logo
An outline is emerging of the US offer to Iran in their high-stakes nuclear negotiations: Analysis

An outline is emerging of the US offer to Iran in their high-stakes nuclear negotiations: Analysis

Ya Libnan04-06-2025
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The outline of the U.S. offer to Iran in
their high-stakes negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program
is starting to become clearer — but whether any deal is on the horizon remains as cloudy as ever.
Reaching a deal is one of the several diplomatic priorities being juggled by
U.S. President Donald Trump
and his trusted friend and
Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff
. An accord could see the United States lift some of its crushing economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for it drastically limiting or ending its enrichment of uranium.
But a failure to get a deal could see tensions further spike in a Middle East on edge over
the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip
.
Iran's economy
, long ailing, could enter a free fall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. And Tehran may decide to fully end its cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog and rush toward a bomb.
That makes piecing together the U.S. offer that much more important as the Iranians weigh their response after five rounds of negotiations in Muscat, Oman, and Rome
Possible deal details emerge
A report by the news website Axios outlined details of the American proposal, the details of which
a U.S. official separately confirmed
, include a possible nuclear consortium enriching uranium for Iran and surrounding nations. Whether Iran would have to entirely give up its enrichment program remains unclear, as Axios reported that Iran would be able to enrich uranium up to 3% purity for some time.
Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels.
U.S. officials all the way up to Trump repeatedly have said that Iran would have to give up enrichment entirely.
The English-language arm of Iranian state television broadcaster Press TV on Tuesday published an extended article including details from the Axios report. Iranian state television long has been controlled by hard-liners within the country's theocracy. Press TV extensively repeating those details suggests that either they are included in the American proposal or they could be elements within it welcomed by hard-liners within the government.
Iranian media largely have avoided original reporting on the negotiations, without explanation.
Iran's reaction
The idea of a consortium enriching uranium for Iran and other nations in the Middle East also have come up in comments by other Iranian officials. Abolfazl Zohrehvand, a member of Iran's powerful parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy, said that he understood that one of the American proposals included the full dismantlement of the country's nuclear program in a consortium-style deal.
The Americans will 'make a consortium with Saudi Arabia, the (United Arab) Emirates and Qatar … on an island to keep it under U.S. control,' Zohrehvand told the Iranian news website Entekhab. 'Iran could have a certain amount of stake in the consortium, but enrichment would not take place in Iran.'
Zohrehvand didn't elaborate on which 'island' would host the site. However, the Persian Gulf has multiple islands. The UAE already has
a nuclear power plant
, while
Saudi Arabia is pursuing its own program
. Qatar has said that it's exploring small nuclear reactors. A consortium could allow low-enriched uranium to be supplied to all those countries, while lowering the risk of proliferation by having countries run their own centrifuges.
While a consortium deal has been discussed in the past, it has fallen through previously. Now, however, the Gulf Arab states largely have reached a detente with Iran after years of tensions following
Trump unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. in 2018
from Tehran's nuclear deal with world powers.
Meanwhile, Fereidoun Abbasi, a former head of the civilian Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, suggested on Iranian state television that one of Iran's disputed islands with the UAE could be a site for the project. Iran, under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, seized three islands in the Persian Gulf in 1971 as British troops withdrew just before the formation of the Emirates, a federation of seven sheikhdoms home to Abu Dhabi and Dubai.
'What do we need the U.S. for?' Abbasi asked. 'We have the know-how.'
What happens next
Iran likely will respond to the American offer in the coming days, possibly through Oman, which has been mediating in the talks. There also could be a sixth round of negotiations between the countries, though a time and location for them have yet to be announced.
This coming weekend is the Eid al-Adha holiday that marks the end of
Islam's Hajj pilgrimage
, meaning talks likely wouldn't happen until sometime next week at the earliest.
But the pressure is on. Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium could allow it to build multiple nuclear weapons, should Tehran choose to pursue the bomb. Western nations may pursue a censure of Iran at the Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency — which could see them ultimately invoke the so-called snapback of U.N. sanctions on the Islamic Republic. The authority to reestablish those sanctions by the complaint of any member of the original 2015 nuclear deal expires in October.
'There is still time for negotiating an agreement that reduces Iran's 'Given that Iran is sitting on the threshold of nuclear weapons and officials are openly debating the security value of a nuclear deterrent, any escalatory spiral could kill the negotiating process and increase the risk of conflict.'proliferation risk. But that time is short,' wrote Kelsey Davenport, the director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association.
Khamanei rejects US proposal
AP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israelis stage nationwide protests to demand end to Gaza war and release of hostages
Israelis stage nationwide protests to demand end to Gaza war and release of hostages

LBCI

time9 hours ago

  • LBCI

Israelis stage nationwide protests to demand end to Gaza war and release of hostages

Thousands of Israelis took part in a nationwide strike on Sunday in support of families of hostages held in Gaza, calling on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to reach an agreement with Hamas to end the war and release the remaining captives. Demonstrators waved Israeli flags and carried photos of hostages as whistles, horns, and drums echoed at rallies across the country, while some protesters blocked streets and highways, including the main route between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

