Farmers And Growers To Reap Rewards
Hon David Seymour
Minister for Regulation
Hon Penny Simmonds
Minister for the Environment
Hon Andrew Hoggard
Minister for Food Safety
Farmers and growers will have faster access to new agriculture and horticulture products because innovation drives success, says Regulation Minister David Seymour, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard.
'The changes announced today show the power of a sector review,' Mr Seymour says.
'Agriculture and horticulture products are integral to the largest sector of New Zealand's tradeable economy, the primary sector. It's important to ensure regulatory settings give the sector the best chance at success.
Cabinet accepted all of the Ministry for Regulation's 16 recommendations to improve the new agriculture and horticulture product approval pathway.
'The changes will speed up the application process, make it clearer and more transparent, and ensure existing international research is utilised. It is estimated that reducing the current approval times for new products by half could generate benefits of about $272 million over 20 years,' Mr Seymour says.
'The seeds of innovation are sown and it's officially the season for growth. The Minister for Food Safety and the Minister for the Environment will action these changes to streamline the product approval pathway. This means farmers and growers can utilise newer and better products faster.
Joint Ministers will be responsible for progressing an Omnibus Bill to provide legislative support and accelerate improvements.
Minister for the Environment Penny Simmonds says the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has been and will continue to work on improving the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) system.
'I have set a 10% reduction target for the HSNO queue in 2025/2026 and will set a more ambitious target in the next three months now that additional staff have been appointed for this work through reprioritisation of funding,' Ms Simmonds says.
'I have directed the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) to improve Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines (ACVM) assessment processes', Mr Hoggard says.
'I want a 20% queue reduction for ACVM products compared to the queues in October 2024, by the end of June 2025. By the end of June 2026 I want to see queues reduce by a further 30%.'
'In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral. It's a tax on growth. Every completed review makes it easier to do business, access services, and innovate in New Zealand. The Hairdressers and Barbers Sector Review is another example of what smarter regulation looks like in action,' Mr Seymour says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Health Committee hears submissions on Medicines Amendment Bill
The Medicines Amendment Bill will continue to be considered by the Health Committee over the next two months. Photo: 123RF MPs on Parliament's Health Select Committee were told by the public this week that, while the government's Medicines Amendment Bill is a step in the right direction, changes are still needed to ensure it balances safety with efficiency. The bill, which amends the Medicines Act 1981, received its first reading in April, and is a component of a wider push by the government to loosen burdensome regulation across sectors. Under current settings, prescription medicines can take a long time to be approved, funded, and made available to the New Zealanders that need them. Historically, we have ranked well below the OECD average for access to medicines. In his oral submission on the bill, New Zealand Initiative chief economist Dr Eric Crampton suggested that New Zealand simply wasn't a desirable target market for medicine companies. "We are a small, relatively poor country at the far end of the world that will not be at the top of anyone's agenda in getting their regulatory affairs team to deal with paperwork… It can take years after a drug has been approved by at least two markets overseas before anybody puts it into the New Zealand approvals process." In his submission, Crampton mentioned the concept of an "invisible graveyard," referring to the people who may have died or been harmed as a consequence of not having access to unapproved medicines. The Medicines Amendment Bill seeks to shake up the status quo, improving patients' access to medication by doing three things. Primarily it would introduce what has been dubbed as 'the rule of two', whereby if a medication has been approved for use in two recognised overseas regulators, Medsafe (New Zealand's medicines regulator), can bypass its usual, often lengthy, assessment process. The government hopes this will reduce the time it takes for new medicines to reach patients. The recognised overseas regulators are those from Australia, Canada, the EU, UK, USA, Switzerland and Singapore. As well as these fast-tracking medicine approvals, the bill also expands the power to prescribe medicine to a wider range of healthcare professionals, such as nurse practitioners, midwives, dentists, and optometrists, so long as the medication falls within their scope of practice. Thirdly, the bill updates some of the settings around the Medicines Classification Committee, which makes recommendations to the Minister of Health around how new medicines should be classed. This week the Health Committee also heard from Dr Graeme Jarvis, CEO of Medicines New Zealand, which represents pharmaceutical companies. While in support of the bill's intent, he told MPs, it needs refinement in order to better achieve its goal outcomes. When asked by Labour's spokesperson for Health Ayesha Verrall, why he was sceptical of the automatic