Interview: Rahul Mehta of MFF on why India needs strategic philanthropy - 'you can't innovate without talent'
With a firm belief that scientific and technological excellence is key to national progress, MFF partners today with top IITs to establish interdisciplinary schools focused on data science, biosciences, AI, health tech, and sustainability.
With over 1,400 students currently enrolled across IITs at Madras, Guwahati, Roorkee, Kanpur, and Palakkad and a target of graduating 12,000 by 2031, MFF's collaborative model goes beyond traditional funding. Under the leadership of CEO Rahul Mehta, it shapes programs, recruits faculty, and aligns with long-term national goals.
In India to announce two new schools at IIT Indore on July 22, Rahul Mehta spoke to LiveMint about the Mehta Family Foundation's journey, the state of academic philanthropy in India, and the road ahead. Excerpts from the interview:
Q: Can you tell us about your background and how the Mehta Family Foundation started?
A: I left India when I was 17. I didn't come from a wealthy or highly educated family—my parents had no formal education. But I worked hard, started multiple companies, and after selling my first one, I had more money than I ever thought I would need. I decided to start the Foundation. I've always believed I am just a steward of this wealth—my goal was to give it away meaningfully.
Initially, I donated to small nonprofits, gave $500 here, $1000 there, even to Indian charities. But over time, I realised I needed to decide to donate where I felt the deepest impact. That's when my philanthropic journey became more focused on education and institution-building.
Q: What was the first major project you funded in India?
A: It started around 2005–06. On a trip to the Aurobindo Ashram, I stopped at IIT Madras and had a conversation with the then-director, Dr K Kasturirangan. We discussed their vision, and that led to the creation of the School of Biosciences and Bioengineering—the first such school I funded.
Later, in 2010, they returned asking for support to expand lab space, animal hubs, and research infrastructure, which became our second project at IIT Madras. So we've supported two major projects there.
Q: How did you choose the areas of focus—Bio, AI, Sustainability?
A: I looked at trends in US academia. By the early 2000s, half of engineering faculty in the US were shifting their focus to healthcare and bio. But Indian campuses hadn't even considered biosciences yet—they still offered only traditional disciplines like mechanical or chemical engineering.
Similarly, I saw that Indian institutions were slow to adopt AI and data science. In 2018–19, I even hosted a meeting in Delhi with several IIT directors to pitch data science and AI schools—no one was interested. Then came ChatGPT and suddenly everyone saw its relevance. The same is happening now with sustainability.
I havve been pushing for formal education in this space for the last three years. We need a new generation of talent explicitly trained in sustainability.
Q: You have been talking about the 12,000 deep-tech graduates goal. What does that mean?
A: Across eight schools we've funded so far, each school typically includes BTech, MTech, and PhD programs. A typical school has:
● 40–60 BTech seats per year → 160–240 BTech students at steady state
● 50–75 master's students With a firm belief that scientific and technological excellence is key to national progress, MFF partners today with top IITs to establish interdisciplinary schools focused on data science, biosciences, AI, health tech, and sustainability.
Every school supports around 300–400 students. With eight schools, that's over 3000 students in steady-state enrollment—equivalent to the size of a new IIT. If you project this over 10 years, it adds up to over 10,000–12,000 graduates, which is critical for India's intellectual and innovation capacity.
Q: Are these schools integrated into existing IITs or independent?
A: They're integrated within existing IITs but are independently funded and branded—like the Mehta Family School of Data Science and AI. So far, we've supported biosciences, AI, and sustainability schools. Each has its own set of faculty, curriculum, and students.
Q: What is your long-term vision for the Foundation in India?
A: To help India build a critical mass of intellectual talent across future-critical areas. For example, one school in sustainability isn't enough. We probably need three or four. Public health is another area I'd like to enter. The idea is to look at long-term capacity creation—not just short-term programs.
Q: Are there specific challenges in setting up these departments in India?
A: Many. The philanthropic ecosystem isn't as mature as the West. In India, people still ask: 'Why do you want to give us money?' Universities often don't know how to write proposals.
Even when they agree, internal processes like Senate approvals, faculty alignment, curriculum design—it all takes 18 months or more. In contrast, if I offer money to Harvard, I get a proposal in 24 hours, and they fly out to meet me.
Q: So it's a 10+ year commitment to build each department?
