Financial adviser debarred after using cousin's signed documents to steal R300,000 from her investment account
A former financial service provider at Accredinet Financial Solutions was debarred after she took R300,000 from her cousin's investment account without her knowledge.
In August 2024, Accredinet made the decision to bar Danielle du Plessis from providing financial services due to her failure to demonstrate honesty and integrity.
She used previously signed documents to carry out a transaction on Mellisa Khan's Stanlib investment account, transferring R300,000 into her own account and utilising the funds for her personal gain.
The company became aware of du Plessis's scheme in August 2024 after Khan wrote an email to Accredinet employee, Christine Edwards asking that her cousin is denied access to her accounts.
"Please can you urgently stop any access by adviser Danielle du Plessis to my investments as I have become aware that she has been withdrawing funds from my investments without my knowledge or consent using my electronic signature...
"Danielle du Plessis is my cousin and I trusted her and her financial advice completely, but I have never given her my banking password or pin, nor have I ever used an electronic signature. I became suspicious when I asked her repeatedly for tax certificates that were not forthcoming.
"Furthermore, she advised me to move R300,000 on March 6, 2024, from my Stanlib investment to a new Sanlam Glacier through Accredinet, which I have subsequently confirmed with Sanlam Glacier that such an investment does not exist. I am using this email as I believe that she has hacked my email address as well," read the email.
Without hesitation, Edwards called du Plessis informing her about Khan's allegations and during the conversation, du Plessis confirmed that she was related to Khan and said the money was a loan which she intends to pay back.
She went on to explain that she was facing some financial challenges and was looking to purchase a car. Khan agreed to let her withdraw a portion of the R300,000 that was originally meant for investment in the Sanlam Glacier.
She explained that the agreement fell apart after a family matter arose, leading to Khan's frustration upon discovering that she had taken all the money. Khan then demanded that all the funds be returned within two weeks, a request that du Plessis indicated she was unable to fulfill.
However, her explanation was not satisfactory as Khan never signed the documents releasing the money.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Twins denied bail in Durban court for the murder of Prasa manager Jacob Khoaele
The Durban Magistrate's Court has refused bail for twins accused of killing a Prasa boss. Image: File Twin brothers, who are accused of killing Jacob Khoaele, the regional manager of Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), over a tender, had their bail application denied by the Durban Magistrate's Court on Friday afternoon. The court found that the twins failed to provide exceptional circumstances warranting their release. Khoaele was shot dead on January 22, 2025, at La Lucia, while returning from his grandchild's school meeting. Vukani Mchunu, Vukile Mchunu, Sandile Sakhile Ngcobo, and Mthandeni Cele are charged with his murder. On Friday, the twins, Vukani and Vukile, applied for bail while Ngcobo and Cele decided to abandon it. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In their application, the twins from Ngonyameni in Mlazi said they are 35 years old and co-own a company, Masoloma Trading. Their lawyer, Musawenkosi Mkhize, said the twins are married, with Vukani having six children and Vukile having five. He said they also co-own a property worth R700,000 and cars, which include a Ford Ranger bakkie and a Mercedes-Benz. They both stated that they are breadwinners who earn approximately R35,000 a month. He said their employees were not paid their salaries due to their incarceration, and that is why they should get bail. Mkhize said it was an exceptional circumstance that his clients were running a company. Additionally, he said his clients were traditional healers who also ran a church. Mkhize said his clients should get bail because the State has a weak case against them. 'How are the two applicants linked? The incident occurred around January this year. The number of months has lapsed, arrests were only made in July,' he said. Mkhize said, judging by what the investigating officer is saying in his affidavit, the State relied on one witness, Shange. As he was arguing, Magistrate Siyanda Mlaba asked Mkhize to tell him about the exceptional circumstances of his clients. Senior State prosecutor, Calvin Govender, said it is the onus of the applicants to prove that they have exceptional circumstances, and they have failed to do so. He reminded the court that this was a bail application and that all evidence would be led during the trial. Govender said the police wanted to get their ducks in a row before making an arrest. 'That is why there was a delay,' he explained. He submitted that the State is of the view that there would be interference with the witnesses should the twins get bail. He said the previous manager from Prasa had to resign because of the twins, who wanted to be paid for work that Prasa was not satisfied with. He said Khoale paid with his life because he also refused to pay the twins for work that Prasa was not satisfied with. 'Everyone at Prasa is afraid of the applicants due to the known fact that they threatened their colleague and killed the other,' Govender added. Delivering his ruling, Magistrate Mlaba reminded that the bail was under Schedule 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. He said the accused were facing serious allegations, and further emphasised that this was not a trial but a bail application. Mlaba criticised Mkhize, saying that he said a lot of things but failed to tell the court why his clients should get bail. 'I remember asking him to hit the nail in the hand. I even asked him the definition of exceptional circumstances. But the attorney was not giving what I was expecting. I ended up just keeping quiet,' he said. He said the worst part was that there was no alternative address for the twins should they receive bail. He said the defence failed to tell the court those exceptional circumstances. The matter has been postponed to September 29 for further investigation.