approvals that Dr Crampton had suggested to the committee earlier, Dr Jarvis suggested that doing so would create "unintended consequences around parallel importing and other activities". "People flood the market, and the product may not necessarily be what you think it is, you may end up with counterfeit products coming in. There is no clawback for the regulator to go after a sponsor who has been acting in an unsatisfactory manner." When New Zealand lawmakers look outward for policy inspiration, they tend not to just throw a dart at a map on the wall and hope for the best. There are generally agreed comparable countries, commonly drawn on as case studies for good lawmaking here, which vary depending on the topic. The Medicines Amendment Bill's 'rule of two' provisions reflects this tradition, using a familiar set of jurisdictions in its list of recognised overseas regulators. Members of the Wellington Community Justice Project, a volunteer group made up of Victoria University law students, suggested to the Health Committee that while these overseas regulators have been historically reliable, that does not mean they always will be. "While the bill allows the minister to make rules for verification through secondary legislation so they can be refined to reflect changes in best international practice, we feel as though there needs to be something within the text of the bill itself, ensuring that the regulatory authorities themselves are regularly assessed and upheld to the standards of best international practice," the students told the committee. They went on to cite the current changes being made to the United States FDA, which has long been the world leader in approving medicine. "The FDA's placement on this list, most notably for the reason that the FDA is currently headed by RFK Jr, a health secretary who has been described as a conspiracy theorist, and relevant to this bill, has cancelled or frozen billions of dollars of research grants for the development of the medicines. Clearly, this bill [will outlast] RFK Junior's appointment. However, this example illustrates the need for a process to review the regulatory authorities in Section 22A, so when the questions arise about jurisdictions' suitabilities to be on the two-step verification process, these are able to be addressed." The Medicines Amendment Bill will continue to be considered by the Health Committee over the next two months, before being reported back to the House by the 9 August. You can listen to the audio version of this story by clicking the link near the top of the page. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
PGG Wrightson's Podcast, ‘Blue Shed Diary,' Broadcasting From Fieldays
Press Release – PGG Wrightson Blue Shed Diary, PGG Wrightsons new podcast is interviewing the movers and shakers of New Zealands primary sector from the PGG Wrightson podcast zone at site E75, Mystery Creek. PGG Wrightson launched its new podcast, ' Blue Shed Diary ' in February. The monthly podcast features news and information for, and about, New Zealand's rural and provincial communities. Like PGG Wrightson's iconic blue sheds dotting New Zealand's landscape, ' Blue Shed Diary' is a valuable resource for the nation's farmers and growers. The programme tackles important issues, explores innovations, showcases best practices, investigates how policies made in the cities impacts our rural communities, and offers advice on everything from sustainability to agronomy and animal health. 'Blue Shed Diary' is a conversation about the people and the land. The podcast takes conversations at the farm gate to the wider New Zealand community. Previous episodes feature interviews with Minister for the Environment Penny Simmonds, Former Trade Negotiator Charles Finney, APHANZ President Liz Shackleton, and Green Party Co-Leader Marama Davidson. This Fieldays ' Blue Shed Diary' is hosting a series of one-on-one interviews from the PGG Wrightson podcast zone, including exclusive interviews with politicians, technical specialists, industry leaders, and more! 'Blue Shed Diary' streams on Spotify, Amazon, or iHeartRadio.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Fibreboard manufacturer fined $12k for large wastewater spill
A section of Saltwater Creek, which was polluted by the spill. Photo: Supplied / Google Maps The company responsible for a wastewater spill that killed thousands of fish in a North Canterbury creek has been convicted and fined $12,000. Fibreboard manufacturers Daiken New Zealand had pleaded guilty to the charge late last year, which carried a maximum penalty of $600,000. The company is wholly owned by major Japanese multinational conglomerate Daiken Corporation but is not associated with air conditioner manufacturer Daikin Industries. The charge - brought by the Canterbury Regional Council under the Resource Management Act - was of discharging of a contaminant onto or into land in a manner that resulted in the contaminant entering water, after wastewater spilled from the medium density fibreboard (MDF) factory into Saltwater Creek, a tributary of the Rakahuri/Ashley River. The spill, which happened overnight on 31 August 2023, saw wastewater contaminated by substances used in the MDF refining processes, including paraffin, urea, formaldehyde, resin, bacteria, and surfactants, as well as a small amount of treated human waste. The court heard the spill was caused by a failure in piping waste from one part of Daiken's wastewater system to another. Daiken's wastewater system was made up of an oxidation pond, an aerated pond, storage lagoons and a partially suspended lagoon (PSL), which is about 30 metres from Saltwater Creek. Recently installed Venturi manual pumps operated