logo
Elon Musk's dream of a third party could disrupt US politics

Elon Musk's dream of a third party could disrupt US politics

Time of India4 days ago
Elon Musk's dream of a third party could disrupt US politics (AP Image)
It appears the world's wealthiest person has set his mind to a new startup: his own political party.
As the ongoing public fracturing of the relationship between the US President Donald Trump and his top election financier continues to play out in public, Elon Musk has again vented his opposition to the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," a tax and spending bill, which he believes undoes the efficiency mantra he sought to instill in Washington.
Musk has gone as far to warn Republican lawmakers who pass the bill that he'll run candidates against them in next year's primaries.
And he also threatened the broader US two-party system with the promise he'll form a faction of his own.
"If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day," he wrote on X. "Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE."
A genuinely competitive third party would upend more than a century of Democrats-Republicans dominance at all levels of government.
Yet few have come close, despite dozens of minor parties operating across the US for decades.
The Libertarian Party, established in 1971, is the third biggest in America. Campaigning for free markets, small government and personal freedoms, it had its best presidential election performance in 2016 with candidate Gary Johnson, who won 3.27 percent of the nationwide vote.
But that's a long way from the tens of millions of votes needed to win the White House, a governorship or even a state legislature seat.
The Green Party is another long-running party that has run candidates in state and federal races. Like the Libertarians, it too holds no seats in government.
US politics: Money,
grassroots movement
essential
The very nature of the American political system is the "winner takes all" principle through the widespread use of a "first past the post" voting system.
This delivers victory to candidates with the most votes — almost always a Republican or Democrat.
There are other factors hampering success, according to Bernard Tamas, a political scientist at Valdosta State University, US, who has written extensively on the subject.
Tamas said it's fundamental for a third party to tap into popular unrest — a large number of people who are dissatisfied with the current political options — and build a groundswell grassroots movement.
"One of the biggest problems with the parties that have emerged is that they're not really tapping into that anger," Tamas said. Upstart parties instead "tend to be more wishy-washy and [are] not really focusing in on that strong urge for change."
If tapping into grassroots is essential, so is money.
Parties spend billions of dollars to get their candidates elected. According to donations watchdog OpenSecrets, nearly $16 billion (about €13.58 billion) was spent across the 2024 presidential and congressional races.
Musk himself was the biggest donor in the 2023-24 election cycle. He gave more than $291 million to Republicans across all races.
Massive campaign war chests help parties "get out the vote" — buying the advertising and campaigning materials that expose candidates to the public and earn their vote.
It doesn't guarantee a win — the Democrats spent more than the Republicans in 2024 — but it certainly helps.
"You need money for things like ballot access and a number of other things, but no third party would ever have enough money to compete against the Republicans and Democrats on their own terms," said Tamas.
Third party in US unlikely
Could a genuine third party supplant the Democrats or Republicans? It's unlikely in Tamas's view.
Instead of winning seats and building long-term success, Tamas said they instead "sting like a bee."
"They emerge very quickly, they run a bunch of candidates all over the country and then they cause one or both major parties major pain," Tamas said. "They basically are pulling away votes."
This is called the "spoiler effect", where protest candidates leech votes away from an often ideologically similar mainstream candidate.
In some cases, they could pull away enough votes that a frontrunner loses the lead and falls to second place.
It's the fear of a third party groundswell that causes the major parties to alter their policies to appease these voters.
Once the change is achieved, like a bee that's stung its victim, "it dies."
"The most successful third parties in America last about a decade. Once they become too much of a threat, the major parties start stealing their rhetoric, their ideology," said Tamas.
Do Americans want a new party?
Not all Americans are happy with their options.
Donald Trump's net approval rating is in negative territory and YouGov's latest polls found almost 3 in 5 Americans view the Democratic Party unfavorably. In 2022, a Pew Research analysis found overall support for more parties in the political system.
But it doesn't mean a new party would succeed. A study by two US political scientists in May 2024 found "disaffected partisans" — Republicans and Democrats unsatisfied with their own parties — were less likely to vote for a third, more centrist alternative.
Tapping into popular anger and frustration with the status quo, Tamas said, is the fastest pathway to success. For a person like Musk, he might do well to look towards the "Fight Oligarchy" movement of left-wing opponents like Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders currently touring America, or the original MAGA movement, if he wants to start a party.
"These are very good examples to follow… the tapping into people's grievances is really it," Tamas said.
"They force the [major] parties to respond by threatening their careers and their livelihood."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China used embassies to undermine Rafale sales: French intelligence
China used embassies to undermine Rafale sales: French intelligence

