Hong Kong's education secretary calls on local universities to offer support to Harvard international students
HONG KONG: Hong Kong authorities have urged local tertiary education institutions to offer support for Harvard University students whose dreams have been dashed after the United States barred the Ivy League school from enrolling international candidates, many of whom are from mainland China.
At least five local universities on Friday invited those affected by the bombshell move to apply, while an education consultant said it had received calls from distraught parents of 'furious' children who had been accepted at Harvard.
According to US authorities, current international students at the university must also either transfer or leave the country.
The US Department of Homeland Security cited the university's alleged 'coordinated activity' with the Communist Party of China as part of the reasoning for the ban, which marks a sharp escalation of the row between the Trump administration and the Massachusetts-based global leader in education.
Just before midnight, US media reported that a federal judge had blocked the Trump administration's move.
Secretary for Education Christine Choi Yuk-lin called on local universities to step up by attracting talent and building the city's 'study in Hong Kong' brand.
'In response to the ban on Harvard University recruiting international students, the Education Bureau has immediately contacted local universities to call on them to take proactive action,' she said in a social media post.
Choi said the government had contacted a local Harvard alumni association to provide 'comprehensive support' to students who had been admitted to the university.
She also said Hong Kong universities should make use of relaxed quotas on non-local student intake to attract top candidates.
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology [HKUST] announced on Friday it was 'opening its doors to Harvard students amid global academic shifts' by expediting admissions and credit transfers, as well as prioritising support for students making the transition, such as help with visas and housing.
A special team and an email hotline have been set up for prospective students affected by the surprise ban.
'Diversity fuels creativity and progress,' HKUST's provost, Professor Guo Yike, said.
'We are prepared to welcome Harvard students into our community, offering them the resources and vibrant environment needed to thrive in their fields.'
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) said on Friday it was committed to promoting internationalisation by recruiting outstanding students from around the world and providing them with comprehensive support.
This past Tuesday, CUHK president Professor Dennis Lo Yuk-ming said his team would explore ways to provide additional research subsidies to attract foreign scholars who were leaving the United States.
City University also said it was 'extending support to international students facing academic disruption, inviting them to continue their education in Hong Kong'.
The university said it would invite the original supervisors of PhD students to serve as co-supervisors, ensuring continuity and academic quality.
Baptist University said it had always been committed to internationalisation and recruited outstanding non-local students. It added it would provide necessary support to the relevant students based on the actual circumstances.
Polytechnic University said it invited students who had received admission offers from Harvard or were currently enrolled in the school or other top US universities to consider the Hong Kong education institution for continuing their undergraduate or postgraduate studies.
It said its admissions team would provide comprehensive support and guidance for transfer students, including scholarships, to help them smoothly navigate the move.
The Post has contacted the other publicly funded universities in Hong Kong for comment.
Samuel Chan Sze-ming, managing partner at Britannia StudyLink, a company specialising in placements at elite schools, said he had received multiple calls from parents of prospective Harvard applicants and some who had already been accepted.
'These kids have gone through hoops and have prepared their applications to top-notch states and to get an entry is very, very difficult,' Chan said. 'Today, they realise that they cannot start the programme. It's hugely disappointing and many of the students are furious.'
Chan recommended parents start looking at other leading universities in the states and Britain, such as Oxbridge and Imperial College London
The Department of Homeland Security said that 'Harvard's leadership has created an unsafe campus environment by permitting anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators' to assault Jewish students on campus and reiterated its accusation of 'coordinated activity' between the university and the Communist Party.
Harvard on Friday filed a lawsuit seeking to reverse the ban, which is expected to affect more than 5,600 foreign students who make up about a quarter of its student population.
According to Harvard, there were 57 students from Hong Kong and 1,282 from the mainland in the 2024-25 academic year.
In his policy address last year, Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said the government would establish a 'Study in Hong Kong' brand to help turn the city into an international tertiary education hub and push for hotels and commercial buildings to be transformed into student hostels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
28 minutes ago
- CNA
Can the US-China agreement to restore trade truce ease long-standing tensions?
