WV Senate Workforce Committee advances bill expanding work requirements of food stamp recipients
Members of the state Senate Workforce Committee met Monday, Feb. 17, 2025, and advanced a bill that expands work requirements for SNAP recipients in West Virginia. (Will Price | West Virginia Legislative Photography)
The Senate Workforce Committee on Monday advanced legislation that would expand the work requirements for West Virginians who receive benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps.
The bill would mandate participation in a SNAP employment and training program for able-bodied adults up to age 59 unless they meet a qualification for exemption. The programs are currently voluntary.
Under the bill, exemptions include caring for a child under age 6 or an incapacitated adult, going to school at least part time, being employed at least 30 hours a week and participating in a drug or alcohol treatment program, among other things.
With some exceptions, the federal government requires able-bodied recipients ages 18 to 54 to meet work and training requirements in order to receive SNAP longer than three months within three years.
If the bill passes, SNAP recipients would be required to work at least 20 hours a week or be subject to a time limit on SNAP of three months within three years, and work 30 hours a week to be exempt from the state's SNAP Employment & Training (SNAP E&T) participation requirements, an attorney for the committee explained.
The bill would allow the state Department of Human Services to exempt up to 20% of individuals from the SNAP E&T program work based on challenges that the person would experience complying with the requirements.
The Senate passed the legislation during the 2024 legislative session, but the House did not adopt it. Sen. Rollan Roberts, R-Raleigh, told West Virginia Watch late last year he planned to reintroduce the bill this session.
During that interview, Roberts said the bill combines compassion with responsibility.
'I don't know what they're doing with their lives,' Roberts said. 'They're not volunteering, seeking vocational training, or they're not working. OK, so what are these able-bodied adults doing with no dependents? They are not contributing to society in a positive way, apparently, and are we sustaining that lifestyle? And does that lifestyle impact other negative consequences everywhere in society? I suspect that it does. It's anecdotal proof.'
Jeremiah Samples, former deputy secretary for the state Department of Health and Human Resources, testified before the committee on behalf of the Opportunity Solutions Project, a partner organization to the Foundation for Government Accountability, a right-leaning organization that promotes work over welfare.
'The most simplistic way to describe this bill is that this expands those work requirements [from 54] up to age 59,' Samples said. 'Ultimately the reason that I have been involved with this issue for many years and that the FGA and the Opportunity Solutions project is involved is that work gives individuals dignity. Employment gives an individual community.
'We're talking about giving people hope and an opportunity to better their lives,' Samples said. 'In West Virginia, and you all know many of our statistics, we struggle with a lack of hope.'
West Virginia has poor rankings for workforce participation, poor mental health days, drug overdoses, adults reporting poor health, diabetes, obesity, middle age death rate, foster care rates, grandparents raising grandchildren, Samples noted.
'The bottom line is that West Virginia is caught in a vicious cycle where individuals and communities, they do not have the resources available to them to get into the workforce, nor the expectation,' Samples said. 'A mandatory SNAP E&T program lays out an expectation as counsel laid out but it also provides individuals with resources.'
Samples said the legislation would have a 'negligible' impact on the state's overall workforce participation rate.
Caitlin Cook, director of advocacy and public policy for Mountaineer Food Bank, said the redundant work requirements in the bill would add stress to the state's charitable food network. The organization opposes the legislation, she said.
Some states that have had a mandatory work and training program have changed their programs to voluntary because they did not meet their employment and self-sufficiency goals, she said.
'We know in those other states that have mandatory SNAP E&T programs, it's both increasing food insecurity as well as not achieving the intended outcome of the SNAP E&T program, which is to connect people with tools, resources and opportunities to achieve self-sufficiency, and in turn no longer need food assistance through SNAP or the charitable food network,' Cook said.
Mandatory SNAP E&T programs also typically struggle to meet federal regulations and increase bureaucracy, she said.
