Reform accused of 'amateur and irresponsible' approach to nation's defence
Labour MPs have claimed Reform UK's failure to mention shipbuilding in their manifesto shows an 'amateur and irresponsible approach to defending our nation'.
A dozen MPs, which includes a number who hold coastal seats, accused Nigel Farage of a 'gross betrayal' of both national security and British industry. Organised by Scottish Labour MP Graeme Downie, the letter also questioned Mr Farage's understanding of shipbuilding, which directly employs almost 40,000 people across the UK with an economic output of almost £3 billion.
It says: 'Although I lose track of which MPs are in your party these days, it appears none of your current MPs at least have even mentioned their support of either the Royal Navy or shipbuilding in the House of Commons since the General Election in July 2024. In addition, Reform MPs are often noted to be absent when opportunities to support this vital part of our economy and security are available. " It comes after Nigel Farage is branded 'farcical' as alien and UFO enthusiast defects to Reform UK.
The letter continues: "For example, neither you or any of your colleagues spoke during the debate on the Strategic Defence Review on 2 June, nor in a debate in Westminster Hall on 18 March with the title: 'Shipyards: Economic Growth.'
'It is disappointing that someone who says he aspires to becoming Prime Minister of this fantastic country can fail to support the vital work of our shipbuilding industry. To continue to fail to do so would be a gross betrayal of both our national security and one of our most vital industries. It would display an amateur and irresponsible approach to defending our nation along with a reckless, and perhaps wilful, misunderstanding of the role of the sea in our national story.
'I know consistency, principles and understanding of complex situations are not something you are best known for but I hope you understand that in order to defend an island nation, you need ships and that it is best for those ships to be built in the UK. Perhaps at the very least you could confirm this understanding?'
The Chancellor Rachel Reeves previously hailed the UK's "extraordinary shipbuilding industry", and committed to a "Britain first" policy for new naval ships.
The letter was signed by numerous MPs who sit on Westminster's Defence Select Committee, and a number with seats where shipbuilding is a key industry. The MPs included Amanda Martin, Tracey Gilbert, Gregor Poynton and Calvin Bailey.
Responding, Reform Deputy Leader Richard Tice said: 'Reform were the only party with a plan at the last election to vastly increase defence spending. Nigel and I lead the way on saving British steel after Labour let Port Talbot blast furnaces close and dragged their feet with Scunthorpe.
'We are the only party with a serious plan to use British steel for shipbuilding in the country. If it was left to Labour without pressure from Reform, all ships would be built with foreign steel.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
36 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
British racing to go on strike for first time in its history in protest at betting tax rise with ALL meetings cancelled
Key figures within the sport are opposing a Government proposal RACE IS RUN British racing to go on strike for first time in its history in protest at betting tax rise with ALL meetings cancelled Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITISH racing is set to go on strike for the first time EVER next month. September 10 events at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Kempton and Lingfield Park are all set to be scrapped. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Four events are set to be scrapped next month, including at Lingfield Credit: Getty The Treasury have proposed to up taxes paid by bookies on racing profits from 15 to 21 per cent - in line with online casinos. According to The Times, the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) have organised the strike, which could cost the industry around £700,000, in opposition to the proposal. The BHA claim that the proposed change would cost the sector £66million every year and put up to 2,752 people out of a job While they also warned that it would send the sport into "irreversible decline". The proposed strike is set to take place just one day before the start of the St Leger Festival at Doncaster. This means that the issue will be placed at the forefront of the sport by the time the prestigious event, that prime minister Keir Starmer attended alongside his wife last year, comes around. Chief executive of the BHA Brant Dunshea said: "This latest tax bombshell from the Government, if followed through, poses one of the gravest risks to horseracing the sport has ever seen. 'The horseracing industry is already in a precarious financial position, and the latest research provides a much more catastrophic forecast than we first thought. 'We're talking thousands of jobs at risk across the supply chain, severely impacted towns and communities, and the irreversible decline of the country's second most popular sport.' It's claimed that bookies would likely look to increase their prices should the proposal come into effect - while two thirds of punters claim that a tax increase would push people towards the gambling black market. Owners remove £195,000 Grade 2-winning horse from Gordon Elliott's yard with his blessing and send to his protege It's also said that bookmakers would cut their advertising and market budgets - while turning their focus towards online gaming. David Menuisier, a trainer at Coombelands Racing Stables, recently told The Sun: 'Racing is much more than just a sport in this country. 'It brings fun and excitement to millions and is a major local employer, particularly here in West Sussex as we prepare for another fantastic year at Goodwood.'
