Volkswagen Shows a Sports Car That Never Happened
Never-before-seen sketches reveal a thrilling take on the VW Group's MEB platform.
Štěpán Řehák
, Spokesperson for Design & Concept Cars, recently shared striking drawings on
of a fully electric sports car. Designed by Tibor Juhasz, the performance EV aimed to pay homage to the SP2. No, not Ferrari's Monza SP2 supercar, but Volkswagen's own sports coupe from the 1970s.
Photo by: Volkswagen
Developed and built in Brazil, the original SP2 was based on the existing Type 3 to keep costs down. It featured a rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout. Its spiritual successor, though never realized, ditched the air-cooled engine and four-speed manual in favor of an electric motor, presumably mounted at the back, since all MEB-based cars so far are rear- or all-wheel drive.
While the original SP2 wasn't styled by Giorgetto Giugiaro, the ID. sports car drew inspiration from the legendary designer behind the first Golf, Passat, Scirocco, Jetta, and the wild W12 supercar concepts. In a
post,
Tibor
shared the vision behind his modern-day SP2 sketch, created back in 2017:
'My SP2 proposal was born from pure intuition. It envisioned an electric future powered by progress, yet deeply rooted in classic values. My goal was clear: build forward without losing what defines us. Emotion, energy, and vision came together to create something that still resonates today.'
But the low-slung coupe with its muscular arches never made it past the drawing board. VW had bigger fish to fry than launching what would've ultimately been a niche product. Instead, it focused on high-volume EVs like the ID.3, ID.4, ID.5, and ID.7. Even so, it found room to play with the
ID. Buzz
, though sadly, the sports car was left on the proverbial cutting room floor.
Photo by: Volkswagen
This unnamed performance EV isn't the first exciting concept from VW in modern times that never reached production. Since we brought up Dieselgate, some may remember the 2009 BlueSport, a mid-engined roadster with a 2.0-liter TDI. Before that came the 2005 EcoRacer, another diesel-powered concept. Then there was the 2014
XL Sport
, fitted with a V-2 engine from the Ducati Superleggera. Yet all of them pale in comparison to the legendary W12.
With Europe's sales ban on new cars with combustion engines looming, it's too late for VW to launch a new sports car with a combustion engine. Still, this spiritual SP2 successor offers a glimmer of hope that a dedicated performance model might one day materialize. Wolfsburg has promised to carry the
GTI
and R badges into the electric era, but a standalone sports car in the mold of this two-door concept would be even more exciting.
Sure, it wouldn't sell like a hatchback, let alone like a crossover. But a sports car could do wonders for VW's brand image after years of damage. Audi is gearing up for its
'TT Moment 2.0,"
so maybe it's time for the mainstream sibling to follow suit?
VW And EVs:
VW's New EV Platform Still Supports Combustion Engines
Volkswagen Is Making Less Money Because It's Selling More EVs
Gallery: VW SP2 (1974)
3
Source:
Volkswagen
Sources:
Stepan Rehak / LinkedIn
,
Tibor Juhasz / LinkedIn
Share this Story
X
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmunds
3 hours ago
- Edmunds
Here's What We Think of Our Dodge Charger Daytona EV After 3,500 Miles
A big EV with big limitations The Edmunds One-Year Road Test fleet is almost entirely made up of practical vehicles — the type that someone with a family or things to haul around wouldn't hesitate to drive. Except for our recently supercharged Ford Mustang Dark Horse and the Dodge Charger, that is. The latter is, to put it lightly, unpopular. Not only is it an electric car with a subpar range, but it's also a two-door with a second row that's spacious but difficult to access. So after a few weeks of walking by it each morning as its bright red paint dulled due to mounting dust layers, I decided to sign it out to see if the Daytona has some untapped charm. My first impressions were far from positive. For one, it's a very long car. Sitting just over 17 feet long, the Charger is hard to maneuver through tight spots and driveways. Just take a peek at its freshly curbed front passenger side wheel, courtesy of yours truly. More importantly, its seating position is odd. You have to sit very far forward to get a comfortable grip on its controls, its front chairs don't offer much lateral support, and because they don't drop low enough, you feel like you're sitting a few inches higher than you'd want to. Did I mention that this also kills some of your headroom? OK, so it's too large to be maneuverable but also somewhat cramped. Is it fun?