The bill will next be considered by the Senate Finance Committee.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘A ton of confusion': Farmers market SNAP programs push forward amid uncertainty
Fall apples at a farmers market are pictured (USDA photo) Ongoing discussions in the U.S. Senate about spending on food assistance programs as part of a major tax bill could spill into Montana. Food assistance programs vary and there's a lot of them. In Montana, as well as other states, some center on paying back food producers who sell their food at farmers markets to those who qualify for SNAP. In the Treasure State, it's called the 'Double SNAP Dollar program' and allows those qualifying for food assistance to stretch their benefits further by offering double credit at some locations. Three major programs in this arena are overseen by Farm Connect Montana. The largest Double SNAP program is used by about 2,000 people who utilize around $200,000 in benefits annually. Shoppers get up to $30 per trip to the farmers market to use as a double benefit. So if a person spends $40 on food at a location where the benefit is accepted, it only counts as $20 to their food assistance. That program is available at 51 different locations statewide and the benefit not only includes farmers markets, but some farm stands and Community Supported Agriculture programs around Montana. The program is federally funded through the Farm Bill, and according to a peer-reviewed article published last month in the Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, there's evidence it works in this state. The Farm Bill has historically been on a five-year cycle and is how the federal government dictates much of the nation's agriculture policy. Lately, it has been renewed on one-year cycles, and parts of the bill are now being discussed in the oft-mentioned 'big beautiful' budget bill being pushed by President Donald Trump. Splitting up the Farm Bill over a multitude of legislative actions even has some food industry leaders concerned and caused confusion about the future of many American agricultural programs. These widespread changes, including work from outgoing Trump advisor Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, has caused some hiccups. This included a period where Double SNAP Dollars were frozen by DOGE cuts between February until April, after which the funding was restored in the short term. 'That created a ton of confusion, because we as the state lead, the operators, we also weren't sure if we would be able to bring that back and have the program this year in the form that it's in,' said Ian Finch, who helps lead to the program at Farm Connect Montana, who added that right now, 'Everything is good.' Finch said they're pushing forward and have alternative plans should federal funding be reduced. Grants and support by local governments can be gap fillers, he said. And they'll have to be — the delay caused by the freeze means a break in federal support for the Farmers Market programs. Finch said the organization is telling partners around the state to look at fundraising over the summer to fill the short-term gap in their communities. The federal money will end in August, Finch said, at which point he hopes Congress and the president will continue it, and make it so that organizations in Montana can reapply. 'The current administration has taken down the opportunity to reapply for funding this year, and we don't know when or if it's coming back, but our national partners are indicating to us that we do expect that application to become available again,' Finch said. 'In which case we will apply and we could have four to five more years of funding.' Finch works on all three programs — the main Double SNAP program, one geared toward elderly Montanans and another looking to connect people with heart disease and diabetes to fresh food. The other two programs are smaller than the flagship Double SNAP, Finch said, and more targeted. The Senior Farmers Market Nutrition Program is for people 60 years and older, or 55, if they're an enrolled tribal member. That's a $48 benefit for the summer. It's utilized by around 1,800 people each year and helps support about 200 different farms, Finch said. The final program, called the Montana Produce Prescription Collaborative, is being done in concert with hospitals and clinics around the state, mostly in rural areas. It's geared towards helping underserved populations. Doctors actually prescribe fresh food, Finch said. That program is about three years old. 'There have been kind of grassroots prescription produce initiatives across the state for probably the last 10 years, and then what we did is we really saw an opportunity to identify all of those grassroots programs, bring them together into a collaborative,' Finch said. 'Then we ended up funding all of them for their next cycle of funding.' The state's Double SNAP program was the subject of peer-reviewed research, published through the University of Montana. Its findings suggest increased purchasing power contributes to increased interest in a healthier diet, improves food security and helps build community. 