2007's Fastest Car Was Just Crushed by Monster Trucks and Fed to Mecha Godzilla
The latest car news, reviews, and features.
Twenty years ago, Bugatti set the world production car top speed record with the then-new Veyron, at 253.81 mph. Just two years later, Washington-based SSC—a company which hadn't even been around a decade by that point—claimed the honor for itself, notching 256.14 mph with its Ultimate Aero supercar. Fast forward to today, and the very car that set that record is a tangle of scrap metal and carbon fiber. Last week, it was demolished by a monster truck, before a fire-breathing robot dinosaur on tank treads ripped it apart and torched the remains. What happened?
This all went down during the 'Thunder at the Mountain' monster truck event at Richland, Washington's Tri-City Raceway over the weekend. Images on social media show the former record holder being lined up for destruction, as well as the aftermath. Freddy 'Tavarish' Hernandez was among the first to share the news on Saturday and, according to his Facebook post, 'Apparently the owner was so displeased with SSC that he donated the historic car to the racetrack, as long as it was thoroughly destroyed with no exceptions.'
We can't speak on that, but The Drive was able to get in touch with SSC North America founder and CEO Jerod Shelby, who told us that SSC 'hasn't owned that particular car in over 10 years,' and the company 'certainly didn't have anything to do with this monster truck event.' Shelby called it 'a shame.' You can see footage of the mechanical T-Rex feasting on the supercar below.
'That car was part of automotive history and also had an amazing story behind its lead up to the 2007 Guinness World Record and the amazing gentleman, Chuck Bigelow (who has since passed away), who piloted the car back then for that amazing record,' Shelby told The Drive . Bigelow died in a plane crash just a year after his SSC top speed run; he was 72.
The Ultimate Aero destroyed last weekend wasn't a running machine, Shelby said. 'That car had been a non-functioning museum piece for the last several years, but I can't imagine why anyone would want to destroy a vehicle of that stature. But, even with the knowledge of this unfortunate news, it still can never take away the amazing memories that particular car created for us in the early days of the SSC journey!' Seen here around the time of its record run, the SSC Ultimate Aero used a 6.3-liter, twin-turbo Chevy V8 that made 1,183 horsepower and 961 lb-ft of torque. SSC
There's still undoubtedly more to this story than what we know, so if the final owner of the record-setting Ultimate Aero would like to tell us why they chose to donate it to a monster truck rally, drop us a note at tips@thedrive.com. In the meantime, we're going to be a little sad that this piece of automotive history has met its end in one of the least dignified manners imaginable, though at least it gave kids smiles and laughter on the way out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
2 hours ago
- TechCrunch
Tesla's robotaxis have already caught the attention of federal safety regulators
Federal safety regulators have reached out to Tesla a day after the automaker began providing rides in its branded robotaxis in Austin. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration contacted Tesla after numerous videos posted online appear to show Tesla robotaxis violating traffic laws in South Austin, where the company is providing rides to invited customers. Bloomberg was the first to report that NHTSA reached out to Tesla. NHTSA confirmed to TechCrunch that is has contacted the automaker. 'NHTSA is aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information,' the company said in an emailed statement. 'NHTSA will continue to enforce the law on all manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment, in accordance with the Vehicle Safety Act and our data-driven, risk-based investigative process. Under U.S. law, NHTSA does not pre-approve new technologies or vehicle systems – rather, manufacturers certify that each vehicle meets NHTSA's rigorous safety standards, and the agency investigates incidents involving potential safety defects. Following an assessment of those reports and other relevant information, NHTSA will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' On Sunday, Tesla began giving paid rides to invited customers in South Austin. The launch, while limited in size and scope, is the first real test of the automaker's autonomous vehicle technology. Tesla does sell its branded Full Self-Driving Supervised software to owners of its vehicles. FSD handles steering and braking when engaged. However, it is considered an advanced driver assistance system that requires the driver to have their hands on the wheel. Tesla robotaxis are equipped with an unsupervised version of FSD, although the company has not provided specific details about this software. The robotaxis, which customers can hail via an app, are meant to drive on their own. Notably, Tesla robotaxis have a human 'safety monitor' sitting in the front passenger seat during these rides. Videos posted online show the Tesla robotaxis driving over the speed limit and in one case, swerving into the wrong lane. TechCrunch reported Sunday that Ed Niedermeyer, author of 'Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors,' who is in Austin to monitor the robotaxi rollout, took video showing a Tesla branded robotaxi suddenly hitting its brakes on two occasions without reason. A video, which TechCrunch has viewed and has since been posted on YouTube, shows that in both instances the Tesla hit the brakes as it approached police vehicles that were located in parking lots adjacent to the roadway.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla could face massive new obstacle as Senate considers controversial new bill: 'Taking away a key element of Tesla's profitability'
Tesla is facing a new potential hurdle, as Senate Republicans have been considering removing an incredibly valuable source of income for the electric vehicle company. According to Forbes, Senate Republicans are considering removing penalties from the Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards. These standards of fuel efficiency require car companies to produce a certain number of fuel-efficient vehicles and receive credits when they do. If they fail to meet production standards on fuel efficiency, they can be subject to strict financial penalties. For companies like Tesla, which only produces EVs, these standards are easily passed, and they load up on credits for every vehicle they produce. For companies like Ford, General Motors, and others who still produce combustion engine cars, it's more difficult. So Tesla can sell their credits to other companies to help keep them in compliance with CAFE regulations and avoid costly penalties. For Tesla, these credits represent an opportunity for pure profit. In fact, according to Forbes, the company made $2.67 billion off the credits in 2024 alone. Gutting those regulations would remove a massive, valuable revenue source for Tesla, at a time when it has struggled to generate revenue consistently. "A key element of