What you need to know about recent changes to schools and education
Photo:
Unsplash/ Greg Rosenke
Explainer
- It's been a year full of changes in the educational system, with announcements and new initiatives coming nearly every week from the coalition government.
What has been announced and what's coming up soon?
Here is a roundup of just some of the major announcements we've seen in 2025 that will affect students and educators:
The new
maths curriculum
and
English curriculum
for primary school-aged students began this year.
It's all part of the first steps in the government's long-term
push for what it's calling a "knowledge-rich" curriculum
.
The government also previously announced moves towards teaching
structured literacy
skills to students.
The drafts of the
secondary English
and maths curriculums are also out for feedback.
Education Minister Erica Stanford.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
The government announced it would
no longer build open-plan classrooms
, moving away from the policy which Education Minister Erica Stanford called too noisy and distracting for children.
While there has been negative feedback from schools on open-plan learning, Stanford said, surveys by the Council for Educational Research showed most teachers who worked in the structures liked them and believed their students benefited from learning in that kind of environment.
New classrooms will be built using standard designs that prioritise flexibility, like glass sliding doors that can open a class when it is time to collaborate and close it for focused learning.
Erica Stanford speaks to students at a Wellington school.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
The government is also allocating $140 million to tackle truancy
with a new school attendance service
.
The funding boost is aimed at supporting more schools and reaching double the number of students over the next four years, according to Associate Education Minister David Seymour.
He said the new attendance service would address chronic absence and focus on keeping students in school when they return.
Transitioning to the new attendance service would start at the end of the year and be fully in place from early 2026.
Charter schools
have returned to New Zealand this year under the coalition government
. They were previously shut down by former Education Minister Chris Hipkins in 2018.
Seven of the publicly-funded, private schools opened in Term 1.
The Charter School Agency said the charter school authorisation board was considering 52 applications from organisations wanting to set up new charter schools next year, as well as two applications from state or state integrated schools wanting to convert.
A
new school property entity
is being set up to manage building, maintaining, and administering the school property portfolio.
Stanford said the new Crown agent will sit separate from the Ministry of Education, which will keep responsibility for education policy and network decisions.
Announcing the launch of the New Zealand School Property Agency, Stanford said schools had been kept waiting for classrooms and refurbishments they badly needed.
A new 600-student primary school
was also announced for Massey in Auckland
.
The government
announced $28 million will be spent on building more "safe, warm and dry classrooms" for tamariki
in Māori full immersion schools.
Twenty new classrooms will be built across four providers, and work will begin on the first stage of a new school north of Auckland.
The new development, for Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Ngāringaomatariki in Kaiwaka, will eventually have 19 classrooms.
It was announced in this year's budget that the Kāhui Ako - Communities of Learning - scheme
was to be disestablished
.
The scheme grouped schools together to work on common problems with extra pay for one principal to oversee each group and for select teachers to share good practice between and within schools.
A report said there were 220 Kāhui Ako, involving 1958 schools and 1506 early learning centres, and more than 4000 teachers received extra pay for Kāhui Ako roles.
From November, eligible student-visa holders
will be able to work more hours a week
, from 20 to 25 hours, and work rights will be extended to all tertiary students in approved exchange programmes.
The government will also consider introducing a short-duration work visa of up to six months to allow international graduates who do not qualify for post-study work rights time to seek jobs under the Accredited Employer Work Visa (AEWV) pathway.
It would also look at updates to make it easier for students to apply for multi-year visas.
The goal was to boost tertiary education's annual economic contribution to $7.2 billion, by lifting enrolments from 83,700 in 2024 to 119,000 in 2034.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford visit Sherwood Primary School in Browns Bay, Auckland.
Photo:
RNZ / Marika Khabazi
There were several
big spending announcements
in this year's budget. Stanford said new education initiatives in the Budget totalled $2.5 billion over four years, though about $614m of that total was reprioritised from "underperforming" initiatives.
The government's total spend on early childhood and school education would grow by roughly $400m to $19.85b in 2025-26, but drop to $19b and $18.9b in subsequent years.
There was also a $720m increase for learning support.
The increase included $266m to extend the early intervention service from early childhood through to the end of Year 1 of primary school, including employing 560 more early intervention teachers and specialists and helping an additional 4000 children.
