Only 8 pc of bacterial infections in India treated appropriately in 2019: Lancet study
Findings published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal show that in 2019, there were nearly 15 lakh bacterial infections resistant to carbapenems -- a common antibiotic -- across eight countries that were under study.
Carbapenems are used for treating severe infections -- such as those acquired from being inside a hospital, where bacteria resistant to antibiotics are abundant.
Of the 15 lakh bacterial infections, only over a lakh treatment courses were procured -- the resulting treatment gap meant that only 6.9 per cent of the patients were treated appropriately, researchers, including those from the Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership (GARDP), Switzerland, found.
"India procured most of the treatment courses (80.5 per cent; 83,468 courses), with 7.8 per cent of infections treated appropriately," the authors wrote.
The eight countries that were part of the study included Bangladesh, Pakistan and Mexico.
The most-procured antibiotic was
tigecycline
-- usually prescribed in hospitals for serious infections.
Most of the 15 lakh infections were found to have occurred in South Asia, with over 10 lakh infections estimated to have occurred in India.
Antibiotic, or antimicrobial, resistance is emerging as a major
public health
, with a 2024
Lancet study
projecting over 39 million around the world could die due to such infections in the coming 25 years -- most of these could occur in South Asia, it said.
The study also estimated that over a million died every year during 1990-2021 from
antibiotic resistance
, in which disease-causing bacteria become immune to drugs developed to kill them, thereby rendering these drugs ineffective.
For this study, data from a systematic analysis of the burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance from 1990 to 2021 -- named 'GRAM' study -- was analysed, along with that from a health-care database managed by IQVIA, a US-based life sciences company.
The authors said the findings highlight the most recently available picture of the state of care for antimicrobial-resistant infections in the selected low- and middle-income countries.
The results also underscore the need for meaningful action by global and national policy makers, the team said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Study reveals how partial flood defences in Surat shifted risk toward vulnerable communities
Do partial flood defences actually protect cities, or do they simply redistribute the hazard? With this question in focus, a recent study by the Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) and University of Burdwan, West Bengal, has revealed how partial flood defences shift risk toward vulnerable communities, raising critical questions about urban planning and equity. The findings of the research, published in the journal Nature Cities, offer a blueprint for cities to rethink flood adaptation strategies and build a more just, resilient, and climate-ready infrastructure. 'Most flood adaptation strategies are judged by whether they reduce total damage. By that measure, Surat's partial embankment system, which was built after the catastrophic 2006 floods, was successful in protecting its dense city centre,' explained Dr Udit Bhatia, Associate Professor at IITGN's Department of Civil Engineering and the principal investigator of the study. To understand these flood adaptation strategies further, Dr Bhatia and his co-authors used advanced hydrodynamic simulations, socio-economic data, and demographic-focused analysis to model a 100-year flood event in Surat. Employing simulations to create partial embankment systems or levees systems that counter the hypothetical catastrophic event, they assessed the impact of partial embankments as a primary systemic response to flooding, and analysed how human life, infrastructure, and the economy are affected. The team noted that levees reduced flood damage in core wards of Surat by Rs 31.24 billion (US$380 million) and in suburban areas by Rs 10.34 billion (US$125 million). But those numbers did not provide the whole story. 'By simulating floods under both 'no levee' and 'partial levee' conditions using a fully coupled 1D – 2D hydrodynamic model, we observed a sharp redistribution of risk,' stated Ashish S Kumar, the lead author of the study and a Ph D scholar in IITGN's Department of Civil Engineering. When the team analysed flood impacts across Surat's 284 neighbourhoods, they found that 134 areas experienced reduced flooding, while 119 saw deeper water. The maximum flood depth reduction reached an impressive 10.13 meters in protected areas, but some unprotected neighbourhoods faced increases of up to 2.38 meters. 'While core areas remained dry longer, downstream and peripheral wards, which are often less affluent and less protected, flooded earlier and more severely,' added Kumar, who is also the recipient of the central government's prestigious Prime Minister Research Fellowship. 