logo
Scathing audit finds L.A. homeless spending lacks oversight, accountability

Scathing audit finds L.A. homeless spending lacks oversight, accountability

Yahoo08-03-2025

Homeless programs funded by the city of Los Angeles are a virtual black hole when it comes to oversight and tracking of outcomes, a court-ordered, independent audit has found.
The audit, released on Thursday, was conducted by Alvarez & Marsal, a global consulting firm. It looked at four years of homeless services managed by the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) from June 1, 2020, through June 30, 2024.
A&M said it encountered information gaps and incomplete data that hindered its ability to assess the results of approximately $2.3 billion in homeless spending over that time period.
'Such gaps in documentation complicated efforts to track expenditures comprehensively, highlighting the need for more accurate recordkeeping within LAHSA's financial and performance oversight processes,' A&M said in its executive summary.
In many instances, auditors found that independent contractors operated under vague arrangements with weak oversight, and the money they received couldn't be properly accounted for.
In one example, A&M's team found inconsistencies with the 'exit rate' of homeless individuals into permanent housing during the 2023-24 fiscal year.
'A sample of sites reported a median permanent housing exit rate of approximately 22.0%, whereas 47.8% of exits resulted in a return to homelessness, exceeding the rate of exits to permanent housing,' the report stated.
Auditors also found that LAHSA frequently approved payments to contractors before verifying that services were provided.
Responding to A&M's report, Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez labeled LAHSA a 'modern-day Titanic.'
'The audit's findings confirm what I've repeatedly warned about—billions have been wasted on homelessness without oversight, accountability, or results,' Rodriguez told KTLA on Friday. 'For over a year, I've pushed legislation to end this failed arrangement, while my colleagues have stalled for more than a year, pouring taxpayer dollars into a system and programs that continue to fail. This blatant mismanagement reflects leadership failure and it is time to untether the city from this modern-day Titanic known as LAHSA.'
Dkt-870-AM-DraftDownload
The L.A. Times obtained a statement from LAHSA acknowledging the 'siloed and fragmented nature of our region's homeless response' for the oversight and accountability issues.
The audit was ordered by U.S. District Judge David O. Carter and stemmed from a 2020 lawsuit filed by the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights. The Alliance, comprised of local business owners and 'concerned residents,' alleged the city had failed to protect public health and safety by allowing rampant homelessness.
The suit was settled in 2022, but the group has accused the city of failing to live up to the terms, which included providing more beds and housing.
On her first day in office in 2022, Mayor Karen Bass declared a state of emergency on homelessness and launched her hallmark Inside Safe program. Among its goals is to dramatically lower the cost of building affordable and temporary housing, get people off the streets and provide them with various services.
According to the program's website, nearly 3,900 homeless individuals have 'moved indoors' since the mayor took office, and 878 have found permanent housing. The latest point-in-time count found more than 75,000 people living on the streets of L.A. in 2024.
The mayor's office did not immediately respond to KTLA's request for comment on the audit.
California Governor Gavin Newsom, who once threatened to withhold homeless funds from cities and counties, has pushed for greater accountability.
'This reaffirms the state's prior findings that local governments need to do a better job of tracking homelessness spending,' Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, told KTLA. 'That's why Governor Newsom has implemented new, strict accountability measures to increase accountability and ensure every dollar is spent effectively.'
Gallegos directed the public to visit accountability.ca.gov to track spending on homelessness and affordable housing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

£10k in cash savings earning peanuts? Considering these dividend stocks could mean a ton of passive income
£10k in cash savings earning peanuts? Considering these dividend stocks could mean a ton of passive income

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

£10k in cash savings earning peanuts? Considering these dividend stocks could mean a ton of passive income

UK interest rates have been coming down recently. As a result, the rates on savings accounts have been falling too. The good news is that it's still possible to generate substantial passive income with dividend stocks. Here's a look at two UK stocks that offer chunky yields at present and could be worth considering as income investments today. First up, we have HSBC (LSE: HSBA). It's a global leader in the banking space. This is my favourite UK banking stock (even though I don't own it personally today). I like it because it's globally diversified and has exposure to high growth areas such as Asia and wealth management. For the 2025 financial year, analysts expect HSBC to reward investors with dividends of around 67 cents per share. That translates to a yield of about 5.7% at today's share price and exchange rate (income of approx. £285 per year on a £5,000 investment). Dividend coverage (the ratio of earnings per share to dividends per share) is expected to be around two. That's healthy and indicates that there's a low chance of a dividend cut in the near term. It's worth pointing out that banking can be a turbulent industry at times. So with a stock like this, investors need to expect some share price volatility. If one is willing to hold the stock for five years, however (which is generally the minimum recommended time to own a stock), I think there's potential for solid total returns (dividend income and capital gains). Next, we have M&G (LSE: MNG). It's a UK savings and investment company. It's not the most exciting company in the world. But it has a good track record when it comes to paying dividends and it offers a high yield at present. Indeed, for 2025, analysts expect M&G to reward investors with a payout of 20.6p per share. That translates to a yield of about 8.6%. On a £5,000 investment, that works out at around £430 income per year. Dividend income is never guaranteed, however, and investors should note that the dividend coverage ratio here is a little on the low side at around 1.3 (signalling that there's a chance of a dividend cut at some stage). Like HSBC, M&G operates in an industry that can be volatile at times. When financial markets get turbulent, the company's share price can swing around wildly as investors worry about future profitability. This company has stood the test of time though, having been around for over 150 years. So, I think it's worth considering as an income play. It's worth pointing out that when investing for income, it's smart to own at least 15 different stocks. Owning just one or two is quite risky. If one had £10,000 to deploy, it wouldn't be smart to put it all into just two stocks. This could lead to disappointing returns if one (or both) of the stocks experienced some problems. Thankfully, there are lots of great dividend stocks on the London Stock Exchange today. If you're looking for more investment ideas, you've come to the right place. The post £10k in cash savings earning peanuts? Considering these dividend stocks could mean a ton of passive income appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Edward Sheldon has positions in London Stock Exchange Group. The Motley Fool UK has recommended HSBC Holdings and M&g Plc. HSBC Holdings is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025

