Alaska man sentenced for trafficking guns to Sacramento
(FOX40.COM) — An Alaska man was sentenced to two and a half years in prison Wednesday after he was found guilty of buying guns in his home state and trafficking them to Sacramento, the U.S. Department of Justice said.
Video Above: Understanding Common Gun Terms
According to the DOJ, Cornelius Smith, 34, legally purchased 28 guns between February 2021 and April 2022. In filling out forms required for some of the purchases, he indicated he was not buying the guns for someone else.
Smith then travelled to Sacramento with the guns, and 10 days later, one of the guns was recovered near the capital city, the DOJ said.
Half of the 28 guns Smith purchased were found in California, 'nearly all' in the Sacramento area.
The DOJ said the firearms have been linked to attempted homicides, robberies and gang-affiliated shootings.
The other 14 guns have not been recovered.
'Mr. Smith deliberately purchased firearms in Alaska for the sole purpose of illegally trafficking them to prohibited individuals in California, and those firearms directly contributed to gun and gang violence in and around the Sacramento area,' said U.S. Attorney Michael J. Heyman for the District of Alaska. 'Let this conviction and sentence highlight that the straw purchase of firearms in Alaska – especially for the purpose of supplying the firearms to violent criminals – will be prosecuted.'
Stockton police, local authorities conduct Saturation Traffic Enforcement Program
Smith was convicted on 11 of 12 counts of firearms trafficking in November. In addition to serving two and a half years in prison, he is required to serve three years on supervised release and complete 120 hours of community service.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hatchet-wielding drug trafficker who sold fentanyl in downtown Portland sentenced
PORTLAND, Ore. () — A drug dealer active in the Portland area was sentenced to more than six years in federal prison, authorities said. Bexon Javier Calix-Rivera was 'a Honduran national unlawfully residing in Portland,' the U.S. Department of Justice said. The 21-year-old had multiple encounters and arrests with the Portland Police Bureau downtown for alleged drug dealing and other charges, stretching back to two years ago. On Thursday, Calix-Rivera was sentenced to 78 months in prison and four years of supervised release. Longview OKs 'zero-tolerance policy' for camping Following a six-count indictment by a federal grand jury in Portland on June 11, 2024, on multiple drug trafficking and gun charges, Calix-Rivera ultimately pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute fentanyl earlier this year. On June 4, 2024, PPB officers saw Calix-Rivera carrying a hatchet, recognizing him from previous drug arrest encounters. He was once again engaging in 'hand-to-hand drug transactions in downtown Portland,' the U.S. DOJ said. 'Officers attempted to detain Calix-Rivera, but he fled on foot,' The U.S. DOJ said in a press release. 'When officers apprehended Calix-Rivera, they seized fentanyl powder, a firearm, and $755 in cash. PPB officers booked Calix-Rivera in the Multnomah County Jail, and he was released the same day.' Ten days prior to this arrest, PPB officers encountered Calix-Rivera in downtown Portland, detained him, and seized hundreds of fentanyl pills, fentanyl powder, and $1,492 in cash. He was arrested and later released. Before that, PPB had first encountered and arrested Calix-Rivera back in January 2023. Police officers had arrived at a pre-arranged drug deal in Portland, court records say. Officers found thousands of fentanyl pills, fentanyl powder and heroin after searching his car He was booked into the Multnomah County Jail and released the next day. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
President Trump responds to return of alleged gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia to US
President Donald Trump responded to the sudden return of Salvadoran illegal and alleged gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia, saying, "he's a bad guy" and that the courts will "show how horrible this guy is." Trump appeared unbothered by Abrego Garcia's return on Friday afternoon, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that the Department of Justice made the decision and that soon the world will see how "horrible" a person he is. Trump expressed confidence in the DOJ and its case against Abrego Garcia. "The DOJ made a decision," he said, adding, "I think their decisions have been very, very good." "Maybe they just said, 'Look, all of these people, these judges, they want to try and run the country.' A local judge trying to run the country," said Trump. "The man has a horrible past, and I could see a decision being made, bring him back, show everybody how horrible this guy is." The president said, "Frankly, we have to do something because the judges are trying to take the place of a president that won in a landslide. That's not supposed to be the way it is. So, I can see bringing him back. I could see. He's a bad guy." The Trump administration deported Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old illegal alien who was living in Maryland, to a high-security prison in his home country back in March on the grounds that he is a member of the violent MS-13 gang. Soon after his deportation, Democrats jumped to advocate for Abrego Garcia's release and return to the U.S., arguing that he was a wrongly deported "Maryland man." Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Friday that Abrego Garcia, 29, has landed in the United States and is set to face federal charges for human smuggling and conspiracy. "Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice," Bondi said. "A grand jury in the Middle District of Tennessee returned a sealed indictment charging him with alien smuggling and conspiracy." According to the indictment, Garcia played a "significant role" in a human smuggling ring operating for nearly a decade. Bondi described him as a full-time smuggler who made more than 100 trips, transporting women, children, and MS-13 gang-affiliated persons throughout the United States. Fox News Digital obtained Tennessee Highway Patrol bodycam footage from a 2022 traffic stop where troopers pulled over Garcia for speeding. Inside his vehicle were eight other men, raising immediate suspicions. "He's hauling these people for money," one trooper said. Troopers found $1,400 in cash and flagged Garcia in the National Crime Information Center, which returned a gang/terrorism alert. ICE was called but never responded. Though Democrats have also pushed a narrative that Abrego Garcia is a "family man," court records show Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, filed a protective order against her husband in August 2020. The order said their shared son and stepchildren needed protection from Abrego Garcia, accusing him of verbal and physical abuse against her and mental abuse against her children. Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who led the charge among Democrats to push for Abrego Garcia's return, released a statement after news of the return broke, saying, "For months the Trump Administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution. Today, they appear to have finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling
By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear an appeal by Alabama officials of a judicial decision that a man convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled - a finding that spared him from the death penalty - as they press ahead with the Republican-governed state's bid to execute him. A lower court ruled that Joseph Clifton Smith is intellectually disabled based on its analysis of his IQ test scores and expert testimony. Under a 2002 Supreme Court precedent, executing an intellectually disabled person violates the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which starts in October. Smith, now 54, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of a man named Durk Van Dam in Alabama's Mobile County. Smith fatally beat the man with a hammer and saw in order to steal his boots, some tools and $140, according to evidence in the case. The victim's body was found in his mud-bound Ford Ranger truck in an isolated, wooded area. The Supreme Court's 2002 precedent in a case called Atkins v. Virginia barred executing intellectually disabled people. President Donald Trump's administration backed Alabama's appeal in the case. At issue in Smith's case is whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in assessing a death row inmate's intellectual disability. Like many states, conservative-leaning Alabama considers evidence of IQ test scores of 70 or below as part of the standard for determining intellectual disability. Supreme Court rulings in 2014 and 2017 allowed courts to consider IQ score ranges that are close to 70 along with other evidence of intellectual disability, such as testimony of "adaptive deficits." Smith had five IQ test scores, the lowest of which was 72. A federal judge noted that Smith's score could be as low as 69, given the standard of error of plus or minus three points. The judge then found that Smith had significant deficits from an early age in social and interpersonal skills, independent living and academics. The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's conclusions in 2023, setting aside Smith's death sentence. This prompted Alabama officials to file their first of two appeals to the Supreme Court in the case. In November, the justices threw out the 11th Circuit's decision, saying that the lower court's evaluation of Smith's IQ scores can be read two ways, and requires clarification. Ten days later, the 11th Circuit issued an opinion clarifying that its evaluation was based on "a holistic approach to multiple IQ scores" that also considered additional relevant evidence, including expert testimony. This prompted a second appeal by Alabama officials to the Supreme Court. Alabama in its filing to the Supreme Court argued that the lower courts in the case applied the wrong legal standard in establishing Smith's intellectual disability and urged the justices to take up the appeal to provide clarity on the issue. Friday's action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia McCabe. It is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top U.S. judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked.
