Student overcomes severe spinal injury to graduate with first class degree
During a tackle, he felt a pain down his right arm which became worse when he got home.
Scans revealed Mr Wills-Johnson had suffered a herniated disc in his neck.
This meant the cartilage between two of his vertebrae had prolapsed, pushing against his spinal cord.
'The doctors told me that without treatment, the excruciating electric shocks would continue and I could end up paralysed if I risked playing contact sport again,' he said.
'It was hard to hear, but I had to face the reality of it.'
He underwent emergency surgery and doctors removed the cartilage between his fifth and sixth vertebrae.
'They replaced it with titanium and screwed it in place. It was frightening but I knew I had no choice,' he said.
The surgery stopped the progression of the injury but his recovery has been far from easy.
Two and a half-years later, the University of Bristol student still suffers chronic nerve pain in his arm.
Surgeons told him he could not play American football again, and he has moved into coaching.
He returned as coach and vice president of the university's team, Bristol Barracudas.
'I couldn't play but I still loved being involved with the team,' he said.
'I became a coach, and I started the flag football team – a form of non-contact American football to help injured players back in so they could train doing something that's slightly less risky and get their strength back up.
'It wasn't the same as playing but I was able to stay connected to the sport and the community that meant so much to me.'
Growing up in Gloucestershire, Mr Wills-Johnson was the first in his family to attend university and he has now graduated with a first class master's degree in biological sciences.
'I've loved my time at Bristol. I felt that I've fully taken part in all the different facets of university life,' he said.
'I want to thank all the people who made my university experience what it was.
'From the academics and coaches who helped me to the friends I made along the way, you've all been amazing. I will always be grateful for my time here.
'Life will always give you setbacks but by showing resilience you can bounce back from the challenges and make the most of your situation.
'From rock bottom, the only way is up.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
British state has a shameful record of moral cowardice
Consider the infected blood scandal, victims of which are only now able to access the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme. From the 1970s to the 1990s, over 30,000 NHS patients were infected with HIV and hepatitis C by infected blood or clotting factor products, killing at least 3,000 people. The history of this scandal is marked by stubbornness and cover-ups from the outset. In the 1970s, American scientists, including Judith Graham Pool, a pioneer in haematology, were characterising the products infecting patients with hepatitis C as 'dangerous' and 'unethical'. The World Health Organization was warning the UK not to import blood from countries with a high prevalence of hepatitis. They were ignored. So too were doctors like Spence Galbraith, the founding director of the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre in England and Wales, who warned the Government in 1983 that blood products may be transmitting HIV. An NHS pamphlet for blood donors distributed in September 1983 stated that HIV could 'almost certainly' be transmitted by blood products, and the consensus among haemophilia physicians by this point was that blood products were spreading AIDS. Despite that, Ken Clarke, then the Health and Social Care Secretary, made statements to the House of Commons that the evidence was inconclusive and maintained the policy of importing untreated blood products. In the decades since the Government settled out of court, in 1990, with claimants who had been infected with HIV by untreated blood products, inquiries were repeatedly denied and evidence destroyed. In 2000, Caroline Flint revealed to Parliament that papers had been destroyed related to both the HIV litigation and the litigation over hepatitis C infections. In 2009, the Archer Report – a privately-funded investigation into the scandal chaired by Lord Archer, a former Solicitor General – reported that 'some of those who gave evidence to us suspected that there was an exercise in suppressing evidence of negligence or misconduct,' and that one witness, Lord Jenkin, Health Secretary from 1979 to 1981, had been 'left with the clear impression […] that all the files bearing upon the issue of contaminated blood products had been destroyed, and that this had been done 'with intent, in order to draw a line under the disaster.'' Read more by Mark McGeoghegan The 2015 Scottish Government-commissioned Penrose Inquiry into the scandal north of the Border was branded a whitewash by victims and campaigners, after it concluded that little could have been done differently, which is untrue, looking at the timeline of warnings, and refused to apportion any blame. Even when a full inquiry was undertaken, it was discovered that hundreds of documents related to the scandal had been removed from archives by Department of Health and Social Care staff and not returned, sparking renewed concerns about a cover-up. As recently as 2023, the Government was still attempting to prevent the implementation of a compensation scheme. The final inquiry report was published last