logo
D.C. mayor to announce Commanders' stadium will relocate to nation's capital: Source

D.C. mayor to announce Commanders' stadium will relocate to nation's capital: Source

New York Times28-04-2025

The day that thousands of Washington Commanders fans have been awaiting for the last three decades will dawn Monday morning, when the team and the city formally announce their agreement on a proposed new stadium that will be built on the current RFK site on East Capitol St. in Northeast D.C., a source with knowledge of the talks confirmed to The Athletic.
Advertisement
A report by Axios on Sunday night first disclosed that the agreement had been reached.
Commanders majority owner Josh Harris and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser will attend a news conference Monday at which they'll disclose some of the specific numbers attached to the proposed development. A new stadium will likely not be the only construction on the 174-acre site, which was home for the then-Washington Redskins from 1961 to 1997, when the team left the District and moved to what is now called Northwest Stadium in Landover, Md.
Reporting earlier this month included unconfirmed funding details that the Commanders would contribute as much as $2.5 billion for a new stadium, with the District contributing up to $850 million, primarily for infrastructure. Harris previously stated a desire for a new stadium to open by 2030. Sources indicated that the numbers reported by NBC 4 in Washington, which reported earlier this month that the sides were close to a deal, were from older iterations of negotiations between the sides.
But they confirmed that Harris and the Commanders would pay most of the costs for a new stadium, which is also expected to host Final Fours, marquee concerts and other big events.
It is unclear how Harris plans to use the rest of the site.
The team hired former JBG Smith executive Andy VanHorn last month to head its real estate development plans. VanHorn helped to build the Amazon HQ2 space in Virginia.
The city wants mixed-use development on the site, including housing, open spaces and other amenities for area residents. Harris is believed to want to build revenue-generating properties like hotels and restaurants on the site as well. Harris and his partners have toured multiple NFL stadiums in recent months.
The District received control of the site's commercial and community opportunities in December, following a last-minute agreement in the U.S. Senate to pass the Robert F. Kennedy Campus Revitalization Act. However, the arduous journey through Capitol Hill red tape remains in limbo until Congress passes a Senate-approved funding bill to return D.C.'s 2026 budget to expected levels.
Advertisement
An earlier congressional bill cut the city's budget to 2024 terms, meaning Bowser would face budget shortcomings and challenging decisions. Congress has not taken action since the Senate vote in March, following President Trump's endorsement.
Bowser has prioritized keeping the city's local sports teams in town in recent years. In 2024, the mayor agreed to a deal with Monumental Sports, owners of the NBA's Wizards and NHL's Capitals, that will see D.C. spend $515 million over three years to refresh Capital One Arena and keep the franchises in the downtown home through 2050. That came after a proposed deal struck by Wizards and Caps owner Ted Leonsis for a new arena and practice facility in Virginia fell apart, primarily because of fierce opposition in the Virginia state legislature.
Bowser also faces local opposition to a Commanders project at RFK.
Two local coalitions, Homes Not Stadiums and No Billionaires Playground, have joined forces to coalesce local opposition. Homes Not Stadiums is seeking to put a ballot initiative on next year's local elections that would prohibit the construction of a stadium on the RFK site, instead prioritizing affordable housing units and other benefits to the community.
Last week, Ward 6 representative Charles Allen, who represents the neighborhoods surrounding the RFK site, reiterated his opposition to public funding for a new Commanders stadium.
'The public investment in this is going to be more than a billion dollars, already, and I don't think that's a good deal for D.C.,' Allen said on 'The Politics Hour' on WAMU-FM radio last week. Allen also cited the notion that the stadium would be dark '340 days out of the year,' noted the need for massive parking structures for more than 8,000 vehicles that would cut into the available land for development, and the current economic downturn locally created by massive firings of government employees at the onset of the second Trump administration.
Advertisement
The Commanders are coming off a surprising 12-win season that ended with the franchise's first NFC Championship Game appearance since the 1991 season.
'There's no question that there's some momentum,' Harris said following the season-ending loss at Philadelphia, 'and we would hope to capitalize on it.'
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who was raised in the District, has thrown ample support behind the stadium concept. Harris grew up in the nearby Maryland suburbs and is naturally drawn to the appeal of returning his hometown team to the place that housed three Super Bowl champions.
'I grew up with a great stadium, and I understand what it's like to play in a stadium where it's hard for the visiting team to play,' Harris said. ' … We're considering multiple jurisdictions, but in each case, right, those areas need help, need improvement and so that's gotta be part of it. The cities themselves have to have their own input as to what they want. …
'We need to have a great place where our fans can show up and as much as possible, we want that to be an advantage to our team in terms of winning on the field.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Muni Yields Remain Attractive—For Now
Muni Yields Remain Attractive—For Now

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Muni Yields Remain Attractive—For Now

