Keir Starmer urged to stand up to EU over new tough holiday checks on British citizens
The Prime Minister was warned that the new regime, which will require Britons to prove they have medical insurance and a return ticket, will cause 'absolute chaos'.
Nigel Farage made clear Sir Keir should not accept the incoming rules and insist on a new deal.
The Reform UK leader told the Mail on Sunday: 'The PM's got to be tough.
'He needs to stand up and say this is completely over the top.'
And Shadow Transport Secretary Richard Holden said 'hard-working Brits' were coming off 'second best' because Sir Keir failed to negotiate a better deal.
Mr Holden added: 'So much for Starmer's so-called reset with Brussels. We're once again a rule taker, not a rule maker, and we have nothing to show for it.'
The criticism began over details of a strict new digital system which will apply to Britons and other non-EU travellers from October 12.
As well as the medical insurance and return ticket requirements, non-EU passport holders will have to have their fingerprints and a photograph taken the first time they use travel into the EU.
Passengers are also expected to be asked a series of questions to check they have proof of accommodation and enough money for the trip.
At most airports and ferry terminals, passengers will undergo the process at automated kiosks. But those who answer no to any questions are expected to be quizzed by a border officer, who could refuse entry.
The long-awaited 'entry/exit system' (EES) will also automatically flag arrivals at risk of overstaying.
Under post-Brexit rules, Britons without the right to work or reside in the EU can only stay for 90 days in any 180-day period. The new entry system has been long in
the planning and is only due to be fully operational across the EU next April.
But there are fears that as the system begins there will be huge queues at EU airports, as well as delays at Dover, Folkestone and London's St Pancras station – where French border checks are carried out before people embark on cross-Channel journeys.
And last night, Mr Farage said Brussels had created a system that was almost as strict as 'getting into America'. He added: 'How on earth we managed to negotiate a deal as bad as this, I do not know.
'For all the travellers who go to France, to have to prove medical insurance will be a very lengthy process.
'Once again, Starmer has gaslit the public, telling us we've got a deal where we can go straight through [digital passport] gates.'
But a Home Office spokesman said the Government had 'been working closely' with the European Commission, member states, local authorities and the travel industry to prepare ports for EES.
They added: 'We are supporting ports and carriers to ensure EES registration is simple for anyone travelling to the Schengen area.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour is flooding Britain's streets with a tidal wave of dangerous criminals: PHILIP FLOWER
As a young sergeant in the Met 30 years ago, I chased and tackled an armed robber who had stabbed a sub-postmistress during a raid. I had a truncheon. He had a whacking great knife, and he tried to wield it against me and another copper as a crowd of schoolchildren in the street watched in mute horror. We disarmed the man and arrested him. The sub-postmistress was badly shaken but recovered from her injuries. And the robber got four years. At the time, I was disappointed with the sentence, but today it's likely he would serve less than half that. Under Labour's shambolic scheme to reduce overcrowding in prisons he might well be deemed a 'low risk' and released after serving just 40 per cent of his time. In other words, if he'd already done a year on remand waiting for trial, he could be sentenced this week – and out by Christmas. Such a travesty of justice is not a rare event. It's happening 100 times a day: According to the Ministry of Justice, criminals are being given early release at the rate of 3,000 a month. Latest figures show over 26,400 prisoners have been let out early in the first seven months of the scheme – with a significant number of them, around 3 per cent, sentenced to ten years or more. To describe such people as 'low risk', as the Government does, is farcical. Judges do not sentence criminals to ten years unless they are a real danger to society. As well as violent offenders, these could be serious drug traffickers, or people who supply guns to gangs, or fraudsters who prey on the elderly. Not only will they have committed a serious offence, but it's very likely their record will also show a long list of previous crimes. Sentencing Council guidelines are stringent. Many judges admit privately that they would like to impose tougher penalties, but their rulings are tightly constrained by directives that must be followed. If a defendant gets ten years, it's because anything less is not safe. Surveys show that between two-thirds and three-quarters of the public believe sentences are already too lenient. Few officers disagree with that. It is demoralising for police to put their safety on the line every day to protect society, only for the thugs and the lawbreakers to smirk as they are once again let off lightly. And if they do get sent to jail, they have the reassurance of knowing they will probably serve less than half their sentence. That undermines the deterrent effect of prison and allows criminals to feel they've beaten the system. It's no wonder that, when the first wave of prisoners won early release in September last year, they were blowing kisses and flicking V-signs at the cameras. There's no way, of course, that the parole boards operating under Labour's hastily devised scheme can begin to assess each case thoroughly. With an average of 100 releases a day, seven days a week, the authorities can barely have time to shout 'Next, please!' – let alone discuss the potential risk each felon presents. Serious issues such as mental health and past history of violence are all too likely to be overlooked. Despite this mass release, Britain's prisons are still gravely overcrowded. Last year, the former chief inspector of prisons, Dame Anne Owers, warned the system could be only days from breakdown. Her successor, Charlie Taylor, says: 'The Government dealt with the problem not by turning off the taps but by letting out the bathwater.' That's an understatement. To flood the streets of Britain's towns and cities with 3,000 criminals a month isn't overflow. It's a tidal wave.
