"Sonam Ran Away After Hitman...": New Details In Honeymoon Murder Case
Sonam Raghuvanshi ran away after Vishal Singh Chauhan - one of the hitmen hired by her - struck her newly-wed husband, Raja Raghuvanshi, with a machete for the first time, police said.
The 24-year-old woman left the crime spot as 29-year-old Raja started bleeding and screaming in pain and returned only when he died after being attacked multiple times, the police said.
The developments came as a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the murder took all the accused, including Sonam, to Meghalaya's Sohra, around 65 km from capital Shillong, to recreate the scene where the crime took place.
The Indore-based businessman was brutally murdered by Sonam, her lover Raj Kushwaha, and three hitmen, during the couple's honeymoon in Meghalaya last month. The other hitmen were identified as Akash Rajput and Anand Kurmi. All the five accused have been arrested.
Police said an investigation and recreation of the crime scene revealed that Vishal was the first one to attack Raja with a machete. "When he started bleeding and screaming, Sonam ran away. Vishal and the other (hitmen) Vishal continued to attack Raja with the machete," one of the police officers said, seeking anonymity.
"Sonam returned to the spot only after Raja died in the attack," the officer added.
Police said a second machete that was used to murder Raja was also recovered during this period. The second "dao" (machete) was found inside the same gorge, below the Wei Sawdong Parking Lot at Riat Arliang, from where Raja's body and another machete were recovered.
Initially, police thought Raja was killed with only one "dao". However, it was only during the recreation of the crime scene on Tuesday that the police learnt about the second weapon.
The case initially began as that of a "missing couple", after Raja and Sonam could not be traced during their honeymoon in the northeastern state, but took a tragic turn and revealed a shocking betrayal.
The couple - both from Indore - got married on May 11. According to the police, the wedding took place despite Sonam's relationship with Raj, who worked as an accountant at the furniture sheet unit owned by her family. Sonam used to look after the family business.
After their wedding in Indore, Raja and Sonam travelled to Meghalaya for honeymoon. They disappeared on May 23, hours after checking out of a homestay at Nongriat village, 20 km from where Raja's body was found on June 2.
Amid an intense search for "missing" Sonam, she surfaced in Uttar Pradesh's Ghazipur on June 8 and later surrendered at Nandganj police station. This came hours after Akash, Vishal, and Anand were arrested from Uttar Pradesh and Indore and Sagar towns (in Madhya Pradesh). Raj was arrested later.
On June 11, Sonam reportedly confessed to killing her husband. Police said her cousin, Jitendra Raghuvanshi, had cleared the first installment of payment to the three hitmen.
Sonam's brother Govind said his family has snapped all ties with her. He also expressed solidarity with Raja's grieving family members and vowed to help them in their fight for justice in a case which has shocked the nation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Man charged with killing prominent lawmaker could face rarity for Minnesota: Death penalty
AI- Generated Image MINNEAPOLIS: The man charged with killing a prominent Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another could face something that is a rarity for Minnesota but could become more common under the Trump administration: the death penalty. Minnesota abolished capital punishment in 1911, and the state's last execution was a botched hanging in 1906. But federal prosecutors announced charges against Vance Boelter on Monday that can carry the death penalty. It's not unheard of for state and federal prosecutors to both pursue criminal cases for the same offense, especially in high-profile matters. In this case federal authorities essentially grabbed the lead from the state prosecutor, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty. Boelter had been scheduled to make his first court appearance on state charges Monday, but instead marshals took him from the county jail to the US courthouse in St Paul, where he appeared on the more serious federal charges. Boelter is accused of fatally shooting former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, in their home early Saturday in the northern Minneapolis suburbs. Before that, authorities say, he also shot and wounded another Democrat, Sen. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ilkeston: If You Were Born Between 1940-1975 You Could Be Eligible For This Life Cover Reassured Get Quote Undo John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who lived a few miles away. He surrendered Sunday night after what authorities have called the largest search in Minnesota history. The federal case Two of the six federal counts can carry the death penalty, something federal prosecutors have not sought in a Minnesota-based case since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976. "Will we seek the death penalty? It's too early to tell. That is one of the options," Acting US Attorney Joseph Thompson said Monday at a news conference where he revealed new details of what he described as a meticulously planned attack. They included allegations that Boelter also stopped at the homes of two other lawmakers that night and had dozens of other Democrats as potential