Trade relations between the United States and China remain fluid, even as the world's two biggest economies have agreed on a framework aimed at reducing friction and reviving the flow of sensitive goods, said observers. Top officials from Washington and Beijing on Tuesday (Jun 10) agreed on the preliminary plan after two days of intense discussions in London. The framework builds upon the groundwork that the superpowers laid in Geneva last month to ease tariffs they had taken against each other's economies. But further details, including plans for a next round of talks, remain sparse. 'It's important to realise that this remains a very fluid, a very contentious relationship,' said Alex Capri, a senior lecturer at the National University of Singapore Business School. 'In the past, historically, negotiating a proper free trade agreement literally took years because there are so many moving parts. There are so many elements … and that takes a lot of time.' Capri expressed skepticism about the efficacy of short-term negotiations, saying these might not lead to long-lasting agreements. 'I think we'll continue to see more transactionalism, and we'll probably see more and more of these types of shorter, one-on-one type of meetings that remain a work in progress,' he told CNA's Asia First. But observers said they are cautiously optimistic about the positive shift in tone between the two global superpowers. 'It's unclear what has been agreed to besides a sort of pathway to a framework to implement a concept of a plan. So it's early days,' said trade and economic policy expert Deborah Elms. 'But I suppose that the good news is, both sides do seem to see that escalation is not in their interest, and they agree that negotiations or discussions are important pathways to get to some kind of resolution.' GROWING WEAPONISATION OF RESOURCES However, analysts highlighted how countries have been weaponising their strategic commodities to gain an edge. China's dominance in rare earth minerals and America's lead in semiconductor innovations have become geopolitical bargaining chips. 'That is something that's here to stay,' said Capri. 'I think it's going to be more and more the new normal to see a linkage between tariff discussions and discussions about strategic supply chains such as rare earth and semiconductors.' He added: 'We're looking at a very transactional world, certainly under the Trump 2.0 administration where tariffs, export controls, sanctions, all of these things are going to be lumped together now in trade-related and commercial discussions.' Although the initial focus was tariff reduction, experts cautioned that these strategic issues could derail momentum. 'Both sides have identified that they have some cards to play in this dispute, and both have shown a willingness to use those if the negotiations start to unravel,' said Elms, who is head of trade policy at philanthropic organisation Hinrich Foundation. 'The tariff discussion is only a small piece of what is now on the agenda,' she told CNA's Asia Now. 'There's a whole lot of things that you could put on the negotiating cards for both sides. All of them are difficult.' COMPLEX NEGOTIATION CHALLENGES The high-stakes issues require compromise from both countries, Elms stressed. 'There are lots of things that could go horribly wrong in these discussions, unless they keep to the sort of bedrock principle that we do not want to have an escalation of tension going forward.' Despite the complexity of factors now on the negotiation table, she said she believes the concerted effort on both sides in reaching a deal is encouraging. 'I think talking is always better than not talking, but the fact that it's proving difficult to get clear outcomes is a worry.' On Tuesday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove some of the recent US export restrictions. In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang noted that the framework would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders for review. 'The fact that both sides have to fly back to present whatever was discussed in person to their leaders tells you something about the negotiating leverage that the teams had on the ground,' said Elms. 'In other words, they weren't authorised ahead of time to accept an agreement. I think that it shows you how complicated these talks will ultimately be.' IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES Observers warned that countries lacking strategic resources may find themselves increasingly sidelined in global trade discussions. 'Unfortunately, for the middle-tier countries that don't have that same kind of bargaining power … those countries are going to have less choice,' said Capri. 'They're going to be pushed into positions where they're not going to be able to leverage a lot of things like the bigger countries when it comes to negotiating a trade deal, whether it's over tariffs or whether it's over access to supply chains.' He highlighted the importance of strategic alliances, encouraging smaller countries to join minilateral agreements to gain negotiating leverage. 'What's in the best interest of middle-tier countries is to build as many relationships as possible, to forge as many minilateral agreements,' said Capri. 'Smaller countries are going to be looking to position themselves and connect themselves with as many opportunities as possible.' Meanwhile, some countries are racing to strike a deal with the US before President Donald Trump's 90-day pause on his sweeping tariffs expires on Jul 9. Without agreements in place, countries may once again face the duties temporarily imposed on Apr 9. 'In any case, these are short deadlines for very complicated negotiations with an awful lot of trading partners,' said Elms. 'Ultimately, the decision maker is Donald Trump himself, and his capacity to manage all of these decisions is also time-limited. He only has so many hours in a day in which he could actually get into the details or even sign off on an agreed upon commitment.'
