logo
Marrying A Foreigner And Navigating U.S. Immigration Rules

Marrying A Foreigner And Navigating U.S. Immigration Rules

Forbes15-05-2025

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex wave during their carriage procession ... More outside Windsor Castle, on May 19, 2018 after their wedding ceremony. (Photo by Aaron Chown -)
Marrying a foreigner with the expectation that he or she will come to the U.S. seems like a natural next step in a loving relationship. However, if your plan involves bringing your fiancé(e) into the United States for the wedding—or remaining together afterwards—you may be surprised to discover that immigration law makes your plan far more complicated than you might have thought. Perhaps the most famous example of such a marriage and later immigration to the U.S. was Prince Harry's union with Meghan Markle and the subsequent steps they had to take to live together in America.
In fact, without proper planning, such a wedding can quickly turn into a border nightmare. Couples have found themselves separated for months—or even years—simply because they misunderstood the rules. The path to permanent residence for a foreign fiancé(e) or spouse depends heavily on your own immigration status as the U.S.-based partner, the intent of your partner at the time they enter the country, and how and when you choose to marry. Fortunately, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle worked it all out properly.
Let's begin with the issue that trips up couples the most: immigrant intent. Whether your partner is Canadian, European, or from anywhere else in the world, U.S. immigration law draws a sharp distinction between visitors and immigrants.
When a foreign national enters the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program (as most Europeans do) or on a tourist visa (as Canadians may be waived in for), they declare to the U.S. government that they do not intend to immigrate—that they are coming only temporarily for tourism, business, or family visits.
So when someone arrives at the U.S. border and tells a Customs and Border Protection officer (CBP) that they are coming to attend their own wedding—and especially if they suggest they plan to stay after—it raises an immediate red flag. CBP officers are trained to detect immigrant intent, and they may deny entry on the spot, cancel a visa or Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), or even ban the individual from returning for several years.
This is not theoretical. Canadians trying to marry their American partners in the U.S. have been turned away at the border. Europeans arriving on ESTA have been placed on return flights the same day. In both cases, the issue is the same: they are attempting to engage in conduct that is inconsistent with the terms of their entry. Immigration rules are now vigilantly being enforced, especially under President Trump's rule.
One of the most misunderstood aspects of immigration enforcement is the idea of preconceived intent. This legal doctrine applies when someone enters the U.S. on a temporary basis—such as a visitor—but has always intended to remain in the country permanently, possibly by marrying and applying for a green card.
The U.S. government uses what's known as the '90-day rule' to help identify these cases. If someone marries a U.S. citizen or applies for a green card within 90 days of arriving in the U.S., the government may presume they lied about their original intentions. This misrepresentation can lead to a denial of permanent residency, and if found to be wilful, even a lifetime ban under U.S. immigration law.
To overcome this presumption, couples must provide evidence that the decision to marry or stay was made after arrival, due to unforeseen circumstances—something that is often difficult to prove.
That's why honesty at the border is essential, but it must be paired with proper planning. It is important to tell the truth about your relationship — but if your partner plans to stay after the wedding, they must have the correct visa in hand.
Here's where your status as the American half of the couple becomes critically important. It is why Prince Harry was properly able to immigrate to the United States based on the sponsorship of Meghan Markle, his spouse and a U.S. citizen.
If you are a U.S. citizen, like Meghan Markle is, you have the most options:
But if you are only a lawful permanent resident (green card holder), your options are more limited:
For this reason, some green card holders choose to naturalize first, gaining U.S. citizenship before initiating a family sponsorship process. It adds time, but can avoid years of delay and legal complexity.
Some couples, out of desperation, choose to circumvent the system. A foreign partner enters as a visitor, marries, and remains—hoping to adjust their status later. While this may work in some limited circumstances (especially if the partner marries a U.S. citizen after 90 days and was otherwise admitted properly), it involves significant legal risks.
If U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that the foreign national lied about their intentions at the time of entry, they may be found inadmissible due to fraud. That finding is extremely difficult to overturn and will affect any future visa or green card applications.
Even worse, if CBP officers detect suspected immigrant intent at the border—whether by reviewing messages on a phone, asking about wedding dates, or examining plane tickets—they can deny entry immediately, without any opportunity for appeal.
To avoid heartbreak and legal trouble, here are key recommendations for couples planning to marry:
1. Do Not Enter the U.S. on a Tourist Visa or ESTA With Intent to Marry and Then Stay Immediately Thereafter
If your fiancé(e) plans not only to marry but also to stay in the USA permanently immediately thereafter, they must use a proper immigrant or fiancé visa or enter in a different capacity, such as a student or, for example, an H1B work visa, to adjust status inside the country. At the very least, they should take careful note of the 90-day rule regarding future steps. This is where consultations with U.S. immigration attorneys can be helpful. Tourist entries are for temporary stays only.
2. If You Are a U.S. Citizen, Use the Fiancé(e) Visa or Spousal Visa
These are the most straightforward and legally secure ways to bring your partner to the U.S. As already mentioned, this was the case with Prince Harry and Meghan, now Duchess of Sussex.
3. If You Are a Green Card Holder, Consider Marrying Abroad and Then Filing
Expect longer wait times and fewer benefits, but this is the correct legal pathway. Choosing to marry abroad, such as in Canada, may be a wise move for you.
4. Do Not Attempt to 'Game the System'
Misrepresentation—even if it seems harmless—can carry lifelong immigration consequences.
5. Get Legal Advice Early
Even well-meaning couples can fall into legal traps. A qualified immigration attorney can save you years of delay and expense.
In short, marrying a foreigner requires familiarity with U.S. immigration rules. For Americans hoping to marry foreign nationals and live together in the United States, the stakes are high and the process is complex. The difference between a joyful wedding, such as the one between Prince Harry and Meghan, and a border crisis can depend on whether you took the time to understand the rules—and followed them carefully.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'
Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'

