Impact of coastal erosion through Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — Historically, a group of Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw people has lived on the Isle de Jean Charles.
Since 1955, the community has shrunk by 98% because of coastal erosion in Louisiana. Coastal erosion is accelerated during eventful and high impact storm seasons.
Louisiana has the barrier islands of it's gulf coast. They, along with natural wetlands play a crucial role in protecting coastal communities from storms and erosion.
Jefferson Parish officials discuss 2025 hurricane preparations
'My dad told me whenever he was a child, he'd be able to walk to a lake that was a little bit west of the island. He told me as a young man, he'd walk there without getting his feet wet. When I came along, as a kid, we was going by boat over there,' said resident of Isle de Jean Charles, Chris Brunet.
The Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project was one of the first of it's kind to move an entire community due to climate change.
Louisiana received $48.3 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, to relocate the families on the island.
A total of 37 families moved off the island in the Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project. In the past, 300 families called the island home.
'20 years ago, the Corps of Engineers and the Terrebonne Levy District said, it was going to cost $190 million to include us in the Hurricane Protection System. They said, for that much money, the island wasn't worth it. Us as a community, had to make the decision to live somewhere else because we were impacted by the environment. I now live 40 miles inland from where I was originally raised. Water is and will always be part of our lives. Everything about me and how I think comes from Isle de Jean Charles. This new place is nice but it's just a place I was relocated to,' explained Brunet.
The Natural Resources Defense Council Estimates that by 2067, 1.2 million people are at risk of coastal flooding in Louisiana.Impact of coastal erosion through Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project
Pelicans Zion Williamson sued on rape allegations, additional charges
Stephen Miller on report of Musk drug use: We're worried about drugs crossing the border
Raceland man accused of attempted murder of kids after setting 'intentional fire'
Labor Department suspends Job Corps centers operations, drawing bipartisan pushback
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
In Dozens of Districts, Teachers Can't Afford to Live Near Their Schools
In a recent analysis, Katherine Bowser of the National Council on Teacher Quality finds that teachers are increasingly being priced out of housing in their communities. She notes that, between 2019 and 2024, the percentage growth in home prices and the cost of renting a one-bedroom apartment have significantly outpaced increases in both inflation and teacher salaries. In short, teachers face, 'a widening gap between income and housing affordability,' according to NCTQ President Heather Peske. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines 'affordable' as 'paying no more than 30% of gross income for housing costs, including utilities.' NCTQ had previously looked at a select sample of 69 large urban districts and found 18 where beginning teacher salaries met the definition for 'unaffordable' as of 2019. By 2024, that number had risen to 39, or about half the sample. In 10 of those districts, the rent for a one-bedroom apartment cost 40% of a beginning teacher's salary. In Boston, for example, it would eat up nearly 43%. Bowser notes that the picture today is even grimmer when looking at a teacher's prospects for purchasing a home. Using some (ambitious) estimates about how much an educator could save toward a down payment on a mortgage and comparing it with local real estate prices, Bowser finds that teachers would struggle to purchase a home in 54 out of 56 sample districts. These are extreme numbers. But who or what is to blame? And what can be done? Related One potential solution starts with a simple premise. If teachers can't find affordable housing, school districts could partner with developers to build apartments and become landlords to their own employees. This has been a particular focus in California, where state Superintendent of Public Education Tony Thurmond and a coalition of legislators and developers are encouraging districts to repurpose empty buildings and unused land to address housing needs. That may seem like a good idea at first blush, but previous efforts have been plagued by delays and rules that prevent 'low-income' housing subsidies from going to people who are not truly low-income. In other words, teachers often make too much to qualify for extra financial assistance. The idea that districts can solve teacher housing issues is also complicated by the fact that educators are far from the only group of workers who struggle to make ends meet in high-cost urban areas. Indeed, recent studies have found that high housing costs have led to lower mobility and fewer opportunities for people to climb the economic ladder. If police officers, social workers, janitors and cleaners, bus drivers, food service workers and many other types of low- and moderate-income employees are