logo
Israel's genocide in Gaza is a war on demographics

Israel's genocide in Gaza is a war on demographics

Middle East Eye23-05-2025

The ongoing genocide in Gaza, which has killed nearly 54,000 Palestinians, along with various plans to expel the remaining survivors, has one primary goal: to safeguard the Jewish settler-colony of Israel by restoring the lost Jewish demographic majority, which had been achieved through mass killings and expulsions since 1948.
Zionists understood early on that the only chance their settler-colonial project had of survival was through the establishment of a Jewish majority by expelling the Palestinians.
Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement, outlined early plans for this in the 1890s, which the Zionist Organisation pursued from the 1920s. Expulsion, however, only became possible after the Zionist military conquest of Palestine.
On the eve of the 1948 war, Palestine had a Jewish population of 608,000 (constituting 30 percent), most of whom had arrived in the country over the previous two decades, alongside 1,364,000 Palestinians.
During the 1948 conquest, Zionist forces killed upwards of 13,000 Palestinians - one percent of the Palestinian population - and expelled around 760,000 Palestinians, or more than 80 percent of those who lived in the area that Israel would later declare a Jewish state.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
It was these killings and acts of ethnic cleansing that established Jewish demographic superiority in Israel between 1948 and 1967.
Expulsion
By November 1948, about 165,000 Palestinians remained in Israel, whose Jewish colonial population had risen to 716,000 people, increasing its percentage from 30 to 81 percent almost overnight.
In 1961, the Jewish population had grown to 1,932,000 out of a total population of 2,179,000, raising the Jewish proportion to 89 percent.
Israel's territorial expansion in 1967 undermined the Jewish demographic supremacy Zionists had worked to secure since 1948
On the eve of Israel's 1967 conquest of three Arab countries, its population numbered 2.7 million, 2.4 million of whom were Jewish colonists and their descendants, maintaining their 89 percent share of the total.
The major demographic faux pas committed by the Jewish settler-colony was its 1967 conquest of the remainder of Palestine, along with the Golan Heights and the sparsely populated Egyptian Sinai.
While Israel's voracious territorial appetite led to a conquest that tripled its geographic size, it also significantly undermined the Jewish demographic supremacy that Zionists had worked so hard to secure since 1948.
Before the 1967 expulsion, the population of the West Bank was estimated to be between 845,000 and 900,000, while the Gaza Strip's population ranged between 385,000 and 400,000.
Outright expulsion began during the Israeli conquest, with over 200,000 Palestinians forced to cross the River Jordan from the West to the East Bank, many of them 1948 refugees from what had become Israel.
Demographic threat
In Gaza, Israeli forces expelled 75,000 Palestinians by December 1968 and prevented a further 50,000, who had been working, studying, or travelling in Egypt or elsewhere, from returning home.
After the expulsion, the Israeli census of September 1967 recorded the population of the West Bank at 661,700 and of Gaza at 354,700.
The Palestinian population of East Jerusalem was 68,600. Altogether, this meant the combined Palestinian population of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza totalled 1,385,000, reducing the proportion of Jews in all territories controlled by Israel from 89 percent to 56 percent - excluding the few thousand Syrians and Egyptians who remained in the Golan Heights and the Sinai.
In fact, from the Golan Heights, the Israelis expelled between 102,000 and 115,000 Syrians, leaving no more than 15,000 behind.
While the population of Sinai at the time mostly comprised Bedouin and farmers, 38,000 of them became refugees. Israel also continued to deport Palestinians by the hundreds as the occupation progressed.
This post-1967 demographic earthquake caused then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir many a sleepless night in the 1970s, as she fretted over the number of Palestinians being conceived each night.
The reduction in the Jewish colonial share of the population continued until 1990, amid growing anxiety among the Israelis.
Soviet influx
By 1990, the population of 1948 Israel had reached approximately 4.8 million, including 3.8 million Jews, and one million Palestinians, while the Palestinian population of the Gaza Strip stood at 622,016 and that of the West Bank at 1,075,531.
The total number of Palestinians under Israeli control was 2,697,547, making Jews 58 percent of the population - a marginal increase from 56 percent in 1967.
The collapse of the USSR and the ensuing economic crises in the post-Soviet republics led to mass emigration - especially among Jews, who had an easier time relocating, as Israel's Law of Return offered them an immediate destination without the complications of emigrating to western countries.
This made Israel a very attractive proposition for Soviet Jews and a godsend for the Israeli state, as it helped forestall the feared Palestinian demographic "bomb", as the crisis came to be understood by the Israelis.