Fox News

time15 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'

FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo., on Wednesday will introduce legislation that would ban congressional stock trading, serving as the House companion bill to Sen. Josh Hawley's, R-Mo., "PELOSI Act" in the Senate. Alford's proposed bill would ban lawmakers and their spouses from holding, purchasing or selling individual stocks while in office, but it allows investments in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds or U.S. Treasury bonds. If passed, current lawmakers would have 180 days to comply with the legislation. Likewise, newly elected lawmakers must achieve compliance within 180 days of entering office. "As public servants, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard and avoid the mere appearance of corruption," Alford said in a statement. "Unfortunately, too many members of Congress are engaging in suspicious stock trades based on non-public information to enrich themselves." "These gross violations of the public trust make clear: we must finally take action to ban members and their spouses from owning or selling individual stocks," he added. Under the proposed legislation, lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions would be required to hand over any profits they made to the U.S. Treasury Department. The House or Senate ethics committees could also impose a fine on such lawmakers amounting to 10% of each wrongful transaction. House Speaker Mike Johnson endorsed a stock trading ban on Wednesday, saying "a few bad actors" have ruined Americans' trust in lawmakers on the issue. "You want me to tell you my honest opinion on that? I'm in favor of that, because I don't think we should have any appearance of impropriety here," he told reporters during a press conference. President Donald Trump himself endorsed the same ban for members of Congress in an interview with Time magazine last month. "I watched Nancy Pelosi get rich through insider information, and I would be okay with it. If they send that to me, I would do it," he said of a trading ban. "You'll sign it?" the reporter pressed. "Absolutely," Trump responded. Democrats in the House of Representatives have also expressed support for a ban, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., throwing his weight behind the proposal last week.

EcoFlow Has Slashed Prices by Up to 55% Ahead of Father's Day
EcoFlow Has Slashed Prices by Up to 55% Ahead of Father's Day

