logo
Helen McEntee says mobile phone pouch scheme will be 'transformative'

Helen McEntee says mobile phone pouch scheme will be 'transformative'

BreakingNews.ie13-06-2025
Minister for Education Helen McEntee has acknowledged that the €9 million cost of the school phone pouch and storage solutions scheme represents 'a lot of money' whilst insisting that restricting phone access for children will be 'transformational.'
In an interview with Newstalk Breakfast on Friday, Minister McEntee said that the scheme will have a hugely positive impact on young people.
Advertisement
'This is about as far as possible protecting our young people. And as far as possible making sure that our schools are phone free zones," she said.
"There will always be pockets of money that will be spent on different initiatives, on new initiatives and this is what's happening here.
'This is specifically to try and support kids in school to make sure that when they're in schools [that] they're learning.
'And that's what education is about, that's what our schools are about.
Advertisement
'I do appreciate this is not a small amount of money but when we break this down and when we see the impact it's already having in schools that have it, I believe this can be transformational.'
Ms McEntee said that more and more young people have access to phones.
'Children as early as seven or eight years of age getting mobile phones. Having social media accounts, bringing them into school and they really have become quite a distraction," she said.
'They are impacting on their school life. What this is about is it's about making sure in our primary schools that phones are banned and in our secondary schools, this is about restricting them.
Advertisement
"Acknowledging that children (there) are older. That we might have 17, 18 or even 19 year olds in schools.'
Minister McEntee stated that restricting children's phone use at school 'isn't going to solve our problem here' adding that what they do at home is also vital to their wellbeing.
'I don't think this is a catch all. We do absolutely have an issue with children at home. We are not sure what they are accessing.
"But when they are at school the fact they are on their phones is distracting and taking away for what they are supposed to learn. At break time it is impacting on them engaging and interacting in social activities.
Advertisement
"We still need those larger conversations. We need to talk to parents about when children are getting phones, how they are using their phones, how parents are engaging with children as well, and I think this is an opportunity that allows them to do that.'
Meanwhile, Minister McEntee also spoke to Morning Ireland on RTE Radio 1 on Friday.
Ireland
Tánaiste defends 'swift' timeline for nationwide r...
Read More
She said that it was 'always the case' that the funds could be used for other storage solutions as well as phone pouches. Sherefuted suggestions made by the Social Democrats of a Government U turn on the matter.
This was after Tánaiste Simon Harris said the funding would be for all kinds of storage solutions as opposed to just pouches. This includes cubby holes and lockable boxes.
Primary schools are now required to forbid the use of and access to mobile phones by pupils during the school day whilst secondary schools have to restrict usage.
The Department of Education said that the measures are being implemented to enhance student wellbeing, to promote focus in school and to reduce cyber bullying and exposure to inappropriate content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC
4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC

A lawyer representing the online message board 4chan says it won't pay a proposed fine by the UK's media regulator as it enforces the Online Safety to Preston Byrne, managing partner of law firm Byrne & Storm, Ofcom has provisionally decided to impose a £20,000 fine "with daily penalties thereafter" for as long as the site fails to comply with its request."Ofcom's notices create no legal obligations in the United States," he told the BBC, adding he believed the regulator's investigation was part of an "illegal campaign of harassment" against US tech has declined to comment while its investigation continues. "4chan has broken no laws in the United States - my client will not pay any penalty," Mr Byrne began investigating 4chan over whether it was complying with its obligations under the UK's Online Safety in August, it said it had issued 4chan with "a provisional notice of contravention" for failing to comply with two requests for said its investigation would examine whether the message board was complying with the act, including requirements to protect its users from illegal content.4chan has often been at the heart of online controversies in its 22 years, including misogynistic campaigns and conspiracy are anonymous, which can often lead to extreme content being posted. 'First Amendment rights' In a statement posted on X, law firms Byrne & Storm and Coleman Law said 4chan was a US company incorporated in the US, and therefore protected against the UK law."American businesses do not surrender their First Amendment rights because a foreign bureaucrat sends them an email," they wrote."Under settled principles of US law, American courts will not enforce foreign penal fines or censorship codes. "If necessary, we will seek appropriate relief in US federal court to confirm these principles."They said authorities in the US had been "briefed" on their response to Ofcom's statement concludes by calling on the Trump administration to invoke all diplomatic and legal levers to protect American businesses from "extraterritorial censorship mandates".Ofcom has previously said the Online Safety Act only requires services to take action to protect users based in the UK. UK backs down Some American politicians - particularly the Trump administration, its allies and officials - have pushed back against what they regard as overreach in the regulation of US tech firms by the UK and EU. A perceived impact of the Online Safety Act on free speech has been a particular concern, but other laws have also been the source of 19 August, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the UK had withdrawn its controversial demand for a "backdoor" in an Apple data protection system - saying she worked with the President and Vice President to get the UK to abandon its days later, US Federal Trade Commission chairman Andrew Ferguson warned big tech firms they could be violating US law if they weakened privacy and data security requirements by complying with international laws such as the Online Safety Act."Foreign governments seeking to limit free expression or weaken data security in the United States might count on the fact that companies have an incentive to simplify their operations and legal compliance measures by applying uniform policies across jurisdictions," he 4chan does successfully fight the fine in the US courts, Ofcom may have other options."Enforcing against an offshore provider is tricky," Emma Drake, partner of online safety and privacy at law firm Bird and Bird, told the BBC. "Ofcom can instead ask a court to order other services to disrupt a provider's UK business, such as requiring a service's removal from search results or blocking of UK payments."If Ofcom doesn't think this will be enough to prevent significant harm, it can even ask that ISPs be ordered to block UK access." Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