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Former attorney accused of theft, fraud released on R10,000 bail
Former attorney Catherine Wilheminah Papenfus appeared in the Johannesburg specialised commercial crimes court on Thursday on theft and fraud charges. Papenfus, 54, was arrested in Hermanus in the Western Cape on Saturday and was released on bail of R10,000. Between September 2010 and July 2013, Papenfus, who was an admitted attorney and conveyancer, allegedly received instructions from clients for legal assistance. 'The clients, intending to purchase properties, paid money into the attorney's trust account,' Hawks spokesperson W/O Thatohatsi Mavimbela said. 'However the suspect failed to pay the sellers and did not refund the clients.' When the clients failed to trace the attorney they lodged complaints with the Fidelity Fund for a refund and Papenfus was struck off the roll of attorneys. Her case was postponed to September 16.
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Letter to Mahlamba Ndlopfu — standards of bribes have plummeted in South Africa
Ah, Chief Dwasaho! This week, the ANC's Integrity Commission (what integrity?) cleared King Paul Mashatile of the Alex Mafia nation of corruption allegations relating to his 'family homes'. No case existed to begin with. Is this the time to say: I told you so – or is it too early? Integrity Commission finds no fault… Shock! Horror! Gasp! According to eNCA, 'the ANC's integrity commission has cleared the party's Deputy President, Paul Mashatile, of any wrongdoing concerning his luxury homes'. What law was supposedly broken by spending a night – or perhaps several years – with the in-laws? One is tempted to ask: can the mere fact of maternal hospitality constitute prosecutable misconduct? Surely not. The law of evidence should not be twisted into a pretzel to suit weak gossip, nor should the ANC display such feeble moral imagination as to call this a scandal. You'd think there would be a law against unethical behaviour and a criminal offence for serious misunderstandings of our legal system. But sadly, no such legislation exists – so spare us the dramatics, the moral grandstanding, and the moral panics. His Deputyship is a man of high moral standing. He once told the 'now-disgraced' broadcaster, JJ Tabane, the unvarnished truth: 'I don't steal, I've never been involved in corruption.' I have no doubt he was right. I see no reason to believe that poorly educated journalists with sleeping problems, an affinity for adult beverages, and, some might say, poor judgement in choosing life partners, can hold a man – or men – to account. Who guards the guardians? Guardians, bribes and Dior bags Speaking of guardians, my esteemed colleague Pieter-Louis Myburgh swears he's delivered what could be the first exposé to catch a bribe recorded on video. The stars of this production? The recently suspended Independent Development Trust (IDT) CEO, Tebogo Malaka, and the entity's smooth-talking spokesperson, Phasha Makgolane. For the record, the IDT is a proud entity of the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure – yes, that very department which delivers on its promises with all the speed and efficiency of a one-legged tortoise on crutches. It appears Malaka has developed a sizeable property portfolio, including a R16-million mansion tucked neatly inside Gauteng's Waterfall Country Estate. And of course – courtesy of… well, you see, I have a weak heart, a single loving wife, type 2 diabetes, an unpaid bond, and 10 children who depend on me. In other words, I'm in no position to be sued. Death of corruption with class Still, the standards of bribes have plummeted in this country: R60,000, stuffed into a white Dior shopping bag and slipped into a white envelope – note, not the classic, respectable brown – handed over in broad daylight at a wine farm restaurant. That alone should have been the first red flag. The second? Conducting the handover at an outdoor table, in full view of fellow diners, as if corruption were now an Olympic spectator sport. Now, everyone knows bribes are meant to be exchanged in dull, smoke-filled, dimly lit rooms overrun with the gentle soundtrack of pole dancers, political crosstitutes, cross-dressers, prostitutes, drug dealers and well-built, tall Nigerian bouncers with menacing, bloodshot eyes. Men, in various stages of intoxication and ill-concealed lust, lean against sticky counters, while drug pushers glide from table to table, making furtive hand signs – two fingers to the nose – signalling that cocaine is on offer. In other words, Pieter-Louis was dealing with amateurs. And really, R60,000? What an insult. You attempt to bribe a youngish white male born after apartheid – no land, no farm, no guaranteed job – with R60,000, when a single bottle of Glenfiddich 50-year-old was going for R600,000 in Makro's festive-season catalogue in November 2023. Bribing in instalments: A 24-month, no-interest deal The amount of money exchanged is the kind of offer you make when trying to buy a second-hand 1912 Toyota Corolla with one missing hubcap. Worse, my leader, they promised Pieter-Louis regular R100,000 payments and easy access to IDT tenders… But here's the punchline: he'd have to do the work himself. Organise the contractors, submit the paperwork and launch a foundation to process the kickbacks before withdrawing the cash, leaving a paper trail thicker than the Zondo Commission's final report. What sort of bribery syllabus is this? 