logo
NC Senate committee approves permitless carry of concealed firearms for residents 18 and older

NC Senate committee approves permitless carry of concealed firearms for residents 18 and older

Yahoo18-03-2025
(Photo by Aristide Economopoulos/NJ Monitor)
The North Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee voted Tuesday to approve a bill allowing gun owners to carry concealed handguns without obtaining a permit, sending it to another panel.
Senate Bill 50, which bears the title 'Freedom to Carry NC,' would authorize permitless concealed carry for individuals who are U.S. citizens, at least 18 years of age, and not otherwise prohibited by law, according to the bill's text.
Its primary sponsors are Sens. Danny Britt (R-Hoke, Robeson, Scotland), Warren Daniel (R-Buncombe, Burke, McDowell), and Eddie Settle (R-Alexander, Surry, Wilkes, Yadkin). Britt and Daniel are two of the Judiciary Committee's co-chairs.
Senate leader Phil Berger is backing the measure, he shared when sponsors filed it in February.
North Carolina law currently requires gun owners to obtain permits from their local sheriff's office in order to carry a concealed handgun. Concealed carry also requires a minimum of eight hours of training.
'We believe that our constitution is clear that law abiding citizens should be allowed to constitutionally carry,' Britt said. 'We believe they should be able to constitutionally carry without having to jump through the hoops that you do for a concealed carry permit.'
If passed into law, North Carolina would become the 30th state to allow what proponents call 'constitutional carry' — meaning concealed carry without a permit. The legislation would still allow concealed carry permits to be issued 'for the purpose of reciprocity when traveling in another state.'
States allowing permitless concealed carry are not limited to red states, the sponsors pointed out. While neighbors like South Carolina and Tennessee grant it, so do others like Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont.
The panel adopted an amendment clarifying that gun owners would be able to carry concealed handguns but not other types of firearms. Senators chose not to discuss this amendment.
Several witnesses gave brief testimony during the public comment portion of the meeting, providing perspectives from law enforcement, military veterans, and healthcare providers.
Beverly Falls, a retired physician and surgeon, said hospitals regularly practice crisis events.
She described the situation as a 'public health epidemic in this country' due to the vast number of guns. Falls said lax gun laws endanger the public as well as law enforcement.
'It's a tragedy when we have actual events such as mass shootings, where there are no survivors to even arrive at our emergency rooms,' Falls said. 'We need safety measures, not guns.'
Raleigh police officer Hattie Gandhi also spoke against the bill.
She shared a story from her time in law enforcement about how current law prevents violent crime by allowing officers to pursue and detain people who are suspected of carrying concealed weapons.
'Concealed carry permits protect police officers and the public,' she said.
Becky Ceartas, executive director of North Carolinians Against Gun Violence (NCGV), suggested adding background checks to the legislation.
In 2023, the General Assembly removed the pistol purchase permitting system, allowing residents to purchase a handgun without getting a permit from a local sheriff.
'If Senate Bill 50 becomes law, it would mean that people as young as 18 years old, with no training and no background check, could carry a hidden loaded weapon in public,' Ceartas said. 'Make no mistake, if Senate Bill 50 passes, the research is clear: it will be paid for in North Carolinian lives.'
NCGV has noted that weakening or removing the concealed carry permitting requirements is associated with a 29% increase in firearm violent crime rates.
The legislation now heads to the Senate Rules Committee.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: L.A. City Council has proven it can't fix city's housing problem on its own
Letters to the Editor: L.A. City Council has proven it can't fix city's housing problem on its own

Los Angeles Times

time10 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: L.A. City Council has proven it can't fix city's housing problem on its own

To the editor: When the Los Angeles City Council opposed Senate Bill 827 in 2018, the average rent for a two-bedroom was $1,663 and there were 31,285 homeless people in L.A. city. When the City Council opposed Senate Bill 50 in 2019, the average rent for a two-bedroom was $1,791 and there were 35,550 homeless people in L.A. city. The City Council opposed Senate Bill 79 this week ('Denser housing near transit stops? L.A. City Council opposes state bill,' Aug. 20). The average rent for a two-bedroom is $2,625 and there are currently 43,699 homeless people in L.A. city. Los Angeles has opposed every major bill that would build housing in crucial areas and decrease the number of homeless people in our city. And now we have Councilmembers Katy Yaroslavsky, Monica Rodriguez, Traci Park, Imelda Padilla, Tim McOsker, John Lee, Ysabel Jurado and Heather Hutt to blame for rising rents and the inevitable continuing rise of homelessness to follow. These council members have shown that they cannot fix L.A.'s housing problem on their own. This is exactly why the state needs to preempt local control from them and other cities like Los Angeles. Josh Albrektson, South Pasadena

