Canadian who could not renew visa due to mental health crisis faces UK ban
Dr Heather Scott has lived in Britain since she came in 2011 on a study visa. The renowned academic, whose area of research relates to Victorian cemeteries including Highgate, Brompton and Abney Park, is required to be based in London.
She has successfully renewed her visa seven times in the past. But in 2022, she became seriously mentally ill. She was hospitalised for 13 weeks and was unable to engage with the visa renewal system as a result of being so unwell.
She overstayed for 46 days before her family in Canada could make an application for further leave to remain on her behalf.
Since then she has been trying to resolve her visa situation for three years with no success, despite submitting extensive documentary evidence to the Home Office about the medical emergency she experienced.
'I am deeply concerned about the effects this will have on my research and employment and on my quality of life and continued recovery,' Scott told the Guardian. 'This feels like a penalty for an infraction that was outside of my control. It does not seem right that I should be punished for having an illness.'
Her mental health has improved and she has resumed her academic research.
She has lodged an appeal on human rights grounds, but if it is unsuccessful she is facing a ban from the UK. An application she made in 2024 for leave to remain was refused on the grounds that she was medically stable and could return to Canada.
Scott said: 'My case highlights the issue of the Home Office applying policy in a way that is actually at odds with their own and Prime Minister Starmer's priority of attracting and retaining highly qualified professionals within the UK's research and employment sectors. It also highlights the hostility of the current climate regarding mental illness.'
In its refusal letter, the Home Office said that indefinite leave to remain was 'a privilege, not an automatic entitlement'. Officials added: 'A mere wish, desire or preference to live in the UK does not amount to an exceptional circumstance.'
They said the fact she was prevented from applying in time to renew her visa due to being 'acutely ill' also did not amount to an exceptional circumstance.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Scott's solicitor, Muhunthan Paramesvaran of Wilson Solicitors, said: 'This is an exceptional case and the Home Office's decision is wrong in my view. She has spent 10 years here lawfully and had it not been for her mental health issues she would have been able to sit the life in the UK test and would have been granted indefinite leave to remain.
'The Home Office has discretion to grant indefinite leave to remain outside the rules. Their refusal to do so has had a devastating impact on her. She has had to put her life on hold.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'All visa applications are carefully considered on their individual merits in accordance with the immigration rules.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Families hit by Britain's worst scandals face inheritance tax threat
Families of the victims of two of Britain's worst scandals face an inheritance tax sting on their compensation. Ministers had promised that money paid to dead victims of the Post Office and infected blood scandals would be free from inheritance tax, capital gains tax and income tax. But lawyers representing bereaved families have since discovered that this only applies to the first transfer of money from a victim's estate. If the money went to a victim's spouse or civil partner and they then passed it on to their children, that would be a second transfer and could be subject to inheritance tax at 40 per cent. For the compensation to go to a child or someone other than a spouse inheritance tax-free, that recipient would have to be specified in the victim's will as the beneficiary of the first transfer — not something that is possible for the children of victims who have died. It is estimated that 30,000 victims were given blood infected with HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C by the NHS between the 1970s and early 1990s. More than 3,000 people have died as a result. Thousands of sub-postmasters were wrongly accused of taking money from their tills between 1999 and 2015when a glitch in the Horizon accounting software was really to blame. Some £13.6 billion was set aside for compensation to victims across both scandals. Jade Gani from the Association of Lifetime Lawyers, a trade body for those who represent older and vulnerable people, said: 'It is a massive flaw in the system that families who have already lost so much could now have to pay back significant sums to the body ultimately responsible for the scandal.' The infected blood scandal is widely considered to be the biggest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS. Thousands of patients were given contaminated blood after accidents, during childbirth or medical procedures. Patients were also given treatments that contained infected blood. About 6,000 people who suffered from haemophilia, a condition that prevents the blood from clotting properly, and other bleeding disorders received treatments to replace missing clotting agents that were made from contaminated blood plasma. In May 2024 the prime minister Rishi Sunak apologised for a 'decades-long moral failure' and promised to pay 'whatever it costs' to compensate victims. More than £11.8 billion was set aside, which included money for infected victims and those affected by the scandal, such as partners and children. The government has paid £1.5 billion to victims since payments began in December. Payments were said to be protected from inheritance tax, but it has now emerged that this