'How to Incriminate Yourself 101'? At this rate, the next bribe will be handed over at a Woolworths checkout counter, wedged between a rotisserie chicken and a packet of organic baby spinach. If IDT head honchos can't even organise a bribe with a bit of class, perhaps it's time they subcontracted the job to the real professionals – the ones who still believe in the brown envelope, a dingy club and the bouncer who knows when to look away. Public service announcement To all aspiring State Capturers, tenderpreneurs and amateur bribers – do not, under any circumstances, attempt to bribe anyone in instalments. It is bad form, unbecoming of the grand South African tradition, and frankly insulting to your intended target. Now, everyone understands there are rules. Bribes, like ANC branch annual general meetings and their elective conferences, require a ceremony of the disgraced. Instead, these two chose a Sunday afternoon in the Cape Winelands, perhaps thinking the chardonnay would pair well with their criminal intent. Bloody idiots. Comrades, at least have the decency to do it properly: one payment, no paper trail, and preferably somewhere without a wine list and cameras. Of bribes, low class and no manners On the subject of bribes, many moons ago, a journalist walked into my office at the legislature, where I was serving as a media liaison officer. He was a familiar face – the kind of reporter who was practically part of the furniture in the media gallery. Without ceremony, as he lowered himself into the chair opposite me, I calmly closed my laptop and flipped my documents facedown. In those days, this was a standard practice, part of what the then National Intelligence Agency said was 'protocol'. We exchanged the usual pleasantries and small political talk. Then he got to the point. He claimed to have a mobile broadcast truck that could revolutionise our media coverage in community radio. I nodded politely, letting him make his case. And then came the hook: if I gave his company the job (tender), we would 'share the spoils'. Imagine walking past tight security, through the body scanner, into my office, and proposing a bribe without even an imvula mlomo to sweeten the deal – not so much as a courtesy cold beer or even a token gesture like a Glenfiddich 12-year-old. Just the raw, unseasoned proposition, slapped onto my desk like a resignation letter. Covert operation or the dumbest criminals? I looked him squarely in the eye and delivered the classic ANC denial: 'I do not sit in tender committees.' He stood up and left, an egg on his face – clearly runny, dripping, and visible from across the corridor. I threw my hands in the air, defeated, displeased, disillusioned, disheartened, disgusted, and frankly disturbed. What on Earth gave him the idea that I was bribeable? Was this a loyalty test, or was I on some underground BlackBerry Messenger list of 'low-maintenance' targets? The audacity haunted me for years. In the old political underworld, such an approach would have been carefully choreographed: a discreet third-party intermediary, a plausible cover story, and a brown envelope slipped under a desk marked 'Confidential.' But here was a man pitching corruption like a Makro clearance sale – blunt, artless, shame-free. I could not decide which was worse: his insult to my principles or the craft of bribery itself. If you're going to try to buy my silence, at least have the professional courtesy to follow the rules of the game. This, Comrades, was corruption without class. My leader, askies. I read in the news that the pipe-smoking former president, Thabo Mbeki, has joined forces with the FW de Klerk Foundation, other foundations and the Freedom Front Plus to snub the National Convention – the supposed launchpad for the National Dialogue. What common cause does Mbeki have with the apartheid apologists? Is it now a bridge too far to bribe the foundations? Neither Woolworths nor Makro offered financial or material support for this article. No bribes were paid or accepted, no animals harmed, and no journalists killed, as in Gaza.
