logo
If your Austin apartment feels smaller, it may very well be, new report says

If your Austin apartment feels smaller, it may very well be, new report says

Yahoo09-05-2025
Austin renters are getting noticeably less space than they did a decade ago, even as the average national apartment size has trended up.
According to a new report from RentCafe.com, Austin lost more than 50 square feet in average apartment size in 10 years. Houston and Plano, meanwhile, saw barely any shrinkage — with decreases of less than 5 square feet, RentCafe said.
"Texas may be known for 'bigger is better,' but Arlington has seen the steepest drop in apartment size in the U.S.," according to a news release from RentCafe, a nationwide apartment search website and a part of Yardi.
"In just 10 years, the average apartment in the home of the Dallas Cowboys shrank by 215 square feet — enough space to accommodate an entire New York City micro-apartment, where the kitchen doubles as the living room," RentCafe said in a news release.
In Austin, several factors are behind the apartment size changes in the city's rental market, said Adina Dragos, the report's author and a RentCafe research analyst.
"There has been an increase in the share of studios and one-bedroom apartments compared to the decade before, while larger units like two-bedrooms have become less common," Dragos told the American-Statesman in an email. "What's more, the average size of all units has shrunk, leading to an overall trend of smaller living spaces.
"These changes are likely to reflect shifting renter preferences towards more desirable areas such as big job hubs, even if it means choosing a smaller living space. This is especially true for younger Millennials and Gen Z who often prioritize location and access to urban amenities over space."
Dragos explained that developers are adding more units to each floor plan to meet the needs of Austin's booming population and rapidly increasing demand for housing.
With square footage emerging as the new currency in the apartment market, RentCafe.com analyzed a decade of apartment data to see how much space renters in 100 U.S. cities are getting now compared with 10 years ago.
Austin's shrinking average apartment size bucks an upward national trend.
"Our annual analysis shows a significant shift in the U.S. rental landscape: the average size of new apartments expanded again in 2024, reversing a decade-long trend of shrinking floor plans," RentCafe said. "The most substantial space gains are appearing in several Coastal and Sunbelt cities, giving renters fresh options for more spacious living."
Other key takeaways:
The average apartment size in the U.S. increased in 2024, reaching 908 square feet, as most unit types expanded their living spaces.
Studios, one- and two-bedroom apartments got larger, adding between 4 square feet and 13 square feet to their floor plans.
Two Florida destinations, Tallahassee and Gainesville, claim gold and silver among the cities with the largest apartments.
Seattle holds on to its top spot as the city with the smallest apartment size in the U.S.
Apartments in San Francisco have expanded the most among large cities, gaining 59 square feet in the last decade compared with the previous one. It's followed by Queens, New York, where renters gained 39 square feet.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin apartments got smaller in size over the past 10 years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boomers Got $50K Homes, Gen Z Gets $100K Bitcoin—Why This Crypto Evangelist Believes Digital Assets Are the New American Dream
Boomers Got $50K Homes, Gen Z Gets $100K Bitcoin—Why This Crypto Evangelist Believes Digital Assets Are the New American Dream

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Boomers Got $50K Homes, Gen Z Gets $100K Bitcoin—Why This Crypto Evangelist Believes Digital Assets Are the New American Dream