ITV News
41 minutes ago
- ITV News
UK must bring in sick and injured children from Gaza 'without delay', MPs demand
A cross-party group of 96 MPs have urged the government to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to the UK for treatment "without delay". In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, the MPs warn the health system in Gaza has been "decimated" and that conditions in the territory are "worsening by the minute". More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. With "essential infrastructure destroyed" and a long-running blockade by Israel of food, water and medical supplies, they say the population now faces a "medical and humanitarian catastrophe of horrific proportion". Citing World Health Organisation estimates, the letter warns 14,800 Palestinians are "in urgent need of medical evacuation - including children at immediate risk of death from trauma injuries and severe pre-existing conditions, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.". "Given this grave reality, we urge the government to launch the medical evacuation scheme without delay". The letter, co-ordinated by Labour MP and GP, Dr Simon Opher, welcomes the government "finally prioritising" the issue but calls on senior ministers to "recognise the real urgency around medical evacuations". The group make six key demands of ministers while a scheme is developed: Timeline: MPs ask ministers to confirm the planned timeline for a medical evacuation scheme for Palestinian children. "This should be done in close coordination with the WHO and civil society organisations, with all eligible evacuees and their accompanying family members expedited as a matter of urgency," they add. Medical needs first: " The prioritisation of medical evacuations from Gaza must be determined solely based on clinical necessity and individual case assessment, without regard to financial implications, political considerations or reputational interests," the letter says. Funding: "Large-scale evacuations cannot rely on private donations or diversion of aid from other conflict responses," MPs say. "We urge you to ensure adequate government funding for medical treatment, psychosocial support, housing and other essential costs." Family unification: The 96 MPs say it is "vital" that children are accompanied by parents, close family members or another appropriate caregiver. "There is clear medical evidence to suggest their presence can positively impact the recovery of sick or injured children," they add. Legal status of evacuees: Ministers are asked to clarify the legal status of evacuees upon their arrival in the UK and following completion of medical treatment, including any rights to remain and pathways to settlement."We would urge that children and their families are given the option of applying for asylum, humanitarian protection or the chance to resettle in the UK. Evacuees must not be returned to Gaza," the MPs say. Biometrics:"The requirement for biometrics as a prerequisite to issue visas remains a major barrier, given that the only authorised biometrics centre in Gaza closed in October 2023," the groups warns. "We urge you to waive biometric requirements for evacuees under this scheme and permit applications to be completed after departure from Gaza." ITV News has contacted the government for comment on the MPs demands. Ministers have already started working on plans to evacuate up to 300 seriously ill or injured children from Gaza for NHS treatment in the UK. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said in late June that the government was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. Two weeks ago a government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.' Scottish First Minister John Swinney welcomed the move to fly up to 300 children from Gaza but criticised the Westminster government for not taking action sooner. 'We have been consistently clear that the suffering being inflicted on the people of Gaza is beyond any justification.'People in Gaza are being bombed and left to starve by Israel on a massive scale. I wrote to the Prime Minister on 9 July to request support from the UK government in meeting the call from Unicef to provide medical care for children from Gaza.'If the UK government is prepared to evacuate Palestinians for medical treatment it would be entirely only regret is the UK government has taken this long to act."
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
As the economy slows and productivity flatlines, is Australia having another banana republic moment?