Municipal bond exchange-traded funds continue to offer high yields for investors seeking to shelter some income from federal and, in some cases, state taxes. That's seen in the elevated municipal/Treasury ratio, known as the M/T ratio, said veteran muni bond manager John Loffredo, co-head of MacKay Municipal Managers, which issues the $835 million NYLI MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and $485 million NLYI MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN). The metric compares the yields of an index of AAA-rated municipal bonds to an equivalent yield on U.S. Treasury bonds. Based on current yields, the ratio ranges from about 75% on the 10-year muni bond to about 91% for 30-year muni bonds. It's about 10 basis points higher than usual. 'When you do your tax adjustment, at the highest tax rate of 37%, the yields that you're getting are extremely attractive, we believe,' Loffredo said. MMIT has a current tax-free yield of 3.7%, and MMIN's current yield is 4%, which equates to 5.9% and 6.3%, respectively, for an investor in the 37% tax bracket. Muni bond prices fell sharply in April as did most other asset classes and haven't fully recovered, keeping yields elevated. Loffredo said several muni-specific factors spurred selling: worries that Congress would strip munis of their tax-free status, the current administration's targeting of certain segments of the muni market, including private higher education and possible Medicaid reimbursement, which would impact non-profit healthcare providers, and investors selling muni bonds to find cash to pay their annual tax returns. He is positive on the outlook for munis as the ratings for many states are stable and munis are likely to be less volatile than other credits, such as corporate bonds or securitized vehicles, if the economy goes into a recession. Congress is still working out the tax bill, aiming to pass it by the July 4 holiday. Loffredo said he doesn't expect the muni tax status to change, and even if states need to take on Medicaid payments, it doesn't change his outlook. Many states have built up rainy-day funds and, if states ultimately must shoulder more Medicaid payments, they have time to figure out how to adjust, he said. States can't run budget deficits, and he expects states will either raise taxes or lower their expenses to keep those budgets balanced. Even states such as Illinois and New Jersey, which have large unfunded liabilities in their pension obligations, have positive operating balances. Both states have made 'significant progress' in staying on a timeline to get those funded again, he | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved

Watch live: Jeffries gives remarks as GOP weighs Trump agenda, Musk feud
Watch live: Jeffries gives remarks as GOP weighs Trump agenda, Musk feud

The Hill

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: Jeffries gives remarks as GOP weighs Trump agenda, Musk feud

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) will give remarks Friday morning as Democrats push back against President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' — which faces significant roadblocks in the Senate. His comments also come after blows between Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently departed from the administration. Musk's opposition to the GOP megabill frustrated the president, which led to a public spat between the duo, offering Democrats fodder for their criticism of the sprawling spending package. The news conference is scheduled to begin at 10:45 a.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.

Soligenix Highlights Dr. Ellen Kim's Recent Q&A and the Promise of HyBryte™ in Ongoing Clinical Trials
Soligenix Highlights Dr. Ellen Kim's Recent Q&A and the Promise of HyBryte™ in Ongoing Clinical Trials

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Soligenix Highlights Dr. Ellen Kim's Recent Q&A and the Promise of HyBryte™ in Ongoing Clinical Trials

