Tesla ordered to pay $243m over fatal Autopilot crash
The verdict is a rare win for victims of accidents involving Autopilot. Musk has been pushing to rapidly expand Tesla's recently launched robotaxi business based on an advanced version of its driver assistance software.
Tesla shares fell 1.8% on Friday, and are down 25% this year.
Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, $US129 million in compensatory damages plus $US200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet.
Tesla was held liable for 33% of the compensatory damages, or $US42.6 million.
Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67%, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share.
"Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.
"Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries," he added.
Tesla said it would appeal.
"Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," the company said.
The plaintiffs had sought $US345 million of damages. Their lawyers said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot.
IMPACT ON FUTURE CASES
Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial.
In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly.
"It's a big deal," said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. "This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology."
The verdict could also impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year.
As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly $US1 trillion market value hinges on Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence.
DRIVER'S ROLE
The trial concerned an April 25, 2019 incident in which George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62mph (100kmh) through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder.
McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV.
Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 23 metres to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries.
"We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash," said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology.
"The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software," he added. "That's a big deal."
Tesla, in its statement, said McGee was entirely at fault.
"To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash," the company said. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver - from day one - admitted and accepted responsibility."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Autocar
a day ago
- NZ Autocar
BMW's smart IX3 charging flap
Artificial intelligence is playing an increasingly important role in our lives and among the myriad things it enhances is car ownership. The next-generation iX3, for example, features an AI-assisted charging flap. Evidently, the EV recognises when the vehicle is approaching a public fast charger that the driver has previously used. Once nearby, the AI figures out that the driver wants to charge the car and opens the flap. It also determines if you're already out of the car and holding the charger if it happens to be one it hasn't encountered before. After the charging process is complete, the flap automatically closes when the connector is removed. Handy? Sure but is it unique? Tesla has a similar powered door system. However, it doesn't activate of its own volition. BMW has yet to explain how AI plays a role here in conjunction with the usual sensors. The iX3 supports bidirectional charging, with Vehicle-to-Load (V2L), Vehicle-to-Home (V2H), and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) applications. AI also helps the iX3 with parking duties, selecting the space, and planning the parking manoeuvre. Moreover, innovations introduced with the Neue Klasse are 'AI-based, smart, and update-compatible.' New tech associated with Neue Klasse won't be exclusive to electric vehicles either, coming to the next 3 Series and X5.
NZ Autocar
2 days ago
- NZ Autocar
Some EVs fall short on claimed range
An Australian motoring group, the AAA, has found that some EVs fall short of advertised range by almost one-quarter. However, others come close to lab test results in the real world. The Australian Automobile Association tested vehicles from Tesla, BYD, Kia and Smart in a bid to give consumers more accurate information on real-world range. The government-funded programme revealed that the true driving range of five popular electric vehicles is between five and 23 per cent lower than results from laboratory testing. Most though were under 10 per cent out. These are the first EVs the AAA has evaluated in its four-year, federally funded Real World Testing Programme. It is designed to give consumers more accurate information on real-world vehicle performance. The extended range variant of the BYD Atto3 had the largest variance, according to the AAA, with a real-world range of 369km. That was 23 per cent lower than the 480km achieved in laboratory testing. The Smart #3 had the lowest discrepancy, out by only five per cent. Tesla's Model 3 had a real-world range 14 per cent lower than suggested. Meantime, sibling Model Y and the Kia EV6 both had a real world range variance eight per cent below predicted. Despite the variations, both the AAA and electric vehicle industry representatives said the results should reduce range anxiety among consumers looking to buy an EV. The Electric Vehicle Council industry body's Aman Gaur said the AAA's results should 'give confidence that EVs have more than enough range for everyday' use. He added that the average person drives around 33km per day. This means that an EV with a range of 350km can be driven for more than 10 days before needing to be recharged. The results provide more reassurance than recent AAA tests on 114 petrol, diesel and hybrid vehicles. Results showed that 77 per cent used more fuel than advertised. One in five also produced more emissions than lab tests suggested they should. The AAA's managing director, Michael Bradley, said that the Real World Testing Program had found consumers couldn't always rely on the laboratory tests as an indicator of real-world performance. 'As more EVs come on stream, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range' he said. Vehicles involved complete a 93km circuit of urban, rural and highway roads around Geelong in Victoria, using protocols based on European regulations. For electric vehicles, the program also measures how much electricity is needed to operate the vehicle during the test. While the five EVs involved used more energy in real-world driving conditions than in the lab, that's not surprising. 'Given the unpredictable nature of driving, it's inherently challenging for manufacturers to provide real-world estimates.' A spokesperson from smart EVs said: 'To achieve such a low five per cent variation is, we consider, a testament to the leading battery and overall EV technology that underpins the smart brand.' 'We thank AAA for the work they undertook to give consumers a real-world view of the performance of EVs that, hopefully, further alleviates any residual range anxiety and helps to act as incentive to experience the future of urban motoring.'
