MEP calls for immediate reversal of rural housing restrictions
The MEP has warned that current planning policies are driving a deepening emergency for families and communities across Ireland and Europe.
Addressing the Housing Crisis Committee, MEP Mullooly highlighted the acute challenges faced by rural homeowners, particularly in Ireland, where building a home on family land has historically been the only viable route to homeownership for people.
The MEP also condemned the 'growing' trend of local people being denied planning permission after incurring prohibitive costs for reports, only to be refused the right to build on ancestral land.
According to the MEP, these barriers are 'fueling a cycle of depopulation', with young people unable to return, local schools losing teachers, sports clubs folding, and vital community hubs like pubs and post offices closing.
Rural housing
MEP Mullooly has criticised planning systems that prioritise environmental protections, such as safeguarding bogs, over the 'survival of rural communities'.
He said: 'Let me be absolutely clear, rural Ireland is not a museum. It is not to be preserved for the benefit of planning documents or biodiversity reports.
'Rural Ireland is living and breathing, but struggling to survive, impacted by decisions made in distant rooms with no links to that place.'
'So we must see the full deployment of the Just Transition fund and ERDF fund to support these local communities,' Mullooly added.
The MEP has called for a balanced approach that recognises both the socio-economic and cultural benefits of one-off housing and the advances in modern environmental techniques that can address legitimate concerns.
Mullooly also warned that uncertainty over future funding in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MMF) threatens to undermine vital rural development efforts.
He called for full deployment of the Just Transition fund and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to empower local communities and insisted that planning must be community-led and designed by locals rather than 'imposed from distant bureaucracies'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
5 days ago
- Agriland
MEP claims older farmers will be 'forced out' of sector by new CAP
An Irish MEP has claimed that some 28,000 farmers in the Midlands--North-West European Parliament constituency could be "forced out" of the sector by the new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The proposals for the next CAP post-2027 were announced last month, with one of a number of controversial changes being a requirement to stop farm payments for pensioners. In its proposal the European Commission states that member states must ensure that by 2032 at the latest, applicants who reach retirement age, determined by national law, who receive a pension, must no longer receive support under the CAP. Irish MEP Ciaran Mullooly has claimed that this will result in thousands of farmers being forced to exit the sector when reaching the state pension age. According to figures provided by Mullooly, the number of farmers that would be impacted by this change in the various counties in the Midlands--North-West constituency varies from almost 600 in Co., Louth to over 5,000 in Co. Galway. According to those figures, over 4,500 farmers in Co. Mayo would be effected, over 3,100 in Co. Donegal, and over 2,200 in Co. Roscommon. Several other counties - Laois, Cavan, Meath, Monaghan, Westmeath, Offaly, Sligo and Leitrim - would each see over 1,000 farmers impacted by the proposed change, according to Mullooly's figures. These figures amount to just under 28,300 farmers in the constituency. Claiming that these farmers could be forced out of farming upon reaching the state pension age of 66, Mullooly said: "This represents one of the most direct and dangerous policy threats to active older I have ever seen. "These dedicated their lives to agriculture; contributed substantially to rural communities and the national economy; to remain in active farming beyond the retirement age," he added. "Forcing them off the land without offering viable alternatives is not just unjust, it is a betrayal of decades of service. The MEP is calling for the introduction of a "well-funded, respectful" retirement scheme for farmers. He pointed to the Early Farm Retirement Scheme that ran from 1994 to 1998 as a potential model for a future scheme. Related Stories "This is not a radical proposal. It's a practical and proven policy that worked before and can work again," he said. "We must reintroduce such incentives to support voluntary, dignified retirement, rather than forcing farmers out of the sector as if they are surplus to requirements." The MEP also said that farming "must be treated as a business, and not just a vocation". "If we want to retain skilled farmers and attract a new generation into the sector, we must ensure that it offers a viable livelihood comparable to other professions," Mullooly said.
