Illinois food pantries face uncertainty as USDA weighs cuts to COVID-era programs
ROCKFORD, Ill. (WTVO) — Food banks across Illinois were left scrambling earlier this month when the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced it would cut COVID era programs they have come to rely on.
Wendy Eltman has helped manage the Old Stone Church Food Pantry, at 101 E Union Street, in Rockton, for years.
Over the last few months, Eltman said the pantry has been stocked with fresh, locally produced items thanks to a USDA grant called the .
With federal funding, Illinois created the IL-EATS program, which bought foods from local farmers and distributed them to food pantries.
More than 170 farmers have supplied food to 883 locations through the supported Illinois-EATS program.
'We service 65 to 75 people a week, families a week. And we could never go purchase that [ourselves],' Eltman said.
The programs were created during the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, earlier this month, the USDA halted the grant, saying the program, along with the Local Foods for Schools program, is a legacy of the pandemic and no longer supported the agency's priorities. The cuts are part of the Trump administration's within the federal government.
'The COVID era is over — USDA's approach to nutrition programs will reflect that reality moving forward,' a USDA spokesperson said in a statement.
The decision was later reversed, but Eltman said the food pantry is unsure of for how long.
'It's going to be week to week. We know we're going to get deliveries in May, and the farmers will get paid, and then after June: no idea,' she said.
Constance Sturdivant, who organizes the food pantry at Christian Union Church in Rockford, said grants like the IL-EATS grant are crucial for the community.
'With the disruption of the grant. What we are able to give would be decreased significantly, if not cut out altogether because of the pantries that are here. We are in the same boat,' she said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Robby's Radar: Elon Musk should join the Libertarian Party
I have an idea for Elon Musk: join the Libertarian Party! Actually, don't just join it — take it over! Let me explain. Musk and President Trump seem to have entered some kind of détente following their big blowup last week. The world's richest man is no longer tweeting constantly about Trump being on the Epstein client list, or about how he feels betrayed over the big beautiful bill, which will massively increase the deficit despite Republican promises to finally cut government spending. In fact, he's spent the last several days tweeting about the Los Angeles riots and the importance of emerging AI technology. Trump, for his part, is refusing to engage Elon with particular hostility. Trump recently told reporters that he would be keeping the Tesla he bought from Musk, that he would continue using Starlink, Musk's internet service, and that he wished Elon well. I try not to make political predictions, but it actually would not surprise me in the least if Trump and Elon makeup — or at the very least, if the Republican Party maintains a friendly enough connection to Elon so that the tech billionaire remains a financial backer of, say, Vice President JD Vance when he inevitably runs for president. But here's an alternative idea I'd like to plan in Musk's head, as he is currently party shopping. As a Libertarian Party member, and voter, I would be thrilled to welcome Elon into the party — and I suspect I wouldn't be alone. After all, the Libertarian Party is a natural fit for Elon, whose politics mostly seem to align with Rand Paul and Thomas Massie, the two most libertarian members of Congress in the Republican Party. Elon wants low taxes, lower spending, low regulation, and thinks the federal government's priorities should reflect that: Cut the deficit first, get our fiscal house in order, and worry about the other stuff later. He also wants government regulations to be friendly to technological growth, is particularly motivated to prevent censorship on social media, and thinks the federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic was authoritarian. These are all textbook libertarian issues. What's more, the current trajectory of the Libertarian Party makes it ideal for some new leadership. For years, the party has been the nation's third or fourth largest, alongside the Green Party. In the 2016 election, Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson received 4.5 million votes and about 3 percent of the national vote, a record at the time. In 2020, the Libertarian nominee received about 1 percent of the national vote. In both of those elections, it finished ahead of the Green Party. Behind the scenes, however, the party has gone through something for a transformation over the last two cycles. Johnson, the 2016 nominee, was perceived by some within the Libertarian Party as too liberal and mainstream — not based enough to attract contrarians and dissidents to the party. In response, a faction calling itself the Mises Caucus formed and attempted to take control of the party. In 2022, they succeeded. Their strategy was podcast-focused: Find people who listen to Joe Rogan and like-minded independent thinkers and draw them to the Libertarian Party. The strategy had a certain amount of merit. The party ended up flirting with Robert F Kennedy Jr., and found itself having significant audience overlap with him. But eventually, Kennedy made a quasi-endorsement of Trump and essentially withdrew from the presidential race. Meanwhile, at the Libertarian National Convention, delegates bucked the Mises Caucus and picked their least preferred candidate, Chase Oliver. In response, the Mises Caucus leadership barely tolerated the Libertarian candidate, hindering his campaign in numerous ways. The party's chairwoman, Angela McArdle, the highest-ranking Mises Caucus official, subsequently resigned from the party. The new chair is not a member of this faction and is trying to chart a more neutral course and reunite the party, though the Mises Caucus has vowed to retake control. So that's where we are now: The Libertarian Party could use some new people, some new leadership, and probably a new infusion of cash. If Elon Musk really wants to make Republicans sorry that they failed to live up to his expectations and cut government spending — but quite rationally believes that Democrats will never ever, ever do better — he might find he has the most in common with the ticket that gets my vote every year. Robbie Soave is co-host of The Hill's commentary show 'Rising' and a senior editor for Reason Magazine. This column is an edited transcription of his daily commentary. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Constellation Energy Stock (CEG) Eyes Atomic Expansion to Empower AI Boom
Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) and Meta Platforms (META) are forming an unlikely partnership. The large-cap energy provider struck what's known as a 'power purchase agreement' with Meta, granting the tech conglomerate the entire 1.1 gigawatt output from Constellation's Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois for 20 years starting in mid-2027. Constellation's stock surged around 10% following the news, but has since given up its gains. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The deal marks a shift in how hyperscale tech companies are addressing their AI-driven power needs, with nuclear energy emerging as a preferred solution due to its carbon-free baseload power. Constellation's fleet of nuclear power plants bodes well for future deals, leaving me cautiously optimistic despite a frothy valuation. Meta's 20-year power agreement marks the largest in a growing wave of partnerships between nuclear energy providers and major tech companies. Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), and Google (GOOGL) have all secured nuclear energy to meet the surging power demands driven by their AI initiatives. Nuclear power offers several key advantages over other energy sources, including around-the-clock availability, scalability, and zero carbon emissions. These attributes make it especially appealing to energy-intensive data centers that operate continuously. To put this into perspective, a single ChatGPT query is estimated to consume roughly 10 times more energy than a standard Google search. Nuclear energy remains somewhat misunderstood. While rare nuclear accidents tend to dominate headlines and shape public perception, support for nuclear power is growing. A recent Pew Research Center poll found that 56% of Americans now favor expanding atomic energy. Regulatory momentum is also shifting in its favor, creating a supportive environment for companies like Constellation Energy. The ADVANCE Act of 2024, for example, reduced regulatory review fees for advanced reactor applicants and imposed an 18-month deadline for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to make decisions. Earlier this year, the Trump administration issued executive orders aimed at quadrupling U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050. Constellation, which operates the largest nuclear fleet in the country with 21 reactors across 15 sites, is well-positioned to benefit. When you combine favorable policy shifts with rising demand for energy, particularly from AI infrastructure, it's clear why Constellation is increasingly optimistic about the road ahead In its first quarter earnings, Constellation highlighted the demand for power from data centers. Constellation is just beginning to monetize AI-driven energy demand. Its adjusted operating earnings grew 17.6% in the first quarter to $2.14 per share. Nuclear production maintained an impressive 94.1% capacity factor and continues to remain stable across all geographies. Due to recent deals, Constellation now projects adjusted operating earnings growth of 13% or more through 2030, up from 10%. That said, much of Constellation's potential appears to be priced in. The stock has surged 380% over the past three years and now trades at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 33, nearly double the average for the Utilities sector. This premium valuation leaves little room for error; any operational setbacks could trigger a sharp pullback. While signing long-term agreements with companies like Meta is a positive step, the real challenge lies in execution—building infrastructure, scaling capacity, and navigating regulatory approvals. Time is a critical factor, and delays could have material consequences. Although Constellation currently enjoys a first-mover advantage, it won't be alone for long. Other utility providers are beginning to adopt similar strategies, and competitive pressures in the space are likely to intensify going forward. On Wall Street, CEG sports a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on eight Buy, five Hold, and zero Sell ratings in the past three months. CEG's average stock price target of $318.36 implies an upside potential of approximately 6.5% over the next twelve months. Following the Meta deal, analyst Ryan Levine from Citi downgraded CEG to Hold with a price target of $318. He noted that the stock's rally following the Meta announcement prompted a reevaluation of its value. He added, 'The Meta deal introduces a new framework where nuclear license extensions are considered additive generation, potentially impacting future deals for other plants in CEG's portfolio.' So, Levine sees both positives (a validated business model and premium pricing) and negatives (high valuation, execution risks, and market uncertainty). Technological advancements—particularly in artificial intelligence—present a significant opportunity for utility companies, and Constellation is well-positioned to capitalize. Its extensive fleet of nuclear power plants gives it a strategic edge, and its recent agreement with Meta could serve as a blueprint for future partnerships with other tech giants. Regulatory momentum is also working in Constellation's favor, further strengthening its long-term prospects. That said, the stock is already trading at a premium, reflecting high investor expectations. While Constellation's growth profile justifies a higher valuation—it's far from a traditional, slow-growth utility—there are still meaningful execution risks tied to complex nuclear infrastructure projects. Given this backdrop, a cautiously optimistic outlook, like the one expressed by analyst Levine, may be the most prudent approach. Still, Constellation appears well-positioned to benefit from the broader resurgence of nuclear energy, particularly as AI continues to drive up demand for reliable, carbon-free power, making it a compelling speculative opportunity. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Mayor Adams' ‘emergency' spending is out of control — now NYC must hit the brakes
New Yorkers, like all Americans, tend to stock up when any crisis is about to hit: We fill up our gas tanks, empty the bread and egg shelves at grocery stores and buy enough toilet paper to last for months. It's human nature — and for far too long, New York City's government has been behaving the very same way. But City Hall's panic reaction is far worse, and does far more damage. Advertisement In recent emergencies, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the asylum-seeker influx, city government kept on 'crisis buying' for more than a year, without ever comparing prices or rooting out contractor abuse, fraud and waste. It's time for drastic change: We must reform the city's out-of-control emergency procurement practices and add vital checks and balances. Currently, when the mayor declares a state of emergency, the city's comptroller and corporation counsel suspend their ordinary oversight regarding contracts and procurement. Advertisement In theory, this allows City Hall to respond quickly and obtain necessary goods and services to alleviate the crisis. In practice, it means the city can award no-bid contracts for up to one year — contracts that, having bypassed the competitive bidding that's normally required, can be rife with waste and abuse. Imagine purchasing a car or searching for your next apartment without competitively price-shopping for those big-ticket items. That's what City Hall does whenever the mayor declares an emergency. City agencies aren't even required to send 'emergency' contracts to the comptroller for auditing before laying out taxpayer cash. In fact, 84% of such contracts filed between January 2022 and September 2023 were submitted more than 31 days after the contract start date. Advertisement Both Mayor Eric Adams and former Mayor Bill de Blasio spent billions of dollars on the asylum-seeker and COVID crises, respectively, drawing multiple allegations of corruption and pay-to-play politics. This uncontrolled spending was especially acute during the pandemic, as de Blasio extended 'emergency' contracts a whopping 100-plus times and spent nearly $7 billion on emergency supplies with no oversight or limiting guardrails. In the private sector, affordability is a prime factor when choosing bids on contracts. The city's emergency procurement process throws such considerations to the wind, leading to reckless overspending. During COVID, City Hall paid top dollar for ventilators and N95 masks it never received — and in one case, paid an absurd $7.50 apiece for cloth masks. Advertisement Its fire sale of nearly $224 million worth of COVID-era surplus items, from ventilators to face shields, only recouped $500,000, a downright outrage. The current administration is no better, awarding a $432 million emergency contract for asylum-seeker services to an untested company called DocGo. Its dreadful performance — with problems like chronic food waste, moldy hotel rooms, unlicensed security guards and an uncredentialed CEO who was forced to resign — resulted in an investigation by the state attorney general. Even in non-emergency circumstances, the city has never reined in city contractors who utilize loopholes to enrich themselves. Take the company owned by David Levitan, listed as one of New York City's worst landlords. For over a quarter century, the city has repeatedly used Levitan's properties as homeless shelters — buildings with rotted floors, broken elevators, rat infestations and peeling lead paint. Levitan has even required some of the nonprofits operating shelters within his buildings to subcontract with his own maintenance or extermination companies to service the properties — reaping even more revenue from our tax dollars. It's time for reform, top to bottom. Advertisement Emergencies, by their very definition, are short in duration. Accordingly, they should necessitate a strictly time-limited use of no-bid contracts, for instances when competitive bidding will truly hinder the city's response. That's why I am introducing two bills in the New York City Council this week to update our lackadaisical, irresponsible procurement processes. These bills will limit all emergency contracts to 30 days, unless both the comptroller and corporation counsel approve of an extension. If passed, the laws will require all contracts be sent to the comptroller for auditing within 15 days of signing, and will increase subcontractor transparency with fines of up to $100,000 for not disclosing to the city any conflicts of interest or competing contractual obligations. Advertisement New York's broken contracting system has price-gouged our taxpayers for far too long — and recent mayoral administrations have shown no appetite to follow good-government procurement practices. It's up to the City Council to advance this vital legislation, saving precious fiscal resources, restoring responsibility and rooting out corruption. City Council Member Julie Menin (D) represents the East Side of Manhattan and chairs the Consumer and Worker Protection Committee.