all being priced out of many American cities, there's only so much a school board can do. In that case, the 'teacher' housing problem is largely a generic, community-wide affordability problem that will be solved only by building more housing units. But even if individual school boards cannot solve this big, societal trend, education policymakers are not helping. In fact, their choices have made the housing affordability problem worse. How? By not turning rising revenues into higher salaries, they've chosen to prioritize a larger education workforce over a better-paid one. In turn, that makes it harder for teachers and other school employees to afford housing in the places where they work. Related As I noted in a recent project for The 74, school spending is keeping up with or even outpacing inflation in many parts of the country, but those investments are not translating into higher compensation for district employees. If those salaries had merely kept up with total education spending, they would be 34% higher. At the national level, that would have worked out to a $22,000 raise for the average school employee. In Portland, Oregon, for example, NCTQ's Bowser finds that it would take 41% of a beginning teacher's salary to rent a one-bedroom apartment. But that's not for lack of investments in the district. As we found in our report, Portland's revenues rose 54% from 2002 to 2022 in inflation-adjusted, per-pupil terms. (That is, the district revenues increased much faster than inflation.) And yet, the average salary paid to Portland school employees fell by 8%. Portland, like many parts of the country, did not turn budget increases into salary gains for its workers. These trends have continued in recent years. While Portland housing prices surged over the last five years, the district lost 10% of its student enrollment. At the same time, it added the equivalent of 445 full-time employees to its payroll (an 8% increase). In other words, instead of leaning into the housing problem and trying to pay its existing workers higher salaries, the Portland school district actually made the city's housing problems just a bit worse by hiring more, lower-paid workers.I don't want to just pick on Portland here. As we showed in our project last month, 90% of districts are making these types of choices. But they effectively mean that school district leaders in some of the biggest, most expensive places to live are making budgetary decisions that add to the housing difficulties in their communities.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Impact of coastal erosion through Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — Historically, a group of Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw people has lived on the Isle de Jean Charles. Since 1955, the community has shrunk by 98% because of coastal erosion in Louisiana. Coastal erosion is accelerated during eventful and high impact storm seasons. Louisiana has the barrier islands of it's gulf coast. They, along with natural wetlands play a crucial role in protecting coastal communities from storms and erosion. Jefferson Parish officials discuss 2025 hurricane preparations 'My dad told me whenever he was a child, he'd be able to walk to a lake that was a little bit west of the island. He told me as a young man, he'd walk there without getting his feet wet. When I came along, as a kid, we was going by boat over there,' said resident of Isle de Jean Charles, Chris Brunet. The Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project was one of the first of it's kind to move an entire community due to climate change. Louisiana received $48.3 million from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, to relocate the families on the island. A total of 37 families moved off the island in the Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project. In the past, 300 families called the island home. '20 years ago, the Corps of Engineers and the Terrebonne Levy District said, it was going to cost $190 million to include us in the Hurricane Protection System. They said, for that much money, the island wasn't worth it. Us as a community, had to make the decision to live somewhere else because we were impacted by the environment. I now live 40 miles inland from where I was originally raised. Water is and will always be part of our lives. Everything about me and how I think comes from Isle de Jean Charles. This new place is nice but it's just a place I was relocated to,' explained Brunet. The Natural Resources Defense Council Estimates that by 2067, 1.2 million people are at risk of coastal flooding in of coastal erosion through Isle de Jean Charles Resettlement Project Pelicans Zion Williamson sued on rape allegations, additional charges Stephen Miller on report of Musk drug use: We're worried about drugs crossing the border Raceland man accused of attempted murder of kids after setting 'intentional fire' Labor Department suspends Job Corps centers operations, drawing bipartisan pushback Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
South St. Louis man facing eviction alleges housing discrimination against his apartment complex
