Pakistan holds up mirror to India over N-oversight call
Rajnath Singh, while on a visit to IIOJK, said that Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme should be placed under the surveillance of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The Foreign Office hit back at Singh, reminding the international community of India's poor record with regard to securing its nuclear programme.
"These irresponsible remarks reveal his profound insecurity and frustration regarding Pakistan's effective defence and deterrence against Indian aggression through conventional means," the Foreign Office spokesperson said in a statement. "Pakistan's conventional capabilities are adequate to deter India, without the self-imposed 'nuclear blackmail' that New Delhi suffers," it added.
The comments of India's defence minister also show his sheer ignorance of the mandate and responsibilities of a specialised agency of the United Nations like the IAEA, he added. "If anything, the IAEA and the international community should be worried about the repeated theft and illicit trafficking incidents involving nuclear and radioactive material in India."
The spokesperson recalled that just last year, five persons with a radioactive device reportedly stolen from the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) were found in Dehradun, India. Later, a gang was found with illegal possession of a highly radioactive and toxic substance, Californium, worth US$ 100 million.
Three incidents of theft of Californium were also reported in 2021. These recurring incidents call into question the measures taken by New Delhi for the safety and security of nuclear and other radioactive material. "These incidents also suggest the existence of a black market for sensitive, dual-use materials inside India," the statement said.
Pakistan urged a thorough investigation into the incidents and called upon India to ensure the safety and security of its nuclear facilities and arsenal.
Singh's statement exposes India's endemic obsession with Pakistan's credible nuclear deterrence against a much larger enemy. The country's media churned out fake news about alleged Pakistani nuclear sites being hit by Indian strikes during the recent hostilities.
However, the international nuclear watchdog officially refuted reports suggesting a radiation leak from Pakistan's nuclear facilities following the Indian aggression.
The claims, which circulated widely on social media and certain foreign media outlets, alleged that Indian missiles had struck the Kirana Hills in Sargodha district, leading to a radioactive incident. However, the IAEA clarified that there is no evidence supporting these assertions.
"We are aware of the reports. Based on information available to the IAEA, there was no radiation leak or release from any nuclear facility in Pakistan," said IAEA spokesperson Fredrik Dahl in a statement.
Ceasefire
The Director General Military Operations (DGMOs) of Pakistan and India held third-round of talks and agreed to maintain the ceasefire.
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar confirmed to parliament that the militaries of both countries communicated earlier in the day and reached the decision to prolong the ceasefire, with plans to a follow-up with political dialogue.
"The ceasefire was initially agreed upon on May 10 to last until May 12. It was later extended to May 14, and now further extended to May 18," he told lawmakers.
Dar added that military-level communication had so far been instrumental in maintaining the ceasefire and after May 18, comprehensive political talks would begin.
"There will be composite and result-oriented talks with India. The purpose is not to accept anyone's superiority but to resolve issues on the basis of equality," the foreign minister said.
The ceasefire deal was brokered by the United States on May 10 after the four-day of hostilities between the two countries. While India's signaling on the ground is different, Indian political leadership continued to ratchet up their rhetoric.
Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch briefed the Islamabad-based diplomatic missions on the recent developments in Pakistan-India relations.
She apprised the diplomatic corps of the implementation and progress of the ceasefire announced on May 10. She underscored that, as a goodwill gesture, Pakistan and India exchanged the personnel of Pakistan Rangers and the Indian Border Security Force in each other's custody.
She thanked the friendly countries for their constructive role in achieving the ceasefire.