It also included $192m over three years to provide learning support coordinators in 1250 more primary schools, $122m to meet increased demand for the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme for students with the highest needs, and $90m to build 25 new satellite classrooms for specialist schools.
Stanford said the government was building up to adding 2 million extra teacher aide hours by 2028.
The other big education initiative in the Budget was $298m for curriculum, nearly half of it targeted to maths and literacy, and about $76m for a new standardised reading, writing and maths test for schools.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Decreasing voter turnout, fewer newspapers, more abuse put off council candidates
A graph shows the voter turnout trend in local body elections has steadily declined since 1989. Photo: Supplied / Department of Internal Affairs A lack of local body candidates could have a negative impact on an already decreasing voter turnout, warns one political commentator. Candidate nominations for October's local body elections closed on Friday, revealing some electorates will go uncontested , with only one candidate entered. A last-minute uptick meant all councils would hold an election for at least some of their seats, after fears just 48 hours out that many would not hold one at all or trigger a by-election, due to a lack of candidates. Dr Grant Duncan said factors like low pay and an increasing level of abuse aimed at elected officials - particularly women - might have discouraged potential candidates. "What is the payoff? Because you're potentially going to be subject to abuse and quite a lot of pressure." He said it could also be influenced by a lack of public interest in local affairs, driven by a decline in local media. "We don't get those little, local suburban newspapers in our letterboxes anymore perhaps and so I think people are just following local affairs less carefully. That has a flow-on affect on people's interest in being candidates or to turn out to vote." A lack of candidates also meant voters were generally less engaged. "We're in a vicious cycle of a lack of local news, a lack of voter participation... and also a decline in candidates willing to put their names forward, and if we don't have all of those things working together, we have an inexorable decline in local democracy," Duncan said. "Increasingly what will happen is that central government will just say, 'Well, we'll take control'." Hutt South MP Chris Bishop posted on Facebook about the lack of contested local body seats. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii According to The Spinoff, in 2022, 20 percent of the 583 elections were uncontested . National minister and local MP for Hutt South Chris Bishop, posted on Facebook following the close of nominations . "Five councillors have been elected unopposed already in the Lower Hutt local elections. Nobody is standing against them and the law doesn't provide for a 'no confidence' option, so they're automatically elected. "On top of this, all of the Eastbourne Community Board have been elected unopposed (five slots, five people). I have to say, I find this fairly remarkable and depressing." A shortage of candidates was not the case across the board. In Hamilton, former Labour MPs Sue Moroney and Jamie Strange will run among a field of 26 candidates in the Hamilton East ward alone, including former National MP Tim Macindoe, who was also standing for mayor. In total, 51 candidates are vying for a place on the council, including 12 for mayor. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Opinion: NCEA isn't perfect but New Zealand shouldn't forget why it was introduced in the first place
The reforms are meant to address long-standing concerns over how students accumulate credits to complete their qualifications. With the NCEA, students can opt out of assessments, including final exams, once they have accumulated enough credits. But as the Government seeks to address the 'gaming' of the system, it shouldn't lose sight of why the NCEA was introduced in the first place – and who it was designed to help. While the system has its flaws, a return to an exam-based model may not make the grade either. Addressing uneven achievement The NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004 to replace the School Certificate, Sixth Form Certificate and Bursary qualifications. Its aim was to broaden educational success, recognising diverse forms of learning as legitimate. The previous qualifications primarily valued traditional academic subjects because those were, in large part, the only ones available for assessment. The NCEA represented a shift away from viewing vocational learning – for example, in trades or creative subjects – as less valuable and not a viable path to formal qualifications. It also marked a departure from 'norms'-based assessment, which scaled student results to fit predetermined pass and fail rates. In contrast, NCEA was 'standards'-based: if a student could demonstrate the required skills or knowledge, they received the credits. But since the early days of the NCEA, there have been concerns students could achieve the qualifications without really having gained an adequate education. The flexibility of the NCEA – allowing schools, teachers and students to tailor learning pathways – is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. It has been criticised for being confusing, inconsistent and lacking credibility. Last year, Mike Grimshaw, an associate professor of sociology at Canterbury University, raised concerns that students were entering university 'functionally illiterate'. He said New Zealand was 'under-educating but over-qualifying'. Concerns such as this over the NCEA have fuelled repeated calls for reform. Whiplash for schools While few dispute changes are needed, the scale and pace of the Government's proposals are another matter. Schools