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A viral Reddit discussion has reignited the debate over generational wealth-building strategies, with younger investors increasingly viewing Bitcoin as their answer to the housing crisis that has priced many out of homeownership. The central thesis gaining traction among millennials and Gen Z investors is straightforward: while Baby Boomers benefited from purchasing homes at dramatically lower prices decades ago, today's younger generations face a different opportunity in the form of digital assets. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The Generational Wealth Divide The numbers tell a stark story. According to Federal Reserve data, the median home price in 1980 was approximately $47,200, while median household income was $17,710. Today, that same home costs over $400,000, while median income has grown to roughly $70,000—creating a far less favorable price-to-income ratio. 'You can't live in a Bitcoin,' critics often argue, highlighting the fundamental difference between a home as shelter and cryptocurrency as a speculative investment. However, Bitcoin advocates counter that traditional real estate comes with hidden costs: property taxes, maintenance, insurance, and what they call 'entropic decay'—the inevitable deterioration of physical assets. Bitcoin as Digital Real Estate Proponents argue Bitcoin offers several advantages over traditional real estate investment: Global Accessibility: Unlike real estate, Bitcoin can be purchased and held anywhere in the world without geographical constraints or minimum investment thresholds. No Maintenance Costs: Digital assets don't require property management, repairs, or dealing with tenants. Liquidity: Bitcoin can be sold instantly, unlike real estate transactions that can take months. Portability: Cryptocurrency holdings can move with the owner, unaffected by local market conditions or political instability. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? The Reality Check Despite Bitcoin's recent surge past $100,000, skeptics question whether the cryptocurrency is still 'cheap' relative to its risk profile. The asset's notorious volatility means investors must stomach potential 50-80% drawdowns during bear markets—a psychological challenge that many underestimate. Financial advisor perspectives vary widely. Some view Bitcoin as portfolio diversification, recommending allocations of 1-5% of total assets. Others warn against treating cryptocurrency as a primary wealth-building strategy, emphasizing the importance of emergency funds, retirement savings, and traditional investments. Systemic Issues vs. Generational Blame The discussion reveals deeper frustrations with monetary policy and economic systems. Many participants blame Federal Reserve policies and fractional reserve banking for inflating asset prices beyond the reach of average earners, rather than targeting specific generations. 'The real enemy isn't Boomers—it's the system that debases currency and inflates assets,' one commenter noted, highlighting how monetary expansion benefits asset holders while disadvantaging new entrants to the Considerations For those considering Bitcoin as a wealth-building strategy, experts recommend: Only investing what you can afford to lose Understanding the technology and market dynamics Using secure storage methods like hardware wallets Viewing Bitcoin as part of a diversified portfolio, not a complete strategy Preparing for significant volatility and extended bear markets The fundamental question remains: Is Bitcoin the great equalizer for younger generations, or simply another speculative bubble that could leave investors worse off than when they started? As traditional pathways to wealth become increasingly difficult to access, the answer may determine the financial future of an entire generation. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Boomers Got $50K Homes, Gen Z Gets $100K Bitcoin—Why This Crypto Evangelist Believes Digital Assets Are the New American Dream originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Gen Z was growing obsessed with luxury watches. New tariffs on Switzerland could cool the expensive hobby
Gen Z was growing obsessed with luxury watches. New tariffs on Switzerland could cool the expensive hobby

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gen Z was growing obsessed with luxury watches. New tariffs on Switzerland could cool the expensive hobby

