logo
Thousands to receive compensation over force-fitting of prepaid energy meters

Thousands to receive compensation over force-fitting of prepaid energy meters

Rhyl Journal28-05-2025

The regulator announced that eight companies will hand out compensation and support after a review into consumers struggling with energy bills who were forced to have pay-as-you-go meters installed.
Scottish Power, EDF, E.ON, Utility Warehouse, Good Energy, TruEnergy and Ecotricity have all agreed to the scheme.
Ofgem said suppliers have committed to pay both additional compensation where it is due, and in some cases write off some energy debt of customers who had an involuntary PPM installed during the assessment period of January 1 2022 to January 31 2023.
Suppliers will pay £5.6 million in compensation – using the guidelines set out by Ofgem – to 40,000 customers who had an involuntary PPM installed during the assessment period.
Suppliers will also write off a further £13 million of debt from customers who had an involuntary PPM during the assessment period.
This comes on top of £55 million of financial support provided directly to affected consumers by suppliers prior to the completion of the review in the form of hardship payments and debt write-off, the regulator said.
Customers identified as having had a PPM wrongly installed or where processes were not followed adequately between January 1 2022 and January 31 2023 will be contacted by their suppliers, and do not need to take action.
OVO has also confirmed it will pay compensation to customers in line with the guidelines developed by Ofgem.
Tim Jarvis, director-general of markets for Ofgem, said: 'This has been one of the most detailed reviews of supplier practices in Ofgem's history, looking at tens of thousands of cases. It has taken time, but our priority has been to put things right for those who weren't treated properly, and ensure we don't see bad practice repeated.
'While the number of cases where a prepayment meter was wrongfully installed is relatively low compared to the total number of PPM customers, one case is one too many.
'Our review also found wider issues with the processes suppliers had in place, which is why we've put in place clearer, tougher rules to protect customers in vulnerable situations, and I'm pleased that from today suppliers will be applying our compensation framework for those customers affected and have also committed to further support such as debt write-off.
'We have made our expectations clear to suppliers on how those customers who were treated poorly should be compensated. They have, and continue to, work closely and collaboratively with us to make sure their processes are robust and that their customers are properly supported.
'We know that PPMs can be an effective tool in helping customers manage their costs and debt. However, customers must always be treated fairly and compassionately, and we are confident that the changes we have made are a significant step to ensure that happens.'
Dhara Vyas, chief executive of Energy UK, which represents energy firms, said: 'Suppliers have worked hard to co-operate with this comprehensive review and taken further action to put things right in the cases where a prepayment meter (PPM) shouldn't have been installed – or where there was insufficient support for the customers concerned.
'Suppliers have been working closely with Ofgem to meet the requirements of its review and have signed up to the Code of Practice before they have been able to restart involuntary installations of PPMs and have carried out thorough testing of the new processes.
'Involuntary installations have been a last – but necessary – resort for cases where repeated attempts to address debt with the customer through other means have been unsuccessful. It's bad for customers to fall further and further into arrears, and bad debt ultimately drives up the prices that are paid by all customers.
'Since the pause on installations, customer debt has risen to a record £4 billion, and the industry remains keen to work with Ofgem on the proposed relief scheme to tackle this problem.'
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Justice is finally being delivered to many of the families, lots of them vulnerable, who were affected by the scandal of energy suppliers wrongly forcibly installing prepayment meters.
'The Government has campaigned tirelessly on this issue and are pleased to see the level of compensation increase to £18.6 million, up from £420,000 under the previous government.
'Consumers must come first, which is why we are reforming the energy market to stamp out bad practice and make it easier to access proper redress when things go wrong, through our comprehensive review of Ofgem. This increased compensation package is a good start, and we will be announcing further reforms in the weeks ahead as we deliver our Plan for Change.'
The scandal first made headlines two years ago, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis, when it came to light that energy companies were switching people on to prepayment methods.
This was done by entering properties to install a smart meter or remotely changing a smart meter to prepayment mode.
The energy regulator subsequently suspended all forced installations and launched a review of the process.
It comes weeks after Good Energy was made to pay £150,000 in compensation and redress after it failed to give final bills and refund credit to more than 2,000 prepayment meter customers.
Ofgem said 2,284 customers on prepayment meters were affected by an error with Good Energy's billing system between 2014 and October 2023.
It meant that prepayment customers who switched to another supplier or ended their contract with Good Energy did not get a final bill within six weeks, as required by the watchdog.
Good Energy paid out £150,067 as a result, with the average sum per customer standing at £66.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'My credit score has been destroyed by fake energy debt'
'My credit score has been destroyed by fake energy debt'

BBC News

time20 hours ago

  • BBC News

'My credit score has been destroyed by fake energy debt'

