logo
Australia has been invaded. And the invader is sure to come back with greater force

Australia has been invaded. And the invader is sure to come back with greater force

The Advertiser19 hours ago
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Trump shifted the goalposts on both tariffs and Gaza
Why Trump shifted the goalposts on both tariffs and Gaza

AU Financial Review

time39 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

Why Trump shifted the goalposts on both tariffs and Gaza

Back at work after the Independence Day long weekend, US President Donald Trump gave himself a bit of breathing room on two policy issues that have dragged on and proved particularly stubborn to resolve. On Monday (Tuesday AEST), he was set to sign an executive order pushing the deadline for the imposition of retaliatory tariffs on trading partners to August 1, out from the original plan of July 9 – or Wednesday this week.

Jason Clare considers introducing classes to stamp out mounting antisemitic sentiments in major reform to national curriculum
Jason Clare considers introducing classes to stamp out mounting antisemitic sentiments in major reform to national curriculum

Sky News AU

time44 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Jason Clare considers introducing classes to stamp out mounting antisemitic sentiments in major reform to national curriculum

Education Minister Jason Clare has said the government 'stands ready' to implement changes to the national school curriculum, including implementing antisemitic prevention classes. On Monday the Victorian government announced the creation of a new anti-hate taskforce in response to a swathe of antisemitic attacks on the Jewish community. Multiple incidents occurred across the city starting last Friday night, including an alleged arson attack on an East Melbourne synagogue. Days later, pro-Palestinian protesters allegedly chanted 'Death, death to the IDF'. Following the release of a 15-point plan from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry in February (ECAJ), which included antisemitism being incorporated into the national curriculum, Mr Clare reiterated that 'Holocaust education is part of the Australian curriculum'. 'It's only by learning the lessons of the Holocaust that we can ensure it never happens again,' he said to The Australian. Mr Clare defended the government's response, pointing to the fact that the Albanese government had increased funding for social cohesion programs in schools and had also opened the National Holocaust Education Centre in Canberra. However, he conceded that there was more the government could do to mitigate the soaring number of antisemitic incidents sweeping the nation. 'There is no place for the poison of anti-Semitism in our community, and our schools play an important role in educating young people about anti-Semitism and racism more broadly,' Mr Clare said. He added the government would be prepared to alter the national curriculum if recommendations were made by Jillian Segal, the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism. 'There is always more that can be done, and the government stands ready to work with the Special Envoy to Combat anti-Semitism on further reforms here," Mr Clare said. The Australian reported Ms Segal is set to imminently urge the government to expand antisemitic education within the school system, and that it was a crucial preventative step. Ms Segal said the 'environment of hatred and intimidation that has been allowed to grow and fester needs to be tackled head on'. 'Condemnation is not enough. We urgently need stronger policing and laws that name this hate for what it is and punish it ­accordingly," she said. The Albanese government has faced fierce backlash for its approach in tackling the sharp rise in antisemitic behaviour, with critics arguing its response had been overly lax. Former prime minister Tony Abbott called on the government to impose a crackdown on anti-Israel protests while ex secretary of the Department of Home Affairs Mike Pezzullo implored the government to commission an Operation Sovereign Borders-style taskforce with bolstered powers. Mr Pezzullo said the special taskforce should be composed of ASIO officials and top delegates from federal and state law enforcement branches. 'Regrettably, we have to assume that such an attack is now probable (to use the ASIO rating), especially as Iranian and possibly other hostile services might decide that mass casualty attacks on Jewish people and/or places would be an effective way to strike back at Israel,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store