
Yes or no? SA weighs into unbanning corporal punishment
The minister called on citizens to start a dialogue during his budget vote presentation at the National Assembly this week.
Delivering his budget vote at the National Assembly this week, Minister of Correctional Services Pieter Groenewald suggested a debate on reintroducing corporal punishment as a means of preventing prison overcrowding.
The controversial practice was abolished in South African schools in 1996 under the Corporal Punishment Act, and later the South African Schools Act, specifically Section 10.
He later told eNCA: 'It is causing the taxpayer R463 per day per prisoner. And that is why I said we should open the debate. I know that there is certain legislation…but let's hear what the people of South Africa's views are'.
He continued: 'If it is possible that we can use corporal punishment, then we can address part of the overcrowding and we're also going to save the taxpayers' money'.
Groenewald suggested that the practice should be used against those who committed petty offences and could not afford bail.
Corporal punishment was officially outlawed in South African schools, as outlined in the Constitution, which enshrines the right to freedom and security of children, including freedom from violence.
In 2019, the Constitutional Court of South Africa ruled that enforcing the act in schools was 'unconstitutional.'
In its judgement, it referred to research that showed that the practice was 'potentially harmful and part of a wider circle of violence', particularly amid South Africa's 'history of widespread and institutionalised violence'. Should SA unban corporal punishment?
Image via Pixabay
Later, in 2022, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) criticised reports that then Gauteng MEC for Education, Penyaza Lesufi, suggested reviewing policies, including corporal punishment.
It said: 'Corporal punishment increases behavioural problems in children in the long-term and has shown no positive behavioural outcomes.'
On the X platform, South Africans have shared their views on whether corporal punishment should be unbanned in society, whether in schools or prisons.
Popular podcaster Penuel Mlotshwa posted: 'I support Pieter Groenewald. There are people sitting in jail for petty crimes, which strains tax money… but fattens the purses of tenderpreneurs. Those people should get a whipping and be released.
Here's what others had to say…
@nicksta_napo: 'Maybe make it mandatory for people to serve in the military for a specific period, rather than abusing kids at school'.
@UnityInSA: 'We need this. Whatever we had in 30 years is clearly not working. Time to change the system. If a potential criminal does not want to be punished, then he/she must stay away from crime. Its simple'.
@KG_Mulelwa: 'Corporal punishment for petty crimes and death penalty via lethal injection for serious and hideous crimes'.
@Sthamber: 'Corporal punishment takes us back to the bad old days of Apartheid. There should be better ways of dealing with prison overcrowding. South Africa needs to be more innovative'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
6 minutes ago
- IOL News
Didiza defends parliamentary legal services amid Mkhwanazi inquiry scrutiny
National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has emphasised that she has unequivocal confidence in the professionalism, competence, and integrity of Parliament's legal advisory services. Image: Supplied National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza has come to the defence of the parliamentary legal services after it came under scrutiny in the Ad Hoc Committee inquiring into the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. This comes after members of the inquiry were unhappy with remarks made by a member of the legal team that the allegations made by Mkhwanazi were technically not evidence. The remarks have been used as one of the motivations by some MPs to call for the appointment of an external legal counsel to lead evidence in the inquiry. On Thursday, Didiza said she noted with concern certain remarks made during proceedings of the Ad Hoc Committee, questioning the competence and integrity of the legal team assigned to support the committee. She said she has unequivocal confidence in the professionalism, competence, and integrity of Parliament's legal advisory services. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'Parliamentary legal advisers are not merely administrative staff members, they are all highly qualified, admitted legal practitioners, governed by the Legal Practice Act and accountable to professional bodies such as the Legal Practice Council. 'Their work is rooted in principles of ethical conduct, professional responsibility, and the pursuit of justice in support of the constitutional mandate of Parliament.' In apparent reference to the affected legal team member, Didiza said Parliament was privileged to be served by one of the most experienced and competent legal teams in a wide and diverse array of legal expertise. She also said the drafting services and advice provided by the parliamentary legal services have passed the test under the most rigorous legal and constitutional scrutiny. The team has consistently guided the institution with credibility and authority. 'While Members of Parliament may, at times, find certain legal opinions unpalatable or may disagree with them, such opinions are nonetheless based on sound legal reasoning and are always intended to support both committees and the institution as a whole, to act within the framework of the Constitution and the law.' Didiza added that constructive engagement with legal advice was both natural and welcome in a democratic parliamentary setting. 'However, it is profoundly important to distinguish between debating the merits of advice and launching unjustified personal attacks on the integrity or competence of the legal professionals who provide it. 'To cast aspersions on these officers of the court for how they deliver their legal opinions or for their considered advice is not only unfair and unjust to the individuals concerned, but also poses a serious risk to the credibility of Parliament and the integrity of its processes, including those currently before the Ad Hoc Committee.'

IOL News
6 minutes ago
- IOL News
Didiza warns MPs: Respect legal advisers or risk undermining Parliament's credibility
Parliament's legal advisers, governed by strict ethical standards, deserve respect, says Speaker Didiza. She urges MPs to challenge legal opinions constructively, not through personal attacks that erode institutional trust. Speaker of the National Assembly, Thoko Didiza, has come out strongly in defence of Parliament's legal advisory services following questions about their competence and integrity that were raised. ''Their work is rooted in principles of ethical conduct, professional responsibility, and the pursuit of justice in support of the constitutional mandate of Parliament,'' Didiza said in a statement. This comes after remarks were made during proceedings of the Ad Hoc Committee probing allegations by KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi Didiza expressed concern over the nature of some of the comments made during the committee's sessions, describing them as unfair and potentially damaging to the institution's credibility. She said Parliament's legal advisers are not just support staff but are 'highly qualified, admitted legal practitioners, governed by the Legal Practice Act and accountable to professional bodies such as the Legal Practice Council.'

IOL News
36 minutes ago
- IOL News
Durban teenager wins New Zealand's prestigious 'Race Unity Speech Awards'
Jordyn Joy Pillay accepts her trophy for winning the Race Unity Speech Awards, from Deputy Police Commissioner Jill Rogers and Superintendent Rakesh Naidoo. South African-born Jordyn Joy Pillay has captured the national spotlight in New Zealand by clinching the top accolade at the prestigious 2025 Race Unity Speech Awards. Since relocating from Durban to Auckland in March 2023, the 16-year-old grade 12 student at Ormiston Senior College used her experiences as a new migrant to deliver a powerful and poignant message on race, belonging, and the indivisible strength of diversity - a message that resonated strongly with judges and audiences alike. Originally from Phoenix, Durban, Pillay has made a remarkable impact following her family's move to Auckland in March 2023. She delivered her winning speech at the national finals held in Auckland. Out of 150 entries from students across New Zealand, Jordyn's presentation stood out for its compelling metaphor: humanity as the ocean - sometimes tranquil and welcoming, at other times forceful and drowning. The metaphor captured the contradictions of racism and the need for an inclusive society: 'I am the ocean I cannot be read I am calm and soothing and so accepting Come to me… I'll bring you peace. I see no difference. I'm home to fins and feathers, skin and scales… home to many, I freely give. I welcome you warmly. Abide in me.' In reflecting on her speech, Jordyn revealed that, 'diversity must be more than a moment, diversity is everything - it means nothing if we cannot practise what we preach.' This perspective aligns with her broader call for lasting, tangible action to enhance cultural understanding and belonging.