Republican Congress members calls for investigation into Ireland's 'discriminatory' Occupied Territories Bill
Backed by 15 House Republican colleagues, Claudia Tenney sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urging him to investigate whether the legislation violates US anti-boycott law.
It says the Bill is part of the broader global Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which Tenney says 'seeks to economically isolate Israel'.
"Such policies not only promote economic discrimination but also create legal uncertainty for US companies operating in Ireland," the letter states.
Despite the opposition, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said that Ireland is committed to enacting the Bill. 'Consequences'
If enacted, the Bill would ban trade with the Occupied Palestinian Territory and make it an offence to import goods from Israeli settlements in the region.
In a press release, Tenney urged the Department of the Treasury to consider adding Ireland to a list of countries that participate in international boycotts against US allies.
It added that the measure could subject Ireland to disclosure and reporting requirements under Section 999 of the Internal Revenue Code, impacting foreign investment and bilateral trade.
"Ireland's proposed boycott is a blatant attempt to isolate and delegitimise Israel on the world stage," said Tenney.
"This proposed boycott is discriminatory, dangerous, and would violate US law.
"The Treasury Department has the duty to enforce the law, protect American businesses, and hold countries accountable when they promote foreign boycotts against our allies.
"The United States will not stay silent while our allies are targeted by hostile political agendas."
Tenney's letter urged Secretary Bessent to 'send a clear signal that efforts to economically isolate Israel will carry consequences'. 'Genocidal activity'
Addressing the letter while speaking to the Press on Friday, Mr Harris reaffirmed the government's commitment to the legislation.
"Ireland intends to continue to advance our commitment in relation to the Occupied Territories Bill — the Programme for Government is clear in relation to that," he said.
"People in Ireland, people in Europe and people right across the world feel extraordinarily strongly about the genocidal activity that we're seeing in Gaza, about the starving children."
He added: "We intend to advance with our legislation.
"Of course, we'll continue to engage and explain and never allow our position to be misrepresented."
See More: Occupied Territories Bill, Simon Harris
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
13 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
US denounces Europe in scaled back rights report
US President Donald Trump's administration has scaled back a key US government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries, such as El Salvador, that have been strong partners of the Republican president. Instead, the widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report of the US State Department sounded an alarm on the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, with which the US has clashed on a host of issues. Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appeared to have been largely omitted. The US referred to Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the "Russia-Ukraine war." The report's section on Israel was much shorter than last year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza. More than 61,000 people have been killed in Gaza, the Gaza health ministry says, as a result of Israel's military assault after an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023. The report was delayed for months as Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with "America First" values, said government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The report introduced new categories such as "Life" and "Liberty," and "Security of the Person." "There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses," the 2024 report said about El Salvador. That stood in sharp contrast to the 2023 report that talked about "significant human rights issues" and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions. The US's two-way ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Mr Trump took office, as his administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele. His country is receiving $6 million from the US to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison. Critics said the report was politically driven. "The report demonstrates what happens when political agenda stake priority over the facts," said Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of nongovernment organisation A New Policy. "The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system." State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and was no longer an expansive list of "politically biased demands and assertions." She declined to respond to specific questions about countries and did not say why a list of rights abuses in El Salvador was removed. The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional US promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticised countries selectively, in line with its broader policy towards a particular country. One example is Europe, where Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on its politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in countries such as Romania, Germany, and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration. For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated Human Rights Report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy. This year's report was prepared following a major department revamp that included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which takes the lead in writing the report. In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote an opinion piece saying the bureau had become a platform for "left-wing activists," and vowing that the Trump administration would reorient it to focus on "Western values." In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes. This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former president Jair Bolsonaro, among others. Mr Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges that he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Mr Trump has referred to the case as a "witch hunt" and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods. In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened. It said, "South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country." In last year's report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa. Mr Trump issued an executive order this year calling for the US to resettle Afrikaners. He described them as victims of "violence against racially disfavoured landowners," accusations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government. South Africa dismissed the report's findings, and said it was flawed, inaccurate and disappointing. "It is ironic that a report from a nation that has exited the UN Human Rights Council and therefore no longer sees itself accountable in a multilateral peer review system would seek to produce one-sided fact free reports without any due process or engagement," the government said. On Ireland, the report's executive summary said "There were no significant changes in the human rights situation in Ireland during the year."