However, it turned out that the one million Soviet Jews who immigrated to Israel between 1990 and 2000 - and significantly altered its demography by increasing both the Jewish and Ashkenazi population - were not all Jewish.
The Jewishness of more than half of them was questioned by both Israel's rabbis, who insisted that a Jew is someone born to a Jewish mother, and by Zionist groups, including the Zionist Organisation of America (ZOA), as many of the new arrivals had, at best, one Jewish grandparent. They included spouses and other relatives who were not Jewish at all.
Many of the post-Soviet immigrants refused to learn Hebrew and continued to speak Russian, leading to the publication of numerous Russian language newspapers in Israel to accommodate them. Some immigrant youths even formed neo-Nazi and skinhead groups that attacked Jews and synagogues across the country.
This major wave of immigration, however, could not compete with the growth of the Palestinian population.
Demographic panic
By 2000, Israel's population had reached 6.4 million, including five million Jews and nearly 1.2 million Palestinians, while the population of the West Bank was recorded at 2.012 million and that of Gaza at 1.138 million - reducing the proportion of Jewish colonists and their descendants to no more than 52 percent of the total population.
Realising that the few European settler-colonies to survive the global reversal of settler-colonialism were those with a white demographic majority, the Israeli government panicked
Realising that the few European settler-colonies to survive the global reversal of settler-colonialism since the 1960s - including, ultimately, South Africa in 1994 - were those that maintained a massive white demographic majority, such as the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, the Israeli government panicked.
By the end of that year, the restoration of Jewish demographic superiority had become a veritable obsession.
That December, the Institute of Policy and Strategy at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Centre in Israel held the first in a projected series of annual conferences focused on the strength and security of the state, especially with regard to maintaining its Jewish supremacist character.
One of the "Main Points" identified in the 52-page conference report was the concern over the demographic numbers required to preserve Jewish supremacy in Israel:
The high birthrate [of Israeli Arabs] brings into question the future of Israel as a Jewish state…The present demographic trends, should they continue, challenge the future of Israel as a Jewish state. Israel has two alternative strategies: adaptation or containment. The latter requires a long-term energetic Zionist demographic policy whose political, economic, and educational effects would guarantee the Jewish character of Israel.
The report added affirmatively that "those who support the preservation of Israel's character as…a Jewish state for the Jewish nation…constitute a majority among the Jewish population in Israel."
Maintaining superiority
The conference was not a lonely effort. None other than Israel's then President Moshe Katsav welcomed the attendees.
Reflecting the dominant Jewish supremacist views among Israeli Jews and pro-Israeli American Jewish organisations, the conference was co-sponsored by the American Jewish Committee, the Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress, The Israeli Defence Ministry, the Jewish Agency, the World Zionist Organization, the National Security Center at Haifa University, and the Israeli National Security Council within the Prime Minister's Office.
The conference featured 50 speakers: senior government and military officials, including former and future prime ministers, university professors, business and media figures, as well as American Jewish academics and operatives of the US pro-Israel lobby.
Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
The Herzliya conference has been held annually ever since, where the demographic question is regularly discussed and strategies are proposed to safeguard Jewish demographic superiority.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres - a key figure in the Israeli government since the 1950s - expressed concern in 2002 about the Palestinian demographic "danger", as the Green Line separating Israel from the West Bank was beginning to "disappear…which may lead to the linking of the futures of West Bank Palestinians with Israeli Arabs".
He described the issue as a "demographic bomb" and hoped that the arrival of yet another 100,000 Jews in Israel would postpone this demographic "danger" for 10 more years. He stressed that "demography will defeat geography".
Israeli expulsion plans are not new: They were first proposed in the 1930s
Joseph Massad Read More »
By 2010, Israel's population had reached 7.6 million, including 5.75 million Jews and 1.55 million Palestinians, while the population of the West Bank was 2.48 million and that of Gaza was 1.54 million. This rendered the Jewish population a minority of no more than 49 percent for the first time since the mass ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948.
This was intolerable for the apartheid state, and it was against this backdrop that the Israeli parliament passed a new "Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People" in July 2018, asserting that "the land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people, in which the state of Israel was established" and that "The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people."