The longstanding neglect of working-class pupils puts Britain to shame
The longstanding neglect of working-class pupils puts Britain to shame

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The longstanding neglect of working-class pupils puts Britain to shame

SIR – Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, writes (Commentary, August 21) that the state has 'failed white working-class pupils', as in 2024 only 19 per cent of them achieved a strong pass in maths and English GCSE. This is hardly surprising, particularly in the case of boys. I taught at six high schools in a 40-year career, and never came across any initiatives that were specifically directed at such children. When I began teaching in 1977, there were no special plans for anyone. Then, the focus became improving the results of girls, especially in IT, science and technical subjects. When pupil performance data began to be used, focus shifted to different ethnic minority groups. Some of the lowest performing schools are to be found in towns such as Morecambe, Blackpool and Clacton – schools where the vast majority of children are white working-class. Another shift in focus is needed. David S Ainsworth Manchester SIR – The real problem is not that the state has failed pupils, but that parents have. Teachers attempt to educate their pupils to achieve the highest possible results they can – but without consistent support from parents, too many children will underachieve. Eric Mansfield Clitheroe, Lancashire SIR – I was a white working-class child – but I was not let down by the state: I studied at a grammar school. I have spent my life feeling so grateful for having been given that chance. Margaret O'Connell Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire SIR – Some 30 years ago I started teaching in a social priority school – one where a child with exceptional social circumstances is considered higher priority for a place. Most of the students had psycholinguistic problems, and there was a long wait for speech and language services. So I started a communication opportunity group scheme (Cogs). This involved integrating communication teaching into the curriculum. Cogs has been shown to get results – but has been taken up abroad much more than in the UK. When will we learn? Rosemary Sage West Haddon, Northamptonshire SIR – I have a school book completed by the brother of my grandmother, when he was a 14-year-old pupil in Derbyshire in 1860. The book includes all the mathematics necessary for somebody wishing to enter the building trade. Typical titles include 'Equation of Payments' and 'Measuring by the Yard Square as Pavers, Painters, Plasterers and Joiners'. The book is also beautifully illustrated. I don't know whether he became a builder, but his schooling provided the necessary education. It's shameful that we no longer seem able to do the same.

CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Hostage: Affairs, asylum seekers, 'Allo 'Allo accents... Netflix's drama is nuts!
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Hostage: Affairs, asylum seekers, 'Allo 'Allo accents... Netflix's drama is nuts!

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Hostage: Affairs, asylum seekers, 'Allo 'Allo accents... Netflix's drama is nuts!

Head for the bunkers — nuclear grade hokum incoming! The heart of British democracy is under attack, not from the Russians, nor Islamist extremists, but from an even bigger bunch of loonies... Netflix. The five-part political drama Hostage sees Suranne Jones playing a Labour prime minister who has to save the NHS (hurrah!) while facing down a neo-Fascist French president (boo!) planning to station Euro-troops in England (boo! hiss!). Meanwhile, there's a boatload of African asylum seekers fleeing persecution who need safe haven in the UK — and, gulp, they've all got ebola. And just when you think the stakes couldn't be any higher, masked gunmen only go and kidnap the PM's lovely husband, Dr Alex (Ashley Thomas). He's in South America with a Medecins Sans Frontieres team, giving vaccinations to happy village children and their poor-but-grateful mums, when terrorists take all the doctors prisoner. They shoot a translator dead. At first this appears to be more proof of what rotten rotters they are, but Dr Alex overhears them talking in English, so perhaps they just realised they wouldn't need a translator. With a gun to his head, Dr Alex is forced to record a video message to his wife. She must resign within 24 hours or one of the hostages will be killed. Suranne Jones, who excels at melodrama, does her best to breathe credibility into all this over-egged nonsense. We're so used to seeing her in extreme situations — wreaking vengeance on an unfaithful husband in Doctor Foster, solving murders aboard a submarine in Vigil — that it doesn't seem too delulu when she takes command of a hostage rescue attempt... and then apologises to the Chief of the Defence Staff for failing to let him know what she was doing. Mind you, it's not much of a rescue. British special forces have apparently been reduced to one soldier, a grizzled veteran called Thomas. And he's armed only with a pistol and a telescopic camera that looks as though he ordered it from one of those sales booklets that fall out of the Sunday supplements. He probably bought a nice pair of orthopaedic sandals and a reversible jacket at the same time. If the PM has any chance of getting her husband back, she's going to have to rely on the French military. But President Vivienne Toussaint (Julie Delpy) has her own problems — she's been having an affair with someone she really shouldn't, and now a blackmailer is threatening to release a video of them in bed together. No wonder Vivienne is so spiteful and mean to her family... though it doesn't explain why, when they're alone, they speak English with 'Allo 'Allo accents. If all that stretches your credulity, consider this. It's only in a fictional drama as bonkers as this that Labour can manage to elect a female leader.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store