PRINCETON, N.J., June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- via IBN – Soligenix, Inc. (Nasdaq: SNGX) (Soligenix or the Company), a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products to treat rare diseases where there is an unmet medical need, today spotlights the efforts of Ellen Kim, M.D., Lead Principal Investigator for the Company's Phase 3 FLASH (1 and 2) studies in early stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), in advancing HyBryte™ (synthetic hypericin) as a potential new therapy for patients living with mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common form of CTCL. In a recent Q&A hosted by Susan Thornton, CEO of the Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation, a patient advocacy group, Dr. Kim shared her gratitude to clinical trial participants and emphasized the urgent need for safer, more effective therapies for CTCL. The conversation underscored the progress being made with HyBryte™, Soligenix's novel, non-mutagenic photodynamic therapy. 'We need new therapies and access to therapies [for patients],' said Dr. Kim, noting that CTCL is a chronic disease which means that therapies with possible side effects, such as the development of contact dermatitis, sun damage or skin cancer from phototherapy, can become a real issue for patients over time. 'There hasn't been an FDA-approved, new skin-directed therapy for over 10 years, so we really need new ones that are safe and hopefully safer [than the ones currently in use].' Clinical results from ongoing studies have been promising, with Dr. Kim noting that participants have experienced positive outcomes and that the therapy has been well tolerated, with no dropouts due to serious adverse events. "HyBryte™ has a unique mechanism of action, so it doesn't damage DNA, unlike phototherapy, so theoretically it's less mutagenic and there's less risk of skin cancer. It's not systemically absorbed, based on prior studies, and seems to be quite well tolerated in terms of its effects on the local skin area,' added Dr. Kim. As a professor of dermatology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Director of the Penn Cutaneous Lymphoma Program, Dr. Kim is keen to continue her research into CTCL with colleagues and patients alike. 'There aren't that many clinical trials going on for early-stage disease,' Dr. Kim stated, adding she is very excited for what lies ahead now that open enrollment in HyBryte™ clinical trials is available. 'Hopefully we can get this over the finish line. We can't thank patients enough; it's so critical for getting new therapies approved.' To watch Dr. Kim's interview and learn more about the real-world clinical study of the treatment of Mycosis Fungoides with Synthetic Hypericin and Visible Light, please visit: About Soligenix, Inc. Soligenix is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products to treat rare diseases where there is an unmet medical need. Our Specialized BioTherapeutics business segment is developing and moving toward potential commercialization of HyBryte™ (SGX301 or synthetic hypericin) as a novel photodynamic therapy utilizing safe visible light for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). With successful completion of the second Phase 3 study, regulatory approvals will be sought to support potential commercialization worldwide. Development programs in this business segment also include expansion of synthetic hypericin (SGX302) into psoriasis, our first-in-class innate defense regulator (IDR) technology, dusquetide for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, including oral mucositis in head and neck cancer (SGX942), and in Behçet's Disease (SGX945). Our Public Health Solutions business segment includes development programs for RiVax®, our ricin toxin vaccine candidate, as well as our vaccine programs targeting filoviruses (such as Marburg and Ebola) and CiVax™, our vaccine candidate for the prevention of COVID19 (caused by SARS-CoV-2). The development of our vaccine programs incorporates the use of our proprietary heat stabilization platform technology, known as ThermoVax®. To date, this business segment has been supported with government grant and contract funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). For further information regarding Soligenix, Inc., please visit the Company's website at and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter at @Soligenix_Inc. This press release may contain forward-looking statements that reflect Soligenix's current expectations about its future results, performance, prospects and opportunities, including but not limited to, potential market sizes, patient populations, clinical trial enrollment. Statements that are not historical facts, such as "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," "hopes," "intends," "plans," "expects," "goal," "may," "suggest," "will," "potential," or similar expressions, are forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results in future periods to differ materially from what is expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Soligenix cannot assure you that it will be able to successfully develop, achieve regulatory approval for or commercialize products based on its technologies, particularly in light of the significant uncertainty inherent in developing therapeutics and vaccines against bioterror threats, conducting preclinical and clinical trials of therapeutics and vaccines, obtaining regulatory approvals and manufacturing therapeutics and vaccines, that product development and commercialization efforts will not be reduced or discontinued due to difficulties or delays in clinical trials or due to lack of progress or positive results from research and development efforts, that it will be able to successfully obtain any further funding to support product development and commercialization efforts, including grants and awards, maintain its existing grants which are subject to performance requirements, enter into any biodefense procurement contracts with the U.S. Government or other countries, that it will be able to compete with larger and better financed competitors in the biotechnology industry, that changes in health care practice, third party reimbursement limitations and Federal and/or state health care reform initiatives will not negatively affect its business, or that the U.S. Congress may not pass any legislation that would provide additional funding for the Project BioShield program. In addition, there can be no assurance as to the timing or success of any of its clinical/preclinical trials. Despite the statistically significant result achieved in the first HyBryte™ (SGX301) Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma or any other studies (including the open-label, investigator-initiated study), there can be no assurance that the second HyBryte™ (SGX301) Phase 3 clinical trial will be successful or that a marketing authorization from the FDA or EMA will be granted. Additionally, although the EMA has agreed to the key design components of the second HyBryte™ (SGX301) Phase 3 clinical trial, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to modify the development path to adequately address the FDA's concerns or that the FDA will not require a longer duration comparative study. Notwithstanding the result in the first HyBryte™ (SGX301) Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and the Phase 2a clinical trial of SGX302 for the treatment of psoriasis, there can be no assurance as to the timing or success of the clinical trials of SGX302 for the treatment of psoriasis. Additionally, despite the biologic activity observed in aphthous ulcers induced by chemotherapy and radiation, there can be no assurance as to the timing or success of the clinical trials of SGX945 for the treatment of Behçet's Disease. Further, there can be no assurance that RiVax® will qualify for a biodefense Priority Review Voucher (PRV) or that the prior sales of PRVs will be indicative of any potential sales price for a PRV for RiVax®. Also, no assurance can be provided that the Company will receive or continue to receive non-dilutive government funding from grants and contracts that have been or may be awarded or for which the Company will apply in the future. These and other risk factors are described from time to time in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including, but not limited to, Soligenix's reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K. Unless required by law, Soligenix assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events. Corporate Communications IBN Austin, Texas 512.354.7000 Office Editor@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store