The new law, affirmed by Israel's Supreme Court as constitutional despite its racist character, was a necessary declaration that Israel understood it was losing the demographic "war".
It thus asserted that regardless of how many Jews remained in Israel or what proportion of the population they constituted, they would continue to hold unique racist and colonial privileges over the indigenous Palestinians.
Supremacy codified
In 2020, the population of Israel numbered 9.2 million, including 6.8 million Jews and 1.9 million Palestinians, while the population of the West Bank was 3.05 million and that of Gaza 2.047 million - further reducing the proportion of Jewish colonists and their descendants to 47 percent of the total population.
The Palestinians, however, do not appear to be the only population viewed as a demographic "bomb" threatening Jewish demographic superiority.
As recently as January 2023, Morton Klein, the national president of ZOA, issued a panicked statement concerning the impending "de-Judaisation" of the Jewish state.
This time, the culprit turned out to be pseudo-Jews, those whom Israel's notorious and racist "Law of Return" allowed into the country. The law was amended in 1970 to permit anyone worldwide who has one Jewish grandparent - including the non-Jewish spouse, children and grandchildren of such a person, and their spouses - to become colonists in Israel and obtain Israeli citizenship.
The ZOA statement declared with dismay that the 1970 amendment had allowed half a million "non-Jews" from the former Soviet Union (FSU) to settle in the Jewish state.
Its concern was based on Israeli government data that "largely as a result of the grandparent clause, over 50 percent of all immigrants to the Jewish state last year were non-Jews, and 72 percent of immigrants from FSU countries into the Jewish state today are non-Jews".
The Zionist group warned that "this is causing a significant drop in the percentage of Jews living in Israel, endangering Israel's continuity as the Jewish state".
According to the ZOA statement, this appalling situation meant that "non-Jews will have even more influence on determining the Jewish state's leaders, laws and security decisions," and that "Diaspora Jews who need or who want to live in the Jewish homeland may be moving to a majority non-Jewish state in the future."
The statement demanded the "elimination or modification/reform of the grandparent clause. We must do everything we can to ensure that the Jewish state remains Jewish."
While it stopped short of explicitly calling for the expulsion of the half a million European "non-Jewish" settlers, as Israel had done with native Palestinians in 1948 and 1967, the implication was clear.
If one accepts the ZOA's view that these formerly Soviet Jews in Israel today are not at all Jewish, then the proportion of Jews drops further to as low as 42 percent.
Final phase
It was in this context that Israel, its Supreme Court, and its Jewish settlers escalated their campaign to terrorise the Palestinians of East Jerusalem in May 2021, expelling 13 families - totalling 58 people - from their homes in the Shaykh Jarrah neighbourhood.
An additional 1,000 Palestinians were being threatened with eviction by the settlers and the Israeli courts.
The decision was seen internationally as further confirmation that Israel is an apartheid state.
In January 2021, the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem had already issued a report identifying the Israeli regime as one of "Jewish supremacy" and describing Israel as an apartheid state.
The desperate Israeli attempt to restore Jewish demographic supremacy is what propels the extermination and planned expulsion of the two million Palestinians in Gaza.
In April, one month before the Supreme Court ruling, Human Rights Watch issued a report declaring Israel an apartheid state within both the 1948 borders and the 1967-occupied territories.
Amnesty International followed suit in February 2022, also declaring Israel an apartheid state.
It is in view of the minority status of Israel's Jewish colonists that the current genocide in Gaza is proceeding, alongside plans to expel the remaining Palestinian survivors outside the Strip.
The desperate Israeli attempt to restore Jewish demographic supremacy is what propels the extermination and planned expulsion of the two million Palestinians in Gaza. In March 2025, the Israeli cabinet approved the creation of "a body to manage voluntary migration [of Palestinians] from Gaza".
The US government, which has collaborated with Israel during the administrations of both Joe Biden and Donald Trump to find destinations for expelled Palestinian survivors of the genocide, is reported to be brokering yet another deal - this time with Libya's warlords - to take them in.
With the exodus of anywhere between 100,000 and half a million Israeli Jews from the country since October 2023, continuing an earlier trend of emigration, it seems unlikely that even if Israel succeeds in its extermination and expulsion campaigns in Gaza, it could ever restore Jewish demographic supremacy.
Its only remaining option would be to exterminate all Palestinians - not just those in Gaza.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