Forecast: in 1 year, the Vodafone share price could turn £1,000 into…
Forecast: in 1 year, the Vodafone share price could turn £1,000 into…

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Forecast: in 1 year, the Vodafone share price could turn £1,000 into…

The Vodafone (LSE:VOD) share price is off to a decent start in 2025, climbing by almost 12%, putting it ahead of its parent index. That's certainly a welcome change of pace compared to the downward trajectory the business has been on since early 2022. And looking at its latest results, this performance is also backed up by improving financials. Operations in Africa continue to grow rapidly by double-digits as the adoption of its mobile payment solution, M-PESA, captures further market share. Growth in the UK is now set to reignite thanks to the recently completed merger with Three, and performance across Europe's also bouncing back (with the exception of Germany). At the same time, higher free cash flow generation, along with non-core disposals, has paved the way for further debt reduction, improving the health of the balance sheet. And when excluding non-cash impairment charges, operating profits during the 12 months leading to March 2025 jumped 12% from €3.67bn to €4.1bn. Needless to say, this is all pretty encouraging news. And it seems CEO Margherita Della Valle's efforts to right the ship are finally starting to bear fruit. So if this turnaround continues, how much money could investors make from the recovery by buying £1,000 worth of shares today? The progress made so far has helped boost institutional analyst sentiment towards this business. While most continue to be cautious with a Hold recommendation, like the team at Barclays, some are more bullish. For example, UBS sees the fair value of Vodafone shares at 120p by this time next year if the firm can achieve its expected post-merger with Three operational efficiencies. JP Morgan seems to have drawn a similar conclusion with a price target of 110p, citing the incoming cost savings from the ongoing restructuring and expected performance boost in the UK market. If these projections prove accurate, a £1,000 investment today could be worth up to £1,564 within the next 12 months. As previously mentioned, not every institutional analyst is as optimistic as UBS or JP Morgan. Going back to Barclays, the banking giant has highlighted its concerns about competitive pressures in Germany – a fear shared by Goldman Sachs. According to their analysis, the fair value of the Vodafone share price is between 75p and 85p, which is roughly in line with where the stock currently trades. So which analysts should investors listen to? The group's weak performance in Germany is problematic. Vodafone has been losing market share for a number of years. Competitors have been offering cheaper alternatives at a seemingly higher quality based on customer reviews. Under Della Valle, client attrition in Germany has slowed (excluding the recent regulatory changes surrounding bulk TV contracts). Management's now allocating capital to improve the quality of customer services as well as accelerate the rollout of 5G & Fibre in the pursuit of boosting its net promotor score. On paper, this strategy sounds sensible. But whether it can be successfully executed remains a big question mark. And with 40% of underlying earnings stemming from this market, a failure to get Germany back on track could significantly adversely impact the business even if other markets continue to perform well. With that in mind, I'm leaning more towards the side of caution and keeping this business on my watchlist. The post Forecast: in 1 year, the Vodafone share price could turn £1,000 into… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Zaven Boyrazian has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Barclays Plc and Vodafone Group Public. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Dan Rather's Defense Of A Gay Rights Icon Against Pete Hegseth Is Going Viral
Dan Rather's Defense Of A Gay Rights Icon Against Pete Hegseth Is Going Viral

Buzz Feed

time15 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Dan Rather's Defense Of A Gay Rights Icon Against Pete Hegseth Is Going Viral

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told the Navy to rename a ship named after iconic civil rights leader Harvey Milk. For those who don't know, Harvey Milk was one of the first openly gay elected officials in US history and a pioneering gay rights activist. In 1977, he was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, where he promoted anti-discrimination laws/LGBTQ rights before being assassinated in 1978. Harvey served as an officer in the US Navy during the Korean War before being forced to leave the military because of suspicions about his sexual orientation. A ship was named after him in 2016. Now, ABC news reports an official told them the renaming of the ship during Pride Month was intentional. Veteran journalist Dan Rather posted a response on Facebook, and it's going mega viral. Here it is: The comments are one of the rare areas online lately not full of garbage: "Kind of a backhanded compliment! Now I know who he is and why the Navy honored him in the first place," one person commented. "They say they want to promote a 'warrior culture.' Milk was most definitely a warrior, as well as a decorated Navy veteran," another person said. And this person joked, "Could we then rename the Titanic the Hegseth?" Then there are a bunch of people who said the post caused them to look up Harvey Milk for the first time. "I never knew of Harvey Milk. Thank you, Hegseth for educating me about this great American hero," one person wrote. "I didn't know that the U.S. Navy had a ship named after Milk. Now I do," another person commented. And this person said, "I didn't even know that Mr. Milk was a veteran, but now I do!" I guess it's working!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store