In the context of India's baseless assertions on establishing a "new normal", the secretary stressed that the only "normal" in bilateral relations is respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. She emphasised Pakistan's preference for peaceful co-existence, dialogue and diplomacy over conflict and strife.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US Treasury official slams India for 'profiteering' off cheap Russian oil
The United States has accused India of cashing in on discounted Russian oil during the Ukraine war, alleging that New Delhi has been buying crude at knockdown prices and reselling refined products to sanctioning regions, a practice Washington has branded as "arbitrage". Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC's Squawk Box on Tuesday that India was "profiteering" from the conflict. "They are just profiteering. They are reselling," he said. "This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage — buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product." Bessent claimed that the move had lined the pockets of "some of the richest families in India," alleging they had made "$16 billion in excess profits." Asked why Beijing had not faced similar penalties, Bessent intimated that China's continued imports were viewed as less problematic because it had been a major buyer even before Russia's invasion. However, energy expert Bob McNally, president of Rapidan Energy and a former advisor to President George W Bush, said India's decision to lean on Russian oil were due to US' encouragement immediately after the invasion. According to him, the Biden administration had asked India to buy Russian crude when other buyers walked away, to prevent a dramatic oil price spike that could have hit American motorists hard. "India played a key role in the price cap sanction mechanism designed by the US and its European allies to ensure Russian oil still flowed while trying to crimp the revenue Moscow earned," McNally told CNBC. According to oil market analyst Matt Smith at Kpler, in his comments to CNBC, India buys Russian crude at a discount due to sanctions, refines it into petrol and diesel, and then "sells the product back to regions that have sanctioned Moscow such as Europe." India's imports of Russian oil have soared since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Prior to that, New Delhi imported only a trickle of Russian crude. Now, India purchases 1.5 million barrels per day, making it Russia's largest client, according to Kpler data. China is close behind at 1 million barrels per day. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump doubled down by ordering an additional 25% tariff on Indian exports to the United States as punishment for buying Russian oil, a levy set to take effect next week. Trump is also threatening "secondary tariffs" on Russian oil buyers like India in an effort to force the Kremlin into a negotiated settlement over Ukraine, though China has thus far been spared such measures.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India, China agree to resume direct flights
India and China agreed on Tuesday to resume direct flights and step up trade and investment flows as the neighbours rebuild ties damaged by a 2020 border clash. The Asian giants are cautiously strengthening ties against the backdrop of US President Donald Trump's unpredictable foreign policy, staging a series of high-level bilateral visits. The latest statements came at the end of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's two-day visit to New Delhi for the 24th round of talks with Indian National Security (NSA) Advisor Ajit Doval to resolve their decades old border dispute. The border talks covered issues related to pulling back troops both countries have amassed on their Himalayan border, delimitation of borders and boundary affairs, the Indian foreign ministry said, without elaborating. The talks appeared to have made no major breakthrough on those issues and Beijing said both countries agreed to meet again in China in 2026. But it also said the two countries would resume direct flights and boost trade and investment, along with smooth facilitation of visas. Direct flights have been suspended since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. No date was given for their resumption. "Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity," Prime Minister Narendra Modi posted on X after meeting Wang. Modi is scheduled to travel to China at the end of this month to take part in the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation — his first visit to the country in more than seven years. Tibet dam A readout from the Chinese foreign ministry said Wang told Doval that "the stable and healthy development of China-India relations is in the fundamental interests of the two countries' people". The two sides "should enhance mutual trust through dialogues and expand cooperation," Wang said, and should aim for consensus in areas such as border control and demarcation negotiations. India said Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar had underlined in his talks with Wang India's concerns with regard to the mega dam China is building on the Yarlung Zangbo river in Tibet. Yarlung Zangbo becomes the Brahmaputra as it flows into India and Bangladesh, a lifeline for millions. The dam would have implications for lower riparian states and the need for "utmost transparency" was strongly underlined, New Delhi said. Chinese officials say hydropower projects in Tibet will not have a major impact on the environment or on downstream water supplies, but India and Bangladesh have nevertheless raised concerns. Earlier on Tuesday, an Indian source said Wang had assured Jaishankar that Beijing was addressing three key Indian concerns — the need for fertilisers, rare earths and tunnel boring machines. The Indian foreign and mines ministries and China's commerce ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan seeks to renegotiate LNG deal with Qatar
