&w=3840&q=100)
In the shadow of Partition's shadow: Stories of loss, hope and resilience
Refugees crowd onto a train as they try to flee India near New Delhi in September 1947. Some 15 million people crossed new borders during the violent partition of British-ruled India. At times, mobs targeted and killed passengers travelling in either direction; the trains carrying their corpses became known as "ghost trains." File Image/AP
The Partition of India was far more complex than the mere drawing of borders — it shattered homes, tore families apart, and scarred millions for life. Arguably the largest displacement of humans in modern times, the Partition that brought Independence to India as well as Pakistan forced millions to leave behind everything familiar and step into the unknown with fear and hope intertwined.
Speaking to Firstpost, many families bravely recounted their horrors and shared deeply personal memories.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
During the Partition of India in 1947, an estimated 10 to 15 million people were uprooted and forced to migrate across the hastily drawn borders, marking one of the largest mass migrations in human history. The borders, hurriedly drawn by British lawyer Radcliffe, left scores of lives irreversibly altered.
'Bogies full of dead bodies… terrible times'
CL Madaan, an 83-year-old resident of Delhi's Mukherjee Nagar, recalled the horrors of Partition to Firstpost, 'When Partition happened, I was just 3 or 4 years old. I don't remember everything, but some glimpses of those horrific times have stayed with me. I remember my parents hurriedly carrying our belongings as we left our native village near Rawalpindi. We boarded a train, and when it reached Amritsar, we got down, took a lorry, and eventually reached Delhi.'
He described the difficult conditions that followed, 'The government provided us with a small tent in a place called Shanti Nagar. My siblings, parents, and I lived in that tiny tent. We stayed in that camp for 30 years until the government allotted us a 160-gaz plot here in Mukherjee Nagar.'
CL Madaan, a retired government employee, speaking to Firstpost's Bhanu Pratap.
'We all bore the pain of losing our homes, our villages, and some even lost loved ones,' he said to Firstpost. 'But we adapted to our new life here. Despite the hardships, we lived together happily, without divisions among us.'
Meher Chand, born in 1936 and a resident of North Delhi, said his family migrated from Dera Ghazi Khan. 'When we arrived here, trains kept coming loaded with entire bogies full of dead bodies from the violence back there. I remember military troops, including Gorkhas, were assigned to protect us and escort us safely to Hindustan when we left Dera Ghazi Khan. It was a terrible time. We had to leave the city, which was on the frontier, and it was a long journey.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Recalling the horrors of Partition, Chand shared, 'A father and his son who lived next door went to Dera Ghazi Khan to buy something. They were killed there, and their families were not even able to see their bodies. This terrorised the few of us who remained.'
Maher Chand, a ex-postman, now lives a retired life in North Delhi. Image: FP
'A train to Patiala… and then to dirty, diseased-filled shelters'
A shopkeeper, who wished to remain anonymous, told Firstpost that his grandfather and grandmother were both killed during Partition violence in Pakistan. His father somehow survived and escaped their native village, Mulhal Mughlan near Chakwal, rebuilding his life in Delhi, where the shopkeeper was later born.
Ninety-year-old Arjan Singh, who was just 11 when he migrated from Dera Ismail Khan, still vividly remembers the Partition. 'I am actually a Sardar. When we migrated, Hindus and Sikhs travelled together. At first, we walked with the group. I remember taking a boat to cross a large river. After that, we reached a railway station, I can't recall which city, and then boarded a train to Patiala.'
People watch the Heritage run of an Indian Railway coach hauled by a 1947 model steam locomotive engine. AFP)
Singh described those times as extremely difficult. In search of a better life, they first went to Jhansi, then Bareilly, feeling confused and suffering, before finally settling in Delhi.
'In Delhi, the government later allotted us a barrack to live in. It was very small, overcrowded, and the area was dirty, with diseases spreading all around. Those were really tough times. We lived in those barracks for 25 to 26 years,' he said to Firspost, adding that his family was later allotted an 80-gaz plot in Indra Vihar in North Delhi.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The migration was accompanied by brutal communal violence, leading to the deaths of an estimated 200,000 to 2 million people. Many were killed in riots, massacres, and attacks along migration routes, while countless others suffered abductions and other atrocities during this tragic upheaval.