West Bank: Israeli settlers seal off access to village for fifth consecutive day as part of campaign to displace residents
West Bank: Israeli settlers seal off access to village for fifth consecutive day as part of campaign to displace residents

Middle East Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

West Bank: Israeli settlers seal off access to village for fifth consecutive day as part of campaign to displace residents

Palestinians in the village of al-Lubban al-Sharqiya, south of Nablus in the West Bank face potential displacement from their homes after Israeli settlers started both an online and physical campaign to demolish homes, according to Wafa news agency. Israeli settlers have threatened to demolish more than 20 homes in the village, located on the main road linking the cities of Nablus and Ramallah. For the fifth consecutive day, dozens of Israeli settlers have stormed the main entrance to the village and performed Talmudic rituals, obstructing people coming in and out. The Israeli military have supported the settlers by sealing off the iron gate at the main entrance to the village according to Wafa. The in-person campaign started 12 days ago, and Israeli settlers have closed off the main entrance to the village seven times over the past 12 days. On Sunday evening, the campaign intensified after Israeli settlers shared posts on social media calling for the Israeli military to demolish homes and infrastructure on the main street of the village. Wafa said the settlers have posted incendiary material against the villagers - particularly against schools located on the main street. The Israeli settlers also announced they would demonstrate every evening at 7:30pm local time at the main entrance and close the village until demolition is carried out.

US embassy in Iraq prepares for partial evacuation ahead of Iran talks
US embassy in Iraq prepares for partial evacuation ahead of Iran talks

Middle East Eye

time9 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US embassy in Iraq prepares for partial evacuation ahead of Iran talks

The US is reducing staff levels at its embassy in Iraq on security concerns, US officials told several media outlets on Wednesday, as Iran threatened US bases if conflict breaks out. "Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq," a US official told AFP on condition of anonymity. Meanwhile, The Financial Times reported that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents throughout the Middle East. The withdrawals come as Iran's defence minister, Aziz Nasirzadeh, said on Wednesday that Tehran would target US military assets in the region in response to any attack 'without hesitation'. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," he said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to negotiate a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The next round of talks is scheduled for Thursday. 'Ordered departure from US Emb Baghdad could reflect a major threat, but also is impactful as a means of signaling possible near-term military action against Iran. It's a big move, hard to reverse quickly, comes at some cost. So if signaling, you play this card when you mean it,' Daniel Shapiro, the US's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. Shapiro added that it doesn't "necessarily" mean military action is imminent but said that the move provides "important leverage in nuclear talks". Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month that Washington was "getting close" to securing a deal. But in an interview published on Wednesday, Trump said he was "less confident" the US and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium. "Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final." Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying that "it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying'. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke on Monday. Trump says he had been holding back Netanyahu from launching preemptive strikes on Iran. Oil prices jumped almost four percent on Wednesday amid the tensions.

How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East
How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East

