
B.C. gives green light to LNG pipeline, with no need for new environmental assessment
The Environmental Assessment Office says it has determined the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission pipeline has 'substantially started,' fulfilling a requirement of the 2014 certificate and allowing the project to proceed without a new assessment.
The original approval was for a roughly 900-kilometre pipeline between Hudson's Hope in northeastern B.C. and Lelu Island near Prince Rupert, the site of a liquefied natural gas processing facility that has since been cancelled.
The pipeline was purchased by the Nisga'a Nation and Texas-based Western LNG last year to supply natural gas to the proposed Ksi Lisims LNG facility, a project the province says is still undergoing environmental assessment.
The province says the office is also reviewing requests by the proponent to change the pipeline route, including shifting its end point to the Ksi Lisims facility and rerouting the eastern portion of the pipeline.
The BC Greens say in a statement that upholding the original certificate is 'reckless,' prioritizing the project's American financial backers over Indigenous rights, environmental protection and community well-being.
'It's outrageous that the government is allowing construction to proceed with no approved terminus, using an outdated plan, and threatening one of the province's most sensitive salmon habitats, all to serve the interests of foreign-owned fossil fuel companies,' the Greens' interim leader, Jeremy Valeriote, says in the statement.
'This is a betrayal of environmental stewardship, Indigenous rights, and a threat to sustained climate action in this province,' Valeriote says.
The pipeline is partly financed by the U.S. private equity firm Blackstone, which the Greens described as a major Republican donor with ties to U.S. President Donald Trump.
The Greens' statement also noted that the U.S. engineering and construction company Bechtel had been selected to construct the pipeline.
Western LNG called the substantially started ruling 'a significant milestone in the path toward delivering responsible, Indigenous-led energy infrastructure' in B.C.
Eva Clayton, president of the Nisga'a Lisims Government, says in a statement released by Western LNG that the ruling was 'an important step — not just for (the pipeline), but for the Nisga'a Nation's vision of self-determination and long-term prosperity.'
The project is opposed by the nearby Lax Kw'alaams Band and Ts'msyen hereditary chiefs, who the Greens say claim jurisdiction over Pearse Island, the site of the proposed Ksi Lisims terminal. Gitanyow hereditary chiefs have also opposed the project based on concerns over Nass River salmon, the Greens add.
Thursday's statement from the province says the Environmental Assessment Office began its review last November in order to make a determination of whether the project had been 'substantially started' within the 10-year deadline.
It says the office looked at construction and other activities by the proponent up to the deadline of Nov. 25, 2024, and found the condition was met.
The review included a field assessment of the project, documentation from the pipeline proponent and 'information from First Nations, Gitanyow hereditary chiefs, Gitxsan Wilps and members of the public,' the statement says.
The Greens' statement says construction activities moved ahead last summer on a portion of the pipeline's right-of-way in order to avoid expiry of the original permit.
The environmental group Stand.earth also issued a statement calling the decision to uphold the decade-old certificate as a 'slap in the face' of B.C.'s climate plan.
The decision follows the release of B.C.'s climate accountability report, which showed the province is already set to miss its climate targets, the group says.
This report by Brenna Owen of The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Could Buying Energy Transfer Stock Today Set You Up for Life?