targets, including officials in other states. Boelter's federal defenders have declined to comment on the case, and he has not entered a plea. On her first day in office in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi lifted a moratorium on federal executions that was imposed under the Biden administration in 2021. Only three defendants remain on federal death row after Biden converted 37 of their sentences to life in prison. Bondi has since authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in at least three cases, including against Luigi Mangione for the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. In the other two cases, the Justice Department has said it is seeking the death penalty against defendants charged with killing fellow prison inmates. President Donald Trump's first administration carried out 13 federal executions, more than the administration of any other president in modern history. The state's case The federal intervention in Boelter's case appeared to irritate Moriarty, the county's former chief public defender, who was elected on a police reform and racial justice platform in 2022 after the police killing of George Floyd. At a news conference Monday to announce the state charges, Moriarty gave only vague answers in response to questions about the interplay between the federal and state investigations. But she acknowledged "there's a tension" and said federal officials "can speak for themselves." Moriarty said she intends to press forward in state court regardless and to seek an indictment for first-degree murder for the killings of the Hortmans, which would carry a mandatory sentence of life without parole. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment Tuesday. As evidence of the tensions, the county attorney refused to clarify how Boelter' first hearings would play out. Court records show that Boelter was called for a first appearance in Hennepin County on Monday and that because he was not there as he was in federal custody, the judge issued a bench warrant as a formality, as requested by prosecutors. "Usually murder cases are overwhelmingly handled in state courts," said Mark Osler, a death penalty expert at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis. "Clearly this is something of national interest. And that seemed to play a role in the decision that the Justice Department is making here." Osler, who formerly served as Moriarty's deputy county attorney and head of her criminal division, as well as assistant US attorney in Detroit, acknowledged that there are often tensions between state and federal prosecutors. "There's no doubt that it's complicated," Osler said. "And it's hard to avoid the sense of the older sibling grabbing something away from the younger sibling." What's next If federal officials do pursue the death penalty, Osler said, they will face an unusual challenge: "a jury pool drawn from the citizens of a state that has rejected the death penalty for over 100 years. It's not the same as choosing people in a state where there's a history of support for the death penalty, such as Texas." After his federal court appearance, Boelter was taken to the Sherburne County Jail in suburban Elk River, where federal prisoners are often held. Thompson told reporters that the federal case "does not nullify the state charges. They remain in place. ... My expectation based on prior cases is the federal case, the federal charges, will be litigated first, but the state charges won't necessarily go anywhere." Boelter's next federal court appearance is June 27. He does not have any further appearances scheduled in state court. "There's a natural competitiveness that occurs sometimes between jurisdictions, but you have to hope that in the end, they're all facing the same way where there's something as important to public safety as this case is," Osler said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Rs 43 lakh for green card: How fake EB-1A claims are trapping Indians
The United States government is reviewing a growing number of EB-1A green card petitions filed under the 'extraordinary ability' visa category, with immigration lawyers in Houston reporting an uptick in fraudulent claims, particularly among Indian applicants. Reddy Neumann Brown PC, a Houston-based immigration law firm, said the category is now facing a wave of re-investigations and revocations. The EB-1A visa allows highly skilled individuals in fields like science, arts, education, business and athletics to live and work in the US without a job offer. Fake citations, dubious awards and journal scams According to attorney Rahul Reddy, several EB-1A applicants appear to have manipulated their profiles using questionable tactics. 'Some petitions have included publications in low-quality journals, coordinated co-authorship to inflate citations, and fake awards like the Stevie and Globee to strengthen their applications,' said Reddy in a social media post. Karim Jivani, an associate attorney at the same firm, wrote in a recent blog post that a rising number of foreign nationals—especially from countries with limited access to immigration legal services—are falling prey to unregulated agents and consultancies promising guaranteed green card success. 'These fraudulent services exploit professionals who are not familiar with the complexities of US immigration law,' Jivani wrote. 