logo
RFK Jr. Wants To Take COVID Shots Away From Pregnant People — But You Can Fight Back

RFK Jr. Wants To Take COVID Shots Away From Pregnant People — But You Can Fight Back

Yahoo2 days ago

Read on Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy's war on health care in the U.S.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a man who just a few weeks ago told the American people, 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me,' is now dishing out vaccine recommendations for pregnant people and children.
You've likely heard about the video he posted on X, formerly Twitter, which was accompanied by the caption 'today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from [the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] recommended immunization schedule.' Going against Kennedy, though, the CDC on Thursday published its new recommendations and still suggest the vaccine for children. But, in line with Kennedy's X announcement, the COVID vaccine is no longer recommended for pregnant people, according to the CDC website.
This is all confusing — and, particularly if you're pregnant, it's only natural to be worried. But it's not currently clear what this will actually mean for the vaccine come fall when the new formulation is available.'The first thing I do want to tell every reader is that the ACIP, or the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, is still going to meet in June, and I think this is important to remember because although RFK sidestepped really what is a decades-long practice of having independent reviewers review all the science and then make a vaccine recommendation ... the ACIP could potentially disagree with RFK's blanket statement,' Dr. Anita Patel, a pediatric critical care doctor in Washington, D.C., told HuffPost.
Also, since Kennedy did not qualify this change with science-backed reasoning, Patel is hopeful that this decision could be overturned. Suffice to say, you shouldn't panic, but you should take this threat seriously.
Doctors spoke with HuffPost about why this move is dangerous, what you can do to advocate for vaccine access and how to stay healthy if you can't get the jab come fall:
Kennedy's announcement of the removal of the COVID vaccine from the recommended vaccination schedule for pregnant people and children is a strange move for many reasons.
'When we really look at who would benefit from COVID vaccines, we do really see value in continuing to vaccinate pregnant women and babies, particularly young children who have never had a primary series,' said Dr. Lori Handy, the associate director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
The vaccine is important for pregnant people because they're immunocompromised during pregnancy, Handy said. More, 'when pregnant, the physiology of how your heart and your lungs work changes because [your body] redirects a lot of your blood flow to the placenta to support the fetus, and that makes COVID infection more risky for pregnant moms,' Handy added.
Beyond the health of the pregnant person, the COVID vaccine also benefits the growing fetus. When a pregnant person gets vaccinated, they then pass those antibodies on to the fetus, she noted. 'And we know that children under 1 are hospitalized at rates second only to people over age 75. So, they're the second most hospitalized group to the elderly, which really states just how significant the infection is for babies and how important it is to get them protected,' Handy said.
The COVID vaccine also reduces the risk of stillbirth and preterm labor, Patel said.
'[People who] really want to continue to have access to vaccines, the key thing they could do right now, actually, is talk with their local, state and federal legislators, let them know' Handy said.
'Please advocate for us and help protect this resource, because we want to have it available even if the guidance changes. ... We want to make sure that vaccines stay available for all of the people that want it,' Handy said.
Your voice matters, and this fight isn't over, Patel said.
'It is also important to remember that the representatives, whether it's a congressperson or a senator, they work for you,' Patel noted.
You can directly call or email your elected officials and let them know you aren't going to vote for them again if they don't fight against the COVID shot restrictions.
'So, using language that is very literal and deliberate, saying 'I will not vote for you if you support this decision to rescind the recommendation regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for pregnant individuals and people under 65,'' Patel said.
'And I really, I really believe in this process, because although we haven't been able to overturn everything, there has been a lot of movement in these executive orders and unlawful announcements, and that is because of the voice of the American people,' she said.
Patel added that the Trump administration is trying to upset us.
'They are trying to paralyze us so that we can't act, and if us as a society and us as a populace in America allow them to do that, we will lose our voice. But if we continue to push back, we will not,' Patel said.
'With regard to pregnant individuals, although the administration has taken the stance against vaccinating pregnant persons against COVID, their doctor, whether it's their OB or their primary care doctor, can still say 'My patient is at high risk for adverse outcomes secondary to COVID-19, and therefore it is medically indicated for this patient to receive the vaccine,'' Patel said.
'And the truth is that RFK actually allowed for that loophole in his announcement when he said that they will continue to cover the vaccine for vulnerable populations,' Patel said, and added that inactivity is one of the underlying conditions that can make you eligible for the jab. 'So there are a lot of underlying conditions that people may not even realize are on that list.'
This administration is creating lots of chaos with its inflammatory and scary decisions, but 'those decisions haven't necessarily trickled down yet into a sphere in which they are appreciably affecting people's ability to get the vaccine,' Patel said.
'I can't say what's going to happen once the ACIP has met, but at this moment in time, children can still get the COVID-19 vaccine ... and as long as an OB-GYN appropriately justifies the indication for the COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant persons, that pregnant person should still be able to get it,' Patel noted.
If your doctor does not agree to give you a COVID-19 vaccine, Patel recommends that you seek out a second opinion.
There are things you can do to protect yourself if a worst-case scenario unfolds and pregnant folks aren't able to get the COVID-19 vaccine come fall.
'If you are in any way at risk of a more severe outcome from respiratory infections, wear a mask when you go to crowded places,' Handy said. You should also practice good hand hygiene — washing your hands regularly and using hand sanitizer when you're out and about.
'People should worry about COVID, but also flu, rhinovirus, all of these infections can make people, particularly pregnant people or immunocompromised people, very ill, and we want to keep those people safe,' Handy added.
When it comes to keeping babies, and particularly newborns, safe, Handy said she tries to 'surround them, essentially cocoon them, with other healthy people.'
This may look like turning away a sniffling babysitter or leaving a friend's house when you notice their coughing 2-year-old.
'Trying to stay around healthy people is just logistically hard in a busy life, but it does protect your child, particularly during winter seasons, when a lot more viruses circulate,' Handy said.
It's also important to get all of the other recommended vaccines for your baby on time, Handy noted. You can ask your pediatrician any questions you have about vaccines, 'but just recognize when your health care provider makes a recommendation for a vaccine in the first week of life, for a vaccine at 2 months of life, that is really done to give the baby the most protection they can. And changing that schedule or delaying just increases the time that that baby's at risk,' Handy said.
'So, if we do face a world where baby can't have COVID protection, making sure they're protected from every single other thing, and then practicing those good infection prevention practices, is really the best we'll be able to do,' Handy noted.
A New COVID Variant Is Here, And It's More Transmissible — Here Are The Signs And Symptoms
Trump's FDA Has Axed COVID Boosters For Most People — And Medical Experts Are Deeply Worried