'This study adds to the growing body of evidence that nutrition incentive programs provide low-income individuals and families with an opportunity to enhance their diet quality, reducing risk for chronic disease and contributing to long-term well-being,' the study states. The worry from some in the state, including Montana Farmers Union president Walt Schweitzer, is eventual cuts to SNAP programs will hurt people dependent on food assistance. Farmers could be hurt too, as food assistance is a market some producers have entered. Schweitzer is concerned the program could be axed, calling it a direct connection between producers and consumers. 'It's really unfortunate,' Schweitzer said. 'And as far as the continuing resolution that was just passed out of the house, where they cut nearly $300 billion from these food nutrition programs, that's going to have a huge impact for the consumers that need this, and it's also going to have a huge impact for producers and losing a big market.' Farmers Market programs can also spur interest in where someone's food comes from and build relationships with local producers, Finch said. The study asked for thoughts from participants, who shared something similar. 'I always spend a little time chatting with my favorite vendors—the Russians, the Syrian, and the local farmers and families who now bring some of their meat directly to market,' said one person anonymously quoted in the study. 'I like to hear where they are from, and how they got started. Stories like my grandparents who travelled and homesteaded in Central Montana. They are pioneers and innovators.' Other respondents mentioned how they're asking farmers about ingredients to make a dish better, as well introductions to wholly new foods. 'Spending Double SNAP starts conversation,' another respondent quoted in the study said. Trump's tax bill passed the House and some estimates put the long-term decrease in SNAP at $300 billion. According to the Congressional Budget Office, those cuts could remove more than 3 million Americans from the program in an average month, as work requirements would expand to those between ages of 55 to 64 as well as those with children aged 7 and up. According to Feeding America's 'Mind the Meal Gap,' a data set and map tracking hunger, more than 139,000 people in Montana were food insecure in 2023, which is 12.3% of the state's population. Glacier County had the highest rate at 21%, followed by Roosevelt County at 19% and Liberty County at 17.8%. More information about Double SNAP can be found at and more information about Farm Connect Montana and its programs is at
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Religious leaders protest cuts to Medicaid, SNAP in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
WASHINGTON — Despite the June heat, hundreds of clergy and their congregants joined Democratic senators at the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday to protest the Trump administration's proposed cuts to the federal budget in a vigil that one leader described as 'very moving.' Leaders from more than 30 churches, organizations and denominations gathered to oppose cuts to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits in the budget bill passed by the House last month. They said prayers, read scripture and sang songs to commemorate Pentecostal Sunday, where disciples received 'courage to act,' and demonstrated to 'not forget the least of these,' the Rev. Jim Wallis said. The 'big, beautiful bill' passed in the House late last month after weeks of debate. It is now in the Senate for consideration and several senators have said they want to see changes to the package before they can support it. The demonstrators Tuesday sought to push senators to make those changes. Bishop Dwayne Royster of the Faith United Church of Christ in Washington, D.C., spoke to the crowd wearing what he described as a Ghanaian symbol that means 'the all sufficient God.' 'And I'm here today to say we have an insufficient government,' he said. 'We have an insufficient government that cannot do the things that it has been called to do, which is care for its citizens all across the country.' 'We need to call out our government's insufficiency because there are people who will go hungry all across the land because SNAP benefits are about to get cut,' Bishop Royster continued. 'The problem is that Jesus fed the 5,000, why can't the United States of America?' Bishop Royster said that the country needs to reevaluate how it views itself and oppose the bill that he said will make billionaires richer and send others into poverty. The faith leaders said they were gathered to protest the budget because they believe it is an immoral document. Paul Raushenbush, the CEO of Interfaith Alliance, told the Deseret News that he found the demonstration Tuesday moving because of the unity between so many different people of faith. He described the budget bill as 'antithetical' to Christian values. 'If you look at Jesus's life and Jesus's teachings, kind of across the board, they lift people up who are hungry, they lift up the people who are sick, they lift up the children,' he said. After the faith leaders held their vigil, participants proceeded to the steps of the Senate and were joined by Sens. Chris Coons, Cory Booker, Raphael Warnock, Lisa Blunt Rochester and Michael Bennet. Coons said Tuesday that they were gathering to remind lawmakers that 'no faith teaches that you should take away food from hungry children and health care and seniors and children in order to pay for a bigger tax cut for billionaires and the biggest corporations.' 