US embassy in Iraq prepares for partial evacuation ahead of Iran talks
The US is reducing staff levels at its embassy in Iraq on security concerns, US officials told several media outlets on Wednesday, as Iran threatened US bases if conflict breaks out.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq," a US official told AFP on condition of anonymity.
Meanwhile, The Financial Times reported that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents throughout the Middle East.
The withdrawals come as Iran's defence minister, Aziz Nasirzadeh, said on Wednesday that Tehran would target US military assets in the region in response to any attack 'without hesitation'.
"God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," he said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to negotiate a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The next round of talks is scheduled for Thursday.
'Ordered departure from US Emb Baghdad could reflect a major threat, but also is impactful as a means of signaling possible near-term military action against Iran. It's a big move, hard to reverse quickly, comes at some cost. So if signaling, you play this card when you mean it,' Daniel Shapiro, the US's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X.
Shapiro added that it doesn't "necessarily" mean military action is imminent but said that the move provides "important leverage in nuclear talks".
Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month that Washington was "getting close" to securing a deal.
But in an interview published on Wednesday, Trump said he was "less confident" the US and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium.
"Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final."
Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying that "it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying'.
Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke on Monday. Trump says he had been holding back Netanyahu from launching preemptive strikes on Iran.
Oil prices jumped almost four percent on Wednesday amid the tensions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel's disconnection with allies and partners has rarely been clearer
Tuesday's decision by the UK to impose sanctions on two ultra-nationalist Israeli ministers means Britain has joined Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway in taking the extraordinary step of introducing travel bans and financial restrictions on members of an ostensibly friendly government to these countries. Perhaps even more extraordinary was the response from one of the ministers concerned. A statement issued by the office of Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich the same day confirmed that Israel cancelled a waiver that allowed the country's banks to work with Palestinian ones. Instead of retaliating against the UK directly, Mr Smotrich instead authorised a move that threatens to paralyse Palestinian financial institutions. Such intransigence – and its deeply embedded position within the current Israeli government – explains why more and more of the country's allies and trade partners are losing patience and taking action. Tuesday's sanctions are the latest example of Israel's increasing isolation and the substantial diplomatic and political cost it is paying for its war of collective punishment in Gaza and continuing military occupation of Palestinian land. The fact that Mr Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are determined opponents of a just political settlement of the conflict also highlights the disconnection between Israel's current leadership and most of the international community. Next week, hundreds of diplomats will gather in New York for a UN summit on the two-state solution, co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. Israel's leadership has already said it will not attend; that is its choice, but it is a poor one. Determinedly opposing the majority of international opinion – that is in favour of an equitable settlement – puts the onus on Israel to provide a realistic alternative that does not involve further displacement or other illegal policies. If it cannot, then it will be clear that Israel, which is currently led by a divided and precarious coalition with an uncertain future, is on a collision course with the international community, one that may even try the patience of a much more capricious and transactional White House. The coming UN summit must be bold and ambitious, holding fast to the overall framework of a solution that most of the international community supports: an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the return of the remaining Israeli hostages, the release of Palestinian detainees as well as a process that leads to Palestinian freedom coupled with security guarantees for Israel. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed It is a source of frustration that the case for this position has to be made time and again. Arab nations have already said they are ready to play their part, as was made clear in the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. Last September, while speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said 57 Muslim and Arab countries were 'willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation' and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state. However, what the world is witnessing right now on the streets of the West Bank and in the rubble of Gaza is what the absence of a peace process looks like. More partners of Israel are making it clear that this situation is simply unsustainable. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
UN adopts resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, aid access and release of hostages
The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on Thursday calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, days after the US vetoed a similar measure in the Security Council. A total of 149 countries voted in favour while 12, including the US, Israel and Argentina, opposed the resolution. And 19 countries abstained. The resolution, presented by Spain, demands the release of all hostages held by Hamas, the return of Palestinian prisoners detained by Israel, and the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. It underscored the need for accountability to ensure Israel's adherence to international law but stopped short of explicitly calling for sanctions. In addition, it 'strongly condemned any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access', and further stressed the obligation to avoid depriving Gaza's civilians of basic survival needs, 'including by wilfully impeding relief supplies and access'. Before the resolution's passage, Palestinian ambassador Riyad Mansour declared the measure's language to be the 'strongest to date' but stressed that words must now turn into decisive action. 'Israel's continuing defiance of international law, UN resolutions and global condemnation demands an immediate response,' Mr Mansour said. He urged member states to stamp their national authority: 'Use the tools available to you, each and every one of you. 'No arms, no money, no trade to support the oppression, ethnic cleansing and land theft against Palestinians." While General Assembly resolutions are non-binding, they serve as a significant indicator of global opinion. Previous UN calls to end the war between Israel and Hamas have gone unheeded. Unlike the Security Council, where permanent members such as the US have the power of veto, the General Assembly operates on a majority vote. There has been increasing international pressure over the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where thousands have been killed and millions face severe shortages of food, water and medical supplies. With the vote taking place days before an international conference at the UN aimed at reviving two-state negotiations, the text also reiterated the General Assembly's 'unwavering commitment to the two-state solution … where two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace and security". The vote comes more than 77 years after the General Assembly's 1947 resolution partitioned British-ruled Palestine into Arab and Jewish states. Israel declared independence in 1948, sparking a war with neighbouring Arab nations, while Palestinian statehood remains unrealised. The US is now urging countries to boycott next week's UN conference, co-sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia. When asked by The National about Israel's attendance in next week's summit, Israel's UN envoy Danny Danon said 'absolutely not". "We will not take part in this conference," he said. 'I was very happy to see that the United States decided also not to participate in this circus." Mr Danon also took aim at French President Emmanuel Macron. 'When Mr Macron arrives at the UN, I will ask him if he has solved all the problems in France and Europe. If he thinks coming here and pushing this conference will actually be constructive, it's not constructive.' He also criticised the resolution for not demanding the immediate release of the 55 hostages still being held, not condemning Hamas 'for the atrocities' it committed on October 7, and not holding the militant group accountable. In October 2023, the General Assembly called for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza, with 120 votes in favour. By December 2023, support grew significantly, as 153 countries voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. Later that month the assembly increased its call, adopting a resolution, with 158 votes in favour, demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Thousands of Palestinians protested against home demolitions and forcible expulsion in southern Israel
Thousands of Palestinians protested against Israel's policy of home demolitions and colonial expansion in the Negev in southern Israel on Thursday, Wafa news agency reported. Thousands took to the streets in front of the Israeli government offices in Beersheba, carrying placards calling for the end of home demolitions and forced expulsion of Palestinians, as well as for the resignation of former Israeli Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli's plans to forcibly displace Palestinians from the Negev.