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Vance tells Europe to step up in Ukraine, even though it lacks the strength
Europe needs to 'step up and take a bigger role' in funding Ukraine in its war against Russia, JD Vance, the US vice-president, said on Sunday. Speaking to Fox News, he claimed Americans were 'sick' of spending their tax dollars abroad and Washington was 'done funding' Kyiv. 'If you care so much about this conflict, you should be willing to play a more direct and a more substantial way in funding this war yourself,' he said. He spoke as European leaders again scrambled to build a united defence behind Ukraine, after President Trump suggested he may cut a deal with President Putin that could mean Ukraine has to concede territory. It is clear, however, that even if it remains unwavering in its diplomatic stance, Europe lacks the strength to back Kyiv in negotiating favourable terms in a future peace agreement or to enforce a ceasefire. The so-called 'coalition of the willing' — a multinational force led by the UK and France intended to support Ukraine and potentially monitor a ceasefire — looks highly unlikely to meet Sir Keir Starmer's original hopes of 64,000 troops on the ground. The Kremlin has also said it will not accept western troops in Ukraine, warning that their presence could trigger a new world war. Even if Putin were to agree, European defence ministers have said there is 'no chance' they could reach the 10,000 troops floated by the UK. Even 25,000 as a joint effort would 'be a push', The Times reported in April. 'Russia has 800,000 [troops],' Dovile Sakaliene, Lithuania's defence minister, told European counterparts. 'If we can't even raise 64,000 that doesn't look weak — it is weak.' It falls far short of the 200,000 troops that President Zelensky estimated in January were needed to credibly enforce peace across Ukraine's extensive front line and to prevent a new Russian attack after any ceasefire deal. Experts put the figure at closer to 600,000. The group consists largely of European and Commonwealth countries. So far, the UK and France are the only countries to have committed a specific number of troops. Finland is reportedly concerned that any deployment would 'dilute' its own border defences, while Poland, Spain and Italy have made clear they will not commit any soldiers. Estonia has said it may only be willing to send a company-sized combat unit of ground troops. Proposals have so far been hampered by shortages of manpower, political reluctance and logistical hurdles around the rules of engagement should Russia attack. Financially, Europe overtook the US as the biggest supplier of aid to Ukraine in June, with about €72 billion in military aid compared with the US's €65 billion, according to the Kiel Institute's Ukraine Support Tracker. The US has supplied the most sophisticated and lethal equipment, however, including advanced air-defence systems and precision munitions. Much of Europe's aid finances the purchase of US-made weapons, underscoring its dependence on the country. Zelensky said in January that about 40 per cent of Ukraine's weapons came from the US, about 33 per cent were produced domestically and less than 30 per cent came from Europe. Russia relies largely on its own resources, bolstered by partnerships with China and Iran. North Korea has also supplied between nine and 12 million artillery shells and rockets since 2023. Pyongyang allocates nearly 16 per cent of its government budget to defence, a proportion unmatched by any European state. Last year, EU members spent €326 billion on defence, about 1.9 per cent of GDP — a 30 per cent rise since 2021 — but the US spent nearly $1 trillion, or 3.4 per cent of GDP. JORGE SILVA/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES To close the gap, the EU launched an €800 billion readiness plan aiming to modernise and integrate military capabilities. But progress is slow, hindered by fragmented industries, political divisions and lack of a shared strategy. The EU has imposed 14 rounds of economic sanctions on Russia since 2022, freezing more than €200 billion of Russian central bank assets and cutting energy imports. But Russia has adapted by deepening trade ties with China, India and other non-western partners, while Trump's promise to impose crippling secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian oil have largely failed to materialise. Europe could offer incentives, such as unfreezing Russian assets, as bargaining chips in any settlement. However, that relies on Putin seeing negotiation as preferable to continued war, something that is far from certain. Following an emergency summit on Saturday hosted by David Lammy, the foreign secretary, with Vance and senior European and Ukrainian officials, Kaja Kallas, the EU's policy chief, said she planned to convene an extraordinary meeting of EU foreign ministers on Monday. 