WV Senate Workforce Committee advances bill expanding work requirements of food stamp recipients
The Senate Workforce Committee on Monday advanced legislation that would expand the work requirements for West Virginians who receive benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps.
The bill would mandate participation in a SNAP employment and training program for able-bodied adults up to age 59 unless they meet a qualification for exemption. The programs are currently voluntary.
Under the bill, exemptions include caring for a child under age 6 or an incapacitated adult, going to school at least part time, being employed at least 30 hours a week and participating in a drug or alcohol treatment program, among other things.
With some exceptions, the federal government requires able-bodied recipients ages 18 to 54 to meet work and training requirements in order to receive SNAP longer than three months within three years.
If the bill passes, SNAP recipients would be required to work at least 20 hours a week or be subject to a time limit on SNAP of three months within three years, and work 30 hours a week to be exempt from the state's SNAP Employment & Training (SNAP E&T) participation requirements, an attorney for the committee explained.
The bill would allow the state Department of Human Services to exempt up to 20% of individuals from the SNAP E&T program work based on challenges that the person would experience complying with the requirements.
The Senate passed the legislation during the 2024 legislative session, but the House did not adopt it. Sen. Rollan Roberts, R-Raleigh, told West Virginia Watch late last year he planned to reintroduce the bill this session.
During that interview, Roberts said the bill combines compassion with responsibility.
'I don't know what they're doing with their lives,' Roberts said. 'They're not volunteering, seeking vocational training, or they're not working. OK, so what are these able-bodied adults doing with no dependents? They are not contributing to society in a positive way, apparently, and are we sustaining that lifestyle? And does that lifestyle impact other negative consequences everywhere in society? I suspect that it does. It's anecdotal proof.'
Jeremiah Samples, former deputy secretary for the state Department of Health and Human Resources, testified before the committee on behalf of the Opportunity Solutions Project, a partner organization to the Foundation for Government Accountability, a right-leaning organization that promotes work over welfare.
'The most simplistic way to describe this bill is that this expands those work requirements [from 54] up to age 59,' Samples said. 'Ultimately the reason that I have been involved with this issue for many years and that the FGA and the Opportunity Solutions project is involved is that work gives individuals dignity. Employment gives an individual community.
'We're talking about giving people hope and an opportunity to better their lives,' Samples said. 'In West Virginia, and you all know many of our statistics, we struggle with a lack of hope.'
West Virginia has poor rankings for workforce participation, poor mental health days, drug overdoses, adults reporting poor health, diabetes, obesity, middle age death rate, foster care rates, grandparents raising grandchildren, Samples noted.
'The bottom line is that West Virginia is caught in a vicious cycle where individuals and communities, they do not have the resources available to them to get into the workforce, nor the expectation,' Samples said. 'A mandatory SNAP E&T program lays out an expectation as counsel laid out but it also provides individuals with resources.'
Samples said the legislation would have a 'negligible' impact on the state's overall workforce participation rate.
Caitlin Cook, director of advocacy and public policy for Mountaineer Food Bank, said the redundant work requirements in the bill would add stress to the state's charitable food network. The organization opposes the legislation, she said.
Some states that have had a mandatory work and training program have changed their programs to voluntary because they did not meet their employment and self-sufficiency goals, she said.
'We know in those other states that have mandatory SNAP E&T programs, it's both increasing food insecurity as well as not achieving the intended outcome of the SNAP E&T program, which is to connect people with tools, resources and opportunities to achieve self-sufficiency, and in turn no longer need food assistance through SNAP or the charitable food network,' Cook said.
Mandatory SNAP E&T programs also typically struggle to meet federal regulations and increase bureaucracy, she said.