ST. LOUIS – Navy veteran Kenneth Hansbrough showed us how showering in his apartment can be a treacherous task. As he is wheelchair bound due to a spinal cord injury; Hansbrough tells us he's repeatedly asked management at the Charless Place apartments in south St. Louis for an ADA-compliant shower. He says management responded by installing grab bars. 'I try to hold onto here, sometimes there, sometimes here and sometimes there to try to get off in there,' he said. 'But they installed it wrong and loosely. I kept emailing them, saying, 'Listen, this grab bar needs to be fixed.' They wouldn't fix it until I fell and got a concussion. I was laid out on the floor. I ended up going to the hospital.' Hansbrough believes Charless Place's alleged failure to properly re-install the grab bars violated the Fair Housing Act. His accusation is included in the Housing Discrimination Complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in February 2024. In the complaint his attorney shared with us, Hansbrough also alleges Charless Place discriminated against him on the basis of his disability by failing to provide a reasonable accommodation of rear gate access needed for safe pickups and drop-offs. Hansbrough is legally blind and doesn't drive. He uses Metro's Call-A-Ride service. 'If I got a doctor's appointment going to wherever, if the driver said, 'I don't feel safe going to the front,' they'll say 'I'll pick you up in the back.' Well, they couldn't pick me up in the back because they didn't have a clicker to the gate,' he said. The rear entrance to the Charless Place campus requires a remote to open the gate. Hansbrough says residents with vehicles are given remotes to open the gate, but when he requested one to use, he was told: 'Well, you have to have a car is what the manager told me. I said, 'Well, Call-A-Ride is my car.'' Sheriff pleads the Fifth repeatedly over questions about mysterious death Call-A-Ride sent Charless Place management a letter on Hansbrough's behalf, requesting he be granted rear gate access so its vehicles can safely pick him up and drop him off. 'There are people all around here who have clickers and don't have cars. Both the managers ignored that. They just said, 'Well, you don't get a clicker,'' Hansbrough said. He believes his HUD complaint prompted Charless Place to take legal action against him. In September 2024, Charless Place filed a motion trying to evict him from his apartment. It alleged Hansbrough was 'seen on video breaking and entering through a window.' Charless Place dropped the suit the day the trial was supposed to start. In March, Charless Place tried to evict him again, this time with an unlawful detainer suit. It alleges Hansbrough didn't vacate the property after being given 30-days notice. It says his tenancy was terminated due to property damage and his refusal to pay for damages. Hansbrough fears he could soon be homeless. 'I've never lived on the street. I don't know nothing about living on the street, and that's what really makes me scared to live on the street. I don't know how to do that,' he said. Kalila Jackson is representing Hansbrough in this case. She says unlawful detainer lawsuits have limited defenses. 'The Supreme Court of Missouri has determined years ago that when you're fighting a HUD case, there's limited defenses in those cases,' she said. 'You can't file counter suits in an unlawful detainer case. But the one right that is preserved is that right to the jury trial—and we do intend to request a jury trial—just to have a jury of his peers here and determine if this is something that should that housing providers should be allowed to do.' That brings us back to Hansbrough's HUD complaint. If the results of federal investigation were favorable, Jackson says it could help keep Hansbrough in his apartment. But she fears cuts by the Trump Administration have greatly handcuffed HUD. 'HUD is basically paralyzed. It's not doing anything with cases with any cases. Most people are just waiting to see at HUD what they're going to be allowed to do,' Former Deputy General Counsel for Enforcement and Fair Housing at HUD Sasha Samberg-Champion said. She now works for the National Fair Housing Alliance. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'They have not charged a single case of discrimination in this administration, whether a complicated case, an easy case, a controversial case, a non-controversial case, they've equally charged none of them,' Samberg-Champion said. Hampering HUD's ability to effectively investigate reasonable accommodation complaints could fuel exploitation of the Fair Housing Act, according to Samberg-Champion. 'I think many housing providers understand right now that HUD investigators are a paper tiger, because even if they find a violation, they're not going to be able to do anything. They're not going to be able to demand action or have the case charged. So ultimately, people can just wait HUD out,' she said. Contact 2's Mike Colombo asked the attorney representing Charless Place in this suit for an interview. He responded, saying the firm does not comment on active litigation, adding that we should direct our request to Charless Place. We've contacted Charless Place multiple times and have yet to get a response. As for Hansbrough, he'll have his day in court May 28. 'I've just asked for what the law allows and what just there's no humanity here. That's what I'm missing,' Hansbrough said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