'The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously,' she said, and any deal 'must have Ukraine and the EU included'. Kallas framed the talks as a matter for not just Ukraine's security, but the whole of Europe's. European diplomatic efforts are significant but, without military backing, risk being symbolic. The ability to uphold Ukraine's territorial integrity depends on sustained US commitment of weapons, troops and political will.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Alex Salmond's allies hit back at Nicola Sturgeon's claims he leaked details of sexual misconduct saga
Allies of Alex Salmond have hit back at Nicola Sturgeon 's claims he may have leaked details of his own sexual misconduct saga. The ex-SNP leader and Alba Party founder was cleared in 2020 of 13 sexual offence charges, including attempted rape, though his lawyer conceded during the trial that his client could have been a 'better man'. The latest extract from Sturgeon's soon-to-be published memoir, Frankly, centres around how Salmond reacted to multiple allegations of sexual misconduct levelled against him in 2018 - many of which made their way into the press. In the book Sturgeon denies any responsibility for the leaks and says that she does not know who was behind them. Controversially, she also claims in her memoir that it would have been 'classic Alex' to have made the leaks himself. Her remarks have caused fury among the Scottish political elite, with Kenny MacAskill - the man who succeeded Salmond as Alba Party leader - calling Sturgeon out for her 'hypocrisy'. Meanwhile, Chris McEleny, the party's former general secretary, branded Sturgeon's speculations a 'fabrication'. MacAskill, a former SNP minister who succeeded Salmond as Alba Party leader, recently called for a public inquiry into the way sexual misconduct complaints against Salmond were handled. In the book Sturgeon denies any responsibility for the leaks and says that she does not know who was behind them - but suggested it would have been 'classic Alex' for him to have He posted on X: 'It's one thing to be supposedly candid in your autobiography. 'Quite another to block openness and transparency when in office and by those you continue to support. 'This hypocrisy is yet another reason for an inquiry into the Scottish government's actions relating to Alex Salmond.' Alex Salmond served as first minister of Scotland from 2007 but stood down in 2014 after losing the Scottish independence referendum. Sturgeon took over the top job and in 2018 allegations against Salmond began to surface, following a review of the Scottish government's 'policies and processes for addressing inappropriate conduct' in the wake of the #metoo scandal. Salmond was accused of a string of sexual offences between June 2008 and November 2014, which ranged from him stroking a civil servant's hair to trying to rape a former Scottish Government official in Bute House. However, in March 2020 he was cleared of all charges, although his lawyer Alex Prentice KC famously said: 'If in some ways the former first minister had been a better man, I wouldn't be here, you wouldn't be here, none of us would be here. 'I'm not here to suggest he always behaved well or couldn't have been a better man on occasions. That would be a waste of my time. MacAskill, a former SNP minister, called Sturgeon out for her 'hypocrisy' after claiming she 'block[ed] openness and transparency when in office' The pair were once close, but Sturgeon now says that once she realised Salmond's 'thirst for revenge' was greater than the bond between them, she knew their friendship was over 'But I'm in a court of law and I'm dealing, not with whether he could have been a better man because he certainly could have been better. 