only applied to the first transfer. This is not an issue for victims who get their compensation during their lifetime because they can change their will so that family members are mentioned as first transfer beneficiaries of the compensation and so won't have to pay tax on it. • Infected blood judge angered by slow and 'unjust' compensation But the payments to victims who have already died, which are due to begin later this year, will only be inheritance tax-free for the first-transfer beneficiary — usually a spouse or civil partner who can inherit their partner's estate inheritance tax-free anyway. The first £325,000 value of an estate is free from inheritance tax (£500,000 if it is worth less than £2 million and includes a main home left to a direct descendant). Spouses or civil partners can inherit without paying inheritance tax, and they can also inherit each other's allowances, meaning a couple can pass on up to £1 million inheritance tax-free. With some blood scandal compensation payments set to hit £2 million and many in line to get about £1 million, it is likely that most victims' estates will breach the allowances. Anything left in an estate above the tax-free allowance can be taxed at 40 per cent. The decades-long delays to compensation payments mean many surviving beneficiaries are now in their eighties and nineties, and will not have enough time to give away their money tax-free. Gifts fall out of your estate for inheritance tax purposes if you live for seven years after they are made. If you live for three to seven years then anything above your allowances is taxed on a sliding scale. Die before three years and it will remain part of your estate and may be taxed at the full 40 per cent inheritance tax rate. It was reported on Wednesday that the chancellor was considering scrapping the seven-year rule or extending the seven years to ten or beyond. Ben Bell from the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners, a trade group for inheritance planners, said: 'This is a major injustice. Parliament made provision for the payments to be exempt from inheritance tax, but the delay in making the payments means that the government will, in many cases, get 40 per cent of the payments back in inheritance tax.' Owen McLaughlin's father, Steve, was born with haemophilia and died in 1989 aged 34 after being given blood plasma infected with HIV. 'My father has never met my wife, he never met my kids. All the important events in my life, he wasn't there,' said Owen, 55, from Exeter. Steve left everything to his wife, Pam, who is now 80 and suffering from a number of health conditions, including multiple sclerosis. She expects to get more than £500,000 in compensation and wants to pass it on to her two sons and six grandchildren, but will then need to survive at least seven years if they are to fully escape inheritance tax. 'It is unfair because if my dad had known there would be this future compensation and the tax rules would be as they are, he would have written his will differently,' Owen said. 'It is completely immoral that the government can pay compensation for a frankly heinous act and then think about immediately taking it back through inheritance tax.' Chris Wood's father, John, was infected with HIV in 1982 after being given blood during a triple heart bypass operation to treat his angina. He lived with the disease for years without knowing, before getting seriously ill during the Christmas of 1992 and being admitted to hospital. He died three weeks later, devastating Chris and his two sisters. Chris's, mother Rita, who is 91, will inherit John's compensation and wants to give it to her children straight away but with her estate worth more than her IHT-free allowances the family face having to pay back £360,000 if she dies within three years. 'I understand it has to stop somewhere, but the exemption should carry through to immediate family,' said Chris, 53, from Chelmsford in Essex. 'We could have to pay back 40 per cent of what we get within a year or two — it's a kick in the teeth after all we have been through.' About 700 sub-postmasters were convicted of offences including fraud, false accounting and theft based on incorrect information provided by the Horizon accounting system. Some went to prison and thousands more were wrongly accused. With the earliest cases now 26 years ago and compensation still being paid, the victims are facing similar inheritance tax worries. Stephen Lewis from the law firm Schofield and Sweeney, which represents 50 sub-postmasters, said that while there would be fewer families affected than with the infected blood scandal, inheritance tax was an issue. 'I anticipate there will be a sizeable element that this could affect just by the fact that we are dealing with compensation for events from up to 25 years ago,' he said. A third of the 10,814 Post Office victims are still waiting for compensation, and at least 345 died before being compensated. Neil Hudgell from the law firm Hudgell Solicitors, which represents 1,000 sub-postmasters, said: 'Compensation ought to be treated holistically as to the close family unit, and there shouldn't be any tax payable on the first or second transfers after compensation is paid.' The Association of Lifetime Lawyers and Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners has written to HM Revenue & Customs about the issue in a push for change. A beneficiary of a will has the option to redirect money to new beneficiaries if they choose through a deed of variation. If done within two years of death, the change will be treated as if the deceased included them in the original will, meaning that compensation could be exempt from inheritance tax. This, however, is not an option for the beneficiaries of many infected blood victims, who died more than two years ago. The Association wants the two-year limit to begin on payment of compensation, rather than death, which would give the initial beneficiary time to ensure that family members benefit from the tax exemption. Gani said: 'Many victims have paid the ultimate price with their lives and now, unless the law changes, their families are forced to pay again; this time to the taxman.' The government said: 'While no amount of compensation will make up for the suffering people have endured, we are committed to delivering compensation as swiftly as possible. 