This photo taken in August 1947 shows Indian soldiers walking through the debris of a building in the Chowk Bijli Wala area of Amristar during unrest following the Partition of India and Pakistan. (Photo by AFP)
The Partition of India remains a dark chapter in history, a profound human tragedy marked by massive migration and unimaginable suffering, that must be remembered and passed on to future generations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
27 minutes ago
- NDTV
Congress Leader's RSS "India's Taliban" Remark, BJP's Mahatma Gandhi Reply
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader BK Hariprasad's "Indian Taliban" remark for BJP's ideological parent, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has drawn a sharp response from the ruling party. The BJP has said that the Congress abuses every nationalist organisation and loves banned radical outfits such as PFI and SIMI. Speaking to news agency ANI, Mr Hariprasad, former MP and currently a member of the Karnataka legislative council, criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for praising the RSS in his Independence Day address. "They (RSS) are trying to disturb peace in the country. I will only equate RSS with Taliban, they are Indian Taliban and the Prime Minister is appreciating them from Red Fort," he said. "Did any 'Sanghi' participate in the freedom struggle? It's a shame that RSS is not a registered organisation. We don't know where they get funds. Any NGO that wants to work in the country should register, as per the Constitution," the former Rajya Sabha MP said. Mr Hariprasad said the BJP and RSS are "masters of twisting history". "BJP and RSS are the masters of twisting history, and they are trying to rewrite history. It was AK Fazlul Huq (Bengal Prime Minister before Independence) and (Sangh ideologue) Syama Prasad Mookerjee who moved the first resolution in Bengal for the Partition. (Muhammad Ali) Jinnah and (Vinayak) Savarkar were of the opinion that both religions need a separate state. They are trying to blame Congress for it," he said. Delivering his 12th Independence Day address, the Prime Minister on Friday congratulated the RSS for completing 100 years. "Today, I would like to proudly mention that 100 years ago, an organisation was born - Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Hundred years of service to the nation is a proud, golden chapter. With the resolve of 'vyakti nirman se rashtra nirman', with the aim of the welfare of Maa Bharati, swayamsevaks dedicated their lives to the welfare of our motherland... In a way, RSS is the world's biggest NGO. It has a history of 100 years of dedication," Prime Minister Modi said, ahead of the Sangh's centenary celebrations on September 25. BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla responded sharply to Mr Hariprasad's remarks and said the Congress sees goons in Indian forces, surrender in Operation Sindoor, Taliban in RSS and considers Pakistan its own. "Insulting the forces, constitutional institutions, social organisations and Sanatan has become Congress's identity. Courts have pulled them up multiple times because of targeting nationalist organisations," he said. "The Congress's mindset is Taliban. Why did Mahatma Gandhi and Jayaprakash Narayan praise RSS? Why did (former President and Congress veteran) late Pranab Mukherjee visit the RSS headquarters?"


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will not let our rights be erased: RJD's Lalu, Tejashwi vow to fight BJP ahead of 'vote adhikar yatra'
The father-son duo of Rashtriya Janata Dal ( RJD ), Lalu Prasad and Tejashwi Yadav , jointly slammed the Bharatiya Janata Party ( BJP ) on Sunday, accusing them of destroying the Constitution by trying to steal people's voting rights away. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency Ahead of the party leaders joining the ' Vote Adhikar Yatra ,' to be organised in Bihar's Sasaram by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi , the RJD leader and Bihar assembly Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav told that they will protest against the alleged theft of voting rights of people. "The people of the BJP are misusing Constitutional agencies, trying to destroy democracy and the Constitution. Bihar's land is the land of democracy. We will not let this happen, that BJP destroys, we will fight wherever we want and we will not let our rights be erased," the Bihar LoP said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Neuropathy is not from Low Vitamin B. Meet the Real Enemy of Neuropathy (Stop Doing This) FootRenew Learn More Undo Rahul Gandhi's vote adhikar yatra is being carried out in Sasaram to protest against alleged electoral malpractice and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar. The Opposition parties have alleged that the Centre, along with the Election Commission , are working to ensure that people's votes are being stolen by filling the electoral rolls with fake votes, and helping the party stay in power. Meanwhile, former Bihar Chief Minister and RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav said that they will continue to make sacrifices to protect democracy, and not let rights of people be erased. Live Events "We have made many sacrifices to save democracy. We will continue to do so in the future. We will not let our voting rights we erased. We will not let it perish," Lalu Yadav said. The RJD chief added, "We were discussing how the Constitution is being destroyed by the BJP." Talking about the rally, which will be flagged off byformer CM Lalu Yadav, his son, Tejashwi Yadav said, "We have organised this Yatra to ensure that every Bihari is able to cast their vote. Lalu Yadav ji will be unfurling the green flag and see off the people" "We have a hope, our hope is big. The people asking us the questions want to destroying democracy. We will not let our democracy be erased, the reality is that people's votes are being cut. It is important to fight this. These people (BJP) don't just want to erase their rights, but also their very existence," he added. Earlier today, Congress MP and Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi for Bihar to launch the party's 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' from Sasaram, organised against the Election Commission. Preparations are also underway for the yatra outside the residence of RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav in Patna. Meanwhile, the ECI has flagged that the time to raise issues about errors in the electoral rolls, even those in the past, was during the "Claims and Objections" period. According to the EC, the precise objective behind sharing the electoral roll with all political parties and candidates was so that any issue regarding the same can be raised on time. The constitutional body raised the issue of political parties and their Booth Level Agents not examining the electoral rolls at the appropriate time.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump faces setbacks in Putin diplomacy as no ceasefire agreed at Alaska
