Suburban mayors welcome Bill 104 changes
Montreal Politics
By
Mayors of the Montreal agglomeration's 15 independent municipalities welcomed proposed changes that are part of Bill 104, introduced this week in the National Assembly.
In a statement emailed to The Gazette, the Association of Suburban Mayors welcomed the bill, which reduced the city of Montreal's overall weight in the Montreal Metropolitan Community, while retaining a tiebreaker vote.
'This long-awaited reform responds to a recurring demand from suburban municipalities for more equitable and democratic metropolitan governance,' the statement read. 'For several years now, the ASM has been leading a sustained battle to ensure that municipalities can participate equitably in decisions affecting the metropolitan region. Until now, the status quo favoured an excessive concentration of power in the hands of the City of Montreal, to the detriment of other municipalities' voices.'
Association co-president Alex Bottausci, mayor of Dollard-des-Ormeaux, added that the citizens of the Montreal agglomeration also deserve redress, as the roughly 250,000 residents 'have no real decision-making rights, nor any real capacity to influence the agglomeration's orientations and, more importantly, its spending, which is entirely under the sole control of the City of Montreal. We hope that the Quebec government will show the same sensitivity and concern for fairness on this matter toward the population of our metropolitan cities.'
Bottausci said Bill 104 is a step in the right direction, and his association believes more balanced governance will result in better co-operation between all the representatives of municipalities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan Tuesday hiked defense spending by 20% following last month's deadly conflict with India. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the increase as part of the budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, in which overall spending will be cut by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). Pakistan and India were pushed to the brink of war earlier this year after a gun massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, marking the biggest breakdown in relations between them since 2019. Weeks of tension followed, culminating in missile and drone strikes that resulted in dozens of fatalities on both sides of the border. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government was allocating 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) for defense compared with 2.12 trillion rupees in the previous budget. India in February increased its defense spending by 9.5%. Sharif told the Cabinet: 'All economic indicators are satisfactory. After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to go beyond it in the economic field as well.' Opposition members of the National Assembly verbally abused Aurangzeb, chanting slogans, throwing scrunched-up copies of the budget at him, whistling, and banging their desks as he gave his address. The coming year's defense allocation is considerably more than the government's expenditure on higher education, agricultural development, and mitigating climate-related risks, to which Pakistan is especially prone.
CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
11 MNAs were subject to a harassment complaint or report
Photo of the Red Room of the National Assembly in Quebec City, taken on Sept. 19, 2024. (The Canadian Press/Jacques Boissinot) No fewer than 11 members of the National Assembly (MNAs) out of 125 were the subject of a complaint or report related to harassment in 2024–2025. That's nine more than the previous year, according to the annual report on the prevention and management of incivility, conflict, and psychological or sexual harassment in the workplace at the National Assembly. Tabled Friday, the report states that 104 cases were handled over the past year, compared to 80 the year before. However, only one complaint was deemed admissible. The names of the complainants and the MNAs involved cannot be disclosed, as confidentiality is guaranteed under the harassment policy adopted by the National Assembly in 2023. Five formal complaints Only five formal complaints were ultimately filed—four for psychological harassment and one for a combination of reasons. Of those, one was deemed admissible, one was dismissed, one was withdrawn, and two are currently under review to determine if they are admissible, according to the report. The admissible complaint is currently under investigation. \ In addition to the 11 MNAs, six political staff members, five managers, and five National Assembly employees were also the subject of a complaint or report, for a total of 27 people. That's already more than triple the eight individuals implicated in 2023–2024. The report also reveals that among those who sought 'support, advice, or intervention' related to incivility, conflict, or harassment, 45 were women, and 32 were men, for a total of 77 people. Among those who filed a report or complaint, 12 were women, and seven were men, for a total of 19. Finally, among those named in complaints—meaning those identified by complainants as being responsible 'for a difficult interpersonal situation, harassment, or similar conduct'—14 were men and 13 were women, totalling 27 individuals. The National Assembly's policy includes processes to address 'difficult interpersonal situations,' as well as corrective and disciplinary measures. These measures can include 'limiting or banning access to the workplace and/or services,' verbal or written warnings or reprimands, 'suspension or demotion,' or 'termination of employment,' the report reads. 'The investigator or the commissioner for compliance (…) may recommend certain measures be imposed on the individual concerned,' it adds. 'These may include restorative, corrective, or disciplinary actions. It is then up to the appropriate authority to implement them.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on June 6, 2025. By Patrice Bergeron
Montreal Gazette
5 days ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: Rights group should stick to defending anglos instead of wooing francophones
Re: ' Anglo-rights association QCGN rebrands as TALQ ' (The Gazette, June 3) With the CAQ government targeting the anglo community in the courts and elsewhere, it seems like the wrong time to blue-wash the QCGN 'to reach out to francophone Quebecers.' I doubt Quebec nationalist politicians will care. Some years ago the EMSB adopted the slogan 'Être bilingue, c'est gagnant!' The CAQ government still wants to abolish English school boards. Perhaps the QCGN should spend less time trying to engage Quebec nationalists and more time defending the community it's supposed to represent. Its budget should be focused on the court battles forced on the anglophone community and forging connections with federal politicians instead of paying consultants for a rebrand. The time for TALQ is over. Pietro Bucci, Rivière-des-Prairies Ramp failure not just an oversight The ramp in Place des Montréalaises designed for cyclists and wheelchairs 'doesn't have a barrier preventing people from falling off and poses a danger,' The Gazette reports. That sounds like not just an oversight, but more like incompetence or workers not doing their job(s). Further, the square will be 'impossible for wheelchairs to use during the repair process.' Mayor Valérie Plante says the work will be completed during the summer. Great, maybe in time for people in wheelchairs to use it in snow and ice? Looks to me like another example of Plante's failures. Bob Vanier, N.D.G. GP blunders are indefensible Mayor Valérie Plante addressed the lack of organization during last year's Grand Prix weekend, saying the city has learned from its errors and will do better this year. What an inadequate and laughable response. Any learning curve had long since passed by the time the police closed access points to Île Notre-Dame, and the fire department forced several restaurants on Peel St. to shut their terrasses. What happened was inexcusable in my view and yet another example of the way Projet Montréal has managed our city. Ian Copnick, Côte-St-Luc Lack of parking hurts merchants Re: ' Hydro work hurts T.M.R. businesses ' (The Gazette, June 2) Retail businesses all over Montreal have been hurt for far too long by never-ending construction projects. What if a mayoral candidate in November's election had the vision and courage to announce a plan to enable better parking options for shoppers patronizing those suffering businesses? Empathetic and business-friendly leadership — what a concept! Barry Beloff, Montreal Students' needs must come first Re: ' Dear Miss Teacher, Why can't I fail too? ' (Opinion, May 31) A thank you to Maïka Forget for bravely sharing her experience with our education system. My two young adults can certainly validate her story. After serving for more than 10 years on my kids' school boards, I could see things had vastly changed since I was in school. Everything was now focused on grades, rankings and competition, which leached the fun of learning out of them. As long as their grades were good and they were impressing teachers, no one seemed to care about the anxiety that was slowly consuming them. We need to invest sufficiently in our education system to serve students, not bureaucrats. Students are not a product; they are people. Karen Bleakley, Dorval Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