May, concluding that the scandal could have been avoided, that patients were knowingly exposed to 'unacceptable risks', and that the Government and NHS did indeed attempt a cover-up by 'hiding the truth'. It would be easy to say that these scandals are relatively rare, if not for the fact that we've just lived through the culmination of the Horizon IT scandal, in which Post Office officials displayed the same stubbornness and aversion to accountability that the NHS did over infected blood products. This sense of entitlement, to a right to avoid scrutiny and accountability, to a prerogative to avoid paying the price for its screw-ups and those of its staff, manifests in other ways, too. Shamima Begum, stripped of her British citizenship despite having been born and raised in London (Image: BBC/PA Wire) What, for example, is the case of Shamima Begum, stripped of her British citizenship despite having been born and raised in London, if not an attempt by the British state to wash its hands of a teenage girl, groomed online by terrorists, who was ultimately our responsibility as a society and the UK's responsibility as a government? And what of efforts to protect British soldiers from being held accountable for war crimes, committed in Northern Ireland, Iraq, and now Afghanistan? Which brings us back to Afghanistan. We know, for example, that in one instance, a UK Special Forces officer who may have been connected to alleged SAS war crimes personally rejected 1,585 resettlement applications from Afghans who may have witnessed those alleged crimes. When Johnny Mercer, then Veterans Minister, raised his concerns with senior officers, one UK Special Forces officer told him that his concerns were offensive – either 'lying to my face', as Mr Mercer put it, or 'so deeply incompetent that he didn't know.' The super-injunction granted to the Government over the Ministry of Defence data leak of the details of thousands of Afghans is an unprecedented, but logical escalation of the British state's tendency towards avoiding scrutiny of its errors. It prevented MPs from holding the Government accountable for the error or overseeing its spending on the secret relocation scheme for those affected. It meant the victims of that leak had no awareness that their personal information was in the hands of people willing to publish those details online, and potentially to sell them to the Taliban. The argument that the super-injunction was needed to prevent the Taliban finding out about the leak doesn't hold water, given reporting this week showing that it continued long past the point it was clear that the Taliban were aware of it. As journalists affected by the super-injunction, like Lewis Goodall, have argued this week, such a super-injunction should never have been granted and should never be granted again. It undermined Parliamentary democracy to cover up a scandal. However, there's a wider, deeply ingrained set of practices in the British state that need to be examined and, ultimately, abandoned to secure a government that's transparent and accountable to those it governs. Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Groundbreaking new method can detect Parkinson's years before symptoms with 98% accuracy
Your dog may be able to tell if you develop Parkinson's disease years before any symptom, a new study suggests. Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurological disorder that primarily affects movement, causing symptoms like tremors, stiffness and slow movement. Currently, this incurable disease can't be diagnosed with a definitive test and most patients do not know they have the condition until symptoms begin. However, now researchers from University of Bristol, UK have found that dogs can smell the signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) through skin swabs with 98 percent accuracy well before any other test. Lead author Dr Nicola Rooney, Associate Professor at Bristol Veterinary School said: 'Identifying diagnostic biomarkers of PD, particularly those that may predict development or help diagnose disease earlier is the subject of much ongoing research. 'I believe that dogs could help us to develop a quick non-invasive and cost-effective method to identify patients with Parkinson's disease.' As of 2025, over 1million Americans suffer from the neurological disorder and a new person is diagnosed with every six minutes, according to American Parkinson Disease Association. Despite mostly affecting older adults aged 65 and above, about 10 percent of people are diagnosed prior to age 40 with young-onset Parkinson's. During early stages of Parkinson's disease, the neurons in the brain responsible for producing a chemical called dopamine begin to slowly break down or die. Dopamine acts as a messenger between the parts of the brain and nervous system that help control and coordinate body movements. The lack of dopamine causes the primary symptoms of the disease to begin appearing including tremors, drooling, cramped or small handwriting, trouble swallowing and a loss of smell. Over time, as the neurons continue to die, the patients also begins to experience a slowness in movement, muscle stiffness, balance problems and begin to show signs of depression. Ultimately, those suffering from Parkinson's may be unable to stand or walk independently and require a wheelchair or are bedridden. They may also require around-the-clock care. Medication can help manage symptoms, but their effectiveness