'Victims' compensation is exempt from inheritance tax when applied to the estate of the person to whom the compensation payment was made, and this relief will not extend to subsequent beneficiaries of the deceased person's estate.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
King Charles leads 80th VJ Day commemoration in UK
King Charles led VJ Day commemorations in the UK as a national service of remembrance and two-minute silence marked the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in the second world war and the end of the six-year-long conflict. He was joined by the queen, the prime minister, Keir Starmer, and veterans who served in the far east theatres of war as wreaths were laid at the National Memorial Arboretum service in Staffordshire. Powerful testimonies read aloud reminded of the terrible cost of war, while a flypast featured the Red Arrows and historic second world war aircraft, including a Spitfire, Hurricane and Lancaster bomber. Guests of honour included 33 veterans aged from 96 to 105. A Royal Navy veteran, Alfred Conway, from Lincolnshire, watched as his great granddaughter laid a wreath on the Burma railway memorial at the arboretum. George Durrant, who served in the intelligence corps, appeared on stage to urge people not to forget the sacrifices made by his comrades. In Japan, Emperor Naruhito spoke of his 'deep remorse' on the anniversary and said he felt 'a deep and renewed sense of sorrow' in a sombre speech in an indoor arena in the centre of the Japanese capital. A visit by two cabinet ministers to the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo angered countries that suffered Japanese military atrocities, particularly China and South Korea, AFP reported. The shrine, which the country's Asian neighbours view as a symbol of Japan's wartime aggression, honours 2.5 million mostly Japanese soldiers who perished since the late 19th century but also enshrines convicted war criminals. Japan's prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, a political moderate, sent a customary offering to Yasukuni, according to Kyodo news. No Japanese prime minister has visited the shrine since 2013, when a trip by then-premier Shinzo Abe sparked fury in Beijing and Seoul. China's foreign ministry on Friday summoned the chief minister of Japan's embassy in China, Yokochi Akira, to lodge solemn representations over Japanese politicians visiting the war shrine, according to a ministry statement, Reuters reported. In an audio message before the national service of remembrance to the nation, realms and Commonwealth, Charles spoke of allied prisoners of war 'who endured years of brutal captivity: the starvation, disease and cruelty that tested the very limits of human endurance' and the 'mental and physical scars' the war left on those who survived. He vowed the service and sacrifice of VJ Day heroes 'shall never be forgotten'. In what is believed to be the most direct reference by a British monarch to the suffering in Hiroshima and Nagasaki after their atomic bombings, he said: 'We should also pause to acknowledge that in the war's final act, an immense price was paid by the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki – a price we pray no nation need ever pay again.' More than 90,000 British troops were casualties in the war against Japan, and nearly 30,000 died according to the Royal British Legion, while more than 12,000 Britons were among the 190,000 Commonwealth troops held as prisoners of war by the Japanese. Of the Allied forces, the US suffered the greatest losses, with more than 100,000 killed in action. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, more than 200,000 people were killed by the US bombs and in the months after succumbing to radiation sickness, the effects of burns and other serious injuries. Hundreds of buildings across the UK were due to be lit up on Friday evening to mark VJ Day 80, including Buckingham Palace, 10 Downing Street, the Houses of Parliament, the Tower of London, Tower 42, the Shard, Blackpool Tower, Gateshead Millennium Bridge, Durham Cathedral, Cardiff Castle, the Cenotaph and the White Cliffs of Dover.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
AntiSocial Asylum hotels
Anger has flared outside hotels used to house asylum seekers. Protestors say they are worried about illegal migration, cost to the taxpayer and a lack of consultation, but one issue seems to spark even more concern - the safety of women and children. Opponents have accused protestors of racism and whipping up hate. Is there any evidence that asylum seekers are more likely to commit sexual offences? We trace the clamour for more data to answer that question. Police have been given new guidance on disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects in criminal cases - especially high profile ones. What might be the effect? And why are so many asylum seekers currently housed in hotels anyway? We hear how the system is supposed to work and how it's evolved. Presenter: Adam Fleming Producers: Simon Tulett, Natasha Fernandes, Emma Close and Tom Gillett Editor: Penny Murphy Production coordinator: Janet Staples Studio engineer: Annie Gardiner
