class voters drift away from the party. At times, our emphasis on identity politics or concepts like 'saving democracy' — while undeniably important — overshadowed the core economic issues that affect people's everyday lives. Instead of meeting voters where they are, we sometimes come across as telling them where they should be. That approach can feel out of touch and give the impression that the party is elitist, disconnected from the realities of everyday people. Working class voters are focused on how they'll afford their mortgage, put food on the table, or save for their kids' college — not necessarily on abstract debates about the soul of the nation. Don't get me wrong: the threat to democracy is real and urgent, especially with a president who shows little respect for courts or the Constitution. But if we're truly going to save democracy, we must build a broader coalition and bring more voters along. That means meeting people where they are, rather than telling them what should matter most. We need to address the tangible, kitchen-table issues that keep folks up at night. The New Dem Coalition has always done this. We have prioritized the needs of hard working Americans over the politics of D.C. We understand that we should be finding ways to make our government more efficient. We understand that we have to work across the aisle when we can — without compromising our values. That's why New Dems are crafting a proactive agenda — not only to win the House majority in 2026, but to maintain it for the long term. So, we're getting out of the D.C. bubble for a new series known as 'New Dems On the Road.' We'll be engaging with communities across the country, and gathering the critical feedback we need to guide our work. We're tackling every issue — from improving education outcomes to bolstering our national security — and working to find practical, lasting solutions that reflect the values and priorities of the American people. For our first stop, we zeroed in on immigration. Immigration isn't a problem we're going to solve overnight, but it's one that is consistently top of mind for the American people. We've come close to bipartisan solutions, only for selfish interests to squash our efforts in the 11th hour. That's why New Dem Immigration and Border Security Working Group members Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.) and Lou Correa (D-Calif.) sat down with Arizona leaders to talk about immigration. They met with industry and union representatives, members of the Arizona business community, and DACA recipients to discuss the importance of immigrants to Arizona's economy. The panel addressed the need to secure our border and pass a long-lasting immigration reform policy. It was instructive. And it showed the folks in these communities that we are listening to them. We know we don't have it all figured out — that's why we need real, local voices to help guide our work. Voices on the ground who are living and breathing these problems every single day. Then, it was my turn. I joined my friends Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) and Wesley Bell (D-Mo.) for a conversation around clean energy and potential opportunities for bipartisan cooperation. We discussed the actions the Trump administration has taken to gut clean energy tax credits. There is no way around it — this is going to have a negative impact on people's utility bills. They will feel this. We also discussed what's ahead — like permitting reform, carbon capture and ultimately ways we can lower costs for people trying to keep the lights on, not raise them. Last month, Reps. Sarah McBride (D-Del.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) got together to talk one-on-one with Delawareans about paid family and medical leave for working families. This is just the beginning. In total, we'll be conducting at least nine New Dems On the Road events — across the country. We need to come together, share ideas and forge a new path forward. A path that can address the issues that demand our attention: whether it's a single mom struggling to afford child care, a farmer looking to break into new markets, or a family who wants a good, public school education for their kids. We should all be committed to finding effective ways to achieve our shared goals and ensure that the government serves the people better. This isn't a partisan objective; it's a matter of common sense. However, real progress requires thoughtful strategy and careful action, not reckless cuts. Simply slashing budgets without consideration doesn't eliminate waste — it erodes the very foundation of what our government is meant to do: serve its citizens. New Democrats understand this deeply. We recognize that this moment calls for a meaningful response and an agenda that inspires — not the status quo. Our communities have elected us to take action, to solve problems and to improve lives. Now, more than ever, Democrats need to prove we can deliver Nikki Budzinski represents the 13th District of Illinois and is vice chair for policy for the New Dem Coalition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store