Archaeologists Discover Roman-Era Weapon, Oldest on Record
The boomerang was discovered in 1985 in the Obłazowa Cave within Poland's limestone cliffs. It was crafted from a woolly mammoth's tusk and was initially believed to be about 18,000 years old, making it the oldest boomerang ever found on record. But a new study published in PLOS ONE has revealed some surprising information.
By using an advanced technique known as Bayesian modeling, Sahra Talamo and her international team of researchers have found that the boomerang likely originated between 42,000 and 39,000 years ago. They determined the date by analyzing the indirect dating of human and animal remains discovered near the boomerang's location.
This dating would make the boomerang older than agriculture itself, having been crafted long before the final peak of the Ice Age. During this time, anatomically modern humans still co-mingled with Neanderthals and were only just starting to develop their own technology. "It's the world's oldest boomerang and the world's only one of this shape and length to be discovered in Poland," Talamo told the BBC.
Due to the boomerang's shape and construction, some questions remain as to whether it was crafted as a weapon or a toy. Some believe it could have been used as both. The shape would have allowed the boomerang to sail far, but it's a 'non-returning' device. Talamo believes that its deliberate construction, as well as fox-tooth pendants adorning the outside, indicate that the boomerang may have had a ceremonial purpose, a hypothesis backed up by its specific burial location. "These are totally clear indicators of behaviors we're unfamiliar with… that are so different from everything we saw in the deeper, Neanderthal-left cultural layers in Obłazowa," co-author Paweł Valde-Nowak told Live Science.Archaeologists Discover Roman-Era Weapon, Oldest on Record first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 6, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Echoes of Old Walls Appear, Briefly, in Britain's Arid Soil
On a grassy expanse at the largest monastic ruins in Britain, a dry scar emerged just days ago in the earth. And at a historic home and ancient priory more than 200 miles to the southwest, patches of brown became visible through grass, as if the ground was trying to recall a half-forgotten memory. But these patches are not paths, past or present. Instead, the lines recall ancient buildings, whose old foundations form these 'parchmarks,' which emerge in dry periods when the grass growing over buried ruins dries at a different rate than in other areas. 'It's almost like a photograph within the landscape itself,' said Chris Gosden, an emeritus professor of European archaeology at the University of Oxford. These parchmarks, which lace across grass like veins on a forearm, have appeared in two British historical sites in recent days, the National Trust, which manages the sites, said on Thursday. They appeared after Britain endured one of its driest springs on record, and are a sign of how the climate crisis is affecting the region. The frequency with which the parchmarks are visible has 'noticeably increased' in recent years, as 'climate change increases the likelihood of hotter, drier weather in spring and summer,' Tom Dommett, the National Trust's head of historic environment, said in a statement. The marks are one sign of how climate change is radically affecting the landscape around the world and, in some cases, revealing hidden history. Melting glaciers in Peru and Nepal have revealed the lost bodies of mountain climbers. Floods in Egypt are corroding the stones of ancient temples. And droughts in Spain, Italy and elsewhere in Europe have brought flooded villages and old ruins back, briefly, into the sunshine. But even as changing weather forces the land to cough up secrets, the climate crisis is also threatening the past that the dirt has protected for generations. 'Overall, climate change is a bad thing for archaeology — even though it may have temporary benefits,' said Dr. Gosden, who partly attributed the increasing visibility of parchmarks to the availability of drones. 'There are things revealed, but the cost to the archaeological evidence, overall, is really considerable.' The marks are useful for archaeologists, even though they reveal the potential dangers to the sites that climate change could continue to bring. The parchmarks at Mottisfont, a historic home and ancient priory in southwestern England, revealed the presence of monastery buildings. Those at Fountains Abbey, which was founded in 1132 by Benedictine monks, showed the outlines of a guest hall. 'It is an exciting and positive aspect to something that's got some quite worrying undertones,' said Mark Newman, an archaeologist at the National Trust, who advises on the abbey in North Yorkshire. At Fountains, the marks were last visible in 2019, he said, and appeared a few other times since 2010. Before that, he said, they emerged in the late 1990s and 1989, but only rarely. And the accelerating frequency of their visibility worries him. That's because climate change can bring periods of extreme heat and also extreme flooding or rains, which can change the actual structure of the soil and cause ruins to shift. 'Should we be horrified? Should we be elated?' he asked, referring to the increasing frequency. 'Probably the answer is a mixture of the two.' The marks show part of a building that was removed in the 1770s. They also show what experts believe was a large guest hall divided into aisles by columns, the National Trust said. Mr. Newman said the guest hall complicates the idea of monks living a secluded, cloistered life. He noted that the monastery would have 'needed accommodation on that sort of scale,' possibly for hundreds of people at a time. The UNESCO world heritage site offers insights into similar communities in Britain, especially because the rapid, bloody rise of Protestantism in the 1500s forced British Catholics underground for generations, Mr. Newman said. Mr. Newman said the climate crisis is forcing some archaeologists to reassess a deep belief that old things are safest when left in the ground. 'If you can no longer be certain that the archaeology is safe, then you need to start thinking about that again,' he said, 'and whether you're better digging it now before you lose it.' Nazaneen Ghaffar, a reporter on the weather team, contributed reporting from London.