NZ Autocar
4 days ago
- NZ Autocar
2025 Tesla Model Y RWD Review
A new look and even more minimalist interior along with extra power and range have sent EV enthusiasts on a Model Y bender. Despite Tesla share gloom overseas, the brand is doing okay here. Totals for the half year are down about 200 on 2024 but the Modeal Y is still the best selling EV (636 units). And that's mainly on the back of the newly facelifted model Y. In June, Tesla found new homes for 407 of them, showing pent-up demand for the newbie. The comprehensively facelifted Model Y is available as a base RWD variant or an AWD dual-motor option. Expect a Performance model soon too. Visually upbeat The RWD version you see here costs $70,224 including ORCs. The look is much improved with its new lightbars and hidden headlights below. They're of the matrix variety too, so can be left on full beam, 'dipping' automatically by turning off pixels. Bumpers at each end are reconfigured, with small air ducts up front to divert the air around the 19-inch alloys. These have black caps that Tesla claims reduce energy use by 2-3 per cent. At the rear is a new three-piece fifth door – evidently simpler to repair – and there's a small ducktail-style spoiler and a new diffuser. The original Model Y had a Cd of 0.23. This is now 0.22, adding a few kays of range. That's one of the lowest Cd figures for any SUV. Minimalist interior There are also significant interior changes. There's still the big 15.4-inch central touchscreen that commands all. The wheel is new, though the spokes are set a touch high, mandating a 10 to 2 hand position. It's comfy enough though, with adaptive cruise controls on the right side. Above there's a panoramic sunroof, with a silver coating to prevent overheating. Mirrors and steering column positioning you set in the central screen. Oddly it's the same for selecting gears. So the cabin is largely devoid of buttons, the only exceptions being on the wheel for the wipers and front camera (also a new feature). Push the wiper button once and a menu comes up on screen or you can cycle through the menu by repeated stabs of the button. It works okay but a rotating controller on the indicator stalk is so much simpler. Like a gear selector on a right wand would be… Most of the other stuff is relatively straightforward. The powered seat controls are in the conventional place – hooray – and the lumbar pump is solid. Seat ventilation is new, along with heating and there's a heated wheel too. Changing between the two drive modes is easy (chill=eco, standard=normal). Same essentially with recuperation, low or standard. We liked both. On tight stuff, standard is good, no brakes required. For other roads, low is fine, gently braking you almost to a halt. This has one of the best crawl modes I've ever encountered, so smooth. Autonomous drive works well too, though it does seem to favour the left side of any lane. Attempts at steering right often lead to ACC cancelling itself. Winter weather It was raining much of the time we had the new Model Y on test. There's a slippery driving mode that amps up the TC, and also prevents really heavy braking. You can stomp on the brake pedal and it doesn't seem to go near the ABS intervention point. Slip back to normal drive mode and regular brake transmission resumes. Clever stuff. So are the electronics; they intervene only when necessary. So you can press on even in the wet and this just responds faithfully. Helping is a low centre of gravity, an even weight split, and not too much of it, just over 1900kg, not bad for a sizeable EV. It is almost 4.8m in length, our model featuring a single, rear-mounted motor. There's generous luggage space up front (117L, and a drain for wet gear) and an equally larger underfloor hold at the back. You can store the magnetic cargo cover under there too if you want. We probably would – or just leave it in the garage – as