'We observed that flooding was delayed by up to 12 hours in protected wards near the river, a valuable lead time for evacuation or emergency response,' said Dr Bhatia in a statement issued by IITGN. In contrast, the team noted that in some downstream regions, the onset of flooding happened up to seven hours earlier than in the baseline scenario. 'This temporal resolution in flood modelling is vital for preparedness planning. Delaying a flood by even a few hours can make the difference between controlled evacuation and disaster,' he added. To better understand the social impact, the IITGN team collaborated with Prof Rajarshi Majumder, a development economist from the University of Burdwan, and Prof Vivek Kapadia, a water policy expert who served as Secretary to the Government of Gujarat and Director of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited between 2020 and 2023. Relying on Prof Majumdar's economics expertise, the researchers analysed how flood damage and exposure were distributed across neighbourhoods. They used the Gini index, a standard measure of inequality, where 0 means perfect equality and 1 indicates extreme disparity. The results were striking. The Gini index for flood damage rose from 0.55 to 0.66, and for population exposure, it rose from 0.31 to 0.39. More starkly, 91% of post-levee flood damage was concentrated in just 50% of the city's neighbourhoods, many of them poorer, with a higher proportion of marginal workers, a proxy for economic vulnerability. 'The data suggest that the residual flood risk disproportionately shifted toward communities that were already disadvantaged,' observed co-author Majumder. In Surat, as in many cities of the Global South, peripheral areas house informal settlements, agricultural workers, and artisanal communities with limited access to infrastructure or disaster support. 'It is not that levees should not be built,' noted Dr Bhatia. 'But policymakers need better tools to understand the knock-on effects, especially in cities where development is uneven and capacity is constrained.' While Surat's levees reduced overall flood losses, a common justification for such investments, the study underscored that cost-benefit analysis alone is insufficient. 'If a flood plan protects downtown but worsens conditions for outlying villages, it transcends from being just a technical issue to becoming a moral one,' said Dr Bhatia. Towards this, the study offers a much-needed model for integrated flood planning that balances structural engineering with social equity. Shedding light on the holistic approaches to urban flood adaptation that cities could undertake, Kapadia, a co-author of the study and a Professor of Practice at IITGN, suggested the deployment of multi-scalar governance, where benefits in protected zones are not assumed to justify harm in others. 'We propose redirecting tax revenue from safer zones to fund adaptation in high-risk peripheries and investing in nature-based infrastructure like wetlands or buffer zones that distribute water pressure more evenly,' Kapadia said. In the face of rising floodwaters and increasingly erratic weather, cities worldwide have turned to a seemingly straightforward solution: Build a wall. From Spain to Surat, partial embankment systems or levees have become the go-to defence against riverine and coastal flooding. The team of researchers said that often built along rivers and low-lying urban corridors, these structures are designed to hold back water during high discharge events, shielding the most economically important urban cores. But, historically, it has been observed that this protection is uneven and temporary. Floodwaters rerouted by these barriers found new paths, it was found. In safeguarding these high-value zones, flood defences often push rising waters to the edges of the city, into informal, less developed settlements that are ill-equipped to absorb the blow, the study noted. With climate change making extreme weather events more common, cities must move beyond patchwork defences, according to the study. Protecting one side of a river while flooding the other may save a few billion rupees today, but it risks compounding inequality and social unrest tomorrow, the study noted, positioning itself as a potential toolkit for city planners, policy makers, and governments.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
How right-wing outcry influenced US pausing visitor visas for Gazans
Written by Hamed Aleaziz and Ken Bensinger The Trump administration announced Saturday that it had paused approvals of visitor visas for people from the Gaza Strip, a key pathway for those seeking medical care in the United States, including young children who arrived in recent weeks with serious conditions. The State Department said it would assess the process behind those visas. 