Queensland to restrict good character references in sentencing of accused rapists
The consideration of good character references for accused rapists will be restricted under major Queensland court reforms but some advocates say it does not go far enough.
The changes introduced to Queensland parliament this week are among the recommendations made by a Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council report into rape and sexual assault.
Good character references from friends and families of accused rapists have traditionally been a consideration in a judge's decision on the sentence.
The report recommended that the use of good character references, including evidence of the offender's standing and contributions in the community, should be restricted in sentencing.
'No one wants to hear that a rapist is all-round great person, a trustworthy mate, or that they're respected in the community – especially not their victim, bravely sitting in court,' the attorney general, Deb Frecklington, said.
Frecklington said this law reform is very close to her heart.
One of the last criminal matters when she was a lawyer involved a former school principal who had been the citizen of the year in her local community.
A good character reference was taken into consideration during his sentencing.
'It is extremely distressing still for many of the victims,' she told parliament.
The bill means good character references can only be used as a mitigating factor if it is relevant to the offender's prospects of rehabilitation or risk of offending.
Courts can also decide not to treat the character reference as a mitigating factor depending on the 'nature and seriousness of the offence'.
'This will limit the use of problematic good character evidence,' Frecklington said.
Read More Government being 'counterproductive' over Clean Air Bill, says MP
The bill also includes recognition of victim harm as an 'express purpose of sentencing' and ensuring courts do not draw any inference about whether the victim was harmed from the fact that no victim impact statement was given.
The introduction of the laws was welcomed by the state opposition, who had lobbied for changes, calling it a win for sexual assault victim survivors.
'These new laws will empower victim-survivors and ensure that perpetrators are held accountable,' the shadow attorney general, Meaghan Scanlon, said.
The state's victims' commissioner, Beck O'Connor, tentatively welcomed the change but claimed it does not go far enough.
She said the laws should be strengthened to mean courts do not give any consideration to good character references in any circumstances.
'Victim-survivors continue to share their distress and trauma about the acceptance and reliance of character references, with little to no effort made by anyone to verify the content,' O'Connor said.
'Completely preventing the use of good character evidence is the best way to show victims they are being listened to, and their significant concerns have been addressed.'
A review of sentencing guidelines in New South Wales is under way, while the use of good character references remains in other states and territories.
Good character references for child sexual abuse offenders were removed in Tasmania in 2016.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Mayor
21-05-2025
- Business Mayor
Queensland to restrict good character references in sentencing of accused rapists
The consideration of good character references for accused rapists will be restricted under major Queensland court reforms but some advocates say it does not go far enough. The changes introduced to Queensland parliament this week are among the recommendations made by a Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council report into rape and sexual assault. Good character references from friends and families of accused rapists have traditionally been a consideration in a judge's decision on the sentence. The report recommended that the use of good character references, including evidence of the offender's standing and contributions in the community, should be restricted in sentencing. 'No one wants to hear that a rapist is all-round great person, a trustworthy mate, or that they're respected in the community – especially not their victim, bravely sitting in court,' the attorney general, Deb Frecklington, said. Frecklington said this law reform is very close to her heart. One of the last criminal matters when she was a lawyer involved a former school principal who had been the citizen of the year in her local community. A good character reference was taken into consideration during his sentencing. 'It is extremely distressing still for many of the victims,' she told parliament. The bill means good character references can only be used as a mitigating factor if it is relevant to the offender's prospects of rehabilitation or risk of offending. Courts can also decide not to treat the character reference as a mitigating factor depending on the 'nature and seriousness of the offence'. 'This will limit the use of problematic good character evidence,' Frecklington said. Read More Government being 'counterproductive' over Clean Air Bill, says MP The bill also includes recognition of victim harm as an 'express purpose of sentencing' and ensuring courts do not draw any inference about whether the victim was harmed from the fact that no victim impact statement was given. The introduction of the laws was welcomed by the state opposition, who had lobbied for changes, calling it a win for sexual assault victim survivors. 'These new laws will empower victim-survivors and ensure that perpetrators are held accountable,' the shadow attorney general, Meaghan Scanlon, said. The state's victims' commissioner, Beck O'Connor, tentatively welcomed the change but claimed it does not go far enough. She said the laws should be strengthened to mean courts do not give any consideration to good character references in any circumstances. 'Victim-survivors continue to share their distress and trauma about the acceptance and reliance of character references, with little to no effort made by anyone to verify the content,' O'Connor said. 'Completely preventing the use of good character evidence is the best way to show victims they are being listened to, and their significant concerns have been addressed.' A review of sentencing guidelines in New South Wales is under way, while the use of good character references remains in other states and territories. Good character references for child sexual abuse offenders were removed in Tasmania in 2016.