Key Points Energy Transfer has extensive natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil operations. The limited partnership's juicy distributions should continue to grow over time. Energy Transfer also has tremendous growth opportunities supplying natural gas for AI-focused data centers. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Investing in hot technologies can be done in different ways. For example, when personal computers were first catching on, some investors bought software stocks rather than the stocks of PC makers. In the early days of the internet boom, some invested in networking stocks instead of highly volatile dot-com start-ups. A similar opportunity is available today with artificial intelligence (AI). You could bet on which AI stock you hope will be the biggest winner. However, some investors understand that AI models require massive amounts of power. And they know that the largest source of generating electricity in the U.S. is natural gas. The stocks of companies that transport and process natural gas should, therefore, be big winners as demand for AI surges. Enter Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET), one of the best natural gas stocks on the market. Could buying Energy Transfer stock today set you up for life? About Energy Transfer The first thing you should know about Energy Transfer is that it's a limited partnership (LP). One key benefit of investing in an LP is that it doesn't pay corporate income taxes. This can help investors avoid double taxation, where the company pays taxes on its profits and then pays dividends to unitholders who have to pay taxes on the dividends. If you want to profit from increased natural gas demand driven by AI, Energy Transfer is one of the top midstream companies in North America. Its natural gas pipelines generate roughly 19% of its total adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Operations related to natural gas liquids (NGLs) and refined products contribute 20% of adjusted EBITDA. Midstream assets, including natural gas gathering pipelines, kick in another 20%. Energy Transfer's pipelines transport around 32.4 million British thermal units (BTUs) of natural gas each day. The LP fractionates (separating NGLs into their components) in the ballpark of 1.15 million barrels per day of NGLs. And its facilities can store roughly 236 billion cubic feet of natural gas. However, Energy Transfer's business isn't limited to natural gas and NGLs. The company also transports around 7 million barrels per day of crude oil. Its Sunoco subsidiary primarily focuses on energy infrastructure and the distribution of motor fuels. Its USAC subsidiary provides compression services used in processing and transporting crude oil, in addition to natural gas. A pipeline to attractive total returns Energy Transfer has delivered a cumulative total return of around 300% over the last five years. The LP's distributions accounted for nearly half of that amount. Distributions should continue to play an important role in total returns for a long time to come. Energy Transfer's distribution yield (the LP version of dividend yield) currently stands at 7.59%. The company targets annual distribution growth of between 3% and 5%. Investors will likely enjoy more than just juicy distributions, though. Energy Transfer's unit price should also appreciate nicely as its adjusted EBITDA rises. Between 2020 and 2024, the midstream leader's adjusted EBITDA increased by a compound annual growth rate of 10%. Is that level of growth sustainable? Probably so. Energy Transfer has a significant project backlog that it believes will support long-term growth. In its second-quarter update, the company reported requests to connect to around 200 data centers in 15 states. It also had requests to connect to more than 60 power plants in 14 states. Perhaps the biggest indicator of how AI could boost Energy Transfer's fortunes over the long run is its agreement with CloudBurst to provide natural gas to data centers in central Texas. With this deal, Energy Transfer's pipelines will provide up to 450,000 million BTUs per day of natural gas to CloudBurst's AI-focused data center campus. Setting you up for life? With all this in mind, can investing in Energy Transfer set you up for life? Maybe. The answer to the question hinges largely on how much money is required to achieve the goal, which will vary from one person to the next. It also depends on how much money you can invest and what your investment time frame is. Whether or not buying Energy Transfer stock sets you up for life, it could be a profitable long-term investment. Income investors should especially find this LP attractive because of its ultrahigh distribution yield. Should you invest $1,000 in Energy Transfer right now? Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,783!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,122,682!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025

Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
You can't fly sovereignty on foreign fuel
Omar Saleh is the chief operating officer at North Vector Dynamics. This week, China slapped a 75.8-per-cent preliminary anti-dumping duty on Canadian canola, threatening $5-billion a year in exports and putting the Prairie agricultural economy squarely in the crosshairs. Yet in this crisis lies an opportunity. The same crop now caught in a trade war could also be the key to fixing one of our biggest national security vulnerabilities. Canola has quietly become one of the most credible feedstocks for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) – chemically identical to conventional jet fuel, yet with up to 90 per cent lower life-cycle emissions. It's a drop-in fuel – usable in current engines, aircraft and refuelling systems with no modifications. The U.S. Air Force flies on it. Lufthansa uses it regularly. NATO is preparing to deploy it. Canada isn't. We have committed to spending $38.6-billion on North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) modernization and Arctic deployments – without securing the fuel to support them. No strategic reserve. No domestic supply chain. No plan. Poilievre urges Ottawa to cancel BC Ferries loan in response to Chinese canola tariffs At Canada's most remote base, CFS Alert, it takes seven litres of fuel to deliver just one usable litre. In a crisis, that's a logistics choke point an adversary wouldn't even need to attack – just wait for the supply chain to strain and watch operations slow. This isn't a technical gap. It's industrial abdication. Canada has the tools to lead. New high-oil varieties can grow on Class 4 marginal lands – millions of acres across Saskatchewan and Alberta that aren't used currently for food crops. That means no pressure on food systems, and no need to convert premium farmland. That shift wasn't driven by marketing – it was earned through hard science, better crop genetics and proven refining results. What's more, Canada has a real shot at global leadership not only because of what we grow, but also what we can store. Alberta already has one of the most advanced carbon-capture networks in North America. Facilities such as Quest, and the provincewide trunk line that supports it, are exactly what will separate low-carbon SAF from the ultralow-carbon SAF needed to win international contracts. That infrastructure is already there. Put it together and the Prairies don't just have the feedstock. They have the land, the logistics, the refining and the emissions solution. No other country has all five. So why are we still acting like this is someone else's opportunity? The European Union and Britain are mandating SAF blending – 2 per cent by 2025, climbing to 70 per cent by 2050. The United States has committed billions through the Department of Energy, Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Defense. Yet Canada remains on the sidelines, siloing SAF under clean fuel programs, ignoring it in procurement and treating it as someone else's file. We've got more to lose than most. Almost a quarter of Canada's jet fuel is imported, leaving our defence and Arctic operations dependent on foreign supply chains that are vulnerable to global disruptions. This isn't about emissions – it's about operational readiness and supply chain control. Scaling SAF to 15 per cent of Canada's jet fuel use could generate $3-billion to $5-billion annually across agriculture, refining and logistics. It could give farmers a new market, insulate us from geopolitical fuel shocks and create an Arctic fuel reserve that doesn't cost $10 a litre to deliver. It means rural jobs. It means Indigenous-led infrastructure and northern resupply chains. It means fuel security for defence operations without relying on U.S. or overseas supply. Ottawa wants certainty from China before making concessions on canola tariffs, minister says It also means leverage. SAF opens the door to premium export markets in the EU and U.S., and strengthens interoperability with NATO and NORAD fleets. Done right, this isn't just industrial policy – it's foreign policy. If Canada can't fuel its own jets, we don't control our defence. If we can't deliver fuel to our Arctic bases without draining our supply chain, we don't control our territory. And if we can't build the industrial system we're uniquely positioned to lead, we don't control our future. Ottawa must treat SAF as strategic infrastructure, not just a climate file. That means committing to a federal SAF procurement mandate for defence and Arctic operations, subsidizing Prairie-based SAF refineries and creating a domestic strategic reserve by 2028. It also means integrating SAF into NORAD modernization planning – so the next time we upgrade our northern air bases, we're upgrading their fuel supply, too. Sovereignty isn't a slogan. It's fuel in the tank. It's time to fill it.

Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Ontario Shipyards partners with province and Italy's largest builder to ready bid for navy corvettes
The Ontario government is boosting efforts to turn the province into an unlikely shipbuilding centre in the hope that its underutilized shipyards can land a multibillion-dollar contract for new Canadian navy corvettes. On Monday, Premier Doug Ford and Vic Fedeli, the Minister of Economic Development, met with senior executives of Algoma Steel ASTL-T of Sault Ste. Marie., Ont., Canada's second-biggest steelmaker. 'We let them know that if they try to pivot into supplying the defence industry and other areas, we would be there to help them,' Mr. Fedeli told The Globe and Mail. Algoma, the country's only publicly listed steel producer, could make steel plate for ships and other heavy military equipment if Ontario Shipyards of Hamilton, the largest ship repair and construction company on the Great Lakes, were to win the corvette contract. Algoma is already listed as a potential supplier to Team Vigilance, the Canadian and international consortium assembled two years ago to bid for the next generation of Canadian naval ships, specifically corvettes. It includes Italy's Fincantieri FNCNF, the largest shipbuilder in Europe and the fourth-largest in the world. Opinion: The USMCA agreement may be circling the drain. Time to fill the trade sink elsewhere Ontario pivots to European defence market with car industry under threat Corvettes are relatively small offshore patrol vessels, or OPVs, that would replace the dozen Kingston Class ships that were built for the Royal Canadian Navy in the mid-1990s and are reaching the end of their careers. The navy announced in July that it will begin to pull eight of the ships out of service in the fall. Those ships are 55 metres long, carry a crew of about 50 and are used for coastal and fisheries patrol, training, minesweeping, search and rescue, law enforcement and drug interdiction. The new Vigilance ships, if built, would be somewhat larger, perhaps 100 metres long, to give them more range and capabilities, said Ted Kirkpatrick, Ontario Shipyards' director of business development and government relations. The federal government has yet to issue a tender for the new corvettes – the navy is reportedly still setting the parameters of the project – and neither Mr. Fedeli nor Mr. Kirkpatrick know the timeline or the expected budget, though the contract could be worth several billion dollars. 'We feel hopeful that this project will move forward fairly quickly,' Mr. Kirkpatrick said, noting that Prime Minister Mark Carney has made rearmament an industrial priority to meet Canada's domestic defence needs and NATO commitments. In an effort to kick-start an ambitious shipbuilding program in Ontario, which has not built a warship since the Second World War, the provincial government last month launched a financial program worth $215-million. The amount is designed to support shipbuilding capacity under the National Shipbuilding Strategy program. Mr. Fedeli said the incentives would be composed of loans and grants and tailored to each project. 'We want Ontario to get back into the shipbuilding business,' he said. Several other funds, including the new Ontario Together Trade Fund, could offer incentives to steel companies and other manufacturers to help them serve Canadian customers. Mr. Kirkpatrick said Ontario Shipyards 'hopes and expects to be a large beneficiary of the incentives programs.' Ontario Shipyards (formerly Heddle Shipyards) was founded in 1987 and has three sites – in Hamilton, Port Weller and Thunder Bay. The company has about 250 employees, and its main business today is repairing coast guard vessels, not building new ships. The company joined Team Vigilance to launch an unsolicited proposal to build a new corvette fleet. In addition to Fincantieri, the group includes Vard, which is Fincantieri's design arm; Thales THLEF, the French defence company that specializes in electronics; and SH Defence of Denmark, a maker of modular loading systems. Ontario Shipyards expects competition for the contract from the other industry players in Canada, primarily Irving Shipbuilding of Nova Scotia, which has a contract worth $8-billion to build the first three River-class destroyers for the navy; Davie Shipbuilding of Quebec, which is making icebreakers for the coast guard; and Seaspan Shipyards of British Columbia, which is building large non-combat ships for the navy and the coast guard. Mr. Kirkpatrick said the three rival shipbuilders have ample work at the moment, leaving only Ontario Shipyards with enough spare capacity to take on a big, new naval contract. 'We have the largest amount of underutilized capacity in Canada,' he said. 'If there is anyone who can put a boat in the water and paint it grey, it's us.' He said the presence of Fincantieri and subsidiary Vard are key advantages for Team Vigilance. Vard would design the vessels, and Fincantieri would handle shipyard layout, procurement and project management. Mr. Kirkpatrick said a team from Fincantieri visited Ontario Shipyards last year to assess the company's capabilities and determine what equipment and training it would need to launch a competitive bid for Canadian navy warships. Fincantieri, based in Trieste, in Italy's northeast, is controlled by the Italian government and is listed on the Milan exchange. The company has built some of world's largest ships for Cunard, Carnival, Princess and other cruise companies. It also builds combat ships, including aircraft carriers and submarines, for the Italian, U.S. and other governments. In Wisconsin, it makes the U.S. Navy's Constellation-class frigates, which are based on the Italian Navy's multipurpose frigates, known as FREMM.