A: Absolutely. From planning, curriculum design, faculty recruitment, to graduating the first batch—it's easily a decade-long journey. But that's what strategic philanthropy requires: focus, patience, and long-term commitment.
Q: How do you assess the impact of your work—what keeps you going?
A: The students. When I visit campuses, I meet them in classrooms and ask about their lives. Most come from small towns I have never heard of. Many are the first in their family to go to college. Getting a job post-graduation changes their lives—and their families.
That's what keeps me going. One student's transformation is enough to justify all the effort. But here, we're talking about thousands.
Q: Do you worry about brain drain—will these students stay in India?
A: I don't dictate that. They should do what's best for them. But global forces are shifting—many will stay in India because opportunities here are growing. The goal is to empower them to lead wherever they are.
Q: Where does India stand in the innovation economy today?
A: We're just beginning. Our innovation capacity has to scale massively. Take healthcare—MD Anderson Cancer Centre in Houston, US, has more cancer researchers than all of India combined. In battery tech, China and the US are far ahead. We must build deep talent pools in these sectors to compete. You can't innovate without talent.
You can't innovate without talent.
Q: And where do you see philanthropy in India going from here?
A: It's getting better. Compared to 2006, people are now more welcoming, more appreciative. But strategic philanthropy is still rare. Many want quick wins—whereas real impact, like building academic institutions, takes 15–20 years. You have to pick one mission and stick to it. That's what we are doing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
ICAI Council clears new financial statement format for businesses; businesses may adopt by FY28
The way Indian companies present their profit and loss statements is set for a makeover, one that could provide investors with a clearer picture of what's driving profits and where the money goes. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has approved a new reporting format under Ind AS 118, bringing it one step closer to implementation, two persons aware of the development said. ICAI will send the proposed new format to audit watchdog National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) for review; the format aims to overhaul how companies present revenue and expenses, offering greater clarity on core performance and return generation. Also read: Businesses will soon have to file financial statements in a new format. Here's why. If cleared, it will be sent to the ministry of corporate affairs for final sign-off, said one of the persons cited above, requesting anonymity. While a formal rollout date has yet to be announced, an April 2027 implementation is likely, in line with a similar global transition to IFRS 18. Queries emailed on Thursday to the ministry of corporate affairs and NFRA remained unanswered at the time of publishing. Council nod, next steps ICAI's Council comprises elected chartered accountants as well as nominees from the government and other constitutional or regulatory bodies, including representatives of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India and the ministry of corporate affairs. CA. Charanjot Singh Nanda, president of ICAI, told Mint in a statement that the proposed Ind AS 118 will mark a significant step forward in enhancing the quality and clarity of financial reporting in India. 'This standard is designed to improve how entities communicate financial performance, with a particular focus on the statement of profit and loss," said Nanda. 'While it does not alter the way financial performance is measured, it introduces a more structured and consistent approach to how that performance is presented and disclosed. The proposed standard will not affect how companies measure their financial performance and the overall profit figure. This will greatly benefit users of financial statements by enabling more meaningful comparisons and deeper insights into a company's operations," he explained. Also read: ICAI tightens norms on tax audits accountants can accept Three-part breakdown The new format will require businesses to show all income and expenses in three defined groups: operating, which deals with the core business activities; investing activities dealing with returns or losses; and financing, which deals with items like interest paid or received, experts said quoting ICAI's exposure draft of Ind AS118 released earlier for public comments. This structure is expected to help investors and regulators better assess performance in both core operations and auxiliary investment activities. Another major change is the requirement to bring certain information—currently disclosed outside the financial statements in investor presentations, press releases, or management commentary—within the audited financials. These are often referred to as management-defined performance measures and will now fall under statutory audit scope. Additionally, the format will mandate more granular disaggregation of income and expenses, with clearer disclosure of the nature of specific costs. These changes aim to improve the transparency, auditability, and comparability of financial statements, and will require preparers to be more precise in their reporting, they added. Also read: Punish bankrupt company owners who don't cooperate in debt resolution, set up advance ruling to cut down delay: ICAI Global alignment The move is part of a broader global shift in financial reporting formats, aligning with International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 18, which takes effect globally from January 2027. However, India's timeline for adoption remains undecided. A likely implementation from April 2027 is possible, though the final decision will depend on discussions among ICAI, NFRA, and the government, the person cited above said.