'They often target scientists, entrepreneurs or artists using native language marketing, fake client testimonials, and social media platforms.' Victims charged up to $50,000 (about Rs 43 lakh) for fraudulent applications Jivani noted that some agents charge anywhere between $10,000 and $50,000, promising near-certain approvals. In many cases, he said, applicants either receive petitions that are 'hastily prepared and riddled with red flags' or no petition at all. 'Once the money is taken, some disappear altogether. The applicants end up flagged by USCIS for misrepresentation, which has long-term consequences,' Jivani wrote. Some consultancies have reportedly gone as far as producing fake judging invitations, counterfeit awards, and orchestrated speaking opportunities at non-existent conferences to meet EB-1A criteria. Wider impact on genuine applicants The surge in questionable applications is also making it harder for legitimate candidates to get approved. 'When USCIS receives too many suspicious cases, they start raising the bar across the board,' said Reddy. 'That means even genuine applicants are facing more documentation requests, stricter reviews and delays.' USCIS, the federal agency that processes these applications, has not yet issued a public advisory on the matter. Who qualifies for an EB-1A visa? The EB-1A is a first-preference, employment-based immigrant visa. It is open to people who meet strict eligibility criteria in their field of expertise. Unlike other work-based green cards, it does not require a job offer or a sponsoring employer. To qualify, an applicant must either have: A one-time achievement such as a Pulitzer, Nobel Prize, Olympic medal or similar Or Meet at least three of the following ten criteria: Received nationally or internationally recognised awards Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements Publications about their work in major media or journals Judged the work of others in the field Made original contributions to the profession Authored scholarly articles in respected publications Displayed their work in exhibitions or showcases Played a leading or critical role in organisations Earned a high salary relative to others in the field Achieved commercial success in the performing arts Self-petitioning and work plans in the US Applicants must also show they plan to continue working in the same field after arriving in the US. This can be demonstrated through: Letters from potential employers or clients A personal statement outlining work plans Evidence of continued professional activity Importantly, the EB-1A does not require a labour market test or employer sponsorship. Individuals can petition on their own behalf through a Form I-140 submission. Can family members also benefit? Yes. A successful EB-1A applicant can also include their spouse and unmarried children under the age of 21 in the green card application.
Fibre2Fashion
2 hours ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Louis Vuitton most counterfeited luxury brand: Entrupy report
Louis Vuitton is the most counterfeited luxury brand, according to the new 'State of the Fake' report from Entrupy, which found the brand accounted for 32.76 per cent of all its submissions for luxury goods. It was followed by Gucci (13.6 per cent), Chanel (13.4 per cent), Prada (9.8 per cent) and Dior (4.6 per cent). Prada was the second most counterfeited luxury brand regarding handbags, with 14.42 per cent of all Prada bags scanned by Entrupy being flagged as 'unidentified', i.e., a fake. Louis Vuitton is the most counterfeited luxury brand, said a report from Entrupy, which found the brand accounted for 32.76 per cent of all its luxury goods submissions. There is a growing sophistication in counterfeits, especially across high-volume and high-demand items. China and Hong Kong still dominate supply, with 3 per cent of counterfeit purchases being enabled by chatbots. Fake Gucci handbags worth $12,190,340 were submitted to the US-based artificial intelligence (AI)-powered authentication technology provider for verification in 2024, with Chanel accounting for the highest total dollar value with a total of $500,470,067 in counterfeit goods detected. The data shows a growing sophistication in counterfeits, especially across high-volume and high-demand items. French brand Goyard maintained its position as one of the most counterfeited brands by volume, with 18.4 per cent of its St. Louis Totes identified as fakes. The top five brands with an elevated risk of fakes were Goyard, Prada, Givenchy, Loewe and Saint Laurent. The Americas accounted for 47 per cent of all Entrupy submissions, with the Asia-Pacific accounting for 42 per cent and Europe and the Middle East accounting for 11 per cent. The report also named Louis Vuitton as the most frequently counterfeited brand in the United States, with the total value of authentic products verified by Entrupy reaching $640 million, compared to $61 million worth of 'unidentified' items. It is the most frequently counterfeited brand in Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, Germany and Indonesia as well. Prada was the most faked brand in Japan, while Saint Laurent was the most faked brand in Italy. Counterfeits now use block chain and cryptocurrency to hide operations and reinvest profits through legitimate businesses, the report noted. China and Hong Kong still dominate supply. Over 30 per cent of counterfeit goods seized at European borders originated from China and Hong Kong. Three per cent of counterfeit purchases are now enabled by chatbots. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