CNET

time15 minutes ago

  • CNET

EcoFlow Has Slashed Prices by Up to 55% Ahead of Father's Day

If you enjoy summer travel, outdoor adventures, or live in an area where the weather can disrupt the power supply, a portable power station or power bank is the perfect way to ensure your devices stay charged. Today's power stations and power banks are more compact and lightweight than ever, making them even easier to transport for almost everyone. Right now, EcoFlow is offering multiple deals that can help you save on various devices, with savings of up to 55% when you purchase directly from their website. Amazon also has several EcoFlow deals, just be aware that their offers might vary. EcoFlow's disaster preparedness deals are live until June 8 and include bundles that can power larger appliances and even medical devices for a long time, as well as solar panels to charge the included power station. The EcoFlow Delta 3 bundle features the power station and a 220W solar panel, all for $999. If only the power station is needed, you can get it for just $699 and save $100 over its original asking price. Other bundle options include the EcoFlow Delta 2 portable power station and a 500-watt solar panel for $1,499, a total of $1,200 in savings. This power station has a 6144Wh capacity that can power devices inside your home as needed. It's also built to efficiently store solar energy that the panel converts to stay charged even in the most trying conditions. EcoFlow has also partnered with Costco to offer the River 3 Plus combo, which includes two power banks, for just $279. The portable power station has a 286Wh capacity suitable for camping needs, and the bundle comes with a 15W wireless power bank and a 30W cable power bank. EcoFlow is also running a Father's Day and summer travel sale from June 9 until June 15. We'll keep you updated when the deals are live for more opportunities to save. To take better advantage of these deals, check out our article that explains how to choose the best portable power station for your needs. Why this deal matters EcoFlow is behind some of our favorite portable power stations, and their solar panels only add value -- ensuring that you can keep them charged, even when there's no outlet. The brand is offering several deals via its own website, in partnership with Costco, and through its official Amazon storefront. Keep in mind that some deals expire on June 8, and others start on June 9 and end on June 15 if you purchase through EcoFlow's website. Still, now is the perfect opportunity to purchase a portable power station, as there are options for many budgets.

Tarrant County citizens file lawsuit against new redistricting map
Tarrant County citizens file lawsuit against new redistricting map

CBS News

time16 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Tarrant County citizens file lawsuit against new redistricting map

Less than a day after Tarrant County commissioners approved a controversial redistricting proposal, a group of citizens filed a lawsuit claiming intentional discrimination. According to the Lone Star Project, the lawsuit claims that Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare and his followers engaged in intentional racial discrimination in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution by drawing the new district lines. "Intentional discrimination is still against the law," said lead legal counsel for the citizen plaintiffs, Chad Dunn. "The map they drew, the process they used to draw it, and the animosity shown to the citizens of Tarrant County violate the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution." Hundreds of residents speak out for, against the redistricting More than 200 people spoke out about redrawing boundary lines during public comment Tuesday night. The majority who spoke were against redistricting, including the mayors of Arlington, Mansfield and Forest Hills. There were still several speakers who expressed their support. Several used the phrase "don't Dallas my Tarrant." Tarrant County "I want to say that I fully support deterring redistricting efforts. These lines haven't been updated since 2010," said Carlos Turcios, the community development committee chairman for the Tarrant Republican Party. Commissioners moved into executive session around 3 p.m. on Tuesday after some tense moments between the two Democrats and the three Republicans. As Commissioner Alisa Simmons expressed all the reasons she is against redistricting, Judge Tim O'Hare abruptly moved to executive session in an effort to limit her comments. O'Hare is spearheading this process and has been clear that it's about partisan politics. He wants another Republican seat on the court to ensure conservative leadership for the next decade. "It's a very divided country and the parties, I'm not sure, have never been further apart in their beliefs," O'Hare said. "I don't apologize for being a Republican. I don't apologize for being a conservative." "It's not partisan. It is racism." Critics believe the redistricting is racial gerrymandering, saying it goes beyond partisan politics and say it dilutes the voting power of minorities. "Absolutely, it's not partisan. It is racism," Simmons said during the meeting. The new map does appear to take areas with high Black and brown populations from precinct two and put them in precinct one. SMU political science professor Calvin Jillson said what the court did is not unusual, but the legality of the new lines comes down to intentions. "Oh, this absolutely gerrymandering – it is the redrawing of electoral boundaries for partisan purposes," Jillson said. "The question is whether the purposes behind the redrawing were actually political, in which case gerrymandering is legal, or racial discrimination, in which case it would not be legal." Check out more on the CBS News Texas YouTube page: contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store