Pakistan on Tuesday decided to seek renegotiation of its Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) import deal with Qatar after its industry slowed down and power demand slumped, resulting in over 50 surplus cargoes during the next one-and-half years alone. The deal, which will expire in 2031, has left the policymakers with two options — either keep shut its 400 mmcfd per day cheaper local gas production facilities along with diversion of expensive surplus gas to subsidised residential use or seek renegotiation of the deal. The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the cabinet has allowed the Petroleum Division to engage with Qatar to renegotiate the import volumes to minimise diversion of imported gas to residential consumers and import only what is required, according to the people who attended the closed-door ECC meeting. Petroleum Minister Ali Pervaiz Malik is expected to travel to Qatar, as the Pakistani authorities are not still sure whether Qatar would also be willing to reopen the import volumes, the sources added. Based on the official assessment, there will be at least 51 surplus cargoes worth $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion from July this year to December 2026, according to the sources. After assuming office in March this year, Ali Pervaiz Malik has been advocating that either the Power Division fulfil its responsibilities by lifting the promised 600 mmcfd imported gas quota or there will not be any other option but to seek renegotiation. According to a terse Finance Ministry statement on the matter, "the ECC reviewed the overall gas sector supply situation in the country and directed the Ministry of Petroleum to take effective measures to control losses in the sector and ensure operational efficiency". The sources said that given the surplus imported expensive gas, the government has three options. Pakistan may ask Qatar to reduce the numbers of monthly cargoes to around 6 to 7 from the existing 9. The second option is that the government may seek an extension in the expiry period with the request to postpone the delivery of the surplus cargoes beyond the original expiry period of 2031. The sources said that the third option of Non-Performance Damages (NPD) clause is given in the contract under which Qatar can sell gas to the third party and claim losses from Pakistan, if the price of selling the gas is lower than the contract price. Pakistan is obligated to pay for contracted LNG volumes even if not consumed. The contract allows flexibility to adjust intake by up to three cargoes per year. The Pakistan-Qatar LNG deal consists of two major agreements signed in 2016 and 2021, aimed at addressing Pakistan's energy needs through long-term LNG supply contracts. The sources said that Pakistan will get an opening for terminating the deal in 2026, if both the sides do not agree on a new price of the gas. The 2016 deal allows termination after 11 years, which is the year 2027, if price renegotiation fails in 2026. The 2021 deal has a shorter 4-year review period, also starting in 2026, but a fixed end date of 2031 unless renegotiated or terminated early. The 15-year agreement enables Pakistan to import up to 3.75 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of LNG to address its energy shortfall. The 2016 deal had been signed at 13.37% of the Brent crude oil price. Each cargo corresponds to roughly 100 million cubic feet per day (MMCFD), totaling 500 MMCFD. The 2021's 10-year deal, provides up to 3 MTPA of LNG at a lower rate than the 2016 deal. It was signed to replace expiring, costlier contracts and ensure supply security. The price of the 2021 deal was 10.2% of Brent crude, a 31% reduction compared to the 13.37% rate of the 2016 deal. Pakistan has already deferred five cargoes from the 2016 deal to 2026 without financial penalties. Due to sluggish economic growth causing lower electricity demand from the national grid and the overall low demand and highly unaffordable prices, the government was not fully running-the LNG fired power plants, which was one of the reasons for the import of gas. Due to roughly Rs3,500 per mmbtu imported gas price, the government also cannot divert the gas to households without incurring heavy losses. LNG was primarily imported to meet the demand of power sector while balance was made available to industry. The LNG Sale Purchase Agreements (SPAs) carried 100% take or pay clause for PSO/PLL whereas instead of mirroring the same clauses, the Gas Supply Agreements (GSAs) with power plants were executed initially at 66% of minimum take-or-pay and later revised to 50% with effect from January this year, the sources added. Before the commissioning of these LNG based power plants, it was assumed that these plants being most efficient would be placed higher in Economical Merit Order (EMO) and/or to be declared as must-run plants for peak loads which did not happen, they added. With the passage of time, LNG demand of power sector has reduced substantially due to availability of generation from other sources which has led to issues of surplus LNG in the system. This LNG glut in system has further been exacerbated with drastic decline in LNG consumption by captive power plants owing to imposition of grid transition levy. The sources said that SNGPL has reported that around 11 cargoes are surplus for July to December 2025 period and similarly for calendar year 2026 some 40 LNG cargoes are estimated to be surplus, considering the projected demand of power sector and demand destruction in the CPPs. This translates into $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion unnecessary import bill for a country whose almost 100% foreign exchange reserves are based on foreign loans. The sources said that the SNGPL is constrained to divert expensive RLNG to domestic sector. To deal with issue of surplus LNG, SNGPL resorts to curtailment of gas production form local fields, which ranging between 250 to 400 mmcfd, to maintain the integrity and safety of the system owing to higher line pack pressures. Curtailment of local production in turn is impacting the revenues of exploration and production companies besides impacting the production of condensate, crude oil and LPG from oil and gas fields, they added. As per the Estimated Revenue Requirements (ERR) for CFY as determined by OGRA, the cost of diversion of RLNG to domestic sector on SNGPL network has been estimated at Rs242 billion against 24 cargoes which led to increase in consumer gas prices, the sources said. The only option for Pakistan now remains to request the brotherly country to review the deal in the light of these developments, the sources added.