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boulder Attack Videos Show People Being Set on Fire
Boulder Attack Videos Show People Being Set on Fire

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Boulder Attack Videos Show People Being Set on Fire

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Eight people were injured after a man hurled makeshift incendiary devices into a crowd at a pro-Israel event in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday. The 45-year-old suspect, identified as Mohamed Sabry Soliman, allegedly shouted "Free Palestine" as he threw Molotov cocktails into the crowd of people gathered to remember the Israeli hostages still being held captive in Gaza. Soliman was reportedly shirtless and holding makeshift flame-throwers in each hand when he was arrested at the scene. More video of the terrorist in Boulder Colorado who attacked a pro-Israel event that was bringing awareness of American and Israeli hostages being held by Hamas. — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 1, 2025 Footage of the incident shows the chaos following the attack, with bystanders tending to the victims. One person can be seen lying on the ground, as others attempt to beat out the flames. Mark Michalek, an FBI special agent, said on Sunday: "It is clear that this is a targeted act of violence and the FBI is investigating this as an act of terrorism." Four women and four men, aged between 52 and 88, were wounded and hospitalized, according to Boulder Police. Newsweek has contacted Boulder Police for comment outside of regular working hours. Police officers investigate the attack in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday. Police officers investigate the attack in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday. David Zalubowski/AP This is a breaking story. More to follow.

Can elite universities remain global?
Can elite universities remain global?

Boston Globe

time28 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Can elite universities remain global?