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Japan remains cautious on tariff impact in June econ report
TOKYO :Japan's government reiterated its warning on the risks from U.S. tariffs on economic growth, saying in a monthly report on Wednesday that the potential impact on corporate profits needed attention. The economy faces pressure from U.S. import levies of 24 per cent from July unless officials can negotiate them down. Japan's government is also seeking an exemption for its carmakers from a separate 25 per cent import tariff on vehicles. Japan's gross domestic product shrank an annualised 0.2 per cent in the January-March quarter, even before U.S. President Donald Trump announced his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on April 2. "The economy is recovering moderately, while uncertainty is arising from U.S. trade policies," the Cabinet Office said in its monthly report for June released on Wednesday, keeping the assessment unchanged for a third month. In addition to tariffs, the report maintained its reference to "the effect of continued price rises on household sentiment and consumption" as another negative risk to the economy. It also noted that corporate profits were recovering, citing first-quarter business statistics, but added a fresh reference to the potential impact of trade disruptions. "With some firms withholding financial forecasts amid uncertainties surrounding U.S. tariffs, their impact on earnings may come to light only in the data for the April-June quarter or beyond," an official at the Cabinet Office told a press briefing. While no significant impact from U.S. tariffs on Japan's export volumes has been seen so far, trade trends from May onwards required attention, the official added. On wages, this spring's pay negotiations probably led to an average raise of more than 5 per cent, exceeding last year's, although smaller firms lagged bigger companies, the official said, based on the national labour group Rengo's data. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said earlier this week that his ruling party would pledge to achieve growth of more than 50 per cent in Japan's average income by 2040 in campaigning for the upper house elections next month.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
China, Africa ask US to return to 'right track' on trade differences
FILE PHOTO: Shipping containers are seen at the port of Oakland, as trade tensions continued over U.S. tariffs with China, in Oakland, California, U.S., May 12, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo China, Africa ask US to return to 'right track' on trade differences HONG KONG - China and 53 African countries called on nations, especially the United States, to return to the "right track" of resolving trade differences, the official Xinhua news agency reported on Wednesday. The statement came after China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi met with African officials in the city of Changsha located in southern Hunan province. The White House, in its April 2 "Liberation Day" tariff announcement, imposed some of the highest tariffs on several African countries. That included levies of up to 50% on goods from Lesotho, 47% for Madagascar, 40% for Mauritius, 38% for Botswana and 31% for South Africa, the continent's biggest exporter to the U.S. The China-Africa statement, made on behalf of China, 53 African countries and the African Union Commission said it "firmly opposed any party reaching a compromise deal at the expense of the interests of other countries." "We call on all countries, especially the United States, to return to the right track of resolving trade differences through consultation on an equal, respectful and reciprocal basis," the statement said. China is willing to implement zero-tariff measures for the 53 African countries that it has diplomatic relations with, the statement said, apart from Eswatini, the only African country that supports Taiwan. China's relations with African countries have strengthened as its own economy slows and it has emerged as Africa's biggest lender. In recent years, China has stepped up cooperation in areas from agriculture to infrastructure. The continent offers a much needed avenue for Chinese state-owned infrastructure firms struggling for projects as indebted local governments hold off on spending, and as a market for its electric vehicles and solar panels, areas where the U.S. and EU say China has over-capacity. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