When Paul Keating stepped into a noisy kitchen in a Melbourne function centre for an interview with John Laws, he didn't mince his words. It was 14 May 1986 when the then Labor treasurer told Laws that without some serious changes, a collapse in export prices meant our trade-dependent country was living beyond its means and fast on its way to becoming 'a banana republic'. 'If this government cannot get the adjustment, get manufacturing going again and keep moderate wage outcomes and a sensible economic policy, then Australia is basically done for,' Keating told Laws. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It was that sense of urgency – the threat of a 'banana republic' – that helped blow away the cobwebs of complacency and drive the massive reforms of the 1980s and 1990s. Australia in the decades since has prospered. Yet once again we are having similar conversations. The economy doesn't seem to be functioning as it should, and may only be capable of growing at a fraction of the rate it used to. The budget is in structural deficit. The population is ageing, and our demand for government services grows and grows, even as our capacity to fund that extra spending goes the other way. Younger Australians are increasingly resentful about their lot, homes are too expensive and the world outside our shores looks more dangerous than it has in decades. Used to being a standout on the global stage, we are being relegated to the back of the pack. Living standards across the rich world climbed by an average of 22% over the past decade. In comparison, our living standards are up just 1.5%, according to analysis by Chris Richardson, an independent economist. Analysts place a lot of the blame for this on a slowdown on one thing: productivity growth. They point to the fact that our economy is no more productive now than it was in 2016. Over the longer term, productivity growth is the ingredient that delivers higher real wages, generates better-quality goods and helps pay for government services. Technological change can explain a lot of productivity growth over the decades. The promise of artificial intelligence is that it ignites an explosion of new growth as AI embeds itself deeper into the economy and our lives. With so much apparently at stake, Chalmers in a recent interview was asked if flatlining national productivity was a 'crisis'. 'No,' the treasurer said, 'but it's a big challenge'. Australia and Australians have a lot of 'big challenges', and some are regularly referred to as 'crises'. Yet not all are worthy of a three-day economic reform roundtable with 900 submissions and 40 ministerial mini-roundtables leading up to it. At the National Press Club on 18 June, Chalmers declared that the government has 'a responsibility to rebuild confidence in liberal democratic politics and economic institutions – by lifting living standards for working people in particular'. Days out from the start of the roundtable, Chalmers has been at pains to play down the very reform fervour that he fanned. Anthony Albanese appears to have little appetite for spending political capital in pushing through tough economic reforms. The PM has made it clear that there will be – read his lips – no new taxes this term. The treasurer has obediently narrowed the scope of the potential 'deliverables' to regulatory reform to get more homes built, with a side promise of some progress on longstanding policy ideas, like a road user charge. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The lack of a 'crisis' in productivity may make it hard to understand why we have spent nearly six weeks leading up to this talkfest in Canberra. But it does help explain the apparent lack of urgency to solve the issue. So what do economists reckon: do we have a productivity crisis? The answer, Richardson quips, 'depends whether you like rising living standards or not'. Are we a commodity price collapse away from becoming a 21st-century version of Keating's 'banana republic'? Saul Eslake, another independent economist, says no – the economy now is totally transformed. Rather than crisis, Eslake volunteers the word 'malaise'. 'I don't think it would help the debate to call it a productivity crisis,' he adds – that could lead to rushed and short-term measures that might just goose the economy for a year or two. 'There are no magic bullets, no short-term solutions. Nothing that can be done, even with the greatest amount of political will, to lift productivity growth in 12 months' time,' Eslake says. John Hawkins, an economics professor at the University of Canberra, says productivity is not a crisis because it's 'not something that is making people worse off'. Instead: 'It's a lost opportunity to make us better off'. 'We got used to the idea that incomes go up over time. Over the long run most of that increase has come from productivity,' Hawkins says. 'More recently we got away with low productivity growth because commodities were strong, but we need to do something if we want real income growth going forward.' Shadows of the 1980s, then, from which we can expect echoes of that era's reforms.