One reason the schools have arguably been caught off guard is less so: They have misread the nation. Advertisement Large and influential swaths of America The globalization of America's universities began decades ago. When Richard Levin assumed the presidency of Yale in 1993, in his inaugural address he stated that 'as we enter the 21st century, we must aspire to educate leaders for the whole world. … We must focus even more on global issues … if we are to be a world university.' For Levin, the mission was clear. In the early 18th century, Yale's mandate was to educate leaders and citizens for the region. 'By the mid-nineteenth century, our compass had become the whole nation,' he said. Now the work would be global. And Yale was far from alone in such ambitions. Advertisement From the establishment of campuses overseas to the creation of research centers and collaborations worldwide and the embrace of international students, many universities have changed dramatically in the years since Levin made those remarks. Today, For years, this embrace of international students was largely seen as in accord with the national interest. Despite pockets of protests, globalization on campus was treated as inevitable — and desirable — in many quarters. Meanwhile, the federal government maintained expansive investment in these universities — to the tune of The assumptions driving the internationalization of America's universities, however, have now changed. Many people no longer believe globalization is good for America. That change is most obvious in the MAGA movement. But the anti-Israel protests tinged with anti-American, anti-Western, and anti-capitalist messages that some international students have helped lead have alienated other Americans as well. Advertisement As a result, many universities have been caught out over their skis. Some now see a heavy international student presence less as a virtue and more as something suspect when it comes to university leaders' motives and wisdom. On university campuses, many faculty would undoubtedly disagree and argue that globalization is still a positive force for America. But with seats scarce at exclusive universities, filling them with international students is seen through a zero-sum lens. Universities may now face a decision. Do they want internationalization or federal support? Both may no longer be an option. The compact between universities and the federal government can only continue if the work of the university is seen as being in lockstep with the national interest. This isn't to say this is the end of global universities. Or of research universities. Minerva University, where I serve on the board of trustees, is unabashedly global. Eighty-five percent of students hail from countries other than the United States. All students live outside the United States for three of their four years. But Minerva doesn't take any federal money, nor is its model built around research. On the other hand, the Highly selective universities may choose to fight to retain federal support and remain global in the hopes that they can weather the next few years. Advertisement But with alternative models and the ascendance of skepticism around the merits of globalization, it seems less clear if this will be a viable strategy.

What to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president

time28 minutes ago

What to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president

WARSAW, Poland -- The final result of Poland's presidential election only became clear after a long, nail-gripping night of counting as both candidates were locked in a near dead heat in the first exit polls after voting ended. Poles awakened Monday to a clear albeit close result that returns a nationalist politician to the presidency who has pledged to hinder the centrist, pro-EU government for the remainder of its term. Here's what to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president: Nawrocki is a 42-year-old historian who had no political experience prior to the campaign and who was not even a party member until he was tapped by the conservative Law and Justice party that governed Poland from 2015 to 2023. Nawrocki heads the Institute of National Remembrance, which embraces nationalist historical narratives. He led efforts to topple monuments to the Soviet Red Army in Poland. Russia responded by putting him on a wanted list, according to Polish media reports. Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic values. Many of them oppose abortion and LGBTQ+ visibility and say Nawrocki reflects the traditional values they grew up with. He was also the preferred favorite of U.S. President Donald Trump, with the American conservative group CPAC holding its first meeting in Poland last week during the campaign to give him a boost. Kristi Noem, the U.S. Homeland Security Secretary and a prominent Trump ally, strongly praised him and urged Poles to vote for him. His campaign echoed themes popular on the American right. A common refrain from his supporters is that Nawrocki will restore 'normality,' as they believe Trump has done. U.S. flags appeared at his rallies. Nawrocki performed better in the first round than expected, an indication he was underestimated in the polling. Nawrocki's quick political rise has not been without controversy, with reports linking him to underworld figures whom he met while boxing or working as a hotel security guard in the past. Nawrocki has also been linked to a scandal involving the acquisition of a Gdansk apartment from an elderly pensioner named Jerzy. Allegations suggest Nawrocki promised to care for Jerzy in return but failed to fulfill the commitment, leading the man to end up in a publicly funded retirement home. His shifting explanations raised questions about his transparency and credibility. After the scandal erupted he donated the apartment to a charity. It recently emerged that Nawrocki took part in a 2009 Gdansk brawl involving about 140 rival soccer fans, some later convicted of crimes. Nawrocki described the fight as a form of 'noble' combat. Polish media have also reported on his connections to gangsters and the world of prostitution. His critics say all of these things make him unfit to represent Poland as the head of state but many right-wing voters don't believe the allegations and accuse the media of using its power to hurt him, creating what appears to be a rallying effect around him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store