'I'm dealing with whether or not it was established he was guilty of serious, sometimes very serious, criminal charges.' Additionally a judicial review in 2019 found that the Scottish government's investigation into Salmond's alleged misconduct was unfair, unlawful and biased. As a result Salmond received £500,000 in legal expenses. Chris McEleny, the Alba Party's former general secretary, who was himself expelled following an investigation into 'gross misconduct' earlier this year, called Sturgeon's remarks a 'fabrication'. He said the investigation into Salmond was a 'stitch-up' and claimed that a number of public bodies had 'conspired to jail Salmond'. He said: 'Alex Salmond delivered an SNP government, an SNP majority and an independence referendum whereas Nicola Sturgeon delivered nothing whatsoever for the national cause. 'Nicola might think she can fabricate her own version of the truth now that Alex is no longer here but the reality is her book will end up in a bargain basket whilst Alex Salmond will reside in the pages of the Scottish history books.' The story about the investigation of sexual misconduct claims against Salmond was broken by journalist David Clegg, then political editor of the Daily Record. Speaking on BBC Scotland's The Sunday Show, Mr Clegg, who is currently editor of The Courier, called the notion that Alex Salmond had leaked the story himself 'a conspiracy theory too far'. He said: 'But I think it shows the level of suspicion and the deep rift that had formed between Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon prior to his death.' Me Clegg said a document arrived at the Daily Record office with the claims against Salmond summarised - but described the idea that it came from Salmond as 'not credible'. He added: 'There is obviously some mystery and speculation about what went on seven years ago and how that happened. 'But if it was Alex Salmond who had leaked it, when I phoned him up that night to put the claims to him, he did an incredible acting job of seeming surprised and shocked. 'I have heard this from people close to Nicola Sturgeon before and it's always struck me as not credible and I would be very surprised if it was the case.' Salmond died of a heart attack in North Macedonia last October, aged 69 - but before his death he maintained there had been a 'conspiracy' between his accusers to bring him down. 'What he never did was show any contrition,' lamented Sturgeon, who added that she felt 'sick' over the allegations. In an extract published by The Sunday Times, the former First Minister added that 'ruthless' Salmond would have done anything to extricate himself from blame - even if it meant the downfall of his party. 'There was also never the merest hint of concern about the damage he did to the party he previously led. 'Indeed, it felt to me that he would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him. 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all.' Sturgeon said the notion his accusers had collaborated with one another to accuse him of misconduct was 'a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct'. She added: 'That he tried to distort and weaponise genuine expressions of shock, in some cases trauma, was truly disgraceful, and it strikes at the heart of why I find it so hard to forgive him.' Retired SNP politician Alex Neil said Sturgeon should issue a retraction after journalist David Clegg categorically denied that Alex Salmond had leaked the report on his own sexual misconduct accusations At the point of realising his 'thirst for revenge' was greater than the bond between them, Sturgeon said she knew their friendship was over for good and she went through a 'grieving process'. She wrote: 'For a time after we stopped speaking I would have conversations with him in my head about politics and the issues of the day. 'I had occasional, vivid dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft.' And even now after Salmond's passing, Sturgeon admitted his impact on her continues and she will 'never quite escape the shadow he casts, even in death'. Ms Sturgeon ruled Scottish politics for years before she walked away from Scotland's top job in March 2023 - shortly before her husband Peter Murrell was arrested in a police probe into the SNP's finances. She was arrested in June 2023 in relation to the Operation Branchform investigation into the SNP's finances. Sturgeon was subsequently released without charge pending further investigation, while Mr Murrell - formerly SNP chief executive - was eventually charged in relation to the alleged embezzlement of party funds.