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rivian's Path To Profitability Gets Longer As Regulatory Changes Squeeze Margins
Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) shares declined on Wednesday after the electric vehicle manufacturer posted mixed second-quarter results and issued a downbeat outlook, prompting a round of price target cuts from Wall Street analysts. The company reported second-quarter revenue of $1.303 billion, a 5.1% year-over-year increase that slightly surpassed the Street consensus estimate of $1.29 billion, according to Benzinga Pro. However, the adjusted loss of 97 cents per share came in wider than the expected 76 cents per share loss, underscoring continued profitability response to the earnings, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives maintained Rivian with an Outperform rating and lowered the price forecast from $18 to $16. While revenues modestly exceeded expectations, driven by higher average selling prices and growth in the software and services segment, profitability deteriorated. Software and services revenue rose to $376 million, up from $318 million in the prior quarter, with approximately $182 million stemming from Rivian's joint venture with Volkswagen (OTC:VWAGY). However, adjusted gross margin fell steeply to 4.9%, down from 26.5% in the previous quarter, primarily due to lower production volumes and roughly $137 million in fixed cost impacts. Tariffs had only a minor impact during the period. Adjusted EBITDA came in at a loss of $667 million, significantly wider than the Street's anticipated $492.7 million loss, as the company ramped up investment in its R2 product line and service infrastructure. Rivian reaffirmed its full-year delivery guidance of 40,000 to 46,000 vehicles but downgraded its profitability outlook. The company now expects gross profit to be roughly breakeven, down from a prior forecast of $300 million. This change is primarily due to recent regulatory changes that have created a net negative impact of a couple thousand dollars per unit. A major part of this loss comes from the elimination of a high-margin revenue stream: $160.0 million in regulatory credits that the company was previously expecting to earn. Adjusted EBITDA guidance was revised to a range of negative $2.25 billion to $2.0 billion, well below the consensus estimate of negative $1.88 billion. Despite short-term challenges, Ives maintained an Outperform rating, while lowering the price forecast, citing regulatory uncertainty, tariffs, and macro headwinds as near-term hurdles in Rivian's broader transformation. JP Morgan analyst Ryan Brinkman took a more pessimistic view, reaffirming an Underweight rating and cutting his price forecast from $10 to $9. Brinkman lowered his estimates and price forecast on Rivian following a wider-than-expected second-quarter EBITDA loss and a deeper full-year guide-down. While revenue of $1.303 billion beat JPMorgan's $1.211 billion estimate and the Street's $1.283 billion, nearly all other metrics disappointed. Regulatory credit revenue came in at just $3 million, well below Brinkman's $107 million forecast, due to legislative changes that reduced demand for EPA and CAFE credits. Core automotive gross margin excluding credits fell sharply to -36%, compared to JPMorgan's -11% estimate, leading to a combined gross profit loss of $335 million versus the firm's projected $90 million loss. Software and services showed relative strength, posting a gross profit of $129 million versus the expected $75 million, while operating expenses were lower than anticipated at $908 million. Despite these positives, the second-quarter EBITDA loss of $667 million fell far short of JPMorgan's forecast of $535 million and consensus of $493 million. Brinkman sees Rivian's updated full-year outlook, now forecasting an adjusted EBITDA loss of $2.125 billion at the midpoint (down from $1.8 billion prior) and regulatory credit revenue of $160 million (cut from $300 million), as indicative of both a more challenging regulatory environment and weaker internal execution. He projects a $2.8 billion free cash outflow for 2025, up from $2.5 billion, equating to over 50% of estimated revenue and 20% of Rivian's market cap. While liquidity remains sufficient with $7.5 billion in cash and expected inflows from Volkswagen and DOE loans, Brinkman reaffirmed an Underweight rating and cut his price forecast. Price Action: Rivian shares are trading lower by 3.16% at $11.79 at last check on Wednesday. Photo via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for RIVN Date Firm Action From To Mar 2022 Wedbush Maintains Outperform Mar 2022 Wells Fargo Maintains Equal-Weight Mar 2022 RBC Capital Maintains Outperform View More Analyst Ratings for RIVN View the Latest Analyst Ratings Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Rivian's Path To Profitability Gets Longer As Regulatory Changes Squeeze Margins originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Lucid (NASDAQ:LCID) Posts Q2 Sales In Line With Estimates But Stock Drops
