Exclusive-ADNOC set to gain unconditional EU antitrust nod for Covestro deal, sources say
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Abu Dhabi state oil giant ADNOC is set to secure unconditional EU antitrust approval for its 14.7 billion euro ($16.6 billion) takeover of German chemicals company Covestro, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said.
The deal, ADNOC's biggest ever, underscores Middle East countries' plans to diversify their investments and reduce dependence on oil amid the global transition to cleaner energy.
The European Commission does not see any competition issues because there are no overlaps between the two companies, the people said.
The EU competition watchdog, which is scheduled to decide on the deal by May 12, declined to comment. ADNOC, which expects to close the deal in the second half of this year, could not be immediately reached for comment.
Covestro, which earlier on Tuesday cut its 2025 core profit expectations, said it does not speculate about regulatory proceedings.
"XRG and Covestro are working constructively with all relevant authorities on the FSR, FDI and Merger Control filings. We are confident that all outstanding approvals can be obtained within the long-stop date (02.12.2025)," the company said in an email.
Once the deal is completed, XRG - the international investment arm of ADNOC - will become the new majority shareholder in Covestro, which makes plastics and chemicals for the automotive, construction, and engineering sectors.
The South African and Indian competition watchdogs have already cleared the deal without demanding remedies.
The acquisition is also subject to the EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR), where the focus is on unfair foreign aid for companies. The rules aim to rein in unfair competition from non-EU companies subsidised by their governments.
ADNOC has yet to seek FSR clearance for the deal. It secured unconditional EU approval last year under the FSR for its acquisition of fertiliser firm Fertiglobe.
($1 = 0.8839 euros)
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Kirsten Donovan and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's demand to trading partners: Pledge money or get higher tariffs
Advertisement The tactic was on display last week as Trump and his team rolled out a blitz of new trade agreements before a self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline. 'South Korea is right now at a 25% Tariff, but they have an offer to buy down those Tariffs,' Trump wrote on social media Wednesday. 'I will be interested in hearing what that offer is.' The next day, Trump agreed to impose a tariff of 15 percent on imports from South Korea. The lower rate came after South Korea agreed to make $350 billion in investments in the United States and purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. Advertisement To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. 'This is no doubt a global shakedown of sorts,' said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the right-leaning Cato Institute. 'The fact is that Trump is using US tariff policy to effectively force these terms upon less-than-willing participants.' But the vague nature of these informal commitments suggests that other nations might also be looking for creative ways to escape Trump's tariffs. Although tariffs are relatively straightforward to enforce, investment and purchase commitments are not as easily policed. The EU, for instance, does not have the authority to dictate the type of investments that it has promised, and much of Japan's pledged investments are coming in the form of loans. The investment announcements have also spurred confusion and lacked the usual detail that would accompany such pacts to avoid future disputes. A large majority of the $350 billion South Korean investment would take the form of loans and loan guarantees. South Korean officials expressed confusion over what US officials meant when they said 90 percent of the profits from the investments would go to the American people. A fact sheet announcing the EU's plans allowed for some wiggle room when it said that 'E.U. companies have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion' in 'various sectors in the U.S.' 'I think there remain a lot of questions, including by the countries who have announced commitments, as to what those commitments actually really mean,' said Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who served as the top trade negotiator in the Obama administration. 'Is it enforceable? If they don't deliver a certain amount of investment over a particular period of time, do tariffs go back into place?' Advertisement During Trump's first term, the trade deal he struck with China included extensive commitments for Chinese purchases of American farm products that were never met. The agreement did have an enforcement mechanism, but it proved toothless. Some of the initial investment pledges appear to be too big to be true. New data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed that in 2024, foreign spending to acquire, start or expand US businesses totaled $151 billion — a small fraction of the new commitments being announced. The $600 billion EU investment commitment matches the total value of the goods that the United States imported from Europe last year. Although the United States has long been a magnet for foreign investment, the longer-term effects of making countries invest under duress are not clear. 'This is the kind of deal you'd more expect to see from an emerging market that can't attract capital on its merits,' said Aaron Bartnick, who worked in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Biden administration. 'And we may find over time that if the United States insists on acting like an emerging market, our trade partners may start treating us accordingly, with more onerous terms and less favorable rates that American companies and consumers are not accustomed to dealing with.' Regardless of the economic implications, Trump's tactics show no signs of abating, as he regularly claims more than $10 trillion — and climbing — in investments from foreign companies and countries. Advertisement Daniel Ames, a professor at Columbia Business School who teaches negotiation strategy, said that Trump's approach to trade deals appears to be drawn directly from his days as a developer and businessperson. Trump became notorious for destabilizing his negotiating counterparts with severely low bids, dazzling sales pitches and an ability to capitalize on weakness to gain leverage. Ames noted, however, that the EU and countries like Japan and South Korea might also be playing into Trump's sense of vanity when they unveil whopping investment promises that might ultimately be hollow. 'Donald Trump is a gifted storyteller, and I think when his counterparts recognize this, they can play to it,' Ames said. 'If you're negotiating with a narcissist, you look for ways to make them feel like they've won.' This article originally appeared in .