Middle East Eye

time9 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East

Turkey and Qatar are making themselves crucial to US President Donald Trump's reshaping of the Middle East. Look no further than in Syria, where Qatari gas and cash, along with Turkish military might, are helping war-ravaged Syria back on its feet while Trump tries to fulfil his promise to pull the plug on western interventionists and 'nation builders'. The two countries' rising stock is not going unnoticed among Arab officials. 'Trump has too much on his plate; China, Iran talks, the war in Ukraine. He doesn't want to intervene. In Syria, he has these two local allies who don't mind getting involved in the nitty-gritty details of Syria's reconstruction. He is going to lean on them,' one senior Arab official told Middle East Eye. Qatar and Saudi Arabia are paying the salaries of Syrian government employees. In March, Qatar began supplying gas to Syria via Jordan. Meanwhile, Turkey's government is in talks with Damascus on a defence pact amid Israeli air strikes in Syria. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters That Turkey and Qatar are the regional powers most active in Syria should not come as a surprise. Turkey shares a long border with Syria and was the last true backer of rebels who fought to oust Bashar al-Assad after most Gulf monarchies gave up on their cause. Qatar was the exception. It was the sole Gulf state to recognise and host Syria's opposition. Conversely, the UAE made a big bet on rehabilitating Assad. MEE revealed that the UAE was negotiating a grand bargain to lift US sanctions on Assad in return for reducing Iran's influence. The talks continued up until the last minute. Assad was toppled in an offensive led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, whose commander, Ahmed al-Sharaa, is Syria's new president. The biggest deal Turkey and Qatar have made in Syria so far was in May. US ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack assumes Syria envoy post Read More » Along with the US, they signed a $7bn energy agreement that envisions the three countries building four gas power plants in Syria and one solar plant to boost the war-ravaged country's meagre energy supplies. Qatar's UCC construction and energy company, owned by the prominent al-Khayyat family, is set to lead the project. Speaking in Damascus at the signing ceremony, US envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack took the opportunity to praise the 'alignment of these amazing countries". 'A young and prosperous Qatar, one of the most incredible and ancient civilisations in Syria; [and] one of the most dominant empires that ever existed in the Ottoman Empire and the succession of Türkiye.' Barrack framed Syria as the poster child for Trump's vision of a Middle East, where the US was empowering local countries to redress the wrong of Sykes-Picot, the agreement that colonial Britain and France used to divide Syria during WWI. 'That mistake cost generations. We will not make it again,' he wrote on X. 'Need to address the PKK' If there is any doubt about whose voice the US will give the most credence to in Syria, look to Ankara, where Barrack also serves as Trump's ambassador to Turkey. 'The Trump administration understands the Turks have a vital national security interest in Syria. He respects that in a way others in Washington haven't,' Robert Ford, the last US ambassador to Syria, told MEE. 'The US has to work with the Turks otherwise, there will be another war' - Bassam Barabandi, former Syrian diplomat and opposition activist During the Biden administration, Syria was a sore point in US-Turkey ties. US troops first entered Syria in 2014 to fight the Islamic State militant (IS) group. They partnered with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Turkey views the SDF as an extension of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). The PKK has waged a decades-long guerrilla war in southern Turkey and is labelled a terrorist organisation by the US and the European Union. 'You can't have a stable Syria without addressing the PKK. The US has to work with the Turks, otherwise there will be another war,' Bassam Barabandi, a former Syrian diplomat and opposition activist, told MEE. During his first term in office, Trump tried to withdraw US troops from Syria. His own officials hamstrung him, and his former defence secretary, Jim Mattis, resigned over a partial troop withdrawal. Although US troops were ostensibly in Syria to fight IS, they came to be seen as a force denying territory to Iran. With Tehran's ally Assad gone, that rationale no longer exists. Trump himself says Turkey has 'taken over Syria', alluding to its close ties to Sharaa. He appears to sense this as his chance to withdraw troops, despite pleas from Israel and the SDF to keep them there. Barrack told Turkish media in June that the US planned to downsize from eight bases to one in northeastern Syria. How Trump's allies view Turkey and Qatar Turkey and Qatar have long been seen as close partners. In a sense, they complement each other. Turkey has the second largest army in Nato, but is cash poor. Qatar is one of the world's top exporters of Liquefied Natural Gas, but has just 300,000 nationals. Turkey has a military base in Qatar. Doha made tens of billions of dollars in investments in Turkey during its inflation crisis, providing Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan with an economic lifeline. The two countries' alignment was solidified during the 2011 Arab Spring, when they backed popular protests against rulers like Assad in Syria and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. Saudi Arabia and the UAE accused them of supporting political Islamists who Abu Dhabi and Riyadh feared would unsettle their monarchies. The rift got nasty in 2017, when a Saudi-led blockade was imposed on Qatar. That Trump should welcome Qatar and Turkish investment in Syria now shows how rapidly the region has reorganised itself. In 2017, he gave a White House speech throwing his weight behind the blockade. Until recently, Trump's Middle East director at the National Security Council was Eric Trager, who has been critical of Qatar. 