Gen Z has become one of the largest consumer bases for luxury Swiss-made watches. Now the Trump administration's 39% tariff on Switzerland may change price-sensitive consumer behavior. But experts tell Fortune top watchmakers like Rolex and Patek Philippe may not see much of a demand shift as young luxury watch buyers crave the social currency that comes with the brands. Gen Z's fascination with luxury watches has been one of the more surprising consumer trends of the last few years. But a steep tariff hike on Switzerland could threaten its market: American youth. Gen Z—alongside younger millennials—have embraced luxury timepieces as status symbols, posting them on TikTok and Instagram and helping reshape an industry long dominated by older collectors. A recent BCG survey found 54% of Gen Z respondents had increased their spending on luxury watches since 2021, and Sotheby's estimated nearly a third of its watch sales in 2023 went to buyers 30 and under. But a new 39% U.S. tariff on Switzerland could make this hobby more expensive, and potentially less attainable for first-time buyers. The duty, imposed during President Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs, hits the world's most important market for Swiss watch exports. From January to June, the U.S. overtook Japan and China as the top destination, with $3.17 billion ( 2.56 billion Swiss Francs) worth shipped, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. 'Companies cannot realistically absorb the tariff, which means retail prices in the U.S. will rise sharply,' Marcus Altenburg, managing partner at Swiss law firm Goldblum & Partners, told Fortune. For American buyers, especially younger ones, the math is straightforward: prices are going up, Anish Bhatt, a millennial 'watchfluencer' with 1.6 million followers on Instagram told Fortune. While the 39% levy applies to an importer's cost, not full retail, industry analysts predict a 12%-14% increase in store prices if brands pass on the cost to consumers. 'For many American collectors, the 39% tariff instantly turned new releases from Swiss brands into a luxury few can justify,' Joshua Ganjei, CEO of European Watch Company in Boston, told Fortune. 'The pre‑owned market is now the best option for value and immediate availability—no import headaches and no sticker shock.' That shift to secondhand is already underway, since availability in the primary market is so limited, Bhatt said. Still, a 2024 report by Watchfinder & Co. found 41% of Gen Z aged 16 to 26 came into possession of a luxury watch the previous year—and individuals in this age bracket who are ready to buy a luxury timepiece said $10,870 would be the starting point for their next purchase. The same report found that Gen Z watch enthusiasts acquired an average of 2.4 first-hand watches and 1.43 pre-owned in 2023, with over half buying for themselves. Altenburg expects Gen Z and millennial buyers, who tend to be more price‑sensitive than older collectors, to gravitate to domestic pre‑owned and grey‑market sellers to sidestep tariffs. Ganjei said his company has 'seen a dramatic increase in purchasing volume over the past few months as U.S. buyers shy away from international sellers.' On the other hand, watchfluencer Bhatt said younger consumers still crave the 'social currency' that comes with a Rolex, Patek Philippe, or Audemars Piguet, even if they pay more to get it. 'They also understand the status that it gives them,' Bhatt said. The social cachet of a Swiss-made watch plays out daily on social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and influencer channels, boosting aspirational demand, he said. Bhatt doesn't expect demand for the most coveted brands to vanish, but says mid‑tier Swiss names without top brand prestige could see sales slow. The added cost may also push Americans to buy while traveling in Europe—where they can sometimes reclaim value added tax (VAT)—and bring pieces back themselves, potentially avoiding tariffs altogether, Bhatt said. 'It could be that allocation of pieces is shifted toward other territories over time,' he added, 'because they see demand increase in Europe or the Middle East and diminish a bit in the U.S.' For the Swiss industry, the stakes go beyond sticker prices. Altenburg warned that sustained U.S. weakness could pressure employment and supply chains in watchmaking regions, while forcing brands to rethink distribution, pricing, and even corporate structures to blunt the tariff's impact. Bhatt thinks marketing to younger generations will also matter more in a cooling market. 'When the market's high, they rely just on brand value and brand name,' he said. 'When the market is low, they need people to understand the rarity and complexity and difficulty in producing these rare watches.' All said, the tariff probably won't kill Gen Z's fascination with luxury watches—but it could redraw the roadmap for how and where they buy them. The social media posts of vintage Daytonas and Nautiluses are unlikely to disappear. What may change is that, for many young Americans, the product may increasingly be secondhand, and possibly stamped by a boutique in Paris or Milan. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio

Gen Z was growing obsessed with luxury watches. New tariffs on Switzerland could cool the expensive hobby
Gen Z was growing obsessed with luxury watches. New tariffs on Switzerland could cool the expensive hobby

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gen Z was growing obsessed with luxury watches. New tariffs on Switzerland could cool the expensive hobby

