Pakistan may soon join an exclusive nuclear missile club and here's why the US is worried
TIL Creatives AI-generated image for representative purpose only
According to U.S. intelligence assessments, Pakistan is reportedly pursuing the development of a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) with the capability to reach the continental United States—a development that could alter regional and global power dynamics.
The Foreign Affairs report indicates that Pakistan's ICBM programme intensified following Operation Sindoor in May. Whilst Pakistan officially states its nuclear arsenal serves solely as deterrence against India, U.S. authorities suspect the ICBM development aims to counter potential American military actions—whether preventive strikes on nuclear facilities or involvement in Indo-Pakistani conflicts.
This represents a notable shift from Pakistan's earlier missile programme, which concentrated on regional concerns.An intercontinental ballistic missile is a sophisticated weapons system that can deliver nuclear payloads across distances exceeding 5,500 kilometres. Contemporary ICBMs typically feature MIRVs (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles), enabling multiple target strikes from a single launch.ICBMs are classified as strategic armaments owing to their extensive range and devastating potential. Although technically capable of carrying conventional or biological weapons, these systems are predominantly configured for nuclear warfare.
The nations currently maintaining operational ICBM arsenals include the U.S., Russia, China, France, the U.K., India, Israel, and North Korea. Pakistan has been the sole nuclear-armed nation without ICBM capabilities until now.Should these reports prove accurate, Pakistan's ICBM development could necessitate a substantial revision of U.S. policy. Historically, Washington has not maintained alliances with nations capable of striking American territory. Officials suggest this development might require reclassifying Pakistan as a strategic nuclear threat.Additionally, amid increasing friction between the U.S. and nuclear-armed states including Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran, Pakistan's inclusion would further complicate American diplomatic relations. The possibility of strategic coordination amongst these nations presents an especially concerning scenario for global stability.
Pakistan's potential advancement into ICBM capability, whether influenced by Operation Sindoor, regional security concerns, or global power shifts, indicates a significant transformation in its nuclear strategy. This development requires the U.S. to address another critical challenge in an increasingly complex international landscape.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Used Trade Deal threat to get India-Pak ceasefire: Trump says again
U.S. President Donald Trump has once again claimed that he got India and Pakistan to agree to a ceasefire in May using trade deals with the U.S. as leverage. While Pakistan has said Mr Trump had a role in brining about a ceasefire and recently recommended that he be awarded the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, India has consistently pushed back against Mr Trump's claim, with some officials speculating that U.S. may have intervened with Pakistan and told them to stop fighting but such interventions had not happened with the Indian side. In The Hague for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit, Mr Trump mentioned India and Pakistan as part of a set of conflicts he claimed he settled during a press conference. Also read: Did Trump cross the line on Kashmir issue? | Explained 'But maybe the most important of all, India and Pakistan, and that wasn't whether or not they may someday have nukes ... like we're talking about with Israel and Iran ... they have nuclear weapons,' Mr Trump said. 'I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade,' Mr Trump said, adding that the fighting was getting very bad. 'If you're going to go fighting each other, we're not doing any trade deal,' Mr Trump said, adding that the Indian and Pakistani sides said to him, ' No, no, no, you have to do a trade deal.' 'I had the General [Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir] who's really was very impressive. The General from Pakistan was in my office last week. You know, Prime Minister [ Narendra] Modi is a great friend of mine. He's a great gentleman. He's a great man. And I got them to reason,' he said, repeating that he had told both men that there would be no trade deals with the U.S. if India and Pakistan were going to fight.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Wings are yours': Tharoor posts cryptic message after Kharge's Modi snub