A woman who had a prepayment meter forcibly installed in her home over a debt she did not owe says her credit score is still ruined years Asante – a church pastor – spent years battling with Scottish Power over a non-existent debt before the company apologised and wiped the remaining balance last Favour says her credit score is still ruined due to the false debt and she remains unable to get a credit card or take out a phone Power said it had removed the credit markers against Favour's record last year but she is concerned her score could take years to recover. The energy firm said: "We've shared with credit reference agencies that she has a prepayment meter with a zero balance, which should have a positive impact on her credit score."The error began when Scottish Power wrongly believed she owed them more than £2,000, which eventually led to the firm forcibly installing a prepayment meter into her Glasgow home in late 2022, while she was out of the country visiting was later discovered that the false debt had arisen because Scottish Power had wrongly opened and closed multiple accounts in her name. The company has since recognised the mistakes, apologised and wiped the Favour said she remains unable to take out a loan, phone contract or get a credit card because of the default on her account. It comes as thousands of energy customers are set to receive payouts, and could see debts written off, in response to widespread controversy over the force-fitting of prepayment meters into people's announcement last month followed a review by the energy regulator Ofgem, and could see eligible customers receiving payments starting at £40 and rising up to £1, years, energy companies were allowed to force-fit prepayment meters into people's homes when bills went unpaid but a scandal erupted during the energy cost crisis of 2022 when suppliers were found to have forced the meters on vulnerable intense criticism, Ofgem introduced a moratorium on forced installations in 2023 but allowed companies to restart the practice less than a year later – albeit with stricter rules in place to protect vulnerable customers who have been affected by the practice of force-fitting prepayment meters over the years have told BBC Scotland News that the compensation payments do not compare with how heavily their lives were impacted. Favour told the BBC: "It's really affected me emotionally, financially, and it's also ruined my credit score because a bill that wasn't mine was forced into my name and given to the credit agencies."For the last six years I have been on the list for not getting any credit from anywhere due to that."My credit score has been ruined, I can't apply for anything at the moment. What I've been through compared with £1,000 is not enough."Favour said she no longer trusts energy companies after the ordeal. 'No compassion' The review from Ofgem into this practice had an assessment period of 1 January 2022 to 31 January 2023, meaning Favour could be eligible for compensation. But many other customers may not has epilepsy and asthma and says that a long-running disagreement with her energy company at the time had a severe impact on her 34-year-old nursing student told the BBC she was so distressed by having a prepayment meter forcibly installed into her home that she had multiple seizures which resulted in who lived in a one-bedroom council flat in Fife at the time, says her then-energy supplier Npower increased her monthly bills from £60 a month in 2014 to about £200 - and said she had a debt of about £1, disputed this which led to a row that would continue for another three claims that a wiring issue with her storage heating meant that it was turning on when it shouldn't have been, including when she was at work. When she called Npower to ask them to assess the issue the company was "really forceful and harassing" and "threatening with bailiffs"."They had no compassion or consideration that there was clearly a huge issue for a one-bedroom flat," she said several appointments were made for the firm to visit and investigate an issue with the heating, but nobody showed up. 'It was torture' Then, in 2017, she returned home from work to find that her flat had been broken into and a prepayment meter installed."They couldn't attend to check my meter but they could attend to force entry into my house," she said."I was having a lot of seizures at the time because of the stress. It really freaked me out and made me feel so unsafe."Energy firm has since acquired Npower and Rebekah says that her debt was finally written off in December 2024 after she applied for a winter heating scheme for vulnerable she believes that even if she were to receive compensation, it would not be enough."It was a constant battle," she said."I had to miss work countless times due to the seizures. I'd end up with horrific injuries."And yes, my debt has now been wiped off and I'm grateful for that, but the stress of it was torture."An Next spokesperson said: "While this case predates our acquisition of Npower and Rebekah was not an customer at the time, we are pleased that we have since been able to offer direct support and resolve the issue for her." Organisations such as Citizens Advice Scotland have long-opposed the practice of forced installations even prior to it catching headlines in 2022, and raised particular concerns around safeguards in place for vulnerable a 62-year-old cleaner from Hamilton, told the BBC she remains affected to this day by having a prepayment meter forced into her home in 2015."I was a single mother, working-part time on minimum wage, and came in from work one day right before Christmas to see an envelope with new keys in it," she said. "They'd broken in and put a prepayment meter in."Susan said she had fallen into debt of about £3,500 with energy provider EDF after struggling with the death of her father alongside having a disability and mental health issues."I know it was my fault for racking up the debt and I buried my head in the sand, but they never gave me the option to pay it off in instalments at all and I didn't know they'd break in when I wasn't there," she said."It was so upsetting because I couldn't talk to anybody about it and I was embarrassed about the debt. I didn't want my family to know."Susan thinks there are not enough protections in place to support vulnerable customers who find themselves in debt, and says she would have agreed to a repayment plan if she had been made aware it was an said: "If they'd have told me they were coming, I would have arranged to take time off work so that at least there wouldn't be people in my house when I wasn't there."I'm not vulnerable now like I was then, I am doing much better, but there were not measures in place to protect vulnerable people."It was just awful. They could see that a kid lived here, that it was Christmas. What a time of year to do that to somebody."Susan said because prepayment meters are generally more expensive than other payment methods, her bills are a "fortune" and she is still paying off the debt to this has been approached for comment. Distressing cases As of 2024, Ofgem has introduced rules which means companies cannot force-fit meters if an occupant of the house is over 75 with no other support, is under two years old, needs energy for health reasons, or suffers from a chronic or terminal Vyas, chief executive of Energy UK, which represents energy firms, said suppliers had been working closely with Ofgem to meet the regulator's requirements, but said there were instances where forced fittings were Advice Scotland director of impact David Hilferty said the compensation scheme is welcome said: "We have always opposed forced installations as they take away people's choice, pushing them to pay money upfront which they often can't afford."Our network has seen many distressing cases over the years of people who have been forced to disconnect their heating supply or go into debt as a result of this, so it's right that they should be compensated."What's important now is that suppliers deliver this compensation quickly and do the right thing for those who have experienced unnecessary harm."