The bill will next be considered by the Senate Finance Committee.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill
Millions of Americans could soon see their food assistance slashed. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' introduced large cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that will affect families across the country. Check Out: Learn More: According to the Urban Institute, over 22 million families are expected to lose some or all of their SNAP benefits, with over 5 million affected households losing an average of $146 per month. The bill also introduces a new requirement: States must begin covering 5% to 25% of SNAP costs starting in 2028, depending on their payment error rates. This cost-sharing model means that states with higher administrative errors will face deeper cuts. A Commonwealth Fund analysis projects that by 2029, some states will see significantly reduced federal SNAP funding, noting that the bill was designed to cut funding disproportionately in certain states. Based on this analysis, these are the 10 states that are facing the deepest SNAP cuts. Also see states where people are most likely to benefit from the SALT changes in Trump's bill. New Mexico Funding loss: $479 million Relative reduction: -43.9% Also See: Explore More: West Virginia Funding loss: $262 million Relative reduction: -43.6% See More: Georgia Funding loss: $1.49 billion Relative reduction: -43% Delaware Funding loss: $112 million Relative reduction: -41.6% New Jersey Funding loss: $846 million Relative reduction: -41.4% Mississippi Funding loss: $367 million Relative reduction: -41.1% Take Our Poll: Indiana Funding loss: $603 million Relative reduction: -39.6% Michigan Funding loss: $1.29 billion Relative reduction: -39.6% Oklahoma Funding loss: $628 million Relative reduction: -39.3% Missouri Funding loss: $630 million Relative reduction: -39.3% Editor's note: Data was sourced from The Commonwealth Fund. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value This article originally appeared on 10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
9 hours ago
- Axios
Federal SNAP changes could cut aid, hike costs
About 360,000 Illinois residents risk losing SNAP benefits under provisions of the " big, beautiful bill," which could also saddle the state with $700 million in additional SNAP costs previously covered by the feds, according to Gov. JB Pritzker's office. Why it matters: The cuts could have far-reaching effects on hunger as well as spending in the local economy. This year, Pritzker's office says, the new provisions could cost Illinois an additional $80 million just to meet administrative requirements at a time when the state is under intense pressure to bail out basic services. Zoom in: About 15% of state residents, or 1.9 million people, receive SNAP benefits in Illinois. The new rules require Illinois to expand work requirements (proof of 80 hours of work a month) to SNAP recipients who are: Able-bodied adults ages 55-64 Adults with dependents who are over 13 years old Adults who had been exempt under Illinois' 4.8% unemployment rate. New rules restrict the exemption to counties with unemployment of 10% or higher. Between the lines: Illinois can avoid the additional $700 million in SNAP payment responsibility if it reduces its "payment error rate" (PER) from 11% to under 6%. The PER measures underpayment or overpayment usually driven by administrative or applicant mistakes. It does not include fraud. Illinois has the 10th worst error rate in the nation, but is on par with most big states. The intrigue: Alaska has an error rate of 20% but Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski worked out a deal to exempt her state from the requirement to reduce it. What they're saying: "While the state government will be doing everything in its power to lower the so-called error rate, we cannot gloss over the fact that this provision was intentionally designed as a craven mechanism to deny states funding and feed fewer people in need," Pritzker spokesperson Matt Hill said in a statement. The other side: " We are incentivizing states to administer the SNAP program more efficiently and effectively, protecting taxpayers and prioritizing limited resources for those who truly need the benefit," Republican Rep. Darin LaHood tells Axios.