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Tuesday Briefing: Trump's Tariff Leverage
Trump's trade deals aren't just about tariffs As dozens of countries race to reach trade deals with the U.S. ahead of a Thursday deadline, President Trump has embraced a strategy that goes beyond the usual focus on markets and deficits: He's demanding multibillion-dollar investments in the U.S. The president's tactics echo his 'Art of the Deal' approach. He is using economic leverage to essentially force trading partners to show him the money or face astronomical tariffs, my colleague Alan Rappeport writes from Washington. To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. Here are a few examples. To secure a lower tariff rate in its deal, South Korea agreed to make $350 billion in investments in the U.S. and buy $100 billion of liquefied natural gas. The E.U indicated that it would buy $750 billion of American energy and that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the U.S. Trade experts cautioned that focusing on the eye-popping investment figures might be premature. Tariffs are easier to enforce than investment and purchase commitments, and their vague nature suggests that countries might be looking for creative ways to escape Trump's tariffs. Some of the pledges appear too big to be true, and many of them lack specifics. More tariff news: India: The foreign ministry said Trump's threat of additional tariffs was 'unjustified and unreasonable' and vowed to 'take all necessary measures' to safeguard India's interests. Malaysia: The country's solar panel industry, which was decimated by tariffs under the Biden administration, provides a warning for the region. A huge pay package for Musk Tesla said yesterday that it had granted Elon Musk roughly $29 billion worth of stock to help retain the billionaire chief executive after a judge struck down his previous multibillion-dollar pay package. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Brooklyn Mirage closed for year as troubled owner files for bankruptcy
The curtains will fall on the Brooklyn Mirage for the rest of the summer after the venue's troubled owner filed for bankruptcy Monday. Avant Gardner LLC took the drastic step after it faced ongoing financial snags and failed to reopen the prized East Williamsburg open-air concert hall in time for its 2025 season of shows – as newly minted CEO Gary Richards claimed he had no choice but to plunge into a reorganization. 'Two months ago I was brought in as CEO to rebuild the Company's culture and turn the business around,' Richards said in a statement. 'I believe this Chapter 11 restructuring is the most viable path forward.' 3 An aerial view of Brooklyn Mirage. NY Post The company faced a mountain of bad publicity and scrutiny over safety after two ravers were found dead near the Mirage in 2023. Each died after leaving separate shows at the isolated location. The venue has also been criticized as a haven for hard drugs even as Avant Gardner has argued it has strict protocols in place. The business was dinged up after chaos unfolded the same year at the Electric Zoo festival – a three-day event operated by Avant Gardner. The annual set of shows didn't take place last year and hasn't been scheduled for this year. 3 Safety issues have dogged the Mirage. Adam Gray for NY Post The Mirage was supposed to open in May after a massive renovation, but was dogged by delays and will remain shuttered for now, according to the company. 3 The Mirage won't be open until next year. Getty Images The other venues in the sprawling complex, the Great Hall and Kings Hall, will still be operational, but the closure of the Mirage has been 'catastrophic' for the company's finances, Richards said in a court filing, according to Bloomberg. The Mirage is expected to reopen by next year, the company said. Avant Gardner, which is owned by co-founder Juergen 'Billy' Bildstein, owes various vendors more than $10 million, including a cool $1.8 million to South African DJ Black Coffee Entertainment, according to the Chapter 11 filing that paints a bleak financial picture. The company hopes to borrow up to $45 million to go toward the Chapter 11 proceeding and keep operations going, the filing shows. Meanwhile, the company has up to $500 million in liabilities and only at most $100 million in assets.