continuously to keep the PSL at a constant level. When a Daiken employee noticed the outlet tube of first of the new pumps was vibrating, he fixed a custom-made brace to it. But when two other pumps were installed shortly before the spill, their tubes were left unsecured. One of the tubes broke overnight, resulting in about 1500-1700 m3 of wastewater spilling onto land and into Saltwater Creek. The Daiken New Zealand Ltd factory in Ashley, near Rangiora. in 2023, wastewater was discharged to land after a pipe broke, and into the adjacent Saltwater Creek, seen here to the bottom of the company's wastewater ponds. The Ashley River/Rakahuri is less than a kilometre from the storage ponds. The company was fined $12,000 in the Christchurch District Court on Wednesday. Photo: Google maps Lawyers representing Daiken said the employee who secured the pipe on the first tube was away when the other two were installed. In his absence, the company's mechanical co-ordinator contracted another company to install pump supports, and another to attend to the commissioning of the pumps. Neither installed braces. A senior representative of one of the companies told his counterpart at Daiken he was happy with the installation, and not concerned with "a little bit of movement". On the basis of that advice, and after organising for another contractor to complete the bracing the next day, Daiken's co-ordinator left the pumps running overnight. The judge described the person involved as a reliable senior employee with about 50 years experience, and classed the incident as a "one off lapse of judgement". Regional council officers at the scene after the spill recorded the creek as a "very turbid light brown" with a "strong odour of MDT effluent". Council reports and subsequent scientific analysis found the discharge resulted in "a severe and rapid drop in dissolved oxygen concentrations", with the decline in water quality persisting through most downstream river reaches for at least ten hours, and likely extended to the estuary - even with dilution - resulting in at least four to 10 hours of "severe and extensive degradation of water quality", Judge Hassan said. "Thousands of aquatic fauna would have perished, including likely the total downstream populations of some taxa including inanga, brown trout and bully" mostly by suffocation, with those left alive suffering "acute stress". Saltwater Creek is made up of a myriad of spring fed channels, and provided habitat for several threatened and endangered species, including the kana kana or pouched lamprey, long and short fin eels, inanga (whitebait), blue gill and giant bullies. Whitebait spawn in the river margins and wetlands of Saltwater Creek between autumn and winter, and surveys prior to the discharge identified declines in kākahi - fresh water mussels - which have a threat status of at risk. Other species included common smelt and black flounder. Te Aka Aka/Ashley estuary is classified as an area of significant natural value in the Regional Coastal Environmental Plan, and as an wetland of ecological and representative importance by the Department of Conservation, Judge Hassan said. The discharge coincided with the opening of the annual white-bait season. Anglers and whitebaiters were told to avoid the area, landowners and water users were warned of the risk to stock, and Te Whatu Ora was notified. The regional council's lawyers suggested a starting point of $130,000, while the company's legal counsel suggested a conviction and discharge would be appropriate, and, if not, a starting point of $130,000 was supported by precedent. On Wednesday, Judge Hassan convicted the company, and fined them $12,000. Judge Hassan found Daiken's offending to have caused a temporary severe environmental consequence, with experts predicting it would have taken 12 months for the ecology to recover, as well as cultural harm and harm to the wider community. Daiken had a commendable history of "responsible local environmental stewardship," the judge said, noting a wetland restoration project on the company's land in conjunction with the Waimakariri Biodiversity Trust. Judge Hassan said he considered the nature of the environment affected, the extent of harm inflicted, deliberateness and attitudinal factors, and found Daiken's culpability to be low. Through a restorative justice process, Daiken committed to pay $15,000 to Waimakariri Biodiversity Trust, and $15,000 to the Sefton Saltwater Creek Catchment Group, and agreed to contribute at least $20,000 towards consultants to carry out assessments and baseline exploratory work across the wider catchment. The company also proactively engaged with Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu and Te Ngāi Tuahuriri, committing to work together on enhancing the health of the creek, including providing regularly monitoring and improvement updates, Judge Hassan said. The terms of these payments were set out in an enforcement order, which requires Daiken make the payments by specified dates. After adopted a starting fine in the range in the order of $80,000, Judge Hassan discounted it for Daiken's guilty plea, good character and remorse, then accounted for the other financial commitments, resulting in the final fine of $12,000. The Rangiora company is wholly owned by Japan's Daiken Corporation, which made 210 billion yen (NZ$2 billion) in revenue and 3.9 billion yen (NZ$45m) in profit in the 2023/2024 financial year. Daiken New Zealand's revenue over the same period was NZ$185.5 million, and its profit after tax was $19.9m. Environment Canterbury compliance manager Jennifer Rochford said the fine was lower than the council expected, but it respected the decision of the court.