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

China used embassies to undermine Rafale sales: French intelligence

China deployed its embassies to spread doubts about the performance of French-made Rafale jets after they saw combat in India and Pakistan's clashes in May, French military and intelligence officials have concluded, implicating Beijing in an effort to hammer the reputation and sales of France's flagship fighter. Findings from a French intelligence service seen by The Associated Press say defence attaches in China's foreign embassies led a charge to undermine Rafale sales, seeking to persuade countries that have already ordered the French-made fighter — notably Indonesia — not to buy more and to encourage other potential buyers to choose Chinese-made planes. The findings were shared with AP by a French military official on condition that the official and the intelligence service not be named. Four days of India-Pakistan clashes in May were the most serious confrontation in years between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, and included air combat that involved dozens of aircraft from both sides. Military officials and researchers have since been digging for details of how Pakistan's Chinese-made military hardware — particularly warplanes and air-combat missiles — fared against weaponry that India used in airstrikes on Pakistani targets, notably French-made Rafale fighters. Sales of Rafales and other armaments are big business for France's defence industry and help efforts by the government in Paris to strengthen ties with other nations, including in Asia where China is becoming the dominant regional power. France is fighting what it calls a disinformation campaign against the Rafale Pakistan claimed its air force downed five Indian planes during the fighting, including three Rafales. French officials say that prompted questions about their performance from countries that have bought the fighter from French manufacturer Dassault Aviation. India acknowledged aircraft losses but didn't say how many. French air force chief Gen Jerome Bellanger said that he's seen evidence pointing to just 3 Indian losses — a Rafale, a Russian-made Sukhoi and a Mirage 2000, which is an earlier generation French-made jet. It was the first known combat loss of a Rafale, which France has sold to eight countries. 'Of course, all those, the nations that bought Rafales, asked themselves questions,' Bellanger said. French officials have been battling to protect the plane from reputational damage, pushing back against what they allege was a concerted campaign of Rafale-bashing and disinformation online from Pakistan and its ally China. They say the campaign included viral posts on social media, manipulated imagery showing supposed Rafale debris, AI-generated content and video-game depictions to simulate supposed combat. More than 1,000 social media accounts newly created as the India-Pakistan clashes erupted also spread a narrative of Chinese technological superiority, according to French researchers who specialize in online disinformation. French military officials say they haven't been able to link the online Rafale-bashing directly to the Chinese government. Intelligence assessment says Chinese officials lobbied potential clients to ditch French planes. But the French intelligence service said Chinese embassy defence attaches echoed the same narrative in meetings they held with security and defence officials from other countries, arguing that Indian Air Force Rafales performed poorly and promoting Chinese-made weaponry. The defence attaches focused their lobbying on countries that have ordered Rafales and other potential customer-nations that are considering purchases, the intelligence service said. It said French officials learned of the meetings from nations that were approached. Asked by AP to comment on the alleged effort to dent the Rafale's appeal, the Ministry of National Defence in Beijing said: 'The relevant claims are pure groundless rumors and slander. China has consistently maintained a prudent and responsible approach to military exports, playing a constructive role in regional and global peace and stability.' In recent years, China has stepped up disinformation campaigns on global social media platforms like X, Instagram or Facebook, using networks of state-sponsored influencers, sites that pose as news organizations, and fake social media accounts to spread narratives from Beijing. France's Defence Ministry said the Rafale was targeted by 'a vast campaign of disinformation" that 'sought to promote the superiority of alternative equipment, notably of Chinese design.' France considers the jet a strategic French offering "The Rafale was not randomly targeted. It is a highly capable fighter jet, exported abroad and deployed in a high-visibility theater," the Defence Ministry wrote on its website. 'The Rafale was also targeted because it represents a strategic French offering. By attacking the aircraft, certain actors sought to undermine the credibility of France and its defence industrial and technological base. The disinformation campaign therefore did not merely target an aircraft, but more broadly a national image of strategic autonomy, industrial reliability, and solid partnerships.' Dassault Aviation has sold 533 Rafales, including 323 for export to Egypt, India, Qatar, Greece, Croatia, the United Arab Emirates, Serbia and Indonesia. Indonesia has ordered 42 planes and is considering buying more. China may be hoping to weaken the security relationships that France is building with Asian nations by spreading worries about the equipment it supplies, said Justin Bronk, an airpower specialist at the Royal United Services Institute, a defence and security think tank in London. 'From a point of view of limiting Western countries' influence in the Indo-Pacific, it would make sense for China to be using the performance of Pakistani weapon systems — or at least purported performance — in downing at least one Rafale as a tool to undermine its attractiveness as an export,' he said. 'They certainly saw an opportunity to damage French sales prospects in the region."

