Grains and soybeans fall on U.S.-China trade talks confusion
Grains, soybeans down on U.S.-China trade talks uncertainty
Welcome rain forecast in U.S. also weakens wheat
By Naveen Thukral and Michael Hogan
SINGORE/HAMBURG, - Chicago soybeans, wheat and corn fell on Monday as confusion about the status of talks to end the U.S.-China trade war weighed.
Forecasts of welcome rain in U.S. grain belts also weakened wheat.
"There is no clarity on U.S.-China trade talks," said one trader in Singapore. "As of now, soybeans coming from the U.S. to China will attract tariffs."
Chicago Board of Trade most-active soybeans fell 0.4% to $10.54-1/4 a bushel, at 1106 GMT. Corn fell 0.9% to $4.80-1/4 a bushel, wheat fell 1.5% to $5.36-3/4 a bushel.
"It does not look like a quick breakthrough in the U.S./China trade dispute is on the cards," one German trader said. "There are conflicting statements at the top level."
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday he has not discussed tariffs with Chinese officials and doesn't know if President Donald Trump had talked to his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping.
Last week, Trump said talks on tariffs were taking place with China and that he and Xi have spoken. Beijing has denied that trade talks are occurring.
News last week that China has exempted some U.S. goods from its tariffs sparked hopes for a de-escalation. However, U.S. soybean and grain exports to China look like they will be stopped by Chinese tariffs for the foreseeable future, traders say.
"Forecasts are showing rain in the U.S. Plains in the next week, which will be good for wheat," the German trader said. "Meanwhile, Russian wheat exports are picking up despite cheap U.S. prices, this competition is not welcome for U.S. and west European exporters."
Meanwhile, U.S. soybean and corn plantings are also believed to be making good progress with rain not enough to disrupt work, traders said.
Russia's April wheat exports will reach 2.2 million metric tons, up from 1.9 million tons in March.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
First Published: 28 Apr 2025, 05:08 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rising uncertainty over trade wars and de-dollarisation are pushing up global demand for gold — its supply is limited: Campbell R. Harvey
Campbell R. Harvey explains gold's enduring value, citing its historical stability from ancient times to today. He notes that the financialization of gold through ETFs and geopolitical factors like de-dollarization influence its price. While volatile in the short term, gold serves as a long-term store of value and a potential hedge against stock market downturns, offering portfolio diversification. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Campbell R. Harvey is Professor of Finance at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Speaking to Srijana Mitra Das, he discusses the value of gold — through the ages:A. Part of my work looks at gold historically and why this is so valuable now. Gold has a very long track record which spans millennia. It's easy to work with because it's a soft metal. It doesn't tarnish — it keeps its lustre and it has artistic worth. Also, gold has held its value through time. I tell two stories about that — one is the cost of a loaf of bread in Nebuchadnezzar's time around 2,500 years ago. There is historical data on how many loaves you could buy for an ounce of gold then. If you convert that to today's prices, it's about $7 a loaf — that's what I pay at my artisanal bakery other story dates from Roman times almost 2,000 years ago in Emperor Augustus' reign. There is data on how much Roman centurions were paid in gold as well as the coins themselves to discern the gold's purity — what Roman centurions were paid in gold 2,000 years ago would cover the wage of an army captain in the US today. That means gold has held its value over the long term.A. Yes. In recent years, the first driver has been the financialisation of gold — physical gold is awkward to store. People who might have wanted it in their portfolio didn't want to take the risk of buying the actual metal. Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) were introduced in the United States in 2004 — that made it possible for the average investor to hold gold at 25 to 40 basis points a year, with the ETF provider taking care of storage. Institutional investors who didn't want to bother with warehousing bullion could do the same thing — hence, the price of gold increased. Previously, demand was unfulfilled because of institutional constraints — suddenly, those were broken and the price rose. Another force is what I call 'de-dollarisation' or the 'weaponisation' of the US dollar, particularly against Russia in terms of sanctions which have meant Russian entities being banned from the SWIFT system for transfer in US could do this, being the reserve currency of the world. I think certain countries — in particular, China — took note of that. The 'weaponisation' of the dollar spurred a move to be independent of it. Hence, the idea of 'de-dollarisation' with China taking actions consistent with that. One step towards doing this is to bolster the credibility of your own currency — to have gold in reserve does this and China's been a there is heightened uncertainty, given the potential for a trade war. In such times, people tend to increase their allocation to safe assets — gold is in that group. Another issue is a perception that the United States might not be the safe haven it was 10 or 20 years ago. When the US dollar suddenly becomes riskier and Moody's downgrades the US credit rating, some countries start thinking,'We need to diversify our reserve holdings and reduce dollar exposure.' So, you sell bonds — however, you need to replace them with something else. Gold is an option. This isn't just central banks — when uncertainty grows, institutional investors increase safe assets like consider supply and demand dynamics — gold's supply is very sticky, being a combination of mining and re-cycling. Mining supply doesn't move much. Even though gold's price has risen dramatically in recent years, actual mining supply has essentially stayed the same. It's hard to ramp up supply — opening a new mine takes years. Hence, gold prices are very sensitive to shifts in demand.A. Gold holds its value over the long