'That is the core of what this bill does,' Coons told MSNBC before the vigil, later adding, 'A budget is a moral document and this budget bill is an immoral document.' Raushenbush said he was glad to see Democratic support for their advocacy because religion and faith have become associated with the Republican Party. 'It was wonderful to hear their voices and to hear how deeply faithful they are,' Raushenbush said of the senators. 'I think one of the reasons it's so important to do this is that there is a false narrative out there that one side of the aisle has God and the other side is nonreligious.' He noted that faith leaders who assembled on Tuesday held meetings afterward with senators on both sides of the political aisle as the Senate considers changes to the bill.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Michigan food assistance recipients talk survival with federal cuts to benefits impending
Melissa Miles speaks during a Michigan state Senate Housing and Human Services Committee meeting on June 10, 2025. | Photo: Anna Liz Nichols As a grandmother the last thing Detroit resident Kathleen Hurd wants to have to do is tell her grandchildren she has been raising for the past decade that their family has to choose between paying for housing or clothes or food. But as a federal spending plan that would cut billions of dollars from food assistance makes its way through Congress, Hurd told Michigan lawmakers Tuesday she's worried that she won't be able to shield her grandchildren from experiencing the effects. The federal spending plan, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, is a plan endorsed by President Donald Trump to align federal spending with the values of the administration. Amongst other cuts, the plan would eliminate nearly $300 billion in funding to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which provides food assistance to 1.5 million Michigan residents, roughly 15% of the state's population. 'As a parent, you try not to put the stress and the concerns of adulthood on children… so to have to possibly say to my grandchildren, 'well, we either have to eat or not have a place to live, or we have to eat, but not be able to get those shoes or whatever it is that they need… is very concerning to me,' Hurd told Michigan lawmakers on the state House Housing and Human Services Committee. Her request to lawmakers and her prayers are for her family and other families to not have to make children have to wonder where their next meal will come from, Hurd told lawmakers. Food banks and pantries in Michigan have raised concerns with the Trump administration making cuts to food assistance programming, outside of the Big Beautiful Bill, in recent weeks, but the cuts expected in congress' plan has leaders in Michigan urging federal officials to consider the human impact across states. Cuts to food assistance will cost Michigan about $900 million, the Michigan State Budget Office said in a memo earlier this month, adding that more than half of SNAP participants are families with children. Michigan having to take over the cost of SNAP food assistance, which is currently 100% federally funded, presents a 'ticking time bomb' for the state, Sen. Jeff Irwin (D-Ann Arbor), chair of the committee, said. SNAP also boosts the state's economy, Dwayne Haywood, senior deputy director of the Economic Stability Administration in the state health department said. A significant portion of Michigan's children and senior citizens rely on SNAP benefits in their household, Haywood said, but ultimately 70% of households receiving benefits have employed individuals. And Michiganders use their SNAP funds locally, at businesses and farmer's markets totalling $3.6 billion in the state in 2023, he added. 'You can only imagine the cost directed to market. It will be a cost. It will be… devastating [for] farmers,' Haywood said of the agriculture sector, a top industry in Michigan. 'That will certainly hurt us as we try to help our residents understand healthy eating…everyone in the community will be greatly impacted.' Hunger is a powerful motivator and not always for good, Sen. Sue Shink (D-Northfield Township) said, remembering her childhood, hearing about how her father's family in Detroit had struggled to ensure every family member could eat, with some loved ones resorting to illegal activity in order to put food on the table. 'I heard from his cousins who would eat less to make sure that my dad had enough food,' Shink said. 'I will tell you, as the daughter of somebody who went through that, who saw the incredible damage that it did to my dad, and who knows the damage that it did to me that I still do carry every day. We don't want to do that to our people.' The American Dream shouldn't just be survival, Melissa Miles, a resident of Hillsdale County told lawmakers. Currently, Miles said she's a student at Eastern Michigan University, raising an immunocompromised four-year-old as a single mom who relies on SNAP. Hers is a story of survival, Miles said, as she is attending school to better herself and create a bigger future for her and her child, but it is dependent on her ability to not have to worry where her child's next meal might come from. 'If my family didn't have SNAP, I can't bear to think how much sicker my child would be. I'm here today asking you to think about… Michigan families,' Miles said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