it's quite sizable and makes viewing stuff at the front of the hold a little tricky. Anyhow, there's piles of room back there, with 854L when all seats are in use, and 2138L after splitfolding. There's generous leg and headroom for the folks in the back too. They get new heated seats and an eight-inch touchscreen to which you can pair two Bluetooth headsets. The split folding is a powered set-up, activated in three different ways. There's also an accessory Tesla mattress, should you choose to have a weekend away in the wilderness. It's that roomy inside! Ride and handling impress Tesla said the improvement in ride quality is palpable. That's soon evident – this is just outright pampering at urban speeds. It also flattens speed bumps effortlessly so long as you're not attacking them like a bull at a gate. The suspension isn't active but uses frequency dependent dampers. Hence, the comfy ride at urban speeds, and the firmer, controlled progress through corners. We appreciated the prompt turn in and good feedback at the helm, though the turning circle is nothing to write home about (12.1m). And from the driver's perspective there is great forward visibility, even if it's more restrictive out the rear window. The seating position and comfort are noteworthy, except for the hard edge against which your left knee rests. Build is sound, not an untoward noise to be heard. If you like minimalist interiors, this will appeal. There's not even a stop/start button. As to the numbers, the Rear Wheel Drive model features a 220kW motor (torque not state, estimated around 400Nm) powered by a 63kWh LFP battery pack, giving it a claimed 466km of range according to WLTP. Its sprint time drops by 1sec from the previous model (6.9 to 5.9sec, which we met). At no time did we feel this needed any more power. Overtakes are achieved easily, quickly. Add $10k for the Long-Range AWD variant ($80,224 drive away). This has a 78kWh NMC battery and a heap more grunt (336kW/639Nm). It is said to run 0-100 in 4.3sec. The claimed range is up a tich on its forebear at 551km. When either variant hooks up to a 250kW Supercharger, up to 283km can be added in 15min. There are evidently 28 Supercharger locations nationwide. On a wallbox, a 60 to 100 per cent recharge takes 4.5 hours. Teslas come with a four-year/80,000km warranty. Battery cover is over twice that. And Tesla has a mobile tyre repair service. Up with the best in class? Well yes, really. On road it's fast and fun. And inside it feels more premium than its asking price. That's perhaps partly a reflection of new acoustic glass and low rolling resistance rubber used; evidently it reduces wind and road noise by around 20 per cent. And the design is (mainly) clever too, particularly the amount of occupant and storage potential it offers. Rivals in this area include Leapmotor C10, Kia EV5, Ioniq 5 and BYD Sealion 7. Generalising they are either slower, more expensive or both. Inbound rivals include Smart #5 and Cupra Tavascan, among others. Most will love the base car but $10k seems not a lot for an upgrade to AWD and more pace and range. Why not indeed? Tesla Model Y RWD $67,900+ORC / 15.7kWh/100km / 0g/km 0-100 km/h 5.83s 80-120 km/h 3.50s (100.3m) 100-0 km/h 35.01m5 Speedo error 98 at an indicated 100km/h Ambient cabin noise 69.2dB@100km/h Motor output 220kW/n.a. Nm Battery 62.5kWh Range 466km Drivetrain Single-speed auto / RWD Front suspension Wishbones / swaybar Rear suspension Multilink / swaybar Turning circle 12.1m (2.3 turns) Front brakes Ventilated discs Rear brakes Discs Stability systems ABS, ESP Safety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHB Tyre size f/r-255/45R19 Wheelbase 2890mm L/W/H 4750 / 1982 / 1624mm Track f-1636mm r-1636mm Luggage capacity f-117 r-854-2138L Tow rating 750kg (1600kg braked) Service intervals 12 months/20,000km Warranty 4yrs / 80,000 km ANCAP rating (2022) Weight (claimed) 1921kg