term. I quoted two examples about that, one from 2,000 years ago and one from 2,500 years ago. Historically, gold has held its value over a very long horizon. That's not very relevant for most investors with a much shorter horizon though — and gold is an unreliable inflation hedge over shorter horizons. Its volatility is approximately the same as the S&P we look over the last 20 years, gold has more than held its value — it's actually gained in inflation-adjusted value. But if you look at the 20 years before that, gold underperformed inflation — it did not hold its value. The longer the horizon historically, the better gold is in terms of a hedge. However, gold's risk should also be measured by how it interacts with other assets in your portfolio. It turns out gold historically is uncorrelated with the stock makes it an attractive hedging property. In my research, I've looked at the last 11 major drawdowns in the S&P 500 — each had very large negative returns for the stock market. Gold, in 8 out of 11 situations, provided a positive return. In three, it was negative but that number was small. Gold could actually act to reduce a portfolio's risk — but, given its volatility, sometimes it'll work, sometimes, it won't, as the historical data shows expressed are personal
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Without me, Trump would have lost election': Elon Musk launches all-out attack on US President
After Elon Musk criticised US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination", he launched another brutal attack on him. Elon Musk said that without his support Trump would have lost 2024 Presidential election. This came after Trump said he was very disappointed with Musk. The war of words between Donald Trump and Elon Musk intensified on Thursday, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO responding bluntly to the US president's criticism over his opposition to Trump's signature economic bill. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Elon Musk vs Trump intensifies Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads After Elon Musk's continuous attack on Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill', the tech billionaire launched an all-out attack on the US President, saying without his support Trump would have lost the election."Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," the Tesla CEO said in a post on X. In comment section, he wrote, "Such ingratitude".This comes after US President questioned his relationship with the tech billionaire- indicating their close alliance may be no more. Trump said Thursday he doesn't know if he and Elon Musk will still have "a great relationship" after the former DOGE head has spent days blasting the GOP's spending bill."Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office before his bilateral sit-down with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm very disappointed … I've helped Elon a lot.'The tight relationship between Trump and the Tesla CEO has been fracturing on public display. Asked about Musk's ongoing criticism, Trump said he was "very surprised."The president noted that Musk hasn't said anything "about me that's bad" but added he'd rather the billionaire "criticize me than the bill." Trump argued Musk was upset because "we took the EV mandate," in reference to the electric vehicle tax credit the legislation would kill.'I would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Elon…I'm very disappointed with Elon. He knew this bill better than anyone and he only developed a problem when he found out I would cut the EV mandate… When he left he said the most beautiful things about me, he hasn't said anything bad yet but I'm sure that will be next…I've helped Elon a lot… Elon worked hard at DOGE and I think he misses the place…I think he got out there and he's no longer in this beautiful Oval Office…it's not just Elon, I think when some people leave they miss it so badly they develop a type of TDS…some embrace it and some become hostile," the President war of words between Donald Trump and Elon Musk intensified on Thursday, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO responding bluntly to the US president's criticism over his opposition to Trump's signature economic bill. 'Whatever,' Musk posted on X. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.'Musk's post followed Trump's remarks from the Oval Office, where he said he was 'very disappointed' in the billionaire. 'I've helped him a lot,' Trump said. 'He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut the EV mandate.'Musk hit back quickly, saying, 'False. This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!'Musk also ridiculed Trump's description of the legislation as 'big and beautiful,' quipping, 'In all of human history, no bill has ever been both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! It's either big and ugly or slim and beautiful. Slim and beautiful is the way.'The legislation, Trump's flagship tax and energy reform proposal, slashes incentives for electric vehicles and solar energy—measures Musk has openly criticized. Their public disagreement has sparked speculation that the once-amicable relationship between the two may now be unravelingThe former DOGE head departed the Trump administration in May, and has since bashed the "one big, beautiful bill" as a "disgusting abomination." Since then, Musk has urged his followers on X to call their representatives to "KILL the BILL." Some House Republicans have privately revealed their frustration with Musk, including criticism of his competence in the White House.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Ambitious, smart, industrious Indian students are welcome: German envoy urges to choose state-run universities