Donald Trump admin building own chatbot to boost govt tech with AI tools: Report
Donald Trump admin building own chatbot to boost govt tech with AI tools: Report

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump admin building own chatbot to boost govt tech with AI tools: Report

The Trump administration is developing a new website called ' and an API meant to 'accelerate government innovation with AI,' according to 404 Media, which found a draft version of the site with code posted to GitHub. Even though Musk is no longer involved in the government and is publicly feuding with the President, the plan shows that some of DOGE's ideas are still being used.(Pexels) The project seems to be led by the General Services Administration's Technology Transformation Services, which is run by Thomas Shedd, a former engineer at Tesla, according to As per New York Times, Shedd is connected to Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and has publicly supported using AI to spot fraud, review government contracts, and build 'AI coding agents' to write software for federal agencies. The draft version of uncovered by 404 Media (the live link currently redirects to the White House website), outlines three tools as part of the platform and says they are 'powered by the best in American AI.' These include an AI chat assistant, an API that connects to models from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, and a dashboard for reviewing how AI is used across agencies. According to 404, the full site was supposed to go live on July 4th. Also Read: Trump rips apart Musk in brutal attack, calls DOGE 'a monster' that may 'go back and eat Elon' Elon Musk no longer involved in the government Even though Musk is no longer involved in the government and is publicly feuding with the President, the plan shows that some of DOGE's ideas are still being used. Shedd, described as a close Musk associate, who has pushed for the GSA to 'operate like a software startup' and has promoted the use of AI tools that other agencies would be required to adopt. The draft site also mentioned plans to work with Amazon Bedrock, Meta's LLaMA, and other FedRAMP-approved vendors, though some of the AI models mentioned do not currently have official government clearance. Federal workers raised concerns Some federal workers have raised concerns about the AI project. Internal reaction has been 'pretty unanimously negative,' with employees worried about possible security issues, the risk of bugs affecting key systems, and the chance that AI could suggest canceling important contracts.

Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration
Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Harvard students push back as over 200 sign open letter against demands from Trump administration

Over 200 Harvard students have signed an open letter urging the University not to bow to political pressure, as former President Donald Trump claims a 'historic' deal with Harvard is imminent. The letter, circulated by Harvard Students for Freedom —an unrecognized student group—was released on July 4 to emphasize concerns around institutional independence and academic freedom. According to a report by The Harvard Crimson , the letter attracted 197 public signatures and 29 anonymous ones from undergraduate and graduate students alike. It was addressed 'To Harvard from its Students' and expressed unease about potential compromises in ongoing negotiations between the University and the Trump administration. Concerns over academic freedom, student rights The letter outlines several red lines that students believe the University must not cross. These include refraining from altering its curriculum under political pressure, refusing to dismiss faculty members over ideological disagreements, and not disciplining students for exercising peaceful free speech. One of the more pressing concerns involves the possible sharing of disciplinary records of international students, which students believe could open the door to politically motivated deportations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 새로 나온 '실비보험' 최적가 비교가입! "月 보험료 낮추고, 보장은 든든하게"... 굿리치 [등록번호:제2006038313호] 가입하기 Undo The group stressed that any deal with the federal government should not come at the expense of Harvard's core academic principles, nor should it set a precedent that undermines university autonomy nationwide. Independence Day release marks symbolic resistance The timing of the letter's release, on July 4, was a deliberate choice. The group positioned the move as a show of unity and a reaffirmation of values such as freedom of expression and institutional integrity. By publishing the letter on a national holiday, the students aimed to frame their message as a defense of foundational American principles, according to The Harvard Crimson . University response remains guarded While Trump has publicly claimed that Harvard is close to reaching a deal with his administration, the University has not confirmed those claims. It has only stated that its communications with the White House have focused on efforts to combat antisemitism and support viewpoint diversity. This ambiguity has sparked concern among students, faculty, and alumni about the nature of the negotiations and their potential implications. The student letter argues that Harvard must maintain its stance, guided by legal principles and a commitment to truth. The signatories contend that conceding to political pressure would erode the University's credibility and autonomy, not just for Harvard, but across higher education institutions in the U.S. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store