Tesla's profitability has been its ability to generate credits because it makes zero emissions, and sell those credits to more polluting car companies like GM and Ford and Stellantis — primarily gas-guzzlers that don't really want to make clean cars," Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, said. "By taking away these credits, they're taking away a key element of Tesla's profitability," he added. But beyond Tesla, removing these penalties from CAFE would essentially remove any teeth from the environmental regulations. There would be no threat to companies that fail to meet the required quotas of efficient vehicles. "It also would essentially turn the CAFE standards into nothing more than a reporting requirement with no consequences for automakers who fail to improve the efficiency of the vehicles they sell," Chris Harto, a senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports, said. The Senate is still deliberating what to do about CAFE regulations; Republicans on the Commerce, Science, and Technology Committee said that removing the penalties could reduce the price of vehicles in the United States, although they did not provide any figures or explain how, and it's unclear if the committee has considered the cost of health care and environmental effects from the resulting pollution should there be fewer EVs replacing gas cars, which are also generally more expensive to maintain and operate. If you care about these environmental regulations (which have been in place since 1975), contact your state senators to push to keep the penalties for non-compliance in place. Do you think EVs are more stylish than gas cars? Definitely No way A few models are Most models are Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 3 defining moments behind Tesla stock's wild ride this year
Simply saying Tesla stock is down 15% this year doesn't do justice to the wild ride it's been on. Shares were up 28% in February before rebounding 23% in May. Tariffs, slowing vehicle sales, and Musk's political dealings have been primarily responsible for the volatility. 2025 has been wild for Tesla shareholders, and it's not even halfway over yet. The EV-maker's stock has been on a roller-coaster ride, with shares dragged sharply lower on multiple occasions by tariffs, slumping car sales, and CEO Elon Musk's involvement with politics. There have also been bright spots, like Tesla's share spike on Monday after officially launching its long-awaited robotaxi service. But it's been anything but a straight path in either direction. A tumultuous February bled into March, with shares falling nearly 50% from highs, then rallying 30% in a matter of weeks. The stock then chopped around for a while before surging 23% in May. June has been a different story, down 6%. The net result? A 20% decline. Feeling whipsawed yet? That's normal for anyone trying to follow Tesla's relentless gyrations. Especially those shareholders who enjoyed a torrid post-election rally, and returns of more than 200% across 2023 and 2024. Despite all the noise around Tesla, its year-to-date stock performance boils down to three main developments that have dictated price action and sentiment. These are detailed below. The sharp declines and volatility in Tesla stock began when Musk — who backed President Donald Trump on the campaign trail — became more entangled in politics. The inflection point came as the Tesla CEO took up a role as a "special government employee" shortly after Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20. This spread fresh concern among investors that his time with the administration was distracting from his duties leading his companies, and shares dropped 37% between the inauguration and the end of March. Shares dropped another 9% in the first week of April, but ended the month 9% higher amid a broader market rebound and Musk's announcement that he would step back from the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk's involvement in DOGE and his cost-cutting spree across the federal government was also seen as impacting Tesla's brand, Wall Street analysts said, pointing to protests, Tesla boycotts, Cybertruck vandalism, and calls from investors for Elon Musk to step down as CEO. In a note in April, analysts at Wedbush Securities pointed to Musk's involvement in the White House and called a "code red" situation for the company. "IF Musk chooses to stay with the Trump White House it could change the future of Tesla/brand damage will grow," the firm said. Big investors, including major pensions, have demanded that Musk spend more time at Tesla, and have pleaded with the board to rein him in. Meanwhile — due to a combination of backlash over Musk's politics and growing international EV competition — Tesla's car sales have tumbled globally. Each new report of declining global sales put pressure on an already-unstable stock. In February, Tesla sales were down 45% year-over-year in Europe, which spurred an 8% single-day share sell-off. In March, Tesla sales were down 59% year-over-year in Germany, and down 12% in China. Tesla sold just over 128,000 vehicles in the US during the first quarter of 2025, a decline of 8% year-over-year. In the EU, vehicle sales dropped 46% from January through April compared to the same period last year, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. In April, Tesla's sales in China dropped another 6% year-over-year, marking the seventh-straight monthly decline, according to the China Passenger Car Association. "In summary, delivery numbers are coming down and growth in the auto business this year may be off the table," analysts at William Blair wrote in a note in March. As sales have dropped, investors are putting their faith in Tesla's coming robotaxi reveal to sustain the rally in the stock since April lows. Most recently, Musk's public spat with Donald Trump has been the stock's most recent headwind. After a four-month honeymoon, Elon Musk and Trump ultimately came to blows over the the Republican tax and spending bill that's currently being marked up in the Senate. Tesla shares cratered 14% on June 5, the day that the feud hit a fever pitch. The two billionaires began a multi-day spat over the "Big Beautiful Bill" that played out publicly on social media. The sell-off intensified as Trump, when speaking to reporters at the White House, said he was "very disappointed" in Musk's reaction. The president also threatened to cancel some government contracts with Musk's firms in a post on Truth Social, and, in a separate post, said that Musk was "wearing thin" and "went CRAZY" after being asked to leave the White House. Finally, Musk and Trump appeared to call a truce. On Friday, Trump said he hoped Musk "does well" with Tesla. Over the weekend, Musk also took down several of his posts on X. On Wednesday, he expressed regret about his posts from the prior week, adding that some of them "went too far." "This is an important step with Musk apologizing for some of his back and forth with Trump that started this battle between the former BFFs. As we said this week, Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk," Wedbush wrote in recent research. Read the original article on Business Insider