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Brand names, empty wallets: The harsh reality of unpaid internships in India
Have you ever worked for free? If yes, then you know what it feels like to contribute time, skill, and effort, and receive no money in return. For thousands of students across India, this is not an exception but the sprawling metros to small-town campuses, thousands of Indian students reluctantly labour for free each year. They pour hours into meaningful projects, sometimes even high-stakes research, yet walk away without a single rupee in their best, they earn 'exposure'; at worst, they accrue mounting expenses on travel, food and rent. Even some of India's biggest private firms, think tanks, media houses, and government-linked institutions continue to offer unpaid or barely-paid internships. Despite rising awareness about fair pay, unpaid internships remain deeply entrenched. According to a recent Internshala report, approximately 35 percent of internships in India offer no stipend at all, with another 25 percent paying below Rs 3,000 per fields from the media to tech, corporate giants, NGOs and government bodies alike continue to rely on unpaid or underpaid students accept these roles as rites of passage, believing that the right name on their CV will unlock future opportunities. Others feel trapped by intense competition and a lack of paid the real costs, financial and emotional, can be BARRIER TO ENTRYThe harshest truth about unpaid internships is that they're not equally accessible. For students from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities or modest financial backgrounds, working for free is a luxury they can't afford.'Financially, it was tough at times, especially since I had to manage my own expenses,' says Aman, who interned at Makonis Solutions and IIT Guwahati. For students from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities or modest financial backgrounds, working for free is a luxury they can't afford. While he made the most of the opportunity and called it "truly rewarding," he admitted that being paid would have added 'more confidence and encouragement.'Others are forced to skip internships altogether, missing out on the hands-on learning and resume value that their peers, often from wealthier backgrounds, gain for PRESTIGE TRAPFor many, the lure of a big name justifies the lack of pay. Prestigious institutions frequently defend unpaid roles by offering intangible benefits like 'networking' or 'exposure.'advertisement'It was a reputed company, Reliance Industries Ltd, where I would get to work with high-level professionals and get good exposure to the real work environment,' shares Trisha Pal, explaining why she took the role despite financial other words, students are told: 'Ohh! We are giving you a brand name to make your resume efficient. What else do you need?'This mindset normalises the absence of even a basic stipend, subtly shifting the value of internships from learning and growth to name-dropping in job HEALTH AND BURNOUTBeyond finances, unpaid internships can have serious emotional consequences. Students often juggle coursework, travel, rent, and full-time work schedules, without any financial compensation or proper mentorship.'It was not easy and things were not in good condition at that time. Financially, I had to depend on my parents a lot, and that made me feel a bit guilty sometimes,' says Kirti Gupta, who interned at the Archaeological Survey of India.'Emotionally, it was tiring sometimes, managing studies, travel, and the internship without getting paid did feel unfair at times. There were moments I questioned if it was worth it, especially when I saw some of my fellow mates doing paid internships.'advertisementWhen the work isn't valued, or worse, goes unrecognised, it chips away at confidence and leads to burnout. Students often juggle coursework, travel, rent, and full-time work schedules, without any financial compensation or proper mentorship. URBAN VS. RURAL DIVIDEThere are more serious consequences of unpaid internships. For example, students based in metropolitan cities may find it easier to navigate unpaid roles, often relying on family support for living contrast, students from smaller towns incur major expenses, housing, food, and transport, just to participate. Trisha Pal points out how she had to cover all her expenses from her own pocket during her internship, making the unpaid nature of the work even opportunity gap between these two groups widens as a CLASS DIVIDEUnpaid internships quietly favour the already privileged. Those who can afford to work for free get early access to networks, mentorship, and job recommendations. Those who can't are left behind, not due to lack of talent, but due to economic openly admits, 'Yes, many times I felt like I was missing out on important internship opportunities just because I could not afford to work for free. It felt unfair, like some doors were closed just because I did not have the money, not because I was not good enough.'GOVERNMENT PROGRAMMES AND POLICY GAPSEven government-linked institutions fall short. Many internships at bodies like NITI Aayog or the Parliament remain unpaid or the National Education Policy 2020 encourages internships for holistic learning, there is still no strong mandate to provide minimum pay or address formal guidelines or enforcement, students are left at the mercy of organisational goodwill. Many internships at bodies like NITI Aayog or the Parliament remain unpaid or underpaid. THE RS 5,000 REVOLUTIONWhile