Congress chief Kharge criticised Tharoor for praising PM Modi in a recent article on Operation Sindoor; the MP responded with a poetic post, fuelling talk of internal dissent Just hours after Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge took a veiled swipe at Shashi Tharoor for praising Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Thiruvananthapuram MP posted a cryptic message on X, interpreted as a subtle retort to internal criticism. 'Don't ask permission to fly. The wings are yours. And the sky belongs to no one,' Tharoor wrote, accompanied by an image of a bird in flight. — Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) June 25, 2025 Kharge's jibe sparks intra-party tension Kharge, responding to Tharoor's recent article commending Modi's diplomacy after Operation Sindoor, remarked, 'It's country first for us, but for some people, it's Modi first.' The comment was seen as one of the sharpest rebukes from the Congress high command amid growing speculation of a rift. Tharoor had written in The Hindu that Prime Minister Modi's 'energy, dynamism and willingness to engage' were valuable diplomatic assets, deserving broader support. The article drew attention after the Pahalgam terror attack and India's subsequent military response, named Operation Sindoor. Congress distances itself from Tharoor's praise Though Tharoor later clarified at a Moscow event that his views were patriotic and not indicative of any political shift, Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate reiterated that his opinion did not reflect the party's official stance. 'It may be his own opinion; it is not the opinion of the Congress party,' Shrinate said, stressing that the party had consistently challenged the government's narrative with evidence. Kharge also remarked that Tharoor is highly fluent in English. "I can't read English well. His language is very good. That's why we have made him a Congress Working Committee member," he said in a press conference. Operation Sindoor stirs political friction Congress initially supported the government's retaliation against the Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 civilians. However, it later shifted stance, demanding transparency over the ceasefire and questioning the role of the United States in its mediation. Tharoor's support for the government's diplomatic handling — coupled with his nomination to lead a parliamentary delegation — deepened the perception of internal disagreement within the Opposition ranks. Praise amid polarisation
Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump says intelligence on Iran strikes ‘inconclusive' as leaked report questions damage claims
US President Donald Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth have admitted that the damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities by recent American airstrikes may not be as extensive as initially claimed, following a leaked Pentagon assessment that suggests the program was only set back by a few months. Speaking at the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump said the US intelligence community had provided inconclusive findings. 'The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests,' he told reporters, The Guardian reported. 'The intelligence was very inconclusive' However, he quickly returned to his earlier language, asserting: 'It was very severe. There was obliteration.' As per The Guardian, Trump even compared the use of US bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordow and Natanz enrichment sites to the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki , highlighting, in his view, their conflict-ending impact. Defence Secretary Hegseth, who had previously declared Iran's nuclear capabilities 'obliterated,' softened his tone, describing the damage as 'moderate to severe.' He also vowed an FBI investigation into the leaks but insisted the information was 'false.' The apparent shift comes after CNN reported on a leaked Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment, which indicated that Iran's key underground nuclear facilities — particularly at Fordow and Natanz — were not destroyed, and that key components, including centrifuges, could be restored within months. The Guardian and other outlets independently confirmed the CNN report, which cited sources calling the assessment 'low-confidence.' However, a US official told the Guardian that further analysis could downgrade the estimate further, noting that most of Iran's 400kg stockpile of 60 per cent enriched uranium had been relocated before the bombing and was now unaccounted for. While US and Israeli bombs targeted Fordow, Natanz and other facilities, much of the destruction appears limited to aboveground structures. Satellite imagery and nuclear experts have warned that Iran retains the ability to reconstitute its program relatively quickly — particularly if it shifts activity to secret sites that were not hit. Israel's military offered a more optimistic view. Brigadier General Effie Defrin said the Israeli Air Force's sorties 'struck a significant blow' to Iran's nuclear infrastructure and estimated the program was 'pushed years backward.' According to CNN, Israeli intelligence assessments estimate the delay at about two years. Concern is growing over Iran's possible withdrawal from the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The Iranian parliament is reportedly preparing a bill to pave the way for such a move, which would end the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and eliminate any remaining oversight. The disappearance of Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile and the uncertainty surrounding the fate of its nuclear infrastructure have been described by nuclear experts as a serious blow to nonproliferation efforts.