may decrease over time, requiring adjustments to treatment plans. In this study, published in The Journal of Parkinson's Disease, the British researchers trained two dogs, a golden retriever and black labrador. Both animals were given over 200 odor samples to learn how to recognize the difference in smell between skin oil (sebum) samples from individuals with Parkinson's and those without for weeks. Researchers have found that dogs can smell the signs of Parkinson's disease (stock image) The dogs were rewarded when they correctly identified a positive sample or accurately ignored a negative one. In a double-blind trial, where neither the handlers nor researchers knew which samples were which, the dogs were able to recognize nearly all Parkinson's-infected swabs. Moreover, they were also able to detect Parkinson's in swabs from people with multiple health conditions. As a result, the researchers concluded that the disease has a unique scent signature, and dogs could help identify it through subtle changes in the sebum produced by individuals with the disease. This could pioneer a faster, non-invasive way to detect the disease years earlier than current methods allow, experts claimed. Claire Guest, CEO of Medical Detection Dogs, the company that collaborated with the scientists, said: 'We are extremely proud to say that once again, dogs can very accurately detect disease. 'There is currently no early test for Parkinson's disease and symptoms may start up to 20 years before they become visible and persistent leading to a confirmed diagnosis. 'Timely diagnosis is key as subsequent treatment could slow down the progression of the disease and reduce the intensity of symptoms.' Previous research has shown that Parkinson's disease affects the production and composition of sebum in the skin which can lead to an altered odor. Since dogs have a highly developed sense of smell, far superior to humans, they are able to detect these subtle differences in scent and identify signs of the disease earlier than any other evaluation.
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Coca-Cola defends corn syrup after Trump claims he struck cane sugar deal
The Coca-Cola company has defended its use of corn syrup after Donald Trump's claim Wednesday that he had apparently convinced the brand to switch to using sugar cane in its US drinks, as it does in Mexico and the UK. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola,' Trump said in a social media post late Tuesday. 'This will be a very good move by them – You'll see. It's just better!' Initially, the drinks giant responded with a neutral statement of appreciation for 'President Trump's enthusiasm' for Coke, and a vague message about 'new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range' to come. On Thursday, however, the soft drinks company released an additional statement making positive claims about high-fructose corn syrup, a product that some blame for soaring US obesity rates and which has become a target of health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr's 'Make America healthy again' movement. 'The name sounds complex, but high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) – which we use to sweeten some of our beverages – is actually just a sweetener made from corn,' Coca-Cola said in a statement. 'It's safe; it has about the same number of calories per serving as table sugar and is metabolized in a similar way by your body.' It added that the American Medical Association 'has confirmed that HFCS is no more likely to contribute to obesity than table sugar or other full-calorie sweeteners', and said: 'Please be assured that Coca-Cola brand soft drinks do not contain any harmful substances.' In 2023, the AMA released a statement saying it recognized 'that at the present time, insufficient evidence exists to specifically restrict use of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or other fructose-containing sweeteners in the food supply or to require the use of warning labels on products containing HFCS'. Trump's rather abrupt entry into the Coca-Cola sugar debate comes as he struggles to move past a growing controversy over the release of files relating to the disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a one-time friend of Trump's. The president's high consumption of Diet Coke is well-documented, including the installation of a red 'Diet Coke button' near his desk that he can press in order to summon a staff member with the drink. Diet Coke contains neither corn syrup nor sugar cane, but aspartame, a low-calorie artificial sweetener. A switch by Coca-Cola to using sugar cane could trade implications for the $285bn US soft drinks market. Coca-Cola in Mexico is made with cane sugar and packaged in glass bottles. Some is imported into the US, where it sells unofficially as 'Mexican Coke' at a premium over its domestic counterpart. In the 1980s Coca-Cola's US arm changed its formulation to use high-fructose corn syrup, supported by US farming subsidies, and not imported sugar cane subjected to import tariffs. But turning back the clock could prove costly if Trump's high US tariffs on nations that produce sugar cane continue to apply. Trump had previously clashed with the company over voting access in Georgia, where the company is based. But ahead of his second inauguration as president in January of this year, the company's CEO, James Quincey, presented Trump with an inaugural Diet Coke bottle.