a stipend of Rs 3,000-5,000 may seem modest, it can be life-changing for a student. It pays for recharges, meals, and occasional travel, and, more importantly, it respects the intern's time.'Even if both have similar learning values, there is no harm in going for the paid one since it would be an additional benefit no one would miss out on,' Trisha Pal Singh, who interned at a multinational company, echoed the same: 'If I know I will get the same exposure in both institutions, then I will go to the one which is giving me extra benefits.'SO, WHY DO UNPAID INTERNSHIPS STILL EXIST?Unpaid internships persist because companies reap 'free' labour under the guise of the system still rewards the illusion of opportunity over actual support. As long as students are willing to work for brand names or are forced to accept free labour due to lack of alternatives, the cycle break the cycle, three steps are crucial:Legislative action - enforce minimum stipends and transparent selection commitment - companies should budget for fair intern advocacy - candidates must value their own worth and demand despite acknowledging the downsides, summs it up best: 'I didn't let the lack of pay stop me. I was focused on grabbing any opportunity to learn.'But should students have to choose between growth and survival? Or can we start treating interns as contributors and not just future potential?- Ends
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's India tariffs set to hit US shoppers hard: Phones, auto parts, jeans, jewellery to get costlier
US President Donald Trump's recent announcement of a 25% tariff on Indian imports, effective August 1, could lead to noticeable price hikes for American consumers across several essential sectors. From smartphones and clothing to auto parts and jewellery, the impact is expected to be broad and significant. The move, announced via Trump's Truth Social platform, has drawn attention for its potential to disrupt trade flows and raise costs in the US at a time when inflation remains a concern. India a key supplier in critical sectors India plays a central role in supplying a wide range of goods to the US. According to Reuters, the country is a major exporter of smartphones, automotive parts, cut and polished diamonds, pharmaceuticals, and ready-made garments. Many mid-range Android phones and even components for Apple products are assembled in India, as noted in a report by Counterpoint Research. With a 25% tariff now in place on these items, US-based tech companies may pass on increased production costs to consumers. Apparel, too, is likely to become more expensive. Forecasts from Yale's Budget Lab and the Associated Press suggest that clothing prices may rise by as much as 17%, even after accounting for possible substitution with alternative sources. Industry-wise impact of new tariffs The new tariffs vary across product categories. Indian exports of jewellery and diamonds to the US, worth $9.9 billion in FY2023-24, will now face a 24% tariff. Textile and garment exports, valued at $9.6 billion, will be subject to a 9% tariff. On the other hand, pharmaceuticals, which account for $8.1 billion of exports, will see no additional tariffs. The automobile sector is another area of concern. India exported $2.2 billion worth of auto components to the US in 2023, including parts like engines, gear assemblies, brakes and wiring harnesses. Reports in The Economic Times and Business Standard highlight the US auto industry's dependence on these parts to keep manufacturing costs low. A 25% tariff could not only make car repairs more expensive but may also slow down vehicle assembly in the US. Donald Trump has just imposed a 25% tariff on India. He has also imposed a penalty. ⦁ Modi campaigns for Trump.⦁ Gives out slogans like 'Abki Baar Trump Sarkar'. ⦁ Hugs him like a long-lost return, Trump goes on to impose such harsh tariff on India. It is… Possible consequences for the US healthcare sector While pharma exports are not directly hit by the new tariffs, concerns remain over broader trade tensions. India currently supplies nearly 40% of all generic medications used in the US, according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These generics are essential for treating cancer, heart conditions, diabetes and infectious diseases. As reported by The New York Times, any disruption or cost increase in this supply could burden US hospitals and patients with higher medical expenses. US President Donald Trump announces 25% tariffs on India starting August "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the… Trump's justification and economic implications Trump justified the tariff move by calling out India's 'high tariffs' and 'non-monetary trade barriers,' labelling them the most 'strenuous and obnoxious' of any country. He wrote on Truth Social, 'India is our friend, but we have done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high.' However, some analysts believe the strategy could backfire on the US. With India exporting over $77 billion worth of goods to the US in FY2023-24, and tariffs now averaging 2.8% across all categories, the burden of these costs will likely fall on American importers and consumers. Trump's tariff decision, while framed as a pushback against trade imbalances, may end up making daily essentials from smartphones to medicines more expensive for average Americans. As businesses prepare to adjust, consumers may soon start feeling the pinch in their pockets. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral follow Indiatimes Trending.