have already contended with numerous policy shifts under this Government, including rapid curriculum changes and new assessments in primary and secondary schools. Now they are being told the entire NCEA framework will be replaced. The sheer volume and speed of these changes puts significant pressure on teachers. This is not the only concern. Under the NCEA, a Year 12 student who worries they might fail the calculus 'standard' can still do maths, knowing they have the option not to sit the calculus exam. Under the new system, this sort of flexibility disappears. Students will either take Year 12 mathematics – or they will not. This inflexibility raises the stakes. It may deter students from taking certain subjects altogether for fear of failure. The renewed emphasis on exams is also problematic. Research has shown exam outcomes can be influenced by gender, anxiety and even personal circumstances on exam day. In other words, exams are not necessarily the 'credible' measure of learning they are made out to be. There are also important questions that the Government's policy consultation proposal does not answer. What are the options for a student who fails the certificate on their first attempt? Will schools still be able to tailor internal assessments to suit their students? Room for some optimism There are, however, reasons for cautious optimism. The Government has promised to retain the NCEA standards-based approach. Preserving the integrity of whole subjects means students are more likely to learn topics, such as algebra, that keep academic options open but are often left out in the NCEA. But this will come at a cost. The stakes will feel higher and students will face greater pressure to succeed. The NCEA delivered on the promise that we shouldn't automatically assume half of our population will fail. Over the past two decades, more young people have left school with qualifications. But did they learn more? That remains an open question. The new system will likely bring consistency and arguably credibility to high school qualifications. But some students will pay the price of this higher-stakes approach to education. David Pomeroy is senior lecturer in Mathematics Education, at the University of Canterbury.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government should match enthusiasm for AI with investment in teachers
[xh Teachers using AI to mark student work 'dangerous' - principals' group Auckland Secondary Principals Association and member of the AI Forum, Claire Amos. Photo: Supplied The Auckland Secondary Principals Association warns the government needs to match its enthusiasm for artificial intelligence with training and funding for teachers. It said suggestions teachers could use AI to mark most student work were "dangerous". Earlier this week, the government said AI marking was critical for its planned replacement of the NCEA and the Education Ministry told schools they "must have a policy" on acceptable use of generative AI such as ChatGPT. On Tuesday Education Minister Erica Stanford said the Qualifications Authority used AI for marking NCEA literacy and numeracy corequisite exams and would use it more widely by the time the Certificate of Education replaced NCEA level 2 in 2029. She said New Zealand was a world-leader and she expected teachers would use the technology to reduce their workloads as the replacement for NCEA was introduced. "If we didn't have AI, this is something that probably wouldn't be possible without a massive injection for NZQA. "But we do have AI, it is coming, and it is getting better and better every year, we are already world-leading in the way that we use it." The same day, the Education Ministry sent schools updated advice on AI . It said schools that offered NCEA must have a policy on the acceptable use of generative AI. "Schools with consent to assess listed standards are required to have an authenticity policy to support assessment practice. This policy must include the acceptable use of GenAI," it said. "The principle of authenticity means that students are required to demonstrate their own knowledge, understanding, and skills in NCEA assessment events. Any evidence submitted for assessment must be their own work." Auckland Secondary Principals Association and member of the AI Forum, Claire Amos, said it was confusing for educators that the ministry was urging caution over AI, but the minster said it would be crucial for replacing NCEA. Amos said the ministry's guidance was very high-level and fell well short of the centralised training, advice and resources that teachers needed. "There's no point having words on a page if we're not upskilling school leaders and we're not upskilling teachers to navigate their way through both the opportunities that AI offers and the great benefits that AI can offer but also understanding the risks," she said. Amos said other countries were much more advanced than New Zealand in terms of school use of AI. Estonia, for example, was investing in teacher training and in AI platforms specifically for schools so student privacy was protected, she said. Amos said AI should not replace classroom teachers when it came to marking student work. "There's huge risks if we start thinking AI is the answer to assessing all student work," she said. "We should be using the technologies and tools to support teachers to make good judgements, we could be using AI in the moderation process and addressing those concerns people have around internal assessment in schools but we are walking a dangerous line if we think we are going to mark all of our student work using AI. That is hugely disempowering for students, hugely disempowering for teachers as well." Amos said the rising use of AI could exacerbate the digital divide between rich and poor schools and between those that were advanced technology users and those that were not. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