Agriland
04-08-2025
- Agriland
MEP calls on DAFM to 'review and revise' approach to GAEC 2
An Irish MEP has called on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) to revise its approach to the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition 2 (GAEC 2). GAEC 2 is the conditionality standard of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) related to the protection of peatlands and wetlands. Last week, the department launched an appeals process for farmers seeking to have their land removed from the standard. However, farm organisations voiced concerns about several conditions attached to the appeals process. Midlands North-West MEP Ciaran Mullooly has also called on DAFM to "immediately clarify and withdraw unnecessary conditions it is imposing on landowners seeking to appeal the classification of their land under GAEC 2". He criticised the department's requirement that landowners applying for an appeal may have to provide: A signed declaration from the appellant that the parcel(s) in question has/have never been drained and he/she plans to carry out drainage works in 2025 as required; Evidence to show that the appellant plans to carry out drainage work in 2025 e.g. contractor quotations, estimate of costs etc as required. 'This demand completely misunderstands the purpose of the appeals process,' Mullooly said. 'Farmers are appealing the peat soil designation because they believe it is scientifically incorrect - not because of what they plan to do with the land next year. 'The decision on whether land is peat soil or not must be based on soil science - not hypothetical future land use or drainage plans. To suggest otherwise is to undermine the integrity of the entire process," he said. Ciaran Mullooly MEP The Midlands-North-West MEP said that the department risks "confusing and intimidating landowners". 'Once again, we see bureaucracy being used in a way that frustrates rather than facilitates access to a fair and transparent appeals process. "Farmers are entitled to have incorrect classifications overturned. That entitlement must not be made contingent on signing unnecessary undertakings or presenting irrelevant contractor paperwork," he said. The MEP is calling for the department to "immediately review and revise its approach to GAEC 2 peat soil appeals and ensure the process remains grounded in science, fairness, and farmers' rights". The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) previously said that the department has made amendments to the appeals process. In an update to the appeal document, DAFM outlined that the documents which have caused concern are not required where no drainage works are planned on previously undrained/drained GAEC 2 land parcel(s) in 2025. Following the amendments, IFA Rural Development Committee chair John Curran said that it is "now clear that all farmers have the opportunity to appeal the indicative GAEC 2 status of individual parcels". 'The clarification also makes the need for signed declarations/proof of drainage works obsolete. "These requirements should be removed from appeal application requirements," he added.
Agriland
04-08-2025
- Agriland
Macra sets out stance on CAP payments for pensioner farmers
Macra has called for "mandatory" farm succession plans for farmers over 63 and "transition payments" for farmers from 67-70 years-of-age. Responding to a query from Agriland on Macra's stance on support payments to farmers in receipt of a pension, Macra national president Josephine O'Neill outlined the rural youth organisation's position. She said: "We need to examine this in the context of creating opportunities to facilitate generational renewal and collaborative arrangements between younger and older farmers plus the reality of a reduced Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) budget. Last month, the European Commission presented its Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) - the EU's long-term budget - which proposed to end farm support payments for farmers once they reach pension age. The Macra leader told Agriland that the rural youth organisation previously proposed a mechanism to the EU Commission for this current CAP programme (2023-2027), which aimed "to encourage succession planning among older farmers". The Macra proposal involves a farm-succession model, which aims to accommodate the needs of older farmers and improve access to land for young farmers. The key aspects of Macra's CAP policy proposal to improve generational renewal include: Once a farmer reaches the age of 63, it becomes mandatory to complete a farm succession plan; At the age of 65, farmers avail of a transition payment up to the age of 70; A farmer that wishes to continue to receive CAP supports beyond the age of 70 would need to get involved in a collaborative arrangement. The Macra president said: "The proposal includes upon reaching 63, it becomes mandatory for all farmers to complete a farm succession plan. "From the age of 65-70, farmers will receive a transition payment in order to both facilitate and support their exit from the industry. "For farmers that wish to continue to receive a CAP payment beyond the age of 70, such a farmer would need to get involved in a collaborative arrangement." The Macra president has told Agriland that Macra will be further discussing the recent EU Commission CAP proposals and examining the range of potential tools available from the Commission to tackle generational renewal. "All options need to be seriously examined so that we can address the lack of young people entering farming," O'Neill said.