By Shafali Nigam New Delhi [India], June 5 (ANI): German Ambassador to India Dr Philipp Ackermann on Thursday encouraged Indian students to explore state-owned and state-run universities in Germany, which offer better quality education at a lower cost. Germany is positioning itself as a global hub for higher education, focusing on attracting Indian students and professionals. With 50,000 Indian students already studying in Germany, the country is keen to increase this number, particularly in top universities. The ambassador highlighted the benefits of studying in Germany, including low fees, high-quality education, and a welcoming environment for skilled labour. These universities offer top-class education at a lower cost than private institutions. He also warned against private colleges that may not provide the same quality of education. Speaking exclusively with ANI, Ackermann highlighted the country's liberal laws for skilled labour immigration and its excellent experience with Indian students. 'We have very liberal laws when it comes to skilled labour immigration. I feel that in skilled labour, we are very good and performing. What is of interest to us is that when it comes to higher education, we have 50,000 Indian students in Germany, the biggest non-German group at German universities. We want to increase this number; we want to increase it specifically in one area, namely, in the top universities area. Now, our experience with Indian students is excellent. We have had a very, very good experience with the ambitious, industrious, and very courageous bunch of people from this country who made it after graduation and had an opportunity to get jobs after graduation. Now, when you see what happens in the world, you see the US being much more difficult, and so easily, you see, people's background being checked in the US. I can state only very firmly that these ambitious, smart, and industrious students are very welcome in Germany,' said the German envoy. Germany is emerging as a premier destination for Indian students seeking top-class education and skill development, and it offers high-quality education, particularly in technical and STEM subjects, at a lower cost compared to countries like the US. 'They get a first-class education, above all in technical subjects, or in STEM subjects, but at a much lower cost than in the US. So, I encourage these smart and ambitious students of India who want to get a top-class education, if you don't get what you want in other parts of the world, focus on Germany,' said Ackermann. Language is not a barrier, as courses are taught in English, making it easier for Indian students to adapt. Moreover, state-owned and state-run universities in Germany offer affordable education, making it an attractive option for students. The ambassador advises Indian students to be cautious of private colleges in Germany that may not offer the same quality of education as state-owned universities. These colleges often charge high fees and may not provide a German diploma. 'Language is not an issue. The courses are taught in English. The fees are very low. At the same time, I have to say that we see agencies here in India aggressively recruiting students for non-German colleges in Germany. Private colleges, coming from other countries, third countries, like the UK, Poland, Italy, and after graduation, do not produce a German diploma. It's a pretty sure Italian diploma. So, we are very concerned that these colleges do not charge much money. People pay a lot of money for education, which is not to be compared to the education that state-owned and state-run universities offer, which is much cheaper and much better. So, I would say that I would encourage every student in India to look first and foremost at the state-owned and state-run universities in Germany to check whether they have something that interests them. It is by far the better choice,' said Ackermann. Philipp Ackermann also discussed the country's foreign policy approach towards India, highlighting the strong commitment of the new German government to the Indo-German partnership. He emphasised the importance of personal meetings between leaders and officials of both countries. 'I think we can say now that Germany, with the new government under the new Chancellor, the new coalition, has exactly the same focus on India as the previous government. We have seen a very successful visit by Dr Jaishankar in Berlin. In the last month, we had a very fruitful conversation between the Chancellor and Prime Minister Modi. We'll have a series of visit of parliamentarians, foreign secretaries, other ministers will come. So, I think we will see a series of very interesting personal meetings in the course of the year, and that shows how strongly the new government is committed to this Indo-German partnership. So, I am very happy about that,' he added. Germany and India are collaborating on climate change, smart cities, and biodiversity projects, marking a shift from traditional development cooperation to a partnership of equals. 'India and Germany are partners in a common effort to get a grip on what is really pressing in the world. Therefore, both sides have agreed in what we call for partnership of green and sustainability developments. It's a very interesting partnership where India and Germany sit together every year and identify projects where you can implement measures that are fighting climate change, improving smart cities, in favour of biodiversity and its consequences. It's a partnership on equal footing, and I think we are beyond development cooperation areas,' said Ackermann. The ambassador also praised Dr Jaishankar's recent visit to Germany, describing it as a huge success. 'The visit was a huge success. We are always very happy when the Minister of External Affairs travels to Germany. It was a very important visit because it was the first visit for the new foreign minister to Germany. I think the bilateral visit went excellently. Dr S Jaishankar also met the new Federal Chancellor. He met with parliamentarians and gave a speech at a Think tank. So, it was a very comprehensive and good visit. I think it made an Indian point of view very clear,' said the German Ambassador. He highlighted the importance of the visit in strengthening bilateral ties and conveying the Indian perspective on various issues, including the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam. 'Dr Jaishankar is an extremely eloquent and very intelligent foreign minister. He can wonderfully explain things. I think the Indian point of view was heard and seen. Everywhere he went, it was made very clear how terrible we felt the terrorist attack in Pahalgam and what a disaster that is for the families who lost their loved ones, and if that is not an act of terror, then what is an act of terror? Our sympathies and feelings were shared with Dr S Jaishankar because that also shocked Germany,' said Ackermann. (ANI)