Luxury electric car manufacturer Lucid (NASDAQ:LCID) met Wall Street's revenue expectations in Q2 CY2025, with sales up 29.3% year on year to $259.4 million. Its non-GAAP loss of $0.24 per share was 11.1% below analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy Lucid? Find out in our full research report. Lucid (LCID) Q2 CY2025 Highlights: Revenue: $259.4 million vs analyst estimates of $259.1 million (29.3% year-on-year growth, in line) Adjusted EPS: -$0.24 vs analyst expectations of -$0.22 (11.1% miss) Adjusted EBITDA: -$632.1 million vs analyst estimates of -$624.3 million (-244% margin, 1.2% miss) Operating Margin: -310%, up from -393% in the same quarter last year Free Cash Flow was -$1.01 billion compared to -$741.3 million in the same quarter last year Sales Volumes rose 38.2% year on year (70.5% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $7.40 billion "We had our sixth consecutive quarter of record deliveries in Q2 and expect to continue this trend as we ramp up Lucid Gravity production in the second half of the year," said Marc Winterhoff, Interim CEO at Lucid. Company Overview Founded by a former Tesla Vice President, Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) designs, manufactures, and sells luxury electric vehicles with long-range capabilities. Revenue Growth A company's long-term sales performance is one signal of its overall quality. Any business can experience short-term success, but top-performing ones enjoy sustained growth for years. Luckily, Lucid's sales grew at an incredible 280% compounded annual growth rate over the last four years. Its growth beat the average industrials company and shows its offerings resonate with customers. Long-term growth is the most important, but within industrials, a stretched historical view may miss new industry trends or demand cycles. Lucid's annualized revenue growth of 11% over the last two years is below its four-year trend, but we still think the results suggest healthy demand. We can dig further into the company's revenue dynamics by analyzing its number of units sold, which reached 3,309 in the latest quarter. Over the last two years, Lucid's units sold grew by 41.5% annually. Because this number is better than its revenue growth, we can see the company's average selling price decreased. This quarter, Lucid's year-on-year revenue growth of 29.3% was excellent, and its $259.4 million of revenue was in line with Wall Street's estimates. Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 121% over the next 12 months, an improvement versus the last two years. This projection is eye-popping and suggests its newer products and services will spur better top-line performance. Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. Operating Margin Lucid's high expenses have contributed to an average operating margin of negative 477% over the last five years. Unprofitable industrials companies require extra attention because they could get caught swimming naked when the tide goes out. It's hard to trust that the business can endure a full cycle. On the plus side, Lucid's operating margin rose over the last five years, as its sales growth gave it operating leverage. Still, it will take much more for the company to reach long-term profitability. This quarter, Lucid generated a negative 310% operating margin. Earnings Per Share Revenue trends explain a company's historical growth, but the change in earnings per share (EPS) points to the profitability of that growth – for example, a company could inflate its sales through excessive spending on advertising and promotions. Although Lucid's full-year earnings are still negative, it reduced its losses and improved its EPS by 24.2% annually over the last two years. In Q2, Lucid reported adjusted EPS at negative $0.24, up from negative $0.31 in the same quarter last year. Despite growing year on year, this print missed analysts' estimates. We also like to analyze expected EPS growth based on Wall Street analysts' consensus projections, but there is insufficient data. Key Takeaways from Lucid's Q2 Results We struggled to find many positives in these results. Its EPS missed and its sales volume fell short of Wall Street's estimates. Overall, this was a softer quarter. The stock traded down 8.4% to $2.23 immediately following the results. Lucid may have had a tough quarter, but does that actually create an opportunity to invest right now? What happened in the latest quarter matters, but not as much as longer-term business quality and valuation, when deciding whether to invest in this stock. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