Trump was the one who stood down, dropping his demand for a ceasefire in favour of pursuing a full peace accord a position that aligns with Putin's AP New York President Donald Trump walked into a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin pressing for a ceasefire deal and threatening severe consequences and tough new sanctions if the Kremlin leader failed to agree to halt the fighting in Ukraine. Instead, Trump was the one who stood down, dropping his demand for a ceasefire in favour of pursuing a full peace accord a position that aligns with Putin's. After calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump wrote as he flew home from Friday's meeting in Alaska that it had been determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up. It was a dramatic reversal that laid bare the challenges of dealing with Putin, a cunning adversary, as well as the complexities of a conflict that Trump had repeatedly boasted during his campaign that he could solve within 24 hours. Trump's position after the summit with Putin Few details have emerged about what the two leaders discussed or what constituted the progress they both touted. The White House did not respond to messages seeking comment Saturday. While European leaders were relieved that Trump did not agree to a deal that ceded territory or otherwise favoured Moscow, the summit allowed Putin to reclaim his place on the world stage and may have bought Russia more time to push forward with its offensive in Ukraine. We're back to where we were before without him having gone to Alaska, said Fiona Hill, who served as Trump's senior adviser on Russia at the National Security Council during his first term, including when he last met Putin in Helsinki in 2018. In an interview, Hill argued that Trump had emerged from the meeting in a weaker position on the world stage because of his reversal. Other leaders, she said, might now look at the US president and think he's not the big guy that he thinks he is and certainly not the dealmaking genius. All the way along, Trump was convinced he has incredible forces of persuasion, she said, but he came out of the meeting without a ceasefire the one thing he had been pushing for, even after he gave the Russian leader the red carpet treatment." Trump has run up against a rock in the form of Putin, who doesn't want anything from him apart from Ukraine," she said. Democrats call for consequences for Putin At home, Democrats expressed alarm at what at times seemed like a day of deference, with Trump clapping for Putin as he walked down a red carpet during an elaborate ceremony welcoming him to US soil for the first time in a decade. The two rode together in the presidential limousine and exchanged compliments. Trump seemed to revel in particular in Putin echoing his oft-repeated assertion that Russia never would have invaded Ukraine if Trump had been in office instead of Democrat Joe Biden at the time. Before news cameras, Trump did not use the opportunity to castigate Putin for launching the largest ground invasion in Europe since World War II or human rights abuses he's been accused of committing. Instead, Putin was the one who spoke first, and invited Trump to join him in Moscow next. President Trump appears to have been played yet again by Vladimir Putin," said Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The President rolled out a red carpet and warmly greeted a murderous dictator on American soil and reports indicate he got nothing concrete in return. Enough is enough," she went on. If President Trump won't act, Congress must do so decisively by passing crushing sanctions when we return in the coming weeks. Sen. Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who is the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he supports diplomacy but peacemaking must be done responsibly. Instead of caving to Putin, the US should join our allies in levying tough, targeted new sanctions on Russia to intensify the economic pressure, he said. Republicans and Trump allies offer little response so far In Washington, the summit was met by little response from Trump's allies. Republican lawmakers who spoke out were largely reserved and generally called for continued talks and constructive actions from the Trump administration. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, wrote on social media after the summit that while the press conference offered few details about their meeting" she was "cautiously optimistic about the signals that some level of progress was made." Murkowski said it was also encouraging to hear both presidents reference future meetings" but that Ukraine must be part of any negotiated settlement and must freely agree to its terms. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and close Trump ally, offered that he was very proud of Trump for having had the face-to-face meeting and was cautiously optimistic that the war might end well before Christmas if a trilateral meeting between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin transpires. I have all the confidence in the world that Donald Trump will make it clear to Putin this war will never start again. If it does, you're going to pay a heavy price, he said on Fox News. For some Trump allies, the very act of him meeting with Putin was success enough: conservative activist and podcaster Charlie Kirk called it a great thing. Some see a Putin win and a Trump loss But in Europe, the summit was seen as a major diplomatic coup for Putin, who has been eager to emerge from geopolitical isolation. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington, describing the talks as calm, without ultimatums and threats. Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said the summit was a distinct win for Putin. He didn't yield an inch but was also a distinct setback for Trump. No ceasefire in sight. What the world sees is a weak and wobbling America, Bildt posted on X.