Yahoo
07-01-2025
- Yahoo
State to appeal two 'manifestly inadequate' sentences
A state government has filed appeals against two sentences it says were "manifestly inadequate" and failed to meet community expectations. Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington on Monday lodged the notices of appeal through the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. One involves the sentence of a juvenile who crashed a stolen car, killing three people and seriously injuring another in Maryborough in 2023. The other concerns that of Brock Andrew McDonald, in relation to the assault and deprivation of liberty of a young woman in October 2023. Nurse Sheree Robertson, 52, Kelsie Davies, 17 and pastor Michale Chandler, 29, were killed in 2023 on Queensland's Fraser Coast when their vehicles collided after being struck by a stolen car driven by the 13-year-old juvenile A fourth woman, 23-year-old Kaylah Behrens, was critically injured. The youth, with other juveniles, stole a Mercedes-Benz from a Maryborough home on April 30, 2023 and drove at speeds between 180 and 200km/h. The youth was sentenced to six years' detention in December and is likely to be released in just over two years' time. In the second matter, McDonald is alleged to have put a rope around a young woman's neck before dragging her into a car in the early hours of the morning. McDonald had pleaded guilty to charges of deprivation of liberty and assault occasioning bodily harm. He was sentenced to two-and-a-half years on parole in December, with 413 days as time served. Ms Frecklington said in her view, the sentences do not meet community standards. "I consider both sentences handed down to be manifestly inadequate," the attorney-general said in a statement. "Notices of appeal were lodged with the Court of Appeal registry today on my behalf by the Director of Public Prosecutions. "As the appeal process is now underway, no further comment will be made on these matters."
Yahoo
12-12-2024
- Yahoo
Children as young as 10 will face adult jail time in Australian state
The Australian state of Queensland has passed laws which will see children as young as 10 subject to the same penalties as adults if convicted of crimes such as murder, serious assault and break-ins. The government says the harsher sentencing rules are in response to "community outrage over crimes being perpetrated by young offenders" and will act as a deterrent. But many experts have pointed to research showing that tougher penalties do not reduce youth offending, and can in fact exacerbate it. The United Nations has also criticised the reforms, arguing they disregard conventions on the human rights of children and violate international law. The Liberal National Party (LNP) - which won the state election in October - made the rules a hallmark of its campaign, saying they put the "rights of victims" ahead of "the rights of criminals". "These laws are for every Queenslander who has ever felt unsafe and been a victim of youth crime across our state," Premier David Crisafulli said after parliament passed the bill on Thursday. Leading up to the vote, both sides of politics had claimed that Queensland was in the grips of a youth crime wave, and that a more punitive approach was necessary to combat the issue. But data from the Australian bureau of statistics, shows that youth crime has halved in Queensland across the past 14 years, that it hit its lowest rate in recorded history in 2022, and has remained relatively steady since. Figures from the Queensland Police Service and the Australian Institute of Criminology also demonstrate a clear downward trend. Dubbed by the government as "adult crime, adult time", the new laws list 13 offences which will now be subject to harsher prison sentences when committed by youths, including mandatory life detention for murder, with a non-parole period of 20 years. Previously, the maximum penalty for young offenders convicted of murder was 10 years in jail, with life imprisonment only considered if the crime was "particularly heinous". The laws also remove "detention as a last resort" provisions - which favour non-custodial orders, such as fines or community service, for children rather than incarceration - and will make it possible for judges to consider a child's full criminal history when sentencing. The Queensland Police Union has called the changes "a leap forward in the right direction", while Queensland's new Attorney-General Deb Frecklington says it will give courts the ability to "better address patterns of offending" and "hold people accountable for their actions". But in a summary, Frecklington also noted the changes were in direct conflict with international standards, that Indigenous children would be disproportionately impacted and that more youngsters were likely to be held in police cells for extended periods because detention centres are full. Queensland already has more children in detention than any other Australian state or territory. Premier Crisafulli said on Thursday that although there may be "pressure in the short-term" his government had a long-term plan to "deliver a raft of other detention facilities and different options". Australia's commissioner for children, Anne Hollonds, described the changes as an "international embarrassment". She also accused Queensland's government of "ignoring evidence" which suggests "the younger a child comes into contact with the justice system, the more likely it is that they will continue to commit more serious crimes". "The fact that [the bill's] provisions are targeting our most at-risk children makes this retreat from human rights even more shocking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. Other legal experts, who gave evidence to a parliamentary hearing on the bill last week, said the laws could have unintended consequences for victims, with children being less likely to plead guilty given the tougher sentences, resulting in more trials and longer court delays.