'You certainly have those in the administration, not the Witkoffs or Barracks, who still believe in a Muslim Brotherhood boogyman. This is deep-seated. So it's interesting to see Trump's really close cohort move beyond this,' Natasha Hall, a Syria expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, )said, referring to US Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Both of Trump's close advisors enjoy good relations with Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The UAE's hotspot troubles The Arab Spring descended into a slew of conflicts, of which Syria was just one. After the Nato-led removal of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, Turkey backed a government in Tripoli while Saudi Arabia and the UAE threw their support behind a rogue general and one-time CIA asset, Khalifa Haftar. The UAE also backed Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the general who overthrew the democratically elected president, Mohammed Morsi, whom Erdogan backed. Turkey and Qatar's growing clout in the Middle East vis-a-vis Syria contrasts with mounting troubles for the UAE in some of these hotspots. UAE lobbying Trump administration to reject Arab League Gaza plan, officials say Read More » Ties between Egypt and the UAE are becoming seriously frayed, although both sides are trying to downplay it, Arab officials tell MEE. Sisi's economy is in crisis, but he has failed to push through the reforms that the UAE, his top backer, wants. The Emiratis have lobbied against Cairo in Washington, MEE revealed. The UAE's ambassador to the US publicly backed a plan floated by Trump to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza - a thought that unnerves Egyptian generals. Libya remains divided. Haftar's bid to conquer Tripoli failed in 2020. His son and likely successor, Saddam, has even courted Turkey and Qatar as their power rises. He visited Doha and Ankara this year. The parliament in Eastern Libya controlled by him is weighing whether to agree to a contentious maritime deal that Turkey favours. As Turkey and Qatar sign energy deals in Damascus under US auspices, the UAE is bogged down in a brutal civil war in Sudan. There it is backing the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) against the Sudanese army, which is backed by Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Litmus test Syria is going to be a test case as the first post-Arab Spring country to be rebuilt after the 2021 al-Ula agreement, in which the Gulf states agreed to put their differences behind them and mend fences. Qatar and Saudi Arabia have patched up ties, but the Qataris and Emiratis still have a chilly relationship. The same goes for the Turks. 'Syria's greatest benefit is that Assad was ousted after al-Ula,' a Syria analyst in the UAE told MEE, speaking on condition of anonymity. Trump announced in Saudi Arabia that he was lifting all US sanctions on Syria, and he credited both Erdogan and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman with convincing him to do so. 'The Saudis have been just as instrumental as the Turks and Qataris, if not more, in convincing Trump to drop sanctions on Syria. They want a stable Syria in order to focus on their own economic development at home,' Anna Jacobs, a non-resident fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute, told MEE. 'The new Saudi looks for interest, not emotion or ideology,' Barabandi told MEE. 'They are with Turkey and Qatar on Syria. The US's goal is to facilitate the flow of GCC money into Syria. That's it.' Even the UAE is stepping in and trying to gain influence. In May, state-owned Dubai Ports World signed a pledge to invest $800m to modernise the port of Tartus. The analyst in the UAE said Sharaa's government welcomed the UAE's investment in Tartus because it needed a country that was seen as agreeable to Russia, which still has a military base there. France's CMA CGM shipping inked a 30-year deal to operate Latakia port in Syria. 'Sharaa couldn't have Turkey or a European state come in. Russia would have complained about that. The UAE is a friend of Russia,' the analyst said. The UAE's Al Habtoor group, a massive conglomerate that spans real estate to the automotive industry, is set to send a delegation to Syria this week. Ford said that Turkey, Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia all have a convergence of interests in Syria to ensure its transition is stable, and Iran, Assad's old patron, stays out. 'I'm not saying Abu Dhabi is comfortable with a conservative Islamist in power, but they all want to see Sharaa reduce Iran's influence,' he said. No nation-building The UAE, which has the closest ties to Israel among Gulf states, also brokered secret talks between Syria and Israel, Reuters reported in May. Israel pummelled Syria after Assad's removal and has sent troops to occupy a swath of the southeast, south of Damascus. MEE previously reported that the US lobbied Turkey and Israel into deconfliction talks. 'I think the Emiratis, and other Gulf states' number one concern is that there not be an outbreak of violence between the Turks and Israelis in Syria or the Iranians and Israelis,' Ford said. Syria after Assad: Sharaa's delicate balancing act with Israel Read More » He said while Turkey and Qatar have stepped up in Syria, it's a leap to say the US is recognising it as a sphere of their influence. 'That is too nineteenth century,' he said. 'The Trump people don't object to Turkey and Qatar getting involved in Syria. But they don't object to the Saudis and Emiratis getting involved either. Ultimately, the goal is for commerce between Israel and Syria.' Still, regional officials say Sharaa's ascent to power has bolstered Turkey and Qatar's power in the Levant. 'Sharaa will take Emirati money, but he won't trust them with security,' the Arab official told MEE. 'The UAE is on their back foot.' However, the real change is that Syria is not talking about elections. 'Sharaa has gone out of his way to prove that he won't be part of any political Islamist movement beyond Syria's borders,' the UAE-based analyst said. 'And he isn't mentioning democracy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store