Irish Daily Star
4 hours ago
- Irish Daily Star
GOP senators warn proposed Republican megabill might do more 'damage' than good
A new "megabill" is reportedly in its early stages at the House, as certain Republicans explained they are unsure about the possible new legislation House Republicans are reportedly proposing another megabill now that Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' was signed into law — but some members of the GOP aren't thrilled about the idea. Last month, Trump's infamous 'big, beautiful bill' was signed into law. Now, Speaker Mike Johnson and other Senate leaders are reportedly working on another megabill that both parties will pass. A White House official reportedly told Politico that a second 'filibuster-skirting reconciliation bill' has been planned during the summer recess season. The official added that the Republican Study Committee allegedly held 'Reconciliation 2.0' group meetings during the Senate's break to think of ideas for the new megabill. According to the outlet, most senators are wary about the bill, still tired from passing the 'big, beautiful bill " in July, and unsure what the next policy package could hold exactly. 'You have to have a reason to do it,' said Sen. Mike Rounds. 'It's not easy to do, so you have to have a purpose for doing it in the first place.' Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo stated he'd consider nearly 200 tax proposals from the Senate that were not included in the first bill. 'Without the pressure, I don't see how you get it done,' one Republican senator told Politico about the possible second package. 'I don't think I see what the pressure is here,' they added. Three sources told the outlet that the White House has not detailed to Republicans the logistics of what it's looking for in the bill. The Irish Star also reached out to the White House for comment. Senators Roger Wicker and Lindsey Graham, the chairs of the Armed Services and Budget committees, said they haven't heard anything from the White House regarding any fall plans or policies. Ted Cruz, the chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, also said he hadn't heard anything from the White House ahead of the fall season. The outlet detailed that Sen. Ron Johnson is leading the push for new legislation, aiming to make more budget cuts after the 'big, beautiful bill.' Earlier this summer, Johnson said. 'Leadership is telling us we'll do one or two more reconciliations in this Congress, so the clock's ticking.' One of the three sources told the outlet that the pressure for a new package is coming from the House rather than the Trump administration, as Budget Chair Jodey Arrington reportedly told lawmakers to try to 'rework' policy cuts into the new bill from the 'big, beautiful bill'. 'My sense is that there's more enthusiasm in the House than in the Senate, and that makes sense,' said Sen. Jerry Moran. 'They can do things with 51 votes anyway; most of what we have to do requires 60. And that means that senators, if you have a desire to actually legislate, need to find ways to legislate, and reconciliation is damaging to that relationship." The outlet added that the Senate is "skeptical" about how this new potential megabill will be successfully created and passed.
The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump's Washington takeover begins as National Guard troops arrive in US capital
SOME OF THE 800 National Guard members deployed by US president Donald Trump began arriving in Washington DC today. It comes after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce crime in what the president called – without substantiation – a lawless city. The influx came the morning after Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. He cited a crime emergency – but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves for at least a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances – right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift from the day before, when Bowser said Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply did not match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in US states, and Ms Bowser said her administration's ability to push back was limited. Military personnel depart the District of Columbia National Guard Headquarters as Trump implements his order to use federal law enforcement and the National Guard in Washington Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi called the Tuesday morning meeting productive in a social media post and said the justice department would 'work closely with the DC city government' to 'make Washington, DC, safe again.' While Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back', Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Advertisement Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasising common ground with the Trump administration on some issues. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives has evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Trump has followed through on months of what many DC officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. Bowser contends that all the power resides with Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office: He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out.