Gizmodo
a day ago
- Gizmodo
Doctors Were Worse at Spotting Cancer After Leaning on AI, Study Finds
Artificial intelligence tools have been shown to help doctors detect pre-cancerous growths in the colon—but don't even think about taking those tools away once you've introduced them. A new study published this week in The Lancet found that doctors who are given AI tools to assist with identifying potential cancer risks in patients get worse at making those same observations when they go back to doing it without AI's help. The study looked at four endoscopy centers in Poland, tracking the success rates of detecting colon cancer for three months before AI tools were introduced and three months after. Once AI was introduced, colonoscopies were randomly assigned to either receive AI support or not. The researchers found that doctors who gave colonoscopies without AI after having its assistance available saw their detection rates drop, producing outcomes 20% worse than what they were before AI was introduced. Making the results all the more troubling is the fact that the 19 doctors who participated in the study were all very experienced and had performed more than 2,000 colonoscopies each. If those doctors can fall prey to de-skilling, seeing their own abilities erode because of reliance on AI tools, the outcomes from inexperienced doctors could be even worse. There is little doubt that AI tools can help in medical settings. There have been numerous studies that suggest that AI can facilitate everything from the detection of cancers to the diagnosis of illnesses based on a patient's medical history. Analyzing information based on a whole wealth of previous examples is kinda the bread and butter of AI (you know, as opposed to generating braindead content slop), and there is evidence that suggests that humans can augment their own abilities by using AI tools. Studies in medical settings have found that doctors who use these tools can produce better outcomes for their patients. But no one, including doctors, is immune to the risk of shutting your brain off and relying on AI rather than their own skills. Earlier this year, Microsoft published a study that found knowledge workers who lean on AI stop thinking critically about the work they are doing and feel confident that the assistance from AI will be enough to get the job done. Researchers at MIT similarly found that relying on ChatGPT for essay writing resulted in less critical engagement with the material. In the long term, there's a real risk that reliance on AI will erode our ability to problem solve and reason, which is not ideal when AI continues to generate bad information. The American Medical Association found that about two in three physicians have already adopted AI to augment their abilities. Hopefully, they're still able to identify when it does something like hallucinating a body part that doesn't exist.
New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
How Scientists Are Using Drones to Study Sperm Whales
In the waters off Dominica in the Caribbean, a drone descends from the sky toward a sperm whale. Instead of dropping a tag from above, this drone will press against the whale's back to attach a specialized sensor. The tag's suction cups will stick to the whale's skin, allowing the device to record audio of these marine mammals communicating. The technique, which researchers call tap-and-go, is described in a new study published in the journal PLOS One on Wednesday. The findings demonstrate that the approach is a possible way to gather vital scientific data while minimizing the disturbance to whales. 'This is definitely the future,' said Jeremy Goldbogen, a marine biologist at Stanford University who was not involved with the research. 'It's really exciting to see these new innovations,' he said. Scientists have long used a traditional tagging method that involves standing on a boat's prow and using a 20-foot pole to attach the tag to the whale. But the boat's noisiness and proximity to the whales can cause them stress. The method also takes a lot of time and coordination, said Daniel Vogt, a research engineer at Harvard and the lead author of the study. 'We always wanted to improve this method,' he said of traditional tagging. Drones, in comparison, allow scientists to reach the whale from a distance, and more quickly. 'We want to reduce the disturbance to the animal while improving the quality of the data that we collect,' Mr. Vogt said. In recent years, drone technology has changed the way scientists study whales. Drones offer more than eyes in the sky: They can identify and measure individual whales, compare their behavior at the sea surface and even collect biological samples. By flying through the clouds of vapor, or 'blow,' that whales emit when they surface to breathe, drones can gather information about the whale's genetics, hormones and microbiomes. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