A Czech deal to build nuclear reactors worth $18 billion is unblocked after a court clears the way
A Czech deal to build nuclear reactors worth $18 billion is unblocked after a court clears the way

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

A Czech deal to build nuclear reactors worth $18 billion is unblocked after a court clears the way

A deal to build at least two nuclear reactors in Czechia was unblocked Wednesday, after an appeals court dismissed on Wednesday a lower court ruling that blocked the government from signing a deal with South Korea's KHNP power utility. The Supreme Administrative Court said that the ruling was not in line with law, meaning the signing of the deal could go ahead. KHNP won a lucrative public tender last year, beating a competing bid by France's EDF. The two new reactors will be built at the existing Dukovany power plant in an effort for the country to wean itself off fossil fuels. The contract between the dominant power company CEZ, where the Czech state has a majority stake, and KHNP was due to be signed on May 7 but EDF lodged a legal challenge at the regional court in the second-largest Czech city of Brno after the Czech anti-monopoly office dismissed its complaint about the tender. The regional court said on May 6 that the deal could not be signed before it rules on the EDF case, because then there would be no way to change it even if the French company won. CEZ and KHNP challenged that. The two new reactors will complement Dukovany's four 510-megawatt units that were completed in the 1980s. The total cost is estimated to be over over 400 billion koruna ($18 billion). The first new reactor is expected to become operational for a trial by 2036, the second about two years later.

Czech court rules $18 bln nuclear power plant deal with KHNP can go ahead
Czech court rules $18 bln nuclear power plant deal with KHNP can go ahead

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Czech court rules $18 bln nuclear power plant deal with KHNP can go ahead

PRAGUE, June 4 (Reuters) - A Czech court has cancelled an injunction preventing a state-controlled company and South Korea's KHNP from signing an $18 billion contract to build two new nuclear power reactors, paving the way for the project to go ahead. The Supreme Administrative Court's decision, announced on Wednesday, means the biggest Czech procurement deal ever, and a key part of the country's drive to replace ageing coal and nuclear units can be signed, although it still faces court challenges and a potential European Commission probe. France's EDF had challenged the tender and won the injunction from a lower court last month, derailing the signing of the contract that was planned for May 7, with a ceremony prepared and a Korean delegation already en route to Prague. However, the state-controlled company EDU II building the plant and KHNP appealed that ruling. The court said on Wednesday it heeded those complaints and found the injunction issued by a lower court illegal and unverifiable. "By cancelling the preliminary injunction with today's judgment, the court lifted the ban on concluding a contract for the fulfillment of a public contract for the construction of a new nuclear power plant in the Dukovany location," the court said. Last year, power firm CEZ ( opens new tab picked KHNP to build two 1,000-megawatt units to expand its Dukovany nuclear plant, giving KHNP its first project in Europe. EDF has sought to overturn the decision on multiple fronts. The government, which will provide loans and a pricing scheme to make the project profitable, took an 80% stake in the EDU II firm running the project from CEZ in April, with CEZ retaining 20%. CEZ, EDF and KHNP had no immediate comment on Wednesday's ruling. The lower court which issued the injunction will hold a hearing on the matter of EDF's complaint against the tender itself on June 25. Separately, EDF, the only European company building nuclear plants, sought to cancel KHNP's win through the European Commission on competition grounds, suggesting KHNP's offer was so low that it implied state aid. KHNP has denied any state aid.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store