Monopoly on weapons: No one wants a confrontation with the Lebanese Army, Mitri says
Monopoly on weapons: No one wants a confrontation with the Lebanese Army, Mitri says

L'Orient-Le Jour

time11 hours ago

  • L'Orient-Le Jour

Monopoly on weapons: No one wants a confrontation with the Lebanese Army, Mitri says

Deputy Prime Minister Tarek Mitri said Sunday in an interview with Al Jazeera that the government is working towards having only state authorities to control weapons, but disagreements remain on how to achieve the goal. He also urged avoiding 'accusations of treason, intimidation and threats.' His remarks followed a speech Friday by Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem, who escalated threats against Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's government, warning that Hezbollah was ready for confrontation if forced to disarm. Mitri said all ministers agreed on the state's monopoly over weapons, but differed on how to implement and manage the issue. He stressed that discussions were ongoing on how to approach Hezbollah's disarmament, according to Al Jazeera. He added that the government wanted to safeguard civil peace and that no one sought a confrontation with the Lebanese Army, which is due to present its weapons control plan to Cabinet at the end of August. Addressing the wider political debate, Mitri said, 'We should instead discuss how to put an end to Israeli aggressions and avoid internal divisions.' Qassem's remarks Friday — in which he declared Hezbollah would not surrender its weapons and was prepared for confrontation if forced to do so — drew sharp reactions from across the political spectrum. Seeking to temper the rhetoric, Hezbollah political council deputy chief Mahmoud Qomati said Saturday that the party was not 'in an internal Lebanese confrontation,' but insisted that 'the weapons of the resistance cannot be handed over during an occupation.' At the beginning of August, Salam's government adopted the roadmap of U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, which calls for the disarmament of armed groups, mainly Hezbollah, by the end of the year. The Israeli army, meanwhile, continues to occupy five hills in southern Lebanon and carries out near-daily strikes despite the cease-fire that took effect Nov. 27, 2024. Iranian pressure Mitri said implementation of the disarmament plan is hampered by both internal and external pressures. He noted that Iran is pushing for Hezbollah to retain its weapons, while Western countries are pressing for disarmament. He urged that Lebanon's interests be safeguarded and called for wisdom in handling the issue. He recalled that the previous government approved security arrangements under French and U.S. auspices on Nov. 27, 2024, to end the 13-month war between Hezbollah and Israel. Those measures, he said, were endorsed by all ministers, including Hezbollah and Amal representatives. Mitri added that the American roadmap recently adopted by the Cabinet reaffirmed the cessation of hostilities.

'They need a Nakba every once in a while,' says former Israeli military intelligence chief
'They need a Nakba every once in a while,' says former Israeli military intelligence chief

L'Orient-Le Jour

time11 hours ago

  • L'Orient-Le Jour

'They need a Nakba every once in a while,' says former Israeli military intelligence chief

Former Israeli military intelligence chief Aharon Haliva, who was in office during the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack and has been blamed for failing to prevent it, said the human toll in the Gaza Strip is 'necessary,' adding that '[Palestinians] need a Nakba every once in a while,' according to a series of undated recordings aired Friday night by Israeli Channel 12, Israeli media reported. The Nakba, Arabic for 'catastrophe,' refers to 1948, when about 760,000 Palestinian Arabs were violently expelled and displaced from their homes during Israel's occupation of Palestine. In the Columbia Law Review, Palestinian legal scholar Rabea Eghbariah argued for recognition of the Nakba as a concept in international law and genocide studies to better understand what he described as the 'domination regime in Palestine.' 'The fact that there are already 50,000 dead in Gaza is necessary and required for future generations,' Haliva said, though the Health Ministry in Gaza puts the death toll at more than 61,000. 'For everything that happened on Oct. 7, for every person killed on Oct. 7, 50 Palestinians must die,' he said. 'I am not saying this out of revenge, but as a message to future generations,' he added. 'They need a Nakba from time to time in order to feel the consequences. There is no alternative in this deranged neighborhood.' A May poll by Penn State University found that 82 percent of Israeli Jews supported the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza. 'Hamas is good for Israel' Haliva also accused the Israeli government of deliberately allowing Hamas to rise to 'fight freely.' He said a plan drafted after the 2014 Gaza war to dismantle Hamas 'was never considered for implementation.' Instead, he argued, some leaders embraced the idea that 'Hamas is good for Israel — that's the argument of [Finance Minister Bezalel] Smotrich,' according to remarks cited by the Times of Israel. Haliva claimed the far-right minister seeks to dismantle the Palestinian Authority and allow Hamas to take over the West Bank. 'Why? Because if the whole Palestinian arena is destabilized and goes insane, it is impossible to negotiate with, and there will be no agreement,' he said. 'Who decided to differentiate Gaza from the West Bank? The prime minister [Benjamin Netanyahu]!' Haliva, who resigned in April 2024, six months after Oct. 7, accused Netanyahu of enabling Hamas's rule in Gaza, which took power in the 2006 legislative elections following Israel's 2005 withdrawal. 'He wants Hamas, which is far worse than the PA. Why does he want Hamas? Because the PA has international status,' Haliva said. 'Hamas is an organization that can be fought freely. It has no international justification, no legitimacy. You can fight it with the sword.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store