Why Senate Republicans won't scrap the ‘blue slip'
Why Senate Republicans won't scrap the ‘blue slip'

Politico

time3 days ago

  • Politico

Why Senate Republicans won't scrap the ‘blue slip'

It also doesn't look like their position will change heading into the fall, either, as Republicans have indicated they'll seek a rules change to speed up the confirmation process for certain Trump nominees on the Senate floor but not at the committee level. 'As a practical matter, the Senate's not going to give up the blue slip,' said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, in an interview. 'So my appeal to the president is: please reconsider. Why do we want to have this fight for nothing?' It marks a rare instance where Hill Republicans have publicly broken with the president, underscoring how even Trump's most loyal allies are willing to stand up to him when it comes to protecting their institution's traditions — and their own ability to exert influence back home. 'The Senators have a real vested interest in what happens in their states,' said Mike Fragoso, a former chief counsel for nominations and constitutional law for the Senate Judiciary Committee. 'At the end of the day, there's probably very little support for what Trump wants within the conference.' Fragoso, who also served as chief counsel for former Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, argued that even Republicans wary of crossing the president now have taken advantage of the blue slip policy when Democrats held power. He added that there are relatively few bench seats in solidly Democratic states that Trump could even fill now without consent from Democrats. Ultimately, said Fragoso, the blue slip's elimination would just expose future seats in reliably red states like Florida and Texas to being filled with progressive judges by future Democratic administrations — and without the GOP getting much in return. Grassley has also already made changes to the blue slip practice once, in 2017, when he announced he would move forward with circuit court nominees over home state senators' objections. Although Judiciary chairs over the years had not always strictly followed that precedent, Grassley's decision to consistently disregard it helped Trump see hundreds of judges confirmed during his first term in the White House.

Interest appears high as Yellow Medicine East voters to decide $74M bond issue
Interest appears high as Yellow Medicine East voters to decide $74M bond issue

Yahoo

time11-08-2025

  • Yahoo

Interest appears high as Yellow Medicine East voters to decide $74M bond issue

Aug. 11---- Interest appears to be high in a special bond referendum to replace aged school buildings in the As of late afternoon Monday, voters had returned 1,115 absentee ballots for the referendum, according to Janel Timm, property and public services director for Yellow Medicine County. Voters were able to obtain early voter ballots beginning June 27 at the Office Building in Granite Falls. Timm said her office has not seen this many absentee ballots requested for any prior special election. The city of is also holding a special election by mail-in ballot Tuesday on a Sunday liquor question. There were 459 ballots mailed to residents of Clarkfield containing both the Sunday liquor and school bonding question, and 222 of those had been returned as of late Monday. That brings to 1,337 ballots already returned for the school referendum, or roughly one-third of the 4,040 registered voters in the school district that serves the communities of Granite Falls, Clarkfield, Echo, Hanley Falls and Hazel Run. Voters who have not requested early ballots can cast their ballots from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Tuesday at one polling place, the Kilowatt Community Center in Granite Falls. The YME School Board is asking voters to approve a $74,339,000 bond. A vote yes committee has been promoting the referendum with district-wide phone and mail campaigns. The school is hoping to take advantage of Minnesota's Ag-to-School tax credit. It would fund 54% — more than $40 million — of the bond, according to Superintendent Rich Schneider during a presentation earlier this summer. The credit reduces the taxes on agricultural lands for the bond by 70%, according to the presentation. The YME board is proposing to replace a 95-year-old high school building, and a 73-year-old elementary school building. During an information session, the superintendent told attendees that the aged and deteriorating buildings are inadequate for modern learning. He cited concerns about accessibility for students with disabilities, the absence of a modern security system, and other safety concerns. The project calls for building a new high school/middle school to replace the existing 1930 structure. The plan also calls for building a new elementary building to replace the Bert Raney Elementary, originally constructed in 1952 and expanded in 1957. A 1965 building will be upgraded, and the district's 1980-built gymnasium and 2019-built auxiliary gymnasium would be saved as well. A new auditorium would replace the existing auditorium. A separate Careers and Technology Education building would also be constructed as part of the new high school. The new facilities will be constructed on the existing campus. The new high school/middle school will be built north of the gymnasium on what is currently a parking lot. The new elementary school will be on the existing elementary site. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store