'All visitor visas for individuals from Gaza are being stopped while we conduct a full and thorough review,' the department said in a statement on the social platform X on Saturday morning. Palestinians coming to the US The move came after an intense lobbying campaign by right-wing activist Laura Loomer, who called the incoming flights a 'national security threat' in a flurry of social media posts starting Friday that targeted a nonprofit aiding in medical evacuations. Just weeks ago, the nonprofit, HEAL Palestine, an Ohio-based group that helps Palestinian families and children, began orchestrating what it called the 'largest single medical evacuation of injured children from Gaza to the U.S.,' bringing injured and ill children from Gaza to the United States for care. To date, the group says it has evacuated 63 injured children for treatment, including 11, from age 6 to 15, who were flown to hospitals in nine U.S. cities this month. Many of the children had lost limbs during the conflict in Gaza. They are expected to travel to Egypt to rejoin their families once their medical care is completed, according to HEAL Palestine. The group, which was founded last year and also operates food kitchens in Gaza, did not respond to requests for comment. Earlier this month, Dr. Zeena Salman, a co-founder of HEAL Palestine, said in a statement that the medical evacuation flights were a matter of life or death. 'These children could not wait,' Salman said. 'Their lives are at stake, and this mission is about giving them a future.' Julia Gelatt, the associate director of the U.S. immigration policy program at the Migration Policy Institute, said that more than 9,000 people with travel documents from the Palestinian Authority had entered the United States on visitor visas in the 2024 fiscal year. 'This move is consistent with the Trump administration's overall treatment of immigrants as constituting a threat to U.S. public safety,' Gelatt said. 'But it is extremely hard to imagine how someone coming to the U.S. for lifesaving medical treatment would present a national security risk.' Loomer, who wields extraordinary power in shaping Trump administration decisions over personnel and policy despite not having an official role in government, said she first learned of the flights earlier this month. 'I felt like this is something that needs attention,' she said in an interview. 'Under the Trump administration, they are actively importing Gazans into the U.S. Clearly this is not what we voted for.' On social media, Loomer called attention to a video posted Aug. 6 by HEAL Palestine, showing Palestinian children arriving at the San Francisco airport. She subsequently posted about flights to St. Louis, San Antonio and Houston and claimed without providing evidence that the nonprofit was connected to Hamas, tagging state and federal officials in her posts. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, responded to her late Friday on X that he was 'deeply concerned about the incoming flights' and was making inquiries. Loomer said she spoke with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday night to alert him to the flights and what she called the threat of an Islamic invasion. The State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Those impacted the most Loomer has a long history of anti-Islam activism. In 2017, she wrote a social media post that cheered the drowning deaths of 2,000 refugees who were trying to flee violence in Syria and other countries with large Muslim populations by crossing the Mediterranean. For years, she has pushed for the Muslim Brotherhood, the Sunni Islamist movement, to be designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government, lobbying both members of Congress and the administration. Last week, Rubio said such a designation from the State Department was 'in the works.' Medical flights for children affected by the conflict in Gaza have been occurring for well over a year, organized by a variety of charities. Dr. Mohammad Subeh, an emergency room physician who volunteers for HEAL Palestine, said that he had previously treated some of the children who recently arrived in the San Francisco Bay Area during his time in Gaza. He said that the injuries included orthopedic trauma and severe burns and that they were exacerbated by malnutrition. 'I am saddened to see fear and hate permeate within a small yet vocal segment of our society, whereby people have dehumanized children,' he said, by pushing for policies to withhold 'life- and limb-saving care.' Andrew Miller, a former senior State Department official on Israeli-Palestinian affairs in the Biden administration, said that Gaza residents could only get visas to the U.S. by appearing at an embassy in Jerusalem, Cairo or Amman, Jordan, and undergo security checks. 'What's more, just to get to a U.S. Embassy outside of Gaza, the Israeli military and security services had to clear them and anyone accompanying them,' he said, adding: 'From what I saw, any insinuation that we were taking an unusual security risk in these cases is baseless.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Free medical camp at Srisailam on August 18
A free medical camp will be held at the Srisailam temple hospital on August 18 (Monday) for the benefit of locals and devotees visiting the shrine. Expert doctors in general medicine, orthopedics, neurology and others will conduct tests and provide medicines free of cost. Paediatricians would also be available and medicines will be provided free after tests. Srisailam temple executive office (EO) M. Srinivasa Rao said Tadipatri-based M. Mallikarjuna Naidu has arranged the medical camp.