Gen Z has become one of the largest consumer bases for luxury Swiss-made watches. Now the Trump administration's 39% tariff on Switzerland may change price-sensitive consumer behavior. But experts tell Fortune top watchmakers like Rolex and Patek Philippe may not see much of a demand shift as young luxury watch buyers crave the social currency that comes with the brands. Gen Z's fascination with luxury watches has been one of the more surprising consumer trends of the last few years. But a steep tariff hike on Switzerland could threaten its market: American youth. Gen Z—alongside younger millennials—have embraced luxury timepieces as status symbols, posting them on TikTok and Instagram and helping reshape an industry long dominated by older collectors. A recent BCG survey found 54% of Gen Z respondents had increased their spending on luxury watches since 2021, and Sotheby's estimated nearly a third of its watch sales in 2023 went to buyers 30 and under. But a new 39% U.S. tariff on Switzerland could make this hobby more expensive, and potentially less attainable for first-time buyers. The duty, imposed during President Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs, hits the world's most important market for Swiss watch exports. From January to June, the U.S. overtook Japan and China as the top destination, with $3.17 billion ( 2.56 billion Swiss Francs) worth shipped, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. 'Companies cannot realistically absorb the tariff, which means retail prices in the U.S. will rise sharply,' Marcus Altenburg, managing partner at Swiss law firm Goldblum & Partners, told Fortune. For American buyers, especially younger ones, the math is straightforward: prices are going up, Anish Bhatt, a millennial 'watchfluencer' with 1.6 million followers on Instagram told Fortune. While the 39% levy applies to an importer's cost, not full retail, industry analysts predict a 12%-14% increase in store prices if brands pass on the cost to consumers. 'For many American collectors, the 39% tariff instantly turned new releases from Swiss brands into a luxury few can justify,' Joshua Ganjei, CEO of European Watch Company in Boston, told Fortune. 'The pre‑owned market is now the best option for value and immediate availability—no import headaches and no sticker shock.' That shift to secondhand is already underway, since availability in the primary market is so limited, Bhatt said. Still, a 2024 report by Watchfinder & Co. found 41% of Gen Z aged 16 to 26 came into possession of a luxury watch the previous year—and individuals in this age bracket who are ready to buy a luxury timepiece said $10,870 would be the starting point for their next purchase. The same report found that Gen Z watch enthusiasts acquired an average of 2.4 first-hand watches and 1.43 pre-owned in 2023, with over half buying for themselves. Altenburg expects Gen Z and millennial buyers, who tend to be more price‑sensitive than older collectors, to gravitate to domestic pre‑owned and grey‑market sellers to sidestep tariffs. Ganjei said his company has 'seen a dramatic increase in purchasing volume over the past few months as U.S. buyers shy away from international sellers.' On the other hand, watchfluencer Bhatt said younger consumers still crave the 'social currency' that comes with a Rolex, Patek Philippe, or Audemars Piguet, even if they pay more to get it. 'They also understand the status that it gives them,' Bhatt said. The social cachet of a Swiss-made watch plays out daily on social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and influencer channels, boosting aspirational demand, he said. Bhatt doesn't expect demand for the most coveted brands to vanish, but says mid‑tier Swiss names without top brand prestige could see sales slow. The added cost may also push Americans to buy while traveling in Europe—where they can sometimes reclaim value added tax (VAT)—and bring pieces back themselves, potentially avoiding tariffs altogether, Bhatt said. 'It could be that allocation of pieces is shifted toward other territories over time,' he added, 'because they see demand increase in Europe or the Middle East and diminish a bit in the U.S.' For the Swiss industry, the stakes go beyond sticker prices. Altenburg warned that sustained U.S. weakness could pressure employment and supply chains in watchmaking regions, while forcing brands to rethink distribution, pricing, and even corporate structures to blunt the tariff's impact. Bhatt thinks marketing to younger generations will also matter more in a cooling market. 'When the market's high, they rely just on brand value and brand name,' he said. 'When the market is low, they need people to understand the rarity and complexity and difficulty in producing these rare watches.' All said, the tariff probably won't kill Gen Z's fascination with luxury watches—but it could redraw the roadmap for how and where they buy them. The social media posts of vintage Daytonas and Nautiluses are unlikely to disappear. What may change is that, for many young Americans, the product may increasingly be secondhand, and possibly stamped by a boutique in Paris or Milan. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store