CBS News
19 hours ago
- CBS News
AT&T plans to replace legacy copper network in California finds resistance from landline holdouts
AT&T is pushing to get rid of its legacy copper landline services and instead replace them with advanced fiber optic networks. But not everyone is on board with getting rid of their landline. If Assembly Bill 470 passes, the company said it will implement a phased, multi-year approach to eliminate the old copper network, which a spokesperson said less than 5% of customers are currently on. AT&T is the designated carrier of last resort in many parts of the state, which means it must provide traditional landline phone service to any customer in the service territory. AB 470 would allow AT&T to request relief from its COLR obligations in certain eligible areas, where there is no population or areas served by multiple fiber optic or wireless providers with comparable service prices. "No customer will be left without access to voice or 911 service. We're committed to working with state leaders and community members on policies that create a thoughtful transition to bring more reliable, modern communications to all Californians," Susan Santana, president of AT&T California, said in an email to CBS News Bay Area. "We're the largest and fastest growing fiber provider in the nation and continue to invest to bring reliable, high-speed connectivity to our customers across the state. This bill also includes a requirement to build fiber to additional residential locations across California." For at least one Berkeley woman, however, there is more at stake in this landline battle. "This landline phone is my lifeline," author Cynthia Larson told CBS News Bay Area. "I absolutely need it. This is the way I would get notification, whether it's time to evacuate or if it's just high winds and we're okay, there's a big difference." Larson, who does not own a cellphone, says she needs her landline to inform her of fire danger in her area. "Rolling power shutoff, because they sometimes do those shutoffs for the utilities to be fire safe in high wind situations," she said. "And so whenever that is happening, I rely upon my landline to find out what's going on outside of my area." Larson said having a beeper at her IT several years ago put her off from ever purchasing a cellphone for herself. "There's no way that I wanted to be on call to anyone, answering anything that rings," Larson said. "Because it just makes me jump out of my skin. They would be calling at all the worst times." And so she would use her landline or the internet to communicate with her loved ones. "I'm not against technology, but I recognize it should be a partner and a friend," Larson said. "Not something we should give our brains and minds away to." But now, her lifeline, the AT&T copper services landline, is in jeopardy. State Assemblymember Tina McKinnor penned the carriers of last resort bill. The Public Utilities Commission rejected a similar proposal last year, but this year the legislation is now headed to the Senate Appropriations Committee for a vote on August 29. "Nobody will be without phone service, 99.9% of Californians will have phone service," McKinnor told CBS News Bay Area. "They have to have three other services. Two wireless and one hardline service, which is a [Voice over Internet Protocol]. If you don't have that in your area, they can't pull out, and you'll just keep your copper lines. But if you have that, we'll be able to go into certain areas, pull out those copper lines and put in fiber optics." She added, "In the next 10 to 15 years, copper will be obsolete. No one will have a home phone anymore. So we'll still need to do those upgrades in those areas that we didn't do in this round." Utility watchdog groups say, however, the bill would impact about 1.5 million Californians who rely on copper services, especially when cell service is down. "It wants to be able to turn out the lights and walk away from serving areas that it thinks that are not as profitable as others," Regina Costa, the telecommunications policy director of The Utility Reform Network, told CBS News Bay Area. "In a major power outage that happens during a disaster like an earthquake or when the power's shut off during the fire, those lines continue to work. They do not need electricity from PG&E in order to keep functioning." "If you only have a wireless phone, you're not going to have service. You will not be able to call 911, you will not be able to get emergency alerts," Costa added. "Because if you're in a place where the power is out and there's a wildfire and people are not getting the information because the networks are down, that house might be the only one getting those alerts." Meanwhile, the Californians for a Connected Future coalition fully supports the legislation. "Assembly Bill 470 includes a careful, phased-in, multi-year approach that protects all Californians during the transition to a next-generation communications network. Importantly, AB 470 includes a number of consumer protections to ensure that no one is left without reliable communications service and is an infrastructure investment bill that includes an aggressive buildout requirement that is unmatched in scale," a spokesperson told CBS News Bay Area. "That's why such a broad and diverse coalition of Tribal leaders, social justice advocates, veterans, ethnic businesses, education, youth, community and non-profit organizations supports AB 470. The bill outlines a responsible, balanced approach to expanding California's broadband network and accelerating investments in communication technologies that will strengthen connectivity and prepare California for the future. Larson, however, said she is concerned about the reliability of these new services in areas that already have spotty connections. "The issue with the cell service is that it's not that reliable inside the house, and not even outside the house," Larson said. "So, for example, sometimes my family or friends, they need to go outside on the porch to use the phone." She said she hopes that AT&T will answer their call to continue offering copper services to longtime customers like her. "They know what they're doing and they're maintaining the copper wires for landline networks and giving us reliable phone services that so many of us depend upon," Larson said. "Do we really have